what would you prefer

bearsausage77 · Fri Feb 03, 2017 3:44 pm

a qb in the 10 - 15 range not top 10 but just outside it or an all pro player at another position

?

?

Middleguard · Fri Feb 03, 2017 5:32 pm

Do you mean, "Would I rather have Jay Cutler or Lance Briggs?" Cutler.

bearsausage77 · Fri Feb 03, 2017 5:36 pm

Middleguard wrote:Do you mean, "Would I rather have Jay Cutler or Lance Briggs?" Cutler.

no buddy

lance briggs is retired

more like cuntler or jj watt

Fri Feb 03, 2017 5:37 pm

I'd rather....not have random threads.

dollamillionz · Fri Feb 03, 2017 5:40 pm

Yo I'd go wit both ,,, bears have had that before I think they can again even with the cheap ass Mcklaskeys runnine things shitty.

Rusty Trombagent · Fri Feb 03, 2017 5:48 pm

wab wrote:I'd rather....not have random threads.

yeah, this is a bad thread.

bearsausage77 · Fri Feb 03, 2017 5:49 pm

its the off season

its a discussion

Fri Feb 03, 2017 6:15 pm

I get that, but this could have been addressed in many of the threads in the War Room. This isn't ChiCity or KFFL guys. We try to keep the place clean and orderly.

I mean I'm letting it ride. Just in the future try and stick stuff like this in an applicable thread.

ROOSTRE · Fri Feb 03, 2017 6:22 pm

Word.

I don't know where you get this whack math from there Tony Circeo, but that jive is more loaded than Taco on Taco Tuesday.

alexwilkins · Fri Feb 03, 2017 6:55 pm

The thing is, as I see it, there's ONE Top-10 QB. That's Deshaun Watson, and even still there's arguments. If you look at some of the teams picking, say 10-20, see Bills, Saints, Browns, Cards, Redskins. They could reach for a Mahomes, or a Kaaya, but that's just it. Any QB who could be taken outside the top-10, will probably last until the second round. Maybe third.

Funkster · Fri Feb 03, 2017 9:26 pm

RustyTrombone wrote:
wab wrote:I'd rather....not have random threads.
yeah, this is a bad thread.

I agree! The quality of content is beginning to slip. Let's keep this forum intelligent and about bears football!

dollamillionz · Fri Feb 03, 2017 9:39 pm

Funkster wrote:
RustyTrombone wrote:
wab wrote:I'd rather....not have random threads.
yeah, this is a bad thread.
I agree! The quality of content is beginning to slip. Let's keep this forum intelligent and about bears football!

Yo, Kirk Cousins seriously? You want Ryan Pace to sign Kirk muff huggin Cousins? He ain't winning no superbowls, why in God's green earth you want the bears to get Kirk MF Cousins? That's some shit gawddam hahahahaha! Kirk Cousins seriously?

ROOSTRE · Fri Feb 03, 2017 10:13 pm

dollamillionz wrote:
Funkster wrote:
RustyTrombone wrote:
wab wrote:I'd rather....not have random threads.
yeah, this is a bad thread.
I agree! The quality of content is beginning to slip. Let's keep this forum intelligent and about bears football!
Yo, Kirk Cousins seriously? You want Ryan Pace to sign Kirk muff huggin Cousins? He ain't winning no superbowls, why in God's green earth you want the bears to get Kirk MF Cousins? That's some shit gawddam hahahahaha! Kirk Cousins seriously?

LoL

Kirk Cousins is the white Teddy Bridgewater.

(amiritebro?!?)

bearsausage77 · Fri Feb 03, 2017 11:32 pm

kurt cousins is a nerd

bearsausage77 · Fri Feb 03, 2017 11:34 pm

Mod edit - just...no.

Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:00 am

Dude. Chill. This is getting rigoddamndiculous. We've been patient but I'm just gonna start banning people for being idiots.

