Here's something I'd be telling him...
On any drop back, know that your receivers aren't going to beat the #1 CBs and not the #2s mostly. So in your pre-snap, identify where the #1s are and the coverage if you can or make your best guess and whichever WR is going to be covered by the #1 (unless it's a rub route that would create space), just don't even bother looking that way. Attack the 2's 3's and other defenders. That'll give you fewer options to process.
What do you think of that?
If I were Biscuit's QB coach...
Moderator: wab
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 342 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- staleystarch
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:08 pm
I would think he should do reads based on the defense and situation and what has been studied on film. Also despite the 13 game meme being repeated ad nauseam he knows more about reading a defense than any of us smucks on this board.Mikefive wrote:Here's something I'd be telling him...
On any drop back, know that your receivers aren't going to beat the #1 CBs and not the #2s mostly. So in your pre-snap, identify where the #1s are and the coverage if you can or make your best guess and whichever WR is going to be covered by the #1 (unless it's a rub route that would create space), just don't even bother looking that way. Attack the 2's 3's and other defenders. That'll give you fewer options to process.
What do you think of that?
"We don’t know exactly what we’re doing” -- John Fox
I think that's a terrible fan inspired idea. No coach is going to tell TRU that. I would say the play called dictates his progression. He should follow through that particular plays natural progression. Then read the defense accordingly. When you start to predetermine what you're going to do, trouble will soon follow.
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
- Boris13c
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 15969
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
- Location: The Bear Nebula
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
Mikefive wrote:Here's something I'd be telling him...
On any drop back, know that your receivers aren't going to beat the #1 CBs and not the #2s mostly. So in your pre-snap, identify where the #1s are and the coverage if you can or make your best guess and whichever WR is going to be covered by the #1 (unless it's a rub route that would create space), just don't even bother looking that way. Attack the 2's 3's and other defenders. That'll give you fewer options to process.
What do you think of that?
I disagree, as your scenario would have him dropping back and automatically dismissing 1 side of the field from consideration and per-determining where he is going to go with the ball
he needs to not only learn proper pre-snap reads, but also have the freedom to act on those reads ("hmmmm ... 10 men up for the run ... time to fake this run and go deep")
we can see by watching the games he does not have that freedom yet because he continues to hand off into the teeth of 8 - 10 man fronts on first down for 2 yards or no gain
and idiot Dowell, who should be helping him with his play calls, is not helping him
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
George Carlin
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 342 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
I guess I didn't explain myself thoroughly enough because people are making assumptions that are not intended. Of course, read the defense and adjust to that. And of course, do progressions according to the play call.Funkster wrote:I think that's a terrible fan inspired idea. No coach is going to tell TRU that. I would say the play called dictates his progression. He should follow through that particular plays natural progression. Then read the defense accordingly. When you start to predetermine what you're going to do, trouble will soon follow.
Let me modify what I said earlier with the following statement. Run plays and read defenses as you have been taught with the simple exception... Don't throw against the #1 CBs, because our team of #3 WRs won't be able to beat them.
By the way... Other teams do that all the time to us. How often do you see throws toward Amukamara compared to Fuller? But it's a dumb idea because I said it?
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 342 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
You're not thinking thru what I said. If you have the outside guy going deep and another short crosser going to the same side, you figure who the #1 is covering and the other WR is a progression option. Same with a bunch formation. You take the #1 guy out of the picture and go thru the other options.Boris13c wrote:I disagree, as your scenario would have him dropping back and automatically dismissing 1 side of the field from consideration and per-determining where he is going to go with the ball
So you have 4 guys going out and one of those is covered by #1. So you progress thru the other 3. How is that a predetermination?
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Thanks for clearing up what you're talking about. I still don't think you want to teach your rookie QB bad habits, which is what ignoring a side is. Just because a QB isn't targeting the #1 side, doesn't necessarily mean he's ignoring it. He is simply looking for indicators and moving on. I see what you're saying but it boils down to teaching your rookie QB good habits and what you're suggesting isn't sound fundamentally.Mikefive wrote:I guess I didn't explain myself thoroughly enough because people are making assumptions that are not intended. Of course, read the defense and adjust to that. And of course, do progressions according to the play call.Funkster wrote:I think that's a terrible fan inspired idea. No coach is going to tell TRU that. I would say the play called dictates his progression. He should follow through that particular plays natural progression. Then read the defense accordingly. When you start to predetermine what you're going to do, trouble will soon follow.
Let me modify what I said earlier with the following statement. Run plays and read defenses as you have been taught with the simple exception... Don't throw against the #1 CBs, because our team of #3 WRs won't be able to beat them.
By the way... Other teams do that all the time to us. How often do you see throws toward Amukamara compared to Fuller? But it's a dumb idea because I said it?
To add, the real problem is better play calling that gets him into a rhythm. He is holding the ball too long and is not throwing on time. I feel getting him into a rhythm early on will help out everything from his mechanics to the O-line.
