Bears Offensive Scheme

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6116
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 98 times

So until we see Nagey without Reid we can only assume what the offense will look like.

Reid comes from a West coast background. However over the years we have seen concepts added dropped readded. McNabb and Smith ran some option pass option and read run. They ran counters and powers with Duece Staley. Screens and stretches with Westbrook. More of a downfield passing game with TO. Slants to gos with Jackson Hill and Maclin. TEs Clerek, and Kelce. Etc.

This year they used many more read pass options.

Here are a few articles.

2017 Chiefs V Pats

Eagles personnel and scheme

Generally looking for quick WR, athletic tackles, RB who catch, TE who can move.

RB

Howard didn't catch the ball well, and could be more of a 2 down guy. I still think he adds value as a one cut up field guy with that zone blocking. He also adds respect in the RPO side. Cohen will continue to be used in a lot of ways.

WR

Meridith fits fine. Landry and [s]Adams[/s] could be options.

TE

Shaheen isn't exactly what you would expect. He can stretch the seem. Sims too . I think a move TE would be a nice piece.

OT

I think both spots likely need upgrades. He had guys like Fisher, Swartz, Ruynan, Thomas, Peters. Big dudes who could move well enough. Leno and Massie are not those guys. Reid was an offensive line guy. He he prioritized tackles.
Last edited by mmmc_35 on Tue Jan 09, 2018 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

How is adams an option at WR when he just signed a 4 year extension with the packers? Or is it a different adams?

Landry, probably not, if people think crabtree is a problem child, landry would be required to wear a straight jacket 6 days a week.
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6116
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 98 times

I didn't know he signed. Strike that. Landry fits physically.
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

mmmc_35 wrote:I didn't know he signed. Strike that. Landry fits physically.
Agreed
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20622
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 223 times
Been thanked: 793 times

I don't want Landry here... Albert Wilson will be cheaper, younger, and he knows the offense.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11040
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 517 times

I wouldn't be surprised to see the Bears take an OL in the first round this year. They are really going to need an upgrade at LT.

I think it's unfair to label Howard as a RB that can't catch. Yes he has struggled. But only in the beginning this year. He's also only in his 2nd year in the league. Let him get some serious coaching, and put some hard work in regarding catching out of the backfield. The kid has worked hard all of his life, he's got great personal drive. He will find a way to get it done.

It's unfortunate that White is such a bust at this point, I think he would have been perfect for this offense (mix of size and speed).
Image
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20622
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 223 times
Been thanked: 793 times

I think Leno is going to be our LT for a little while, but yeah if we don't move from #8 I can see OL/RT being the move.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.

One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
Image
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.

One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
Thank you John Fox
Middleguard
MVP
Posts: 1667
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 120 times

I had read, before Fox got here, that he hated TEs. Maybe that's it.
Middleguard
MVP
Posts: 1667
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 120 times

I posted this in an earlier thread and no one was interested. Still, I think that FB use is important in the definition of offensive style and I also think this illustrates Nagy's ability to adapt to his players:

I understand that Nagy took over playcalling for the last five games of the regular season.
In the first 11 games, the Chiefs used their FB on 15% of offensive downs. In the next 4 games they only used him 8%. As that is far less than any earlier 4-game stretch I think it is Nagy's style rather than their opponents' defenses or game situations. But in their last game, the only game Mahomes started, the FB was used 52%.
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11040
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 517 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.

One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
100% on board with that idea. I am pretty sure, so is Pace. I believe that Shaheen can be Nagy's Kelce. From what we did see of him, he had great hands, and some good speed in the open field.
Image
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.

One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
I think you are way off by saying there was no development. We are talking about two very raw rookies. Fox and Loggains may not have handled them exactly the way I would have, but no one's knocking down my door to be a head coach, and I don't think it was handled improperly. In fact, I think they're very well poised to take the next step in their NFL careers.

And f*** you for making me defend Fox and Loggains!

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Middleguard wrote:I posted this in an earlier thread and no one was interested. Still, I think that FB use is important in the definition of offensive style and I also think this illustrates Nagy's ability to adapt to his players:

I understand that Nagy took over playcalling for the last five games of the regular season.
In the first 11 games, the Chiefs used their FB on 15% of offensive downs. In the next 4 games they only used him 8%. As that is far less than any earlier 4-game stretch I think it is Nagy's style rather than their opponents' defenses or game situations. But in their last game, the only game Mahomes started, the FB was used 52%.
Nagy went with more of an h-back with Orson Charles when Alex Smith was playing because of Alex Smith's experience, but with Mahomes they wanted to protect him or so they went back to the fullback

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

MoFugger wrote:
The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.

One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
I think you are way off by saying there was no development. We are talking about two very raw rookies. Fox and Loggains may not have handled them exactly the way I would have, but no one's knocking down my door to be a head coach, and I don't think it was handled improperly. In fact, I think they're very well poised to take the next step in their NFL careers.

And f*** you for making me defend Fox and Loggains!

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Lol @ the Fox and Loggains comment.

Shaheen had 12 receptions over 13 games.

12!

In a year where the receiving group was depleted and we traded for arguably our only active real WR halfway through the year!

It's not like this was a borderline playoff team and we needed to watch this in order to manage a playoff run. This was a sub-500 team no matter what through no fault of Biscuit or Shaheen. Let that develop.

http://www.nfl.com/player/adamshaheen/2558144/profile
Image
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.

One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
I think you are way off by saying there was no development. We are talking about two very raw rookies. Fox and Loggains may not have handled them exactly the way I would have, but no one's knocking down my door to be a head coach, and I don't think it was handled improperly. In fact, I think they're very well poised to take the next step in their NFL careers.