Adipost · Sat Feb 04, 2017 12:47 am

ROOSTRE wrote:
dollamillionz wrote:
Funkster wrote:
RustyTrombone wrote:
wab wrote:I'd rather....not have random threads.
yeah, this is a bad thread.
I agree! The quality of content is beginning to slip. Let's keep this forum intelligent and about bears football!
Yo, Kirk Cousins seriously? You want Ryan Pace to sign Kirk muff huggin Cousins? He ain't winning no superbowls, why in God's green earth you want the bears to get Kirk MF Cousins? That's some shit gawddam hahahahaha! Kirk Cousins seriously?
LoL

Kirk Cousins is the white Teddy Bridgewater.

(amiritebro?!?)

Cousins actually throws the ball downfield.

Mjiton · Mon Feb 06, 2017 12:27 pm

I like Trubisky over Watson. I'm not buying the hype.
Watson seems blind to underneath coverage. And I got the feel from watching Trubisky play he saw the field better than Watson.

Both throw jump balls. Both are mobile with Watson being the greater. Both lack Kaaya's accuracy. But Trubisky's tight throws seem more calculated than Watson's "trust in his receiver" mentality.

Regardless we go QB at #3. Play to win. But chances are we sit that QB behind Jimmy G. or Hoyer.
If the Bears got Jimmy G. and went BPA I'd be fine with that. I'd be less secure going BPA w/o Jimmy unless we grabbed Kaaya to sit.

Regardless of the talent of this class. The Bears have get a QB to groom. And with the Bears history I'd rather swing high and miss than to not swing and strike out all the same.

There always seems to be a non-QB talent of some sort available for the Bears to draft.
QB is just too important.

Moriarty · Tue Feb 07, 2017 8:19 am

Cutler was never a "10-15, just outside the top 10" QB. He was in the 15-25 range. Stats said so and repeated surveys of league professionals said the same.

Boris13c · Tue Feb 07, 2017 8:44 am

Moriarty wrote:Cutler was never a "10-15, just outside the top 10" QB. He was in the 15-25 range. Stats said so and repeated surveys of league professionals said the same.

agreed

Cutler has the physical skill set to be better, but just isn't

Mjiton · Tue Feb 07, 2017 1:13 pm

Moriarty wrote:Cutler was never a "10-15, just outside the top 10" QB. He was in the 15-25 range. Stats said so and repeated surveys of league professionals said the same.

I used to tell Cutler haters. "He's 15-17 range Quarterback who can have games like a 13, & games like a 22.
He's a gunslinger. Don't expect anything else."

Watson is a gunslinger. He locks in on Williams. People who drop underneath the coverage pick him off because he's locked in. His highlight reels are his runs and slinging in downfield to Williams who has several steps on his coverage.

G08 · Tue Feb 07, 2017 2:03 pm

Mjiton wrote:
Moriarty wrote:Cutler was never a "10-15, just outside the top 10" QB. He was in the 15-25 range. Stats said so and repeated surveys of league professionals said the same.
I used to tell Cutler haters. "He's 15-17 range Quarterback who can have games like a 13, & games like a 22.
He's a gunslinger. Don't expect anything else."

Watson is a gunslinger. He locks in on Williams. People who drop underneath the coverage pick him off because he's locked in. His highlight reels are his runs and slinging in downfield to Williams who has several steps on his coverage.

Man, you really need to watch more of him if you think he's a gunslinger and that his best plays are runs/bombs to Williams.

malk · Tue Feb 07, 2017 7:20 pm

Anyone remember that year when Devin Hester was our number one receiver and our offensive line wasn't great. If only we had a top ten QB that year, we would have gone all the way!

mmmc_35 · Tue Feb 07, 2017 8:27 pm

malk wrote:Anyone remember that year when Devin Hester was our number one receiver and our offensive line wasn't great. If only we had a top ten QB that year, we would have gone all the way!

For a while I thought just punt snaping him the ball and letting him "return" it from 10 yards deep might be better then what those offenses could muster.