Bears destroyed by 49ers, 32-7

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

User avatar
EverybodyHatesCutler
Rookie
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:14 am

Funkster wrote:
EverybodyHatesCutler wrote:I
The keys for us is to get the running game going early, and get more than a 1/2 yard on first and second down. We need to keep out of the 2nd/3rd and longs, and not run with the box stacked.
Finally, someone is seeing the light. I wouldn't mind seeing Bush on 1st and 2nd and bring in Forte on 3rd and short. The possibilities would be endless with run,pass or screen opportunities. This would defiantly keep the defense guessing.
The personel or play calling does not matter to me as long as we stop being put in 2nd/3rd and longs.

We have been to predictable lately, and especially with us going against a top 5 defense, we need to not be stupid.
Chicago Bears: 7-2 1st place (S.F. Baby! Will be there this Monday Night!)
Chicago Whitesox: 2nd place... (Close but no cigar)
Chicago Bulls: (No Rose? Big problem)

Prosportsdaily- DaBears1990
Motion
Practice Squad
Posts: 64
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 8:02 pm

Defense: Advantage 49ers
Home Field: 49ers
Offense: Advantage 49ers
Special Teams: Advantage Bears
Turnovers: Advantage Bears
Preparation: Advantage 49ers

The 49ers started practice Wednesday and the Bears waited until Thursday. The Bears will go into San Francisco unprepared for one of the biggest games of this season and will be beat up and down the field.

With the way the offense is playing Lovie Smith should have called practice on Tuesday but he coaches with the urgency of "a morning shit".

WTF this is Cutler's 3rd NFL concussion and with that knowledge Smith should have called practice for Tuesday and announced that he was going to get Campbell prepared for this game. That's all he would have had to say.

Again the Bears will be behind the eight ball going into a stadium which they have never won in.

San Francisco 35 Bears 10
All NFL teams and players face adversity but the will to overcome adversity and succeed is what makes certain teams and players elite. The time has come for the Chicago Bears to become an elite NFL team again.
mbrs!
MVP
Posts: 1066
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:03 pm

Right now, I don't care too much if the Bears win or lose this one.

I just want to see if the OL and receivers not named Marshall can stop playing like a bunch of you-know-whats.

The OL should be pissed off and offended that Tice has to devote extra blockers to protect them; they should be embarassed that they allowed Matthews to get a clean hit on Cutler, and that they allowed Suh to do a WWF move on him. Play with some attitude and pride. Their attitude should be, "I got this." ala Rodman vs. Shaq.

Receivers and TEs, beat that 2nd or 3rd stringer defending you, and stop making him look like a superstar against you. Also, catch the freaking ball.

If we lose this game, but show really good offensive improvement in the OL and other receivers, then it will build towards wins against the Packers, and in the playoffs.
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

I feel this game is being taking to light by the organization.I feel the coaching staff is planning on "giving" this win to the niners.I see this as a must win game if we plan of making the playoffs. The pukers, giants and seahawks are all nipping at our heals. Let's not forget the vikes,bucs and saints.

Our remaining schedule is not going to be easy and we need to go in planning on winning every game.
Niner's
vikes
hawks
vikes
pukers
cards
lions

with this schedule, and the schedule of some of those teams, we could easily go from 1st to bumped out of a wildcard spot.

I say we loose this game before the kickoff. The mentality going into the game by the coaching staff feels to me like they are just trying to "get through" this game and move onto next week when cutler is back. I hope I am wrong.

Niners 24
Bears 10
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
FranktheTank
Player of the Month
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Silicon Valley
Contact:

This is that one game that I've been waiting for since the schedule was announced. I will be there and God do I hope they win.

I was hoping Smith would be out for this game, because I think those little dink and dunk passes are going to tire out the D.

Raider fans have a rep for being dickheads, but 49er fans are just as bad, if not worse, so you guys will most likely see me throwing blows in the stands on some espn highlights.
User avatar
Pagan
MVP
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:19 am
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 3 times

Go get em Franko!

There are so many X factors in this game it isn't funny!

