So until we see Nagey without Reid we can only assume what the offense will look like.
Reid comes from a West coast background. However over the years we have seen concepts added dropped readded. McNabb and Smith ran some option pass option and read run. They ran counters and powers with Duece Staley. Screens and stretches with Westbrook. More of a downfield passing game with TO. Slants to gos with Jackson Hill and Maclin. TEs Clerek, and Kelce. Etc.
This year they used many more read pass options.
Here are a few articles.
2017 Chiefs V Pats
Eagles personnel and scheme
Generally looking for quick WR, athletic tackles, RB who catch, TE who can move.
RB
Howard didn't catch the ball well, and could be more of a 2 down guy. I still think he adds value as a one cut up field guy with that zone blocking. He also adds respect in the RPO side. Cohen will continue to be used in a lot of ways.
WR
Meridith fits fine. Landry and [s]Adams[/s] could be options.
TE
Shaheen isn't exactly what you would expect. He can stretch the seem. Sims too . I think a move TE would be a nice piece.
OT
I think both spots likely need upgrades. He had guys like Fisher, Swartz, Ruynan, Thomas, Peters. Big dudes who could move well enough. Leno and Massie are not those guys. Reid was an offensive line guy. He he prioritized tackles.
Bears Offensive Scheme
Moderator: wab
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4624
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 336 times
How is adams an option at WR when he just signed a 4 year extension with the packers? Or is it a different adams?
Landry, probably not, if people think crabtree is a problem child, landry would be required to wear a straight jacket 6 days a week.
Landry, probably not, if people think crabtree is a problem child, landry would be required to wear a straight jacket 6 days a week.
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4624
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 336 times
Agreedmmmc_35 wrote:I didn't know he signed. Strike that. Landry fits physically.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20622
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 223 times
- Been thanked: 793 times
I don't want Landry here... Albert Wilson will be cheaper, younger, and he knows the offense.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11040
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
I wouldn't be surprised to see the Bears take an OL in the first round this year. They are really going to need an upgrade at LT.
I think it's unfair to label Howard as a RB that can't catch. Yes he has struggled. But only in the beginning this year. He's also only in his 2nd year in the league. Let him get some serious coaching, and put some hard work in regarding catching out of the backfield. The kid has worked hard all of his life, he's got great personal drive. He will find a way to get it done.
It's unfortunate that White is such a bust at this point, I think he would have been perfect for this offense (mix of size and speed).
I think it's unfair to label Howard as a RB that can't catch. Yes he has struggled. But only in the beginning this year. He's also only in his 2nd year in the league. Let him get some serious coaching, and put some hard work in regarding catching out of the backfield. The kid has worked hard all of his life, he's got great personal drive. He will find a way to get it done.
It's unfortunate that White is such a bust at this point, I think he would have been perfect for this offense (mix of size and speed).
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20622
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 223 times
- Been thanked: 793 times
I think Leno is going to be our LT for a little while, but yeah if we don't move from #8 I can see OL/RT being the move.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8423
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 910 times
- Been thanked: 1294 times
I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.
One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4624
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 336 times
Thank you John FoxThe Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.
One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
I had read, before Fox got here, that he hated TEs. Maybe that's it.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
I posted this in an earlier thread and no one was interested. Still, I think that FB use is important in the definition of offensive style and I also think this illustrates Nagy's ability to adapt to his players:
I understand that Nagy took over playcalling for the last five games of the regular season.
In the first 11 games, the Chiefs used their FB on 15% of offensive downs. In the next 4 games they only used him 8%. As that is far less than any earlier 4-game stretch I think it is Nagy's style rather than their opponents' defenses or game situations. But in their last game, the only game Mahomes started, the FB was used 52%.
I understand that Nagy took over playcalling for the last five games of the regular season.
In the first 11 games, the Chiefs used their FB on 15% of offensive downs. In the next 4 games they only used him 8%. As that is far less than any earlier 4-game stretch I think it is Nagy's style rather than their opponents' defenses or game situations. But in their last game, the only game Mahomes started, the FB was used 52%.
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11040
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
100% on board with that idea. I am pretty sure, so is Pace. I believe that Shaheen can be Nagy's Kelce. From what we did see of him, he had great hands, and some good speed in the open field.The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.
