Bear Drafted Player Scouting Reports (Updated 2nd Round)

College football and the NFL Draft

Moderator: wab

EricTighe
MVP
Posts: 1220
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 63 times

Not sure where you got your info on Mahomes throwing 60 mph?
http://blogs.ourlads.com/2017/03/16/qua ... 2008-2015/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And for those who didn't know about them recording these numbers here they are as in all it is just a another tool.
TheWorldBreaker
MVP
Posts: 1118
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:57 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 120 times

EricTighe wrote:Not sure where you got your info on Mahomes throwing 60 mph?
http://blogs.ourlads.com/2017/03/16/qua ... 2008-2015/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

And for those who didn't know about them recording these numbers here they are as in all it is just a another tool.
" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4645
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 811 times
Been thanked: 339 times

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1_-SienfT3umX0HKxRyQqyXM9BqHrotdcQA6W-V_pDiY/htmlview?usp=drive_web&usp=sheets_home&ths=true&sle=true#

Numbers since 2008.

Looks like 54 and below are a red flag for the guys putting it together, but looking at the list i would say 53 or higher is ok, but it's just another tool. Lots of busts on either side of the spectrum.

It's interesting as some guys known for not having the greatest arms are pretty high in the MPH readings whereas other guys that are known long passers aren't all that high.

The eye opener was Watson's poor number.
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 99 times

I figure the mph is like baseball pitchers in ways. Yes you can throw 87 in the bigs if you hit your mark. You can also miss the bigs if you throw 100 but can't find the plate. Both ends need some form of accuracy. However if your tossing 65 and not a knuckle baller, you need to forget the dream.

Same concept for QB. You can't have Lamar Lattrell throwing deep outs. But non corrected vision Rick Vaughn can't either.
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7390
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 576 times
Been thanked: 1017 times

mmmc_35 wrote:I figure the mph is like baseball pitchers in ways. Yes you can throw 87 in the bigs if you hit your mark. You can also miss the bigs if you throw 100 but can't find the plate. Both ends need some form of accuracy. However if your tossing 65 and not a knuckle baller, you need to forget the dream.

Same concept for QB. You can't have Lamar Lattrell throwing deep outs. But non corrected vision Rick Vaughn can't either.
the more i look at those numbers the more my head hurts. i guess that watson number does jump out at you, but it feels like, those numbers could only really mean something if there's other components to it. like, as you said, the throw should be as fast as they can to an accurate spot, not just rifling it like uncle rico.

i'd want to somehow take release time into account as well, even though that'd be hard to be exact measuring. but like a 57mph tebow throw which took 8 seconds to wind up is useless as well.

worst measurement ever.
Image
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29951
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2036 times

You know who could throw real hard? JaMarcus Russell. Like literally the best arm in the history of football.

This statistic is stupid.
User avatar
Nanky
Journeyman
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:58 am
Location: Sioux Falls, SD

wab wrote:You know who could throw real hard? JaMarcus Russell. Like literally the best arm in the history of football.

This statistic is stupid.
I like it to look at the trend, basically no QB has been good when throwing under 55 mph going back to 2008. The only exception is Dak last year and he threw 54 mph, possibly Tyrod Taylor. No you cannot rely on it solely, but it it's a checkbox and a huge red flag to be under, especially significantly like Watson. It's interesting to look that far back and see the numbers.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20673
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 235 times
Been thanked: 815 times

Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
User avatar
Nanky
Journeyman
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:58 am
Location: Sioux Falls, SD

G08 wrote:Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
As long as you're applying the same test every year, a person can look at the data and come to conclusions. Relax dude.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20673
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 235 times
Been thanked: 815 times

Nanky wrote:
G08 wrote:Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
As long as you're applying the same test every year, a person can look at the data and come to conclusions. Relax dude.
But you can't; if you want to look at data and draw conclusions then every one of the participants needs to be doing the same thing. IE throw as hard as your can.

These dudes are trying to complete passes, not rifle fastballs.

It's unbelievably stupid to judge on those numbers.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
User avatar
Nanky
Journeyman
Posts: 227
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:58 am
Location: Sioux Falls, SD

G08 wrote:
Nanky wrote:
G08 wrote:Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
As long as you're applying the same test every year, a person can look at the data and come to conclusions. Relax dude.
But you can't; if you want to look at data and draw conclusions then every one of the participants needs to be doing the same thing. IE throw as hard as your can.

These dudes are trying to complete passes, not rifle fastballs.

It's unbelievably stupid to judge on those numbers.
It's just another piece of information, anyone would be stupid to only look at that and make a final decision based solely on it. It's a piece of the puzzle. The more information the better, I think looking back at the history of velocities is interesting. It's a very small piece of the puzzle, but it's info so why not look at it.
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 99 times

G08 wrote:Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
Actually they do. I asked two different dudes who have involved. They tell them throw it as hard as you can, and every QB knows its for the gun.
TheWorldBreaker
MVP
Posts: 1118
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:57 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 120 times

G08 wrote:
Nanky wrote:
G08 wrote:Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
As long as you're applying the same test every year, a person can look at the data and come to conclusions. Relax dude.
But you can't; if you want to look at data and draw conclusions then every one of the participants needs to be doing the same thing. IE throw as hard as your can.

These dudes are trying to complete passes, not rifle fastballs.