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 342 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
So you're saying that what I said above was just throw to the RBs?46Blitz wrote:Sadly, this is exactly what Glennon was doing. Not bothering with anyone else but just dumping off to the RBs. What is not known, is if the coaches had anything to do with it.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 342 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
Here's another part of my thinking... Yes, it's not optimal. But in my view, Biscuit isn't doing a good job with 4-5 reads right now. So to reduce that number by 1 makes it easier for him by reducing the number AND taking a mismatch out of the picture.Funkster wrote:Thanks for clearing up what you're talking about. I still don't think you want to teach your rookie QB bad habits, which is what ignoring a side is. Just because a QB isn't targeting the #1 side, doesn't necessarily mean he's ignoring it. He is simply looking for indicators and moving on. I see what you're saying but it boils down to teaching your rookie QB good habits and what you're suggesting isn't sound fundamentally.Mikefive wrote:I guess I didn't explain myself thoroughly enough because people are making assumptions that are not intended. Of course, read the defense and adjust to that. And of course, do progressions according to the play call.Funkster wrote:I think that's a terrible fan inspired idea. No coach is going to tell TRU that. I would say the play called dictates his progression. He should follow through that particular plays natural progression. Then read the defense accordingly. When you start to predetermine what you're going to do, trouble will soon follow.
Let me modify what I said earlier with the following statement. Run plays and read defenses as you have been taught with the simple exception... Don't throw against the #1 CBs, because our team of #3 WRs won't be able to beat them.
By the way... Other teams do that all the time to us. How often do you see throws toward Amukamara compared to Fuller? But it's a dumb idea because I said it?
To add, the real problem is better play calling that gets him into a rhythm. He is holding the ball too long and is not throwing on time. I feel getting him into a rhythm early on will help out everything from his mechanics to the O-line.
You want Loggains to make his playcalling to get Biscuit into a rhythm. I like that too. But do you think that leopard is going to change his spots? Also, you rightly dislike that he holds the ball too long. But won't having fewer reads help him hold the ball less?
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20614
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 222 times
- Been thanked: 787 times
You can't teach a QB to ignore a receiver/side of the field in the scope of an offensive play/progressions.Mikefive wrote:Here's something I'd be telling him...
On any drop back, know that your receivers aren't going to beat the #1 CBs and not the #2s mostly. So in your pre-snap, identify where the #1s are and the coverage if you can or make your best guess and whichever WR is going to be covered by the #1 (unless it's a rub route that would create space), just don't even bother looking that way. Attack the 2's 3's and other defenders. That'll give you fewer options to process.
What do you think of that?
It's a terrible idea... you're essentially telling the defensive coordinator that side of the field is shut down and you can roll coverage over to the other receivers. Ignoring all that, it's still a really bad habit to teach to a young QB in a read/progression offense like this.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
No.Mikefive wrote:So you're saying that what I said above was just throw to the RBs?46Blitz wrote:Sadly, this is exactly what Glennon was doing. Not bothering with anyone else but just dumping off to the RBs. What is not known, is if the coaches had anything to do with it.
And Yes.
It's that stupid game plan that didn't go so well for Glennon in which also got him benched. To be fair, he didn't have the ability to do otherwise. But Trubisky has the potential and has shown he can make those throws down field. Being that he is "in training" and development, I say if he can learn and get the job done with these WRs he will be on fire if he gets a legit weapon or two. Screw it, let him be challenged and let him challenge. He will only get better even if he makes a mistake or two.
Essentially yes, but again, I don't want to ingrain bad habits into my rookie QB. You have to think longevity when grooming a potential franchise QB. I know you can limit reads systematically. For example, how about a bubble screen on first down? How about spreading the receivers out and working rub routes?
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20614
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 222 times
- Been thanked: 787 times
Exactly, or sprinkle in some God damned RPOs like the kid did a bit in college. I mean my God, this has to be the stupidest approach to developing a QB that I've seen in the past couple seasons. Maybe the Rams and their static bullshit offense last season was worse -- maybe.Funkster wrote:Essentially yes, but again, I don't want to ingrain bad habits into my rookie QB. You have to think longevity when grooming a potential franchise QB. I know you can limit reads systematically. For example, how about a bubble screen on first down? How about spreading the receivers out and working rub routes?
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
BTW, what do you guys think they do in the film room and during game planning sessions. Of course they look to stay away from bad mismatches and exploits they can take advantage of. That's what football is all about.
I understand what you are saying MikeFive, but think you have it spelled out badly.
They already do these things, But we don't really have a #1 WR on this team, so doubt a true shutdown CB is locked in on anyone specific anyway. You can however call plays to stay away from where you think is one of their strengths. That's exactly what they already do. But if for some reason they change their coverage, you can't just change who your first read is because the other reads may be behind. Some routes take longer to develop, some reads may be dictated after the first read etc.
Let's just say you have a safety playing Zone on the right side of the field. Your #1 read is your wideout to the right and he is running a go route. You also have a TE running a skinny post down the middle as a #2 read. Both reads depend on that safety and how he reacts. Let's just say the safety bites on the TE leaving the #1 WR one on one down the sideline. Do you still stick to forcing it to your "2nd read" because your afraid of that #1 CB even though it's the correct read? Even though it's a TE with underneath and over the top coverage? By this time, the pocket is collapsing. Your indecisive because you were told not to throw in the direction of the #1 CB. Now it damage control and your scrambling, your looking for your underneath outlet but since you moved from the pocket your out of position to make the toss.
