12.3.17 // Bears lose to 49ers 15-14

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8074
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 314 times

Dominant bitch of those leaving Soldier Field Sunday, McCaskeys must go (of course with Fox as well). Fans are outraged at the McCaskeys and their perceived/factual incompetence.
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6116
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Eh that long post above was good. I would definitely take Jimmy over Mitch. As I said prior to the draft Jimmy was the best QB available by far. He made Louis Murphy look like a pro bowler. That said Mitch is comparable physically in talent level. Jimmy is more refined, and educated in the NFL.
User avatar
docc
Head Coach
Posts: 3823
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Outpost of Reality S.E. Arizona
Has thanked: 966 times
Been thanked: 178 times

Yep..dam office..had to answer a question..and typed JP instead of JG..!
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

mmmc_35 wrote:Eh that long post above was good. I would definitely take Jimmy over Mitch. As I said prior to the draft Jimmy was the best QB available by far. He made Louis Murphy look like a pro bowler. That said Mitch is comparable physically in talent level. Jimmy is more refined, and educated in the NFL.
I would take Jimmy over Biscuit because of the experience around the Patriots, but also the cost. Jimmy was a 2nd rounder and I like Biscuit.

We'd get a 1st round (3rd overall), third and fourth round picks back, but then had to give up a 2nd. I'll take that deal.
Image
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

The Marshall Plan wrote:
mmmc_35 wrote:Eh that long post above was good. I would definitely take Jimmy over Mitch. As I said prior to the draft Jimmy was the best QB available by far. He made Louis Murphy look like a pro bowler. That said Mitch is comparable physically in talent level. Jimmy is more refined, and educated in the NFL.
I would take Jimmy over Biscuit because of the experience around the Patriots, but also the cost. Jimmy was a 2nd rounder and I like Biscuit.

We'd get a 1st round (3rd overall), third and fourth round picks back, but then had to give up a 2nd. I'll take that deal.
But at the draft it was a 1st and a 3rd. I think at the time I said I would have done our first for JG and their late 1st, but that wasn’t on the table.

The Patriots overplayed their hands on that a bit.
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

BR0D1E86 wrote:
The Marshall Plan wrote:
mmmc_35 wrote:Eh that long post above was good. I would definitely take Jimmy over Mitch. As I said prior to the draft Jimmy was the best QB available by far. He made Louis Murphy look like a pro bowler. That said Mitch is comparable physically in talent level. Jimmy is more refined, and educated in the NFL.
I would take Jimmy over Biscuit because of the experience around the Patriots, but also the cost. Jimmy was a 2nd rounder and I like Biscuit.

We'd get a 1st round (3rd overall), third and fourth round picks back, but then had to give up a 2nd. I'll take that deal.
But at the draft it was a 1st and a 3rd. I think at the time I said I would have done our first for JG and their late 1st, but that wasn’t on the table.

The Patriots overplayed their hands on that a bit.
That's a fair point. I recall that as well. Had the cost been a 2nd rounder at the time, Pace would've had to have done that deal.

I was just shocked by the Biscuit trade given the recent signing of Glennon and the QBs available in 2018.
Image
User avatar
staleystarch
Assistant Coach
Posts: 506
Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:08 pm

Jimmy G won a game over the Fox lead 3-9 Chicago Bears. Put him in the HOF.
"We don’t know exactly what we’re doing” -- John Fox
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:
BR0D1E86 wrote:
The Marshall Plan wrote:
mmmc_35 wrote:Eh that long post above was good. I would definitely take Jimmy over Mitch. As I said prior to the draft Jimmy was the best QB available by far. He made Louis Murphy look like a pro bowler. That said Mitch is comparable physically in talent level. Jimmy is more refined, and educated in the NFL.
I would take Jimmy over Biscuit because of the experience around the Patriots, but also the cost. Jimmy was a 2nd rounder and I like Biscuit.

We'd get a 1st round (3rd overall), third and fourth round picks back, but then had to give up a 2nd. I'll take that deal.
But at the draft it was a 1st and a 3rd. I think at the time I said I would have done our first for JG and their late 1st, but that wasn’t on the table.

The Patriots overplayed their hands on that a bit.
That's a fair point. I recall that as well. Had the cost been a 2nd rounder at the time, Pace would've had to have done that deal.

I was just shocked by the Biscuit trade given the recent signing of Glennon and the QBs available in 2018.
I agree - if the Patriots had offered up Garappolo for a second round pick prior to the Bears signing Glennon or drafting Trubisky, it would have been a chance worth taking ... but they didn't ... they were holding to their 1st and 3rd for him even after the draft
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
Post Reply