Where will the top 5 QB's be drafted?

College football and the NFL Draft

Moderator: wab

User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

every day there is a new mock draft changing where the 2017 QB's will be drafted ... and every day there are new stories about why each is rising on the draft board or falling ... I can't make heads or tails of how this draft is going to go and may be the first draft day I actually watch for a change just to see what sort of madness will prevail

so since none of the experts can come to a consensus, and it seems we on this board also have varying degrees of how these guys are being rated, time to make your guesses as to where these guys will go

the 5 QB's are : Deshaun Watson, Mitchell Trubinsky, Patrick Mahomes, Deshone Kizer, and Brad Kaaya

Select the round they will be picked. To show added guessing ability, select the position selected and team selecting them.

My guess :

* Deshaun Watson - First Round ... Number 3 to the Bears is what I wanted, but appears unlikely, so I am picking Cleveland to move up from # 12 if they have to in order to get him

* Mitchell Trubinsky - First round ... number 6 to the Patriots after their draft day trade of Jimmy Garropollo to the Jets

* Patrick Mahomes - Second round ... number 34 to the 49ers

* Deshone Kizer - third round ... number 77 to the Cardinals

* Brad Kaaya - fourth round ... number 111 to the Bears (I'll hate this, but to me it seems the most likely scenario for the Bears)

your turn
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29947
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2035 times

I can't see the Pats trading Jimmy to a division rival.
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

wab wrote:I can't see the Pats trading Jimmy to a division rival.

I can, so Belichick can laugh twice a year at how much different (worse) Jimmy G is not running the Patriots Offense
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20672
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 235 times
Been thanked: 815 times

I think Watson/Trubisky/Mahomes go in round 1

I think Peterman and Kizer go in round 2

I think Kaaya goes in round 4
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29947
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2035 times

I think Davis Webb goes in the 3rd, but possibly as early as R2.
User avatar
FaithInCutler
MVP
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:58 pm

My guess is-
Watson and Mitch will go round 1.
Mahomes, Kizer, Peterman will go round 2.
Webb Rd 3.
Kaaya will likely go in the 3rd but could see him dropping.
"dooooonnn'tt ccaaaaaaarrrreeeeeee" - Jay Cutler
User avatar
BamaBear09
Assistant Coach
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:57 am

wab wrote:I think Davis Webb goes in the 3rd, but possibly as early as R2.
I just don't get this Davis Webb hype... dude is so inconsistent at 5-15 yards, pretty much to basic offensive throws he will be required to make in the pros... but it's "ZOMG hez 6foot4 & can zip it 75 yardzzzzz" I just like to imagine anyone who gets hung up strictly on QB size and arm strength is truly a 13 year old girl on twitter inside....
User avatar
FaithInCutler
MVP
Posts: 1687
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 5:58 pm

BamaBear09 wrote:
wab wrote:I think Davis Webb goes in the 3rd, but possibly as early as R2.
I just don't get this Davis Webb hype... dude is so inconsistent at 5-15 yards, pretty much to basic offensive throws he will be required to make in the pros... but it's "ZOMG hez 6foot4 & can zip it 75 yardzzzzz" I just like to imagine anyone who gets hung up strictly on QB size and arm strength is truly a 13 year old girl on twitter inside....

There are 32 teams. Someone will "bang the table" at some point. In theory, you can't teach tall and you can't teach freak arm strength. A guy who is 6'0 tall will never be 6'4, and a guy who cant throw it 65 yards on the move at his pro day, likely wont be able to develop that skill. So If those are the traits you have to begin with, mechanics and accuracy can be improved with time and coaching. That's what you get in the fourth round and beyond. If someone really thinks he is a fit for their team they could easily take him in the third.
"dooooonnn'tt ccaaaaaaarrrreeeeeee" - Jay Cutler
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3894
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 629 times
Been thanked: 629 times

FaithInCutler wrote:
BamaBear09 wrote:
wab wrote:I think Davis Webb goes in the 3rd, but possibly as early as R2.
I just don't get this Davis Webb hype... dude is so inconsistent at 5-15 yards, pretty much to basic offensive throws he will be required to make in the pros... but it's "ZOMG hez 6foot4 & can zip it 75 yardzzzzz" I just like to imagine anyone who gets hung up strictly on QB size and arm strength is truly a 13 year old girl on twitter inside....

There are 32 teams. Someone will "bang the table" at some point. In theory, you can't teach tall and you can't teach freak arm strength. A guy who is 6'0 tall will never be 6'4, and a guy who cant throw it 65 yards on the move at his pro day, likely wont be able to develop that skill. So If those are the traits you have to begin with, mechanics and accuracy can be improved with time and coaching. That's what you get in the fourth round and beyond. If someone really thinks he is a fit for their team they could easily take him in the third.
Pretty much the same reason I can't see Kizer getting out of the top 10, and probably not Mahomes either. In fact, it wouldn't surprise me, after all the wailing and gnashing of teeth about this "awful" year for QBs, to see four go in the top 13. Someone's gonna look at those tools and think "I can fix him!"
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
DaSuperfan
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

I don't see Kizer dropping out of the 1st round, no way.
Never Die Easy
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5196
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 280 times

For thunder's reasons, no way in hell Mahomes falls out of R1. The same logic makes me tend to think Kizer won't either.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
BamaBear09
Assistant Coach
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:57 am

Sums up my thoughts on Davis Webb being drafted so high..

