Bears Barroom - collection of mock draft picks

College football and the NFL Draft

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25162
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 935 times

http://bearsbarroom.com/nfl-mock-drafts-bears-1-0/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Looks better linked.
Image
User avatar
MrPrettyBoyFancyLad
Journeyman
Posts: 111
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 4:21 pm
Location: east coast representin'

it's tough for me to get into these mocks until i see how free agency pans out. i'd like to think that we'll hold on to the current cb's so we don't need to waste our 1st or 2nd rounder on one of them.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29871
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1991 times

As of right now, today, the Bears need - in order

Corner
Wide Receiver
Pass Rusher
Guard
Tackle
5 Tech
Kicker
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20605
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 221 times
Been thanked: 785 times

wab wrote:As of right now, today, the Bears need - in order

Corner
Wide Receiver
Pass Rusher
Guard
Tackle
5 Tech
Kicker
I might flip guard and tackle there but I'd basically agree.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5192
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 278 times

Here's my prioritized list of Bears needs...

1. CB
2a. WR
2b. Edge
3. CB
4. 5T
5. PK
6. OG

My method highly prioritizes spots without legitimate starters. Thus, OT drops off the list and PK moves up. Starter ages and position priority also factor in. I'm also making cut assumptions like McPhee. For me, WR and Edge are about equal needs. While we clearly need a #1 WR, it's a lower priority position than Edge which also has an age concern with Young.

I think a very interesting question, assuming we bring back Kyle Fuller (or Amukamara, for that matter) is... Would you prioritize upgrading Robertson-Harris or Bullard at 5T over upgrading Cooper at the #2 CB spot?

(Can FA get here already, please? We all know with oodles of cap room, many of these questions will be answered that way, for better or worse.)
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29871
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1991 times

Mikefive wrote:Here's my prioritized list of Bears needs...

1. CB
2a. WR
2b. Edge
3. CB
4. 5T
5. PK
6. OG

My method highly prioritizes spots without legitimate starters. Thus, OT drops off the list and PK moves up. Starter ages and position priority also factor in. I'm also making cut assumptions like McPhee. For me, WR and Edge are about equal needs. While we clearly need a #1 WR, it's a lower priority position than Edge which also has an age concern with Young.

I think a very interesting question, assuming we bring back Kyle Fuller (or Amukamara, for that matter) is... Would you prioritize upgrading Robertson-Harris or Bullard at 5T over upgrading Cooper at the #2 CB spot?

(Can FA get here already, please? We all know with oodles of cap room, many of these questions will be answered that way, for better or worse.)
If the Bears bring back one of the corners, pass rusher jumps to the top and flip/flops with CB on my list.
Post Reply