One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
I think you are way off by saying there was no development. We are talking about two very raw rookies. Fox and Loggains may not have handled them exactly the way I would have, but no one's knocking down my door to be a head coach, and I don't think it was handled improperly. In fact, I think they're very well poised to take the next step in their NFL careers.The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.
One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
And f*** you for making me defend Fox and Loggains!
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Nagy went with more of an h-back with Orson Charles when Alex Smith was playing because of Alex Smith's experience, but with Mahomes they wanted to protect him or so they went back to the fullbackMiddleguard wrote:I posted this in an earlier thread and no one was interested. Still, I think that FB use is important in the definition of offensive style and I also think this illustrates Nagy's ability to adapt to his players:
I understand that Nagy took over playcalling for the last five games of the regular season.
In the first 11 games, the Chiefs used their FB on 15% of offensive downs. In the next 4 games they only used him 8%. As that is far less than any earlier 4-game stretch I think it is Nagy's style rather than their opponents' defenses or game situations. But in their last game, the only game Mahomes started, the FB was used 52%.
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8423
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 910 times
- Been thanked: 1294 times
Lol @ the Fox and Loggains comment.MoFugger wrote:I think you are way off by saying there was no development. We are talking about two very raw rookies. Fox and Loggains may not have handled them exactly the way I would have, but no one's knocking down my door to be a head coach, and I don't think it was handled improperly. In fact, I think they're very well poised to take the next step in their NFL careers.The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.
One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
And f*** you for making me defend Fox and Loggains!
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Shaheen had 12 receptions over 13 games.
12!
In a year where the receiving group was depleted and we traded for arguably our only active real WR halfway through the year!
It's not like this was a borderline playoff team and we needed to watch this in order to manage a playoff run. This was a sub-500 team no matter what through no fault of Biscuit or Shaheen. Let that develop.
http://www.nfl.com/player/adamshaheen/2558144/profile
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4624
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 795 times
- Been thanked: 336 times
Pretty hard to catch the ball when the coach doesn't put you in the game.The Marshall Plan wrote:Lol @ the Fox and Loggains comment.MoFugger wrote:I think you are way off by saying there was no development. We are talking about two very raw rookies. Fox and Loggains may not have handled them exactly the way I would have, but no one's knocking down my door to be a head coach, and I don't think it was handled improperly. In fact, I think they're very well poised to take the next step in their NFL careers.The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.
One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
And f*** you for making me defend Fox and Loggains!
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Shaheen had 12 receptions over 13 games.
12!
In a year where the receiving group was depleted and we traded for arguably our only active real WR halfway through the year!
It's not like this was a borderline playoff team and we needed to watch this in order to manage a playoff run. This was a sub-500 team no matter what through no fault of Biscuit or Shaheen. Let that develop.
http://www.nfl.com/player/adamshaheen/2558144/profile
The one week he played a lot, week 10, 73% of the snaps he graded out as PFF's #1 TE for the week.
Last edited by southdakbearfan on Tue Jan 09, 2018 8:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
They had to play biscuit. And Shaheen came in knowing about three maybe four blocking assignments. With the offense of line as influx as it was from week to week, it made more sense to play Sims and Brown. You will be seeing more of Shaheen in 2018. But his development was not hampered.The Marshall Plan wrote:Lol @ the Fox and Loggains comment.MoFugger wrote:I think you are way off by saying there was no development. We are talking about two very raw rookies. Fox and Loggains may not have handled them exactly the way I would have, but no one's knocking down my door to be a head coach, and I don't think it was handled improperly. In fact, I think they're very well poised to take the next step in their NFL careers.The Marshall Plan wrote:I think Shaheen could have a great year next season depending on the WR group we've got.
One of the most frustrating things for me last year was that there was no development of Biscuit to Shaheen. You've got to nurture that because a TE is a great security blanket for a QB. With the play-it-safe playcalling last year I was shocked that I didn't see Biscuit to Shaheen a bunch of times last year.
And f*** you for making me defend Fox and Loggains!
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
Shaheen had 12 receptions over 13 games.
12!
In a year where the receiving group was depleted and we traded for arguably our only active real WR halfway through the year!