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7388
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 1017 times

BamaBear09 wrote:Sums up my thoughts on Davis Webb being drafted so high..

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
for shits i listened to an appearance klassen made on a podcast yesterday talking about his top 5 qb's
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and he's got kizer at number 1, and it's sorta weird. he says at the end of the day his criteria is, who's got the best arm to make all the throws in late game clutch situations. and how he's basically ignoring 2016 and only looking at 2015 for him, and it just feels like these guys started with an answer, and then worked backwards.
Image
User avatar
FranktheTank
Player of the Month
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 12:26 am
Location: Silicon Valley
Contact:

Watson
Mahones
Kizer
Trubisky
Davis Webb
User avatar
BamaBear09
Assistant Coach
Posts: 708
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 8:57 am

RustyTrombone wrote:
BamaBear09 wrote:Sums up my thoughts on Davis Webb being drafted so high..

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
for shits i listened to an appearance klassen made on a podcast yesterday talking about his top 5 qb's
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and he's got kizer at number 1, and it's sorta weird. he says at the end of the day his criteria is, who's got the best arm to make all the throws in late game clutch situations. and how he's basically ignoring 2016 and only looking at 2015 for him, and it just feels like these guys started with an answer, and then worked backwards.
I'm getting the feeling that most who have Kizer as QB1 are acting like 2016 didn't happen, like to blame his issues on a young WR corps and all that. It's just excuses I have heard many times before, potential means dick when it doesn't turn into production...
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7388
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 1017 times

BamaBear09 wrote:
RustyTrombone wrote:
BamaBear09 wrote:Sums up my thoughts on Davis Webb being drafted so high..

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
for shits i listened to an appearance klassen made on a podcast yesterday talking about his top 5 qb's
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
and he's got kizer at number 1, and it's sorta weird. he says at the end of the day his criteria is, who's got the best arm to make all the throws in late game clutch situations. and how he's basically ignoring 2016 and only looking at 2015 for him, and it just feels like these guys started with an answer, and then worked backwards.
I'm getting the feeling that most who have Kizer as QB1 are acting like 2016 didn't happen, like to blame his issues on a young WR corps and all that. It's just excuses I have heard many times before, potential means dick when it doesn't turn into production...
i'm not a big college guy so i'm definitely talking out my ass here a bit, but how do you ignore the most recent year for a qb? you're looking at how his mechanics, his decision making, poise, etc have progressed.

is there precedent for this? is there some nfl qb out there who just shat the bed his last year of college and then lit it up in the nfl?
Image
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 99 times

Sam Bradford? Completely different but that's the only one that came to mind.
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6913
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 394 times
Been thanked: 712 times

I haven't kept up with all the free agent movement, but it feels like a number of formerly QB desperate teams aren't anymore (like the Bears).

For the moment, let's say:

Trubisky: 2-12
Kizer: 12-25
Watson: R2
Mahomes: R2

5th? Could be any number of guys - Kayaa? Webb? Peterman?
I'd imagine somebody likes one of them in the 3rd
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7388
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 1017 times

Moriarty wrote:I haven't kept up with all the free agent movement, but it feels like a number of formerly QB desperate teams aren't anymore (like the Bears).

For the moment, let's say:

Trubisky: 2-12
Kizer: 12-25
Watson: R2
Mahomes: R2

5th? Could be any number of guys - Kayaa? Webb? Peterman?
I'd imagine somebody likes one of them in the 3rd


well, any of these teams taking a qb in the first two rounds wouldnt be surprising at all:

-browns
-49ers
-cardinals
-saints
-steelers
-bears
-jets
-texans

trying to play it all smart saying watson is going to go in the second is just you smelling your own farts. look at all these bums who were drafted in the first round over the last ten years:
http://www.thesportster.com/football/ra ... -10-years/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

ponder! manuel! manziel! weeden! freeman!
it's even uglier when you look at the second round over the last two years.
Image
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3894
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 629 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Sure, over the last two years. Before that, not as ugly. (Though still not tremendously inspiring.)

I suspect Pace is trying to play this as the 2014 draft, and looking to nab his own Derek Carr. The success of that strategy is, naturally, the question.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7388
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 575 times
Been thanked: 1017 times

oops, meant ten years.
Image
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3894
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 629 times
Been thanked: 629 times

This is interesting.