Will Alshon return to his sure handed form or be gunshot catching the ball?
Will the Oline have another nice blocking day like last Sunday?
Will the receivers catch more than they drop?
Can Forte effectively run against the 49ers D?
Will the ST players finish blocks without penalties?

If we get 2 out of these 5 it's going to be a baseball score.
Bears 11
9ers. 9
Field goal fest with a safety in the 4th quarter.

If we get 3 or more it's a completely different game!
Bears 27
9ers. 16
late score by San Fran in mop up time.
Image
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13725
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:23 am
Location: Sittin' at a bar on the inside
Been thanked: 1 time

I think everyone is giving the 9ers team a bit too much credit.

They survived the Rams only because of two procedure penalties in OT.

They lost to the Queens.

They got destroyed by the Giants.

Yes it's always tough to win on the road, but if we take care of the ball I think our defense is actually much much better (at least from a 'difference making' point of view) then the Niners and neither of the offenses are worth a shit.

We have better special teams, better defense, and both offenses are not even worth talking about....so the only reason this contest should be close is because Frisco is at home IMO.

If you haven't watched the Niners this year, Justin Smith has been quite and their secondary has had a lot of brain farts. Let them make the mistakes instead of forcing one..take easy plays underneath and make their secondary make the tackle. Nip, nip, nip and then let them take a bad angle or miss a tackle and give us the big play.
Image
User avatar
FranktheTank
Player of the Month
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Silicon Valley
Contact:

DaDitka wrote:I think everyone is giving the 9ers team a bit too much credit.

They survived the Rams only because of two procedure penalties in OT.

They lost to the Queens.

They got destroyed by the Giants.

Yes it's always tough to win on the road, but if we take care of the ball I think our defense is actually much much better (at least from a 'difference making' point of view) then the Niners and neither of the offenses are worth a shit.

We have better special teams, better defense, and both offenses are not even worth talking about....so the only reason this contest should be close is because Frisco is at home IMO.

If you haven't watched the Niners this year, Justin Smith has been quite and their secondary has had a lot of brain farts. Let them make the mistakes instead of forcing one..take easy plays underneath and make their secondary make the tackle. Nip, nip, nip and then let them take a bad angle or miss a tackle and give us the big play.
I'm going to print a thousand copies of this post and throw them to the masses in candlestick park.
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

DaDitka wrote:I think everyone is giving the 9ers team a bit too much credit.

We have better special teams, better defense, and both offenses are not even worth talking about....so the only reason this contest should be close is because Frisco is at home IMO.
Like I said,people are taking them to lightly.

Bears -------- Niners

Offense 27th - 11th
Defense 10th - 5th
Kicking 3rd - 31st
Kick return 32nd - 10th
Punting 24th - 22nd
Punt return 13th - 5th
FG 7th - 17th
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13725
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:23 am
Location: Sittin' at a bar on the inside
Been thanked: 1 time

Funkster wrote:
DaDitka wrote:I think everyone is giving the 9ers team a bit too much credit.

We have better special teams, better defense, and both offenses are not even worth talking about....so the only reason this contest should be close is because Frisco is at home IMO.
Like I said,people are taking them to lightly.

Bears -------- Niners

Offense 27th - 11th
Defense 10th - 5th
Kicking 3rd - 31st
Kick return 32nd - 10th
Punting 24th - 22nd
Punt return 13th - 5th
FG 7th - 17th
Oh, I know what the numbers are, but so much of stats are are skewed buy game situations and opponents (garbage time production, level of opponent, weather)

I noticed you didn't include scoring differental, turnover differential....etc. You can always finds stats to make any point you want to (I know I'm the king of it)

But the eye test tells me we are a superior team to the Niners. I didn't feel that way last week against to Texans, but against the Niners I do. I watched their entire game last week and other then Alden Smith, Vernon Davis, and 4 of their 5 O-line man I don't think any of their 'started' would start over ours..( I know many/most would say Willis over Urlacher...but I refuse to).

I'm not going to argue with those that feel the Niners are a better team, I just don't see it that way.