It's unbelievably stupid to judge on those numbers.
If you're just throwing to complete passes and your passes are 5 MPH slower than everyone else's that's a potential problem because the disparity in velocity could be the difference between an interception and completion.

How much faster does someone throwing a 55 MPH pass (when they're trying to be accurate) get to the receiver than a guy throwing 49 to be accurate? I'm bad at math but I'd think probably a second or two depending on how far you're throwing.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20673
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 235 times
Been thanked: 815 times

mmmc_35 wrote:
G08 wrote:Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
Actually they do. I asked two different dudes who have involved. They tell them throw it as hard as you can, and every QB knows its for the gun.
Can I ask who? I've heard otherwise. Benjamin Allbright (solid twitter follow) broke down Watson's mph in a game based on frame rate, came away with 53 mph. I don't know from where he would get an extra 4mph on his throws (unless you want to argue adrenaline) in a game compared to the Combine.

The whole thing is dumb to me. I mean Mike Glennon has a solid arm and he was clocked at 49 mph at the Combine, which is worse than Peterman and Kaaya (which is preposterous).
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
TheWorldBreaker
MVP
Posts: 1118
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:57 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 120 times

G08 wrote:
mmmc_35 wrote:
G08 wrote:Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
Actually they do. I asked two different dudes who have involved. They tell them throw it as hard as you can, and every QB knows its for the gun.
Can I ask who? I've heard otherwise. Benjamin Allbright (solid twitter follow) broke down Watson's mph in a game based on frame rate, came away with 53 mph. I don't know from where he would get an extra 4mph on his throws (unless you want to argue adrenaline) in a game compared to the Combine.

The whole thing is dumb to me. I mean Mike Glennon has a solid arm and he was clocked at 49 mph at the Combine, which is worse than Peterman and Kaaya (which is preposterous).
This article mentions them throwing for velocity: https://www.google.com/amp/ftw.usatoday ... thomas/amp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Could be wrong or poor wording though, I suppose.

Also, I'm not sure how scientific the process you describe that guy on Twitter doing is. And even if you could reliably extrapolate that from tv, I doubt he's qualified to do it accurately.
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6118
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 99 times

Doing a frame by frame calc is going to have a wide discrepancy.

I shouldn't say their names. I don't think they would appreciate it. So these are my anonymous sources. Lol, but I do trust them even if they are pucker fans. One has a connection to a guy on the velocity list the other was a qb way back on the depth chart to someone on that list.

Another reason to trust the validity (not of the findings, but that teams are looking). There was a show on discovery or history channel called American Muscle. It only has like 3 episodes. As a S&C geek I watched it. Very little S&C insight. However Pat White was on it. Trying to get ready for a camp. They literally worked on his velocity, saying anything below 45 teams won't look at you. I believe he hits 48. This might be a lose connection but it was important to them. Suh and Nick Swisher were on the show training also.

All of that said I think the Gabriel article saying spin might be more important, has validity to. I think that's why Watson's passes vs Kaaya look different. Arm angle and spin.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20673
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 235 times
Been thanked: 815 times

That's fine... I just go off the eyeball test and if there's a world were Peterman/Kaaya have a better arm than Glennon, I don't want to live in it.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
User avatar
malk
Head Coach
Posts: 3632
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
Has thanked: 133 times
Been thanked: 208 times

TheWorldBreaker wrote:
G08 wrote:
Nanky wrote:
G08 wrote:Nobody
Asked
These
QBs
To
Throw
As
Hard
As
They
Can

For fucks sake.
As long as you're applying the same test every year, a person can look at the data and come to conclusions. Relax dude.
But you can't; if you want to look at data and draw conclusions then every one of the participants needs to be doing the same thing. IE throw as hard as your can.

These dudes are trying to complete passes, not rifle fastballs.

It's unbelievably stupid to judge on those numbers.
If you're just throwing to complete passes and your passes are 5 MPH slower than everyone else's that's a potential problem because the disparity in velocity could be the difference between an interception and completion.

How much faster does someone throwing a 55 MPH pass (when they're trying to be accurate) get to the receiver than a guy throwing 49 to be accurate? I'm bad at math but I'd think probably a second or two depending on how far you're throwing.
55mph is 24.59 m/s. 49 mph is 21.90 m/s. So trying to rifle it 20 yards takes 0.81s for the former and 0.91s for the latter.

Taken to more of an extreme 60mph is 26.82 m/s, 45 mph is 20.12 m/s. So the same 20 yard throw would take 0.75s for 60 mph and 0.99s for 45mph.

So the question is, what difference does a quarter of a second make? You've also got to factor in the mechanics of the QB i.e. how quick their release is. Their vision/anticipation, can they throw a receiver open or do they need to see them open first.

Then you'd need to know whether there was a dropoff in accuracy as each QB approached their maximum velocity. If someone can only scrape 45 mph when wanging it as hard as they can then there's a problem but if that's their standard consistent speed and they just don't have that higher gearing then I'm not so fussed.

Ultimately, yes it's a data point but I don't think it's a particularly meaningful one outside of perhaps triggering further investigation if under a threshold or used to confirm something seen on tape.

EDIT. Looking at that ourlads page I don't trust the data either. Only three players in 2017 achieved 55mph or higher with a max of 56mph. 10 players managed it in 2016. Now maybe 2017 was the year of the noodle but does anyone think that Mahomes wouldn't be considered one of the best arms in that 2016 class rather than around 10th best?
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".

Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.

(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Post Reply