Put together by Ethan Young, a stat geek (his SLAYTICS composite is fascinating stuff, if you're into that sort of thing), his SEMTEX composite attempts to effectively translate college production into professional projection. He also retrogresses everything back to 1983, which proves quite telling.

FYI: Ethan's all about RoI when it comes to draft picks, so read part 1 with a clear eye on that before you get to part 2, which includes his tiers for the 2017 draft.

I'm adding this to my list of consideration factors.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5196
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 280 times

thunderspirit wrote:Sure, over the last two years. Before that, not as ugly. (Though still not tremendously inspiring.)

I suspect Pace is trying to play this as the 2014 draft, and looking to nab his own Derek Carr. The success of that strategy is, naturally, the question.
I think it's possible that the Bears either take a QB at #3 or trade down and take one in the top half of R1. But if they don't do that, if one of the top 4 are available at the bottom of R1, Pace will trade R2 and of of those R4s to move up and take whichever's left.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
malk
Head Coach
Posts: 3631
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
Has thanked: 133 times
Been thanked: 208 times

thunderspirit wrote:This is interesting.

Put together by Ethan Young, a stat geek (his SLAYTICS composite is fascinating stuff, if you're into that sort of thing), his SEMTEX composite attempts to effectively translate college production into professional projection. He also retrogresses everything back to 1983, which proves quite telling.

FYI: Ethan's all about RoI when it comes to draft picks, so read part 1 with a clear eye on that before you get to part 2, which includes his tiers for the 2017 draft.

I'm adding this to my list of consideration factors.
And Glennon is a bronze QB and hence has a 3.9% chance of becoming starter level, hurrah!
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".

Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.

(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6913
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 394 times
Been thanked: 712 times

thunderspirit wrote:This is interesting.

Put together by Ethan Young, a stat geek (his SLAYTICS composite is fascinating stuff, if you're into that sort of thing), his SEMTEX composite attempts to effectively translate college production into professional projection. He also retrogresses everything back to 1983, which proves quite telling.

FYI: Ethan's all about RoI when it comes to draft picks, so read part 1 with a clear eye on that before you get to part 2, which includes his tiers for the 2017 draft.

I'm adding this to my list of consideration factors.
Interesting.
The Fast Summary I see is:

[*]The system is flawed in that Gold and Silver tiers have a lot of bombs mixed in with successful QBs.
However, that's not as damning as it sounds at first, in that picking QBs is so hard and most QBs selected high are failures, using 'human' methods of selection.

[*]Bronze level QBs are almost always flops. Semi-useful borderline starters is about the best you can hope for.
Glennon and DeShaun Watson are/were Bronzes.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3894
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 629 times
Been thanked: 629 times

Moriarty wrote:
thunderspirit wrote:This is interesting.

Put together by Ethan Young, a stat geek (his SLAYTICS composite is fascinating stuff, if you're into that sort of thing), his SEMTEX composite attempts to effectively translate college production into professional projection. He also retrogresses everything back to 1983, which proves quite telling.

FYI: Ethan's all about RoI when it comes to draft picks, so read part 1 with a clear eye on that before you get to part 2, which includes his tiers for the 2017 draft.

I'm adding this to my list of consideration factors.
Interesting.
The Fast Summary I see is:

[*]The system is flawed in that Gold and Silver tiers have a lot of bombs mixed in with successful QBs.
However, that's not as damning as it sounds at first, in that picking QBs is so hard and most QBs selected high are failures, using 'human' methods of selection.

[*]Bronze level QBs are almost always flops. Semi-useful borderline starters is about the best you can hope for.
Glennon and DeShaun Watson are/were Bronzes.
For me, that's the net takeaway: no matter what, the "hit rate" on QBs is about one in three, so maximizing your chances means Gold or Silver tier.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
Adipost
MVP
Posts: 1295
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 5:54 am

thunderspirit wrote:This is interesting.

Put together by Ethan Young, a stat geek (his SLAYTICS composite is fascinating stuff, if you're into that sort of thing), his SEMTEX composite attempts to effectively translate college production into professional projection. He also retrogresses everything back to 1983, which proves quite telling.

FYI: Ethan's all about RoI when it comes to draft picks, so read part 1 with a clear eye on that before you get to part 2, which includes his tiers for the 2017 draft.

I'm adding this to my list of consideration factors.
Holy shit, this was fascinating. Thank you! Deserves a thread of its own.
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

G08 wrote:I think Watson/Trubisky/Mahomes go in round 1

I think Peterman and Kizer go in round 2

I think Kaaya goes in round 4

I'm revising my thinking on this based on various team reports, and now think Watson/Trubisky/Mahomes/Kizer all go in the first round
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
User avatar
malk
Head Coach
Posts: 3631
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
Has thanked: 133 times
Been thanked: 208 times

Trubisky, Kizer, Mahomes in round 1. Watson and Kaaya in 2. In that order.

That's not my ranking though!
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".

Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.

(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 99 times

Good post thunder.
Post Reply