I think Seattle is better then them in their own division and think think the Bears, Packers, and Falcons are all far superior in the NFC, they have already lost to the Giants.. so at the very least I see 5 superior teams in the NFC alone. Yet I feel many act like they are one of the top 3 or 4 teams in the league and I really don't see it that way.
Image
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

DaDitka wrote:
Funkster wrote: Like I said,people are taking them to lightly.

Bears -------- Niners

Offense 27th - 11th
Defense 10th - 5th
Kicking 3rd - 31st
Kick return 32nd - 10th
Punting 24th - 22nd
Punt return 13th - 5th
FG 7th - 17th


But the eye test tells me we are a superior team to the Niners. I didn't feel that way last week against to Texans, but against the Niners I do. I watched their entire game last week and other then Alden Smith, Vernon Davis, and 4 of their 5 O-line man I don't think any of their 'started' would start over ours..( I know many/most would say Willis over Urlacher...but I refuse to).

I'm not going to argue with those that feel the Niners are a better team, I just don't see it that way.

I think Seattle is better then them in their own division and think think the Bears, Packers, and Falcons are all far superior in the NFC, they have already lost to the Giants.. so at the very least I see 5 superior teams in the NFC alone. Yet I feel many act like they are one of the top 3 or 4 teams in the league and I really don't see it that way.
I think you left out a few players that are better than ours. Besides Cutler and Marshall, I would trade our entire offense for theirs. The only way you could take lach over willis is systematically. Urlacher is one of the best to ever play the game,hands down, but to say you would take him over willis today is just homer talk. Willis is younger,stronger and faster.

You say loosing to the gaints as though they are chumps, they are defending superbowl champs. They are not playing good ball right now, true. But they play their best ball late in the season. They will be in the hunt and they are clutch come post season.

The niners already beat seattle and will beat them again. I live in Seattle and watch every game. Seattle has a lot of holes that need to be filled and can only win at home.

The way I see it, the niners are what the bears could look like if we had a system on offense. They utilize their players to their strengths. They have no problem dink and dunking their way down the field.They don't have to pick up 18 yards per play or nothing. They take what they defense gives them. They use Gore the way we should use Forte. Maybe we can learn something from them?
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

DaDitka wrote:
Funkster wrote: Like I said,people are taking them to lightly.

Bears -------- Niners

Offense 27th - 11th
Defense 10th - 5th
Kicking 3rd - 31st
Kick return 32nd - 10th
Punting 24th - 22nd
Punt return 13th - 5th
FG 7th - 17th
Oh, I know what the numbers are, but so much of stats are are skewed buy game situations and opponents (garbage time production, level of opponent, weather)

I noticed you didn't include scoring differental, turnover differential....etc. You can always finds stats to make any point you want to (I know I'm the king of it)

But the eye test tells me we are a superior team to the Niners. I didn't feel that way last week against to Texans, but against the Niners I do. I watched their entire game last week and other then Alden Smith, Vernon Davis, and 4 of their 5 O-line man I don't think any of their 'started' would start over ours..( I know many/most would say Willis over Urlacher...but I refuse to).

I'm not going to argue with those that feel the Niners are a better team, I just don't see it that way.

I think Seattle is better then them in their own division and think think the Bears, Packers, and Falcons are all far superior in the NFC, they have already lost to the Giants.. so at the very least I see 5 superior teams in the NFC alone. Yet I feel many act like they are one of the top 3 or 4 teams in the league and I really don't see it that way.
Wow. I'll give you this, you are a loyal Bears fan. But, wow.
mbrs!
MVP
Posts: 1066
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:03 pm

Imagine what this team could be like with the 49ers OL. We wouldn't have to call 1 man routes anymore. :D

It's funny. Kurt Warner mentioned on Waddle and Silvy that the Bears offense under Tice is very simple, so that it needed WRs who could get open. Currently, only Marshall has been able to do that consistently.

With Marz, the offense was complex, but it enabled average receivers to get open, if the OL could afford them enough time.

Martz would love to call 5 man blocking, to increase the number of targets, but it was getting Cutler killed. With Tice, he's calling 1 man routes to protect Cutler, but that means throwing to a double or tripple covered target.

