R1 Draft Scenarios You Like / That Make You Cringe

College football and the NFL Draft

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
User avatar
Hiphopopotamos
Head Coach
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:56 pm

Like: Nelson/Smith/Vea/Landry/Davenport

Cringe: McGlinchey/Fitzpatrick/Ward
Holy Shit - We got Justin Fields!

In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.

Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

I'm hoping that we trade up for Fitzpatrick, only because it would be hilarious to see the reaction.

I would have to say I would be disappointed if we drafted a guard anywhere in the top 10.
46Blitz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 545
Joined: Fri Apr 28, 2017 2:40 pm

I was stuck on Nelson, though there is a good chance he will be gone.

Gonna just trust the Bears to pick the best talent on the board. I can care less on what position outside QB obviously. If they can trade a few spots to pick up extra pick/s I would be even happier.
User avatar
docc
Head Coach
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Outpost of Reality S.E. Arizona
Has thanked: 993 times
Been thanked: 183 times

Smith..Nice..nasty..fast..sideline to sideline..great Football IQ..

Ray Lewis type..
Let's get some hurt going !
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 394 times
Been thanked: 712 times

Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport

Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29940
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

Moriarty wrote:
Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport

Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
Or he just wanted to take Smith?
User avatar
Hiphopopotamos
Head Coach
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:56 pm

Moriarty wrote:
Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport

Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.

You saw what Oakland got in a trade down. I wouldn't have moved down either.
Holy Shit - We got Justin Fields!

In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.

Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

wab wrote:
Moriarty wrote:
Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport

Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
Or he just wanted to take Smith?
I think this was it. He said they explored a trade down. They didn’t think it was worth losing Smith. (My take)
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6908
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 394 times
Been thanked: 712 times

wab wrote:
Moriarty wrote:
Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport

Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
Or he just wanted to take Smith?
That would be the first option, "wasn't interested"
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3893
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 628 times
Been thanked: 628 times

If Smith was the guy I wanted and didn't think I'd get at #8, I wouldn't have been interested either.

If you find that unconscionable, that's your right.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
Post Reply