You're convincing me. I don't know. Part of me says that Fangio would know what to do with the guy. Another part says that some 4-3 team (hopefully more than one) will be justifiably in love with the guy and willing to trade up (bidding war?) for him.wab wrote:Personally, I wouldn't draft him. Not because he isn't good, I just don't think he's a great fit for the Bears overall.Mikefive wrote:So is that how you would play him? Would you not start him and just bring him in in nickel? That seems crazy for a top 10 pick, doesn't it? Or start him at 5T and move him around in passing situations? In college they moved him inside some on passing downs.wab wrote:Considering the Bears spend 70% of their time in sub packages, Chubb would be fine. I just don't think he's got the lateral agility or overall athleticism to play OLB.
He reminds me a lot of Chris Long/Joey Bosa.
I'm trying to think this through.
But for argument's sake, if the Bears did draft him, I think they'd ideally play him like a combo of McPhee and Young. Stand him up in the base defense and on 1st and 2nd downs like they do with McPhee, and drop him to DE on 3rd downs, sub packages, and obvious passing downs like they do with Young.
I just think the Bears have a similar guy already in Bullard and need a better pure LB/Pass rusher.
Bradley Chubb discussion
Moderator: wab
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 342 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
-
- Player of the Month
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 5:46 pm
- Been thanked: 11 times
Chubb is a very similar player to Pernell McPhee. Physically they compare well:
McPhee (when drafted): 6' 2.5"/ 274 lbs / 4.97 40 time
Chubb (pre-combine): 6'4" / 275 lbs / good but not great speed
Both are noted by scouts to have very long arms and great tenacity.
I think Chubb will fit our system just fine. Unfortunately, I have yet to see a mock draft where he falls to #8. Of course, at this time last year Jonathan Allen was a can't miss top 3 prospect too.
P.S. - McPhee was graded as a mid-round pick due to being very limited in understanding the game. PFW said it would take several years to get him up to speed and reach his potential. They were right.
McPhee (when drafted): 6' 2.5"/ 274 lbs / 4.97 40 time
Chubb (pre-combine): 6'4" / 275 lbs / good but not great speed
Both are noted by scouts to have very long arms and great tenacity.
I think Chubb will fit our system just fine. Unfortunately, I have yet to see a mock draft where he falls to #8. Of course, at this time last year Jonathan Allen was a can't miss top 3 prospect too.
P.S. - McPhee was graded as a mid-round pick due to being very limited in understanding the game. PFW said it would take several years to get him up to speed and reach his potential. They were right.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29885
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 1997 times
I wouldn't hate the pick, because you are replacing two guys with one, but you aren't going to get out of him what you would in a 4-3. That's why I draw the Bosa and Long comparisons. He was super stiff as an OLB, then they moved to a 4-3 and he flourished.
When Long was in the draft, the prevailing thought was that he was the best fit as a 4-3 DE, but should he fall to the Jets at 6, they could probably make it work with him at OLB.
I just think it's a square peg/round hole situation. Chubb is talented enough to make it work, but I don't think his potential would be maximized.
When Long was in the draft, the prevailing thought was that he was the best fit as a 4-3 DE, but should he fall to the Jets at 6, they could probably make it work with him at OLB.
I just think it's a square peg/round hole situation. Chubb is talented enough to make it work, but I don't think his potential would be maximized.
- DaSuperfan
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
I'm sticking with Harold Landry as an edge rusher that would be a great complement to Floyd. I think Davenport is too raw to take at 8 and Edmunds to me is a 4-3 OLB.
I also think Chubb is long gone before 8, I have him going at 3 to Indy.
I also think Chubb is long gone before 8, I have him going at 3 to Indy.
Never Die Easy
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29885
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 1997 times
Edmunds is like 6’5 260.DaSuperfan wrote:I'm sticking with Harold Landry as an edge rusher that would be a great complement to Floyd. I think Davenport is too raw to take at 8 and Edmunds to me is a 4-3 OLB.
I also think Chubb is long gone before 8, I have him going at 3 to Indy.
- DaSuperfan
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Interesting, I didn't know was THAT big. I thought I saw somewhere that he was 235 pounds and around 6'3. But nowI see he's listed at 6'5 250. The problem I have with Edmunds is that we don't know how he'll fare as a 3-4 OLB, rushing the QB off the edge since he wasn't asked to do that in college. I see Edmunds as an inside 3-4 ILB more than a pass rushing 3-4 OLB, but maybe that's just me.wab wrote:Edmunds is like 6’5 260.DaSuperfan wrote:I'm sticking with Harold Landry as an edge rusher that would be a great complement to Floyd. I think Davenport is too raw to take at 8 and Edmunds to me is a 4-3 OLB.
I also think Chubb is long gone before 8, I have him going at 3 to Indy.
As a pure pass rusher I still like Landry over Edmunds in a 3-4. Landry has the unique ability to bend and dip under Tackles with speed off the edge. He also has a nice counter inside move which he uses effectively. Hes also decent against the run.
Never Die Easy
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29885
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 1997 times
Edmunds is a more physical Leonard Floyd. They both played similar hybrid positions - people forget how much Floyd played inside at Georgia.
He's also like 19/20 years old. His job at Tech isn't "follow your assignment". It's "go get the ball".
He's also like 19/20 years old. His job at Tech isn't "follow your assignment". It's "go get the ball".