It's not like this was a borderline playoff team and we needed to watch this in order to manage a playoff run. This was a sub-500 team no matter what through no fault of Biscuit or Shaheen. Let that develop.
http://www.nfl.com/player/adamshaheen/2558144/profile
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1997 times
I don’t know if Nagy will follow Andy Reid to the letter, but Reid definitely prefers bigger offensive linemen. I think they averaged like 6’5 320 in Kansas City. In Philly he had monsters like Todd Herremans, King Dunlap, Jason Peters, Evan Mathis, Mike McGlynn, and Max Jean-Giles.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Not exactly the worst time to revamp our online.wab wrote:I don’t know if Nagy will follow Andy Reid to the letter, but Reid definitely prefers bigger offensive linemen. I think they averaged like 6’5 320 in Kansas City. In Philly he had monsters like Todd Herremans, King Dunlap, Jason Peters, Evan Mathis, Mike McGlynn, and Max Jean-Giles.
And another reason for me to blow my trumpet for Eugene Chung.
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
- Hiphopopotamos
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3535
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:56 pm
RPO’s!
Inverted Veer!
Veer & Shoot!
All the offenses bitches!
Inverted Veer!
Veer & Shoot!
All the offenses bitches!
Holy Shit - We got Justin Fields!
In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.
Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.
Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11040
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
No shit. He is the first RB in Bears history to have back to back 1000 yard seasons in his first two years. I think the introduction of Nagy's play calling is going to turn him into a beast. Possibly one of the top three backs in the league.botfly10 wrote:People acting like Jordan Howard is suddenly a liability to this team are off their goddamn rocker
- mmmc_35
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6116
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
- Has thanked: 105 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
I didn't say that. He does have a different skill set compared to Staley, Westbrook, Hunt, Mccoy, or Charles. I would think that would change his roll a bit. He has the ability to work with in the running scheme. I just don't think he is getting 250+ handoffs a season. He can still be productive just in a different roll.botfly10 wrote:People acting like Jordan Howard is suddenly a liability to this team are off their goddamn rocker
Kind of like Ingram with the Saints a few years back.
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11040
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
I always thought of Ingram as more of a between the tackles bruiser. Not sure if that is how Howard should be used. I think his best play is the off tackle stretch/zone hand-off. He seems to really do well on the near edge, and planting a foot and heading up field.mmmc_35 wrote:I didn't say that. He does have a different skill set compared to Staley, Westbrook, Hunt, Mccoy, or Charles. I would think that would change his roll a bit. He has the ability to work with in the running scheme. I just don't think he is getting 250+ handoffs a season. He can still be productive just in a different roll.botfly10 wrote:People acting like Jordan Howard is suddenly a liability to this team are off their goddamn rocker
Kind of like Ingram with the Saints a few years back.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20622
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 223 times
- Been thanked: 793 times
Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
I am still very big on Eugene Chung but Philadelphia has to lose firstG08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
- IotaNet
- MVP
- Posts: 1513
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 am
- Location: Minneapolis (Chicago Native)
- Has thanked: 284 times
- Been thanked: 212 times
That’s what I’m curious about. I believe that pick will give us some insight into Nagys thinking.G08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
“Never let your ego get so close to your position that when your position falls, your ego falls with it.”
- Colin Powell
- Colin Powell
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1997 times
Samesies.MoFugger wrote:I am still very big on Eugene Chung but Philadelphia has to lose firstG08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11040
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 79 times
- Been thanked: 517 times
So Chung was in KC with Nagy from '13-'15? He also looks like the right kind of lieutenant, if Nagy is going to do all of the play calling.wab wrote:Samesies.MoFugger wrote:I am still very big on Eugene Chung but Philadelphia has to lose firstG08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1997 times
They were together his last year in Philly too.Bears Whiskey Nut wrote:So Chung was in KC with Nagy from '13-'15? He also looks like the right kind of lieutenant, if Nagy is going to do all of the play calling.wab wrote:Samesies.MoFugger wrote:I am still very big on Eugene Chung but Philadelphia has to lose firstG08 wrote:Have we looked into potential offensive coordinators? Anyone have a list of names?
Sent from my LG-V495 using Tapatalk