Look, you're the one who laughed at my post about Loveland's scoring potential. And of course we had a pile on to go along with that. You guys shoot I get to shoot back with my own explanation.

And.....if you have a personal problem with me let's do it in a PM not here. That's how I moderate ...

wab wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:59 pm If the Bears would have taken Loveland at 39 I would have been beside myself with excitement.

But 10 is lunacy.

IF he contributes to this offense like LaPorta has to Detroit's will that matter because we wouldn't have gotten him in round two.

Oh Jeezus Christ. Do I have to do everything for you two?

Look at LaPorta's scoring in Detroit. 17 tds in two seasons. NOW do you get it?


You aren’t having the best couple of days around here so maybe just don’t.


Look, you're the one who laughed at my post about Loveland's scoring ...

Otis Day wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 9:43 pm Bears fans always need something to bitch about.

Ain't that the truth. Now we gotta have two separate bars set up here.

This one serves only shots and beers.

The whine bar is in the back of the room for the rest of you.

LaPorta averaged 1.25 TDs a season in college.

Still - its going to take me a minute to process this pick.


And LaPorta went 34th. Not 10th.


Who the phuc cares. It was a different draft with different players and different opportunities.

The kid hasn't played one down of football in the ...

lol

He averaged 3 touchdowns a season in college.


LaPorta averaged 1.25 TDs a season in college.

Still - its going to take me a minute to process this pick.


Oh Jeezus Christ. Do I have to do everything for you two?

Look at LaPorta's scoring in Detroit. 17 tds in two seasons. NOW do ...

It's his better version of Sam LaPorta. Loveland is a TD maker for him.


lol

He averaged 3 touchdowns a season in college.


Look at LaPorta's scoring in the NFL wab not Loveland's in college. :frustrated: That's what I meant. He's not playing for Michigan any longer now he's playing for ...

I agree. There really isn't much difference between how Warren and Loveland were graded and they're ranked #1 and #2 TE. Warren gets a slight nod because he's a more traditional inline TE. If we didn't already have Kmet and feel good with him in that spot then Warren is the guy to take. But ...

Loveland it is. Jeezus these guys on The Bears Draft party can't get off their whining about not taking an OT. I still don't get it. If we didn't already have two LT already I can see it but it was not a necessity.


With 3 less than spectacular OTs taken, to take Simmons or Conerly at 10 would ...

artbest01 wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 8:22 pm Guarantee this was a Ben Johnson pick all the way

quote="Heinz D." post_id=422647 time=1745543768 user_id=2570]
Goodbye, Poles. And good riddance.

[/quote]

It's his better version of Sam LaPorta. Loveland is a TD maker for him.

Gonna need to slice some cheese. The whining party has already begun. LOL

Loveland it is. Jeezus these guys on The Bears Draft party can't get off their whining about not taking an OT. I still don't get it. If we didn't already have two LT already I can see it but it was not a necessity.

Does NOLA take a QB?

Surprise pick by Carolina.

Walker to Carolina. Lookin' more like Warren to the Bears or they trade down.

I'm thinking Membou to the Jets.

All of the speculation about Jeanty goes for naught. He ends up right where we all thought he would go to begin with.

Well.....we didn't get a trade done and Campbell goes to NE as expected. LV up next.

First big trade. So....are we dealing with Cleveland for #5 now?

This Discord is about as useless as tits on a boar. I guess it doesn't like me because I can't get on so phuc it. I'll post on the draft thread instead. Old guys like me prefer that anyway.

I would be upset if we trade up for Jeanty. We can have all the pretty weapons in the world but if we dont protect Caleb and further solidfy our line it is for naught.


We just traded for an All-Pro guard and probably one of the top three C in the league.


Mark him down as having been in ...

For the people who are pooh-poohing the idea of trading up for Jeanty. You are probably the SAME PEOPLE who have been complaining that the Bears don't have a modern offense, don't score enough points, or "we would have won that game if we could do anything in the red zone."

Either you want the ...

If there's any substance to the trade rumors I like the idea but would not willing give up our 5th. Worst case scenario I offer a 2026 pick instead. My guess is our target is Jeanty but Graham and Membou would also be there. And since one of those 2nds would've been used on a RB anyway using it to ...

I didn't say that, and you know it.


https://media0.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExNmZtdno1ejA0OWZzcmExd2docWM0Yno1YmVsYWhpZHc5NTZmZW8wdiZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/EouEzI5bBR8uk/giphy.gif


Lance Zierlein compares him to Tomlinson *shrug*

https://www.nfl.com/prospects ...

Well.....here we go. The answers to all of our questions will come soon.

If there's any substance to the trade rumors I like the idea but would not willing give up our 5th. Worst case scenario I offer a 2026 pick instead. My guess is our target is Jeanty but Graham and Membou would also be there. And since one of those 2nds would've been used on a RB anyway using it to ...

Ryan Poles thinks he’s smarter than everyone else when it comes to oline play. He’s proven that time after time…only getting proven guy now because he’s one bad season away from the unemployment line. IMO, he still thinks Kiran is his LT of the future. If he does go LT, I see another mid round ...

Word is that the Bears have offered the Jags 10 and 39 for 5 and 107. Jags want the Bears to add 148.


Bears trade: 10 and 39 (1810 points depending upon which chart you use)

for

Ashton Jeanty, and #107 (1780 points) but they want us to add #148 which is worth 32.3 points.


1842.3 would be ...

Gotta disagree here on the depth of this draft. NFL guys are saying you can find quality RBs well into round 5.

I think Kaleb Johnson is an excellent fit in this offense (assuming we will be heavy outside zone, which is what I am expecting).

This is going to be so much fucking fun, are you ...

wab wrote: Thu Apr 24, 2025 8:42 am Word is that the Bears have offered the Jags 10 and 39 for 5 and 107. Jags want the Bears to add 148.

That would already be a 20% premium for the #5 pick without our 5th. How bad do we want the deal?