Like: Nelson/Smith/Vea/Landry/Davenport
Cringe: McGlinchey/Fitzpatrick/Ward
R1 Draft Scenarios You Like / That Make You Cringe
Moderator: wab
- Hiphopopotamos
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3535
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:56 pm
Holy Shit - We got Justin Fields!
In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.
Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.
Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
I was stuck on Nelson, though there is a good chance he will be gone.
Gonna just trust the Bears to pick the best talent on the board. I can care less on what position outside QB obviously. If they can trade a few spots to pick up extra pick/s I would be even happier.
Gonna just trust the Bears to pick the best talent on the board. I can care less on what position outside QB obviously. If they can trade a few spots to pick up extra pick/s I would be even happier.
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6908
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 394 times
- Been thanked: 712 times
Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport
Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29940
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
Or he just wanted to take Smith?Moriarty wrote:Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport
Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
- Hiphopopotamos
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3535
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:56 pm
Moriarty wrote:Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport
Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
You saw what Oakland got in a trade down. I wouldn't have moved down either.
Holy Shit - We got Justin Fields!
In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.
Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.
Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
I think this was it. He said they explored a trade down. They didn’t think it was worth losing Smith. (My take)wab wrote:Or he just wanted to take Smith?Moriarty wrote:Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport
Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6908
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 394 times
- Been thanked: 712 times
That would be the first option, "wasn't interested"wab wrote:Or he just wanted to take Smith?Moriarty wrote:Even more painful than my Cringe scenario.Moriarty wrote:Realistic Ideal:
Trade down a few spots and still land Davenport
Cringe:
4 QBs are gone in top 7, no one wants to trade, have to make a meh value selection at 8 (which pretty much everyone who could be there is, in my book).
Only 2-3 QBs were gone, a trade was there begging to happen (#7 and #10 pulled off a trade down), and Pace either wasn't interested, wanted too much, or otherwise botched it.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3893
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 628 times
- Been thanked: 628 times
If Smith was the guy I wanted and didn't think I'd get at #8, I wouldn't have been interested either.
If you find that unconscionable, that's your right.
If you find that unconscionable, that's your right.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct