Yet another change to what a catch is?

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25191
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 945 times

I can't believe Collinsworth fought so hard against the Ertz catch. The guy caught it, had clear control for 3 steps, broke the plane with ball in control, and the ground caused a fumble.

It was a clean, easy touchdown catch, yet Collinsworth is insisting it be overturned and was analyzing frame-by-frame like the Zapruder film. There was no reason for any drama.
Image
YOGABBA
Rookie
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2017 2:41 pm

Nothing says thrilling more than having to wait 2-3 minutes for some middle aged white dude to make a decision after watching what just happened on a Microsoft Surface.
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7388
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 1015 times

UOK wrote:I can't believe Collinsworth fought so hard against the Ertz catch. The guy caught it, had clear control for 3 steps, broke the plane with ball in control, and the ground caused a fumble.

It was a clean, easy touchdown catch, yet Collinsworth is insisting it be overturned and was analyzing frame-by-frame like the Zapruder film. There was no reason for any drama.
yep that was incredibly brutal, and i normally like collinsworth.

if they had overturned the clements catch, that would have been bullshit but i would have understood where they were coming from.

if they had overturned the ertz catch i'd still be out in the street burning cop cars and chucking bricks through starbucks windows right now.
Image
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20672
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 815 times

UOK wrote:I can't believe Collinsworth fought so hard against the Ertz catch. The guy caught it, had clear control for 3 steps, broke the plane with ball in control, and the ground caused a fumble.

It was a clean, easy touchdown catch, yet Collinsworth is insisting it be overturned and was analyzing frame-by-frame like the Zapruder film. There was no reason for any drama.
That pissed me off to no end. The dude caught the ball, took three fucking steps with the ball SQUEEZED in his hands, and then he dove into the endzone.

Here's a shocker for idiots like Collinsworth: if you're a runner, the SECOND that the ball broaches the goal line the play is dead and it's a touchdown.

I don't know if he's stupid or if he was pandering to Patriots Nation.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29940
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

I took Collinsworth's remarks as more of an indictment on NFL rules than pandering or fighting against the catch. It was like "with how stupid these rules are, and how confusing everything is, you know it has to be overturned right?"

Almost in a way that says "it's a catch, but you all know what's going to happen right?"
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

just curious if anyone know the actual definition in the rules as to when a receiver becomes a runner ... 2 steps with the ball? 3?

I know it is more than 1

there is no way to know just from watching games because each game the shit is called differently
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
Post Reply