Then you have to ask, Why didn't I just go to the original #1 read when I saw the FS bite on the post and my guy was shoulder to shoulder with that CB? That could have been a huge play...... That's right, my coach (who may not be back next year) told me to stay away from the #1 CB......
I understand what you are saying MikeFive, but think you have it spelled out badly.
They already do these things, But we don't really have a #1 WR on this team, so doubt a true shutdown CB is locked in on anyone specific anyway. You can however call plays to stay away from where you think is one of their strengths. That's exactly what they already do. But if for some reason they change their coverage, you can't just change who your first read is because the other reads may be behind. Some routes take longer to develop, some reads may be dictated after the first read etc.
Let's just say you have a safety playing Zone on the right side of the field. Your #1 read is your wideout to the right and he is running a go route. You also have a TE running a skinny post down the middle as a #2 read. Both reads depend on that safety and how he reacts. Let's just say the safety bites on the TE leaving the #1 WR one on one down the sideline. Do you still stick to forcing it to your "2nd read" because your afraid of that #1 CB even though it's the correct read? Even though it's a TE with underneath and over the top coverage? By this time, the pocket is collapsing. Your indecisive because you were told not to throw in the direction of the #1 CB. Now it damage control and your scrambling, your looking for your underneath outlet but since you moved from the pocket your out of position to make the toss.
Then you have to ask, Why didn't I just go to the original #1 read when I saw the FS bite on the post and my guy was shoulder to shoulder with that CB? That could have been a huge play...... That's right, my coach (who may not be back next year) told me to stay away from the #1 CB......
- o-pus #40 in B major
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2793
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 2468 times
- Been thanked: 254 times
and I thought the regular news was depressing
There is a GM named Poles
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 342 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
Cool. I like that you gave me an example.46Blitz wrote:BTW, what do you guys think they do in the film room and during game planning sessions. Of course they look to stay away from bad mismatches and exploits they can take advantage of. That's what football is all about.
I understand what you are saying MikeFive, but think you have it spelled out badly.
They already do these things, But we don't really have a #1 WR on this team, so doubt a true shutdown CB is locked in on anyone specific anyway. You can however call plays to stay away from where you think is one of their strengths. That's exactly what they already do. But if for some reason they change their coverage, you can't just change who your first read is because the other reads may be behind. Some routes take longer to develop, some reads may be dictated after the first read etc.
Let's just say you have a safety playing Zone on the right side of the field. Your #1 read is your wideout to the right and he is running a go route. You also have a TE running a skinny post down the middle as a #2 read. Both reads depend on that safety and how he reacts. Let's just say the safety bites on the TE leaving the #1 WR one on one down the sideline. Do you still stick to forcing it to your "2nd read" because your afraid of that #1 CB even though it's the correct read? Even though it's a TE with underneath and over the top coverage? By this time, the pocket is collapsing. Your indecisive because you were told not to throw in the direction of the #1 CB. Now it damage control and your scrambling, your looking for your underneath outlet but since you moved from the pocket your out of position to make the toss.
Then you have to ask, Why didn't I just go to the original #1 read when I saw the FS bite on the post and my guy was shoulder to shoulder with that CB? That could have been a huge play...... That's right, my coach (who may not be back next year) told me to stay away from the #1 CB......
You did make a good point earlier about a #1 not being locked up on a particular guy with our team. But I tried to say that during pre-snap, anticipate which of our guys will be covered by the #1 and you know where not to go.
My basic thinking on this is that a #1 CB on any of our WRs is a mismatch. I'm really not sure why people think I'm a fool for saying that. On your example with a post, skinny post and an underneath... I tend to think that only 3 targets out is pretty light. A lot of the time, you'd have more. So I guess I can see with only 3, 2 reads isn't much to do. That leads to how I think your example would play out. If you've been directed to not challenge #1, you give it a glance, look to the middle for the TE and probably just check it down. That's faster than taking a full read, not slower. But commonly, there's another read in there.
I think you made the best point against my strategy when you pointed out that if they change coverage--or for that matter, young Biscuit mis-assesses the coverage pre-snap--then you're missing a potentially reasonable option and spending time assessing a bad matchup because #1 didn't end up where he was expected to be.
To your last point, maybe names make my point better. If you have Stephon Gilmore running down the field in man coverage with Kendall Wright, is that really where you want to throw the ball? Sure, Gilmore could slip or trip or get tangled up. But generally, that's a losing proposition. At least that's the way I see it.
Thanks for your detailed analysis.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20614
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 222 times
- Been thanked: 787 times
Pretty good read from Moon Mullin:
http://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/bears/ ... rve-really" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.nbcsports.com/chicago/bears/ ... rve-really" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29880
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1995 times
lol, what isbotfly10 wrote:lol, so ridiculous
- Boris13c
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 15969
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
- Location: The Bear Nebula
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
yes he was ... and I am still thankful today of his days as a productive member of the BearsG08 wrote:This guy?
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
George Carlin