Either offense would work with the 49ers OL, LOL! :D
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

I would rather like to imagine what we would look like, with pats, saints and even the bronco's O line! Every time cutler has time to throw, it's big yardage down field. This is how brady,brees and manning put up huge numbers week in and week out.


I still don't think we win this game, but the only hope we have is to get Bush the ball. He needs to touch the ball 20 times. He is a down hill runner and will keep us in manageable 3rd down situations. If we can establish a run game and stay with it, it will open up the pass late in the game.
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8075
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 315 times

We talk about better OL, WRs that are marginal, but no mention of Cutler making our WRs better. I know it is a chicken and egg conversation, but qbs can make their WRs better. Most qbs can do it but I haven't seen that out of Cutler. Look at Cobb in GB. He was seen as a returner. He is getting a chance this year and the kid is producing. His #s are up there with Nelson's (probably due to him missing a couple of games). All those GB WRs produce and they are not all world.

I think and hope with a better OL this may soon happen. Cutler will have more time and he can get others the ball. the catch will have to be made of course. We can just quit chucking it to Davis.
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

Don't take this wrong because I think Cutler is a better qb than campbell overall. However, I think campbell with his window/timing passing will do better with this wr corp than cutler. Cutler "has to see the wr open" before he throws it. I think campbell will have more total yards in a single game than cutler has. I think players like bennett and Hester will benefit from the way campbell throws more timing passes. Campbell may dink and dunk more but at least we will get some yards out of it. It seems when Cutler is at the helm, it is either huge yards down field or nothing.

I am really anxious to see the difference between Cutler and Campbell and the way the two qb's run the same offense.
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
EverybodyHatesCutler
Rookie
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 12:14 am

FranktheTank wrote:
DaDitka wrote:I think everyone is giving the 9ers team a bit too much credit.

They survived the Rams only because of two procedure penalties in OT.

They lost to the Queens.

They got destroyed by the Giants.

Yes it's always tough to win on the road, but if we take care of the ball I think our defense is actually much much better (at least from a 'difference making' point of view) then the Niners and neither of the offenses are worth a shit.

We have better special teams, better defense, and both offenses are not even worth talking about....so the only reason this contest should be close is because Frisco is at home IMO.

If you haven't watched the Niners this year, Justin Smith has been quite and their secondary has had a lot of brain farts. Let them make the mistakes instead of forcing one..take easy plays underneath and make their secondary make the tackle. Nip, nip, nip and then let them take a bad angle or miss a tackle and give us the big play.
I'm going to print a thousand copies of this post and throw them to the masses in candlestick park.
Are you going to be at the game? I'll be there sitting in section 29
Chicago Bears: 7-2 1st place (S.F. Baby! Will be there this Monday Night!)
Chicago Whitesox: 2nd place... (Close but no cigar)
Chicago Bulls: (No Rose? Big problem)

Prosportsdaily- DaBears1990
HurricaneBear
Head Coach
Posts: 2233
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
Has thanked: 1982 times
Been thanked: 375 times

It's been years since i've gone into a game actually thinking we would lose....but that's how I feel today. It's like the season is just setting us up for a thrashing. Here's hoping i'm wrong or if it does happen it's just a wake up call to the offense(outside ofBmarsh and Forte) to start playing real football.
Rgrigutis
Practice Squad
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2012 8:42 am

They'll have 8 in the box so it's on Campbell and the ol especially to find the holes on the short to intermediate routes. Wish we had a screen game but oh well. I think the d will hold them to 17 or less and we'll need to play mistake free penalty free on the o side to win.

On the issue of someone other than Marshall to step up: start throwing them the ball! With Jeffrey back sit Hester totally. Make Bennett or Jeffrey primary for a while and come back to Marshall
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13725
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:23 am
Location: Sittin' at a bar on the inside
Been thanked: 1 time

Funkster wrote: Urlacher is one of the best to ever play the game,hands down, but to say you would take him over willis today is just homer talk.

Yup.....and I thought I eluded to that in my post.


Sorry....a team that is averaging 16 points a game and 200 passing yards over their last 4 contests doesn't exactly strike fear in my heart.

This game is there for our offense to 'loose' we don't need them to 'win' it.

