Houston/Young in Bears Plans for 2016

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29940
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2031 times

By John Mullin May 22, 2016 10:15 PM

BEARS SOUNDING LIKE HOUSTON, YOUNG IN ’16 PLANS

While the Bears cut ties with veterans Matt Forte, Antrel Rolle and Matt Slauson sooner rather than later this offseason, they have done nothing to hint that the immediate futures of outside linebackers Lamarr Houston and Willie Young project to be other than Chicago.

Just the opposite, in fact. Despite chatter that the Bears were shopping various veterans in the days around the draft, reports have the Bears not only open to extending Young’s contract, but also doing nothing with Houston and his nearly $6 million price tag for 2016. And John Fox is sounding like anything but a head coach who’s done with either edge threat.

“In year two, a lot of times there’s a big jump from freshman to sophomore, year one to year two, just in the scheme,” Fox said during the Bears’ rookie minicamp. “Two of our outside linebackers [Houston, Young] a year ago were coming off major injuries and really didn’t have an off-season. And they were making the transition from 4-3 ends earlier in their career to acclimating to a 3-4 outside linebacker.

“They’re going to have a full off-season this time around. So they were, and really everybody out there was, kind of new at outside linebacker because we got two new guys in free agency that we brought in, so there will be some growing pains.”

As the Bears headed into this offseason, with its Combine, draft and sundry transactions, the futures of Houston and Young were subjects of speculation. Team-leading sack totals (eight for Houston, 6.5 for Young) notwithstanding, the combination of salaries and age (Young turning 31 in September) put both at risk on a team looking to get younger and faster on defense.

Now, even with the expenditure of draft capital on Leonard Floyd, a decidedly Young-like outside pass rusher, the Bears do not appear inclined to let go of proven pass rushers.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20672
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 234 times
Been thanked: 815 times

This is a very good thing.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13725
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:23 am
Location: Sittin' at a bar on the inside
Been thanked: 1 time

Superbowl Trophies come in waves.....as in 'waves of pass rushers'

That's why Rodgers. Warner, and Brees each have only one Lombardi and Flacco and Eli each have two.

Look..it took the league's best defense once and Rex Grosseman another time to get Peyton two championships.
Image
User avatar
crueltyabc
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5136
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
Location: Dallas TX
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 235 times

I see this as a signal that Fox and Pace expect this team to win some games next year. It's not just rebuilding when you keep (fairly) expensive older veterans around.
xyt in the discord chats
User avatar
RING4CHI
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5235
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: Ames, IA

DaDitka wrote: Look..it took the league's best defense once and the Bears defense allowing 430 yards another time to get Peyton two championships.
FIFY.
"Every team needs badasses." - Dan Hampton
User avatar
DaDitka
Hall of Famer
Posts: 13725
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 6:23 am
Location: Sittin' at a bar on the inside
Been thanked: 1 time

RING4CHI wrote:
DaDitka wrote: Look..it took the league's best defense once and the Bears defense allowing 430 yards another time to get Peyton two championships.
FIFY.

Now come on...since when have we let the facts get in the way of a good story ;)

That said.....the 430 yards surrendered does back up my initial point even better.
Image
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25191
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 945 times

Thing is that neither of these guys are terribly old and have proven at one or multiple points in their careers that they are good. Why get rid of these guys unless there's a blatant cap crunch (doesn't appear to be one yet) just to let some other team harness their talent?
Image
Post Reply