And f*** you for making me defend Fox and Loggains!

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Lol @ the Fox and Loggains comment.

Shaheen had 12 receptions over 13 games.

12!

In a year where the receiving group was depleted and we traded for arguably our only active real WR halfway through the year!

It's not like this was a borderline playoff team and we needed to watch this in order to manage a playoff run. This was a sub-500 team no matter what through no fault of Biscuit or Shaheen. Let that develop.

http://www.nfl.com/player/adamshaheen/2558144/profile
Pretty hard to catch the ball when the coach doesn't put you in the game.

The one week he played a lot, week 10, 73% of the snaps he graded out as PFF's #1 TE for the week.
Last edited by southdakbearfan on Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.

One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
I think you are way off by saying there was no development. We are talking about two very raw rookies. Fox and Loggains may not have handled them exactly the way I would have, but no one's knocking down my door to be a head coach, and I don't think it was handled improperly. In fact, I think they're very well poised to take the next step in their NFL careers.

And f*** you for making me defend Fox and Loggains!

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Lol @ the Fox and Loggains comment.

Shaheen had 12 receptions over 13 games.

12!

In a year where the receiving group was depleted and we traded for arguably our only active real WR halfway through the year!

It's not like this was a borderline playoff team and we needed to watch this in order to manage a playoff run. This was a sub-500 team no matter what through no fault of Biscuit or Shaheen. Let that develop.

http://www.nfl.com/player/adamshaheen/2558144/profile
They had to play biscuit. And Shaheen came in knowing about three maybe four blocking assignments. With the offense of line as influx as it was from week to week, it made more sense to play Sims and Brown. You will be seeing more of Shaheen in 2018. But his development was not hampered.

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

I don’t know if Nagy will follow Andy Reid to the letter, but Reid definitely prefers bigger offensive linemen. I think they averaged like 6’5 320 in Kansas City. In Philly he had monsters like Todd Herremans, King Dunlap, Jason Peters, Evan Mathis, Mike McGlynn, and Max Jean-Giles.
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

wab wrote:I don’t know if Nagy will follow Andy Reid to the letter, but Reid definitely prefers bigger offensive linemen. I think they averaged like 6’5 320 in Kansas City. In Philly he had monsters like Todd Herremans, King Dunlap, Jason Peters, Evan Mathis, Mike McGlynn, and Max Jean-Giles.
Not exactly the worst time to revamp our online.
And another reason for me to blow my trumpet for Eugene Chung.

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
User avatar
Hiphopopotamos
Head Coach
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:56 pm

RPO’s!

Inverted Veer!

Veer & Shoot!

All the offenses bitches!
Holy Shit - We got Justin Fields!

In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.

Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
User avatar
botfly10
Player of the Month
Posts: 337
Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2017 10:59 pm

People acting like Jordan Howard is suddenly a liability to this team are off their goddamn rocker
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11040
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 517 times

botfly10 wrote:People acting like Jordan Howard is suddenly a liability to this team are off their goddamn rocker
No shit. He is the first RB in Bears history to have back to back 1000 yard seasons in his first two years. I think the introduction of Nagy's play calling is going to turn him into a beast. Possibly one of the top three backs in the league.
Image
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6116
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 98 times

botfly10 wrote:People acting like Jordan Howard is suddenly a liability to this team are off their goddamn rocker
I didn't say that. He does have a different skill set compared to Staley, Westbrook, Hunt, Mccoy, or Charles. I would think that would change his roll a bit. He has the ability to work with in the running scheme. I just don't think he is getting 250+ handoffs a season. He can still be productive just in a different roll.

Kind of like Ingram with the Saints a few years back.
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11040
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 517 times

mmmc_35 wrote:
botfly10 wrote:People acting like Jordan Howard is suddenly a liability to this team are off their goddamn rocker
I didn't say that. He does have a different skill set compared to Staley, Westbrook, Hunt, Mccoy, or Charles. I would think that would change his roll a bit. He has the ability to work with in the running scheme. I just don't think he is getting 250+ handoffs a season. He can still be productive just in a different roll.

Kind of like Ingram with the Saints a few years back.
I always thought of Ingram as more of a between the tackles bruiser. Not sure if that is how Howard should be used. I think his best play is the off tackle stretch/zone hand-off. He seems to really do well on the near edge, and planting a foot and heading up field.
Image
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20622
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 223 times
Been thanked: 793 times

Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

G08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
I am still very big on Eugene Chung but Philadelphia has to lose first

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
User avatar
IotaNet
MVP
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 am
Location: Minneapolis (Chicago Native)
Has thanked: 284 times
Been thanked: 212 times

G08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
That’s what I’m curious about. I believe that pick will give us some insight into Nagys thinking.
“Never let your ego get so close to your position that when your position falls, your ego falls with it.”

- Colin Powell
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

MoFugger wrote:
G08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
I am still very big on Eugene Chung but Philadelphia has to lose first

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Samesies.
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11040
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 517 times

wab wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
G08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
I am still very big on Eugene Chung but Philadelphia has to lose first

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Samesies.
So Chung was in KC with Nagy from '13-'15? He also looks like the right kind of lieutenant, if Nagy is going to do all of the play calling.
Image
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

Bears Whiskey Nut wrote:
wab wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
G08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
I am still very big on Eugene Chung but Philadelphia has to lose first

Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Samesies.
So Chung was in KC with Nagy from '13-'15? He also looks like the right kind of lieutenant, if Nagy is going to do all of the play calling.
They were together his last year in Philly too.
Post Reply