Obviously if our D doesn't show up, all bets are off. But I think we match up well against this particular opponent. (especially since they seem to have forgotten who Vernon Davis is)
Image
User avatar
RING4CHI
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5235
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: Ames, IA

Jason Campbell is no Jay Cutler, but he's better than Caleb Hanie, or Todd Collins, who replaced Cutler the last time he was concussed.
"Every team needs badasses." - Dan Hampton
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13725
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:23 am
Location: Sittin' at a bar on the inside
Been thanked: 1 time

RING4CHI wrote:Jason Campbell is no Jay Cutler, but he's better than Caleb Hanie, or Todd Collins, who replaced Cutler the last time he was concussed.
Let's be honest....we're talking about replacing the guy running the leagues second worst passing attack and is responsible for more turnovers then TDs. It can't really be that big of a deal.

Yes...I totally understand that many of those things are not Jay's fault and I'm not bashing him.

But the fact is that if the offense wasn't gaining yards and turning the ball over.....how much worse can it 'really' get?
Image
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

DaDitka wrote:
RING4CHI wrote:Jason Campbell is no Jay Cutler, but he's better than Caleb Hanie, or Todd Collins, who replaced Cutler the last time he was concussed.
Let's be honest....we're talking about replacing the guy running the leagues second worst passing attack and is responsible for more turnovers then TDs. It can't really be that big of a deal.

Yes...I totally understand that many of those things are not Jay's fault and I'm not bashing him.

But the fact is that if the offense wasn't gaining yards and turning the ball over.....how much worse can it 'really' get?
Yet you always point to Jay in these posts and never really offer up the "other things" that contribute to the problem 8-)
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

wab wrote:
DaDitka wrote: Let's be honest....we're talking about replacing the guy running the leagues second worst passing attack and is responsible for more turnovers then TDs. It can't really be that big of a deal.

Yes...I totally understand that many of those things are not Jay's fault and I'm not bashing him.

But the fact is that if the offense wasn't gaining yards and turning the ball over.....how much worse can it 'really' get?
Yet you always point to Jay in these posts and never really offer up the "other things" that contribute to the problem 8-)
Exactly. Jay has been playing mostly crappy this year. This isn't Erin Rodgers or Petunia Manning we're replacing here.

I'll go as far as to say that Kyle Ortman would be 9-0 as the QB of this year's team. :evilgrin:
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
dadoc
MVP
Posts: 1117
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2012 2:34 pm

IE wrote:
wab wrote:
I can't believe we are Facebook friends :frustrated:
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

dadoc wrote:
IE wrote:
I can't believe we are Facebook friends :frustrated:
Just stirrin' it up! :rofl:
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

Well Alex smith isn't playing, this changes a lot. Kaepernick is very mobile and will run first and pass later. We usually handle mobile qb's very well. I think with Kaepernick at qb, that makes Gore's ground assault easier to stop. we may have a better chance than I first thought.

I am changing my prediction. Bears 17 Niners 13

I still want to see a heavy dose of Bush, wow, I can't remember myself ever saying those words together :o
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

Funkster wrote:I still want to see a heavy dose of Bush.
Don't we all. We really need to pound Bush all night ... get Bush all lathered up, and keep pounding.

By cracky.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13725
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:23 am
Location: Sittin' at a bar on the inside
Been thanked: 1 time

wab wrote:
DaDitka wrote: Let's be honest....we're talking about replacing the guy running the leagues second worst passing attack and is responsible for more turnovers then TDs. It can't really be that big of a deal.

Yes...I totally understand that many of those things are not Jay's fault and I'm not bashing him.

But the fact is that if the offense wasn't gaining yards and turning the ball over.....how much worse can it 'really' get?
Yet you always point to Jay in these posts and never really offer up the "other things" that contribute to the problem 8-)
Because those other things will be the same with Jay out Jason under center so they are not relevant to this argument. Jason can not produce much less since Jay wasn't producing himself. I'm speaking to the impact the QB has, not their abilities. No matter what is wrong that is holding them back.those factors will be the same no matter who is under center.
Image
Post Reply