Preseason Week 2: Bears "win" 24-23 over Denver

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

The Marshall Plan wrote:It doesn't take much to convince me to trade for an elite player. I wanted the Bears to trade for Marcus Peters.

With Mack, and anybody else, it all depends on the cost and from what I've read online (take it for what its worth) we're looking at multiple picks similar to the Jared Allen trade. One first and two third round picks.

No way. Especially not with the new rules in the league. I'm not saying to avoid having a push rush period, but I'm not sure I want an elite guy that the refs might key in on. I could be totally wrong, but in the same way the big hit rules negated having a home run hitting safety I'm thinking a top tier pass rusher isn't something you want to tie up cap dollars on anymore. Yes, draft a guy, but I'm not sure about the position given the new rules.

Good points.

I read somewhere that Mack hasn’t missed a single game in 3 season and has had double digit sacks each year. He very well could be the type of player that could be the finishing piece. The bears need to seize an opportunity like this, they don’t come around to often. The team has an oft injured Flyod, Lynch and a perennial back up (but fan/team favorite) in Acho as edge rushers. That doesn’t really scream confidence to me.

On the new helmet rule, do you think the league told the refs to over exaggerate the rule during pre season to set a precedent?
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
bearsfaninaz
Head Coach
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Mikefive wrote:
bearsfaninaz wrote:it is apparent leblanc is to stupid to return punts. 2 now inside the 5 he's fielded.
That can be taught. But oi. He was bad.
I've known that since I played in middle School. If he doesn't know that by now he never will IMO.
User avatar
bearsfaninaz
Head Coach
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Mikefive wrote:Is Mizzell a practice squad guy they bring in if Cohen goes down? He sure isn't a guy you want to hand off to.

Speaking of guys wearing 33, Tolliver does a lot of good things at CB. I don't think he makes the team, but definitely a practice squad/bring him back to camp next year guy.

I never heard of Kasim Edebali #57, but that guy is making plays against the Walmart guys. He did in earlier games too. He is catching onto things faster than Irving did last year. But he's only 6'2". :-(
57 caught my eye yesterday not because of his sack, but because two plays in a row the LT had serious hold it straight out tackle of him that wasn't called. If he can get pressure consistently is worth keeping him around.
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

Funkster wrote:
The Marshall Plan wrote:It doesn't take much to convince me to trade for an elite player. I wanted the Bears to trade for Marcus Peters.

With Mack, and anybody else, it all depends on the cost and from what I've read online (take it for what its worth) we're looking at multiple picks similar to the Jared Allen trade. One first and two third round picks.

No way. Especially not with the new rules in the league. I'm not saying to avoid having a push rush period, but I'm not sure I want an elite guy that the refs might key in on. I could be totally wrong, but in the same way the big hit rules negated having a home run hitting safety I'm thinking a top tier pass rusher isn't something you want to tie up cap dollars on anymore. Yes, draft a guy, but I'm not sure about the position given the new rules.

Good points.

I read somewhere that Mack hasn’t missed a single game in 3 season and has had double digit sacks each year. He very well could be the type of player that could be the finishing piece. The bears need to seize an opportunity like this, they don’t come around to often. The team has an oft injured Flyod, Lynch and a perennial back up (but fan/team favorite) in Acho as edge rushers. That doesn’t really scream confidence to me.

On the new helmet rule, do you think the league told the refs to over exaggerate the rule during pre season to set a precedent?
There is no denying Mack's talent or the impact he would have on the Bears. The "finishing piece" is a good choice of words in terms of cementing an elite defense. This defense definitely needs THAT GUY(S) who makes the offense shit themselves. I liked Peters for that reason and others. Mack easily serves that need. We can't count on a Top 10 defense every year that has no Pro Bowlers.

My concerns are the cost and the true value given the new rules the league has.

I hope you're 100% right that the refs are overly sensitive with that rule in the preseason. In fact, I heard a comment during the TV broadcast that the refs were encouraged to call that penalty so that they'd have tape to review before week 1 of the regular season.

If the circumstances were exactly the same, but we had the rules of 10 years ago, I could be easily convinced to trade for Mack.
Image
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6869
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 388 times
Been thanked: 700 times

This comes up every time a talented player is rumored available.


You can pay top dollar for a guy
You can trade significant picks for a guy

But you DON'T DO BOTH
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
Knuckles
Player of the Month
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 1:49 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Moriarty wrote:This comes up every time a talented player is rumored available.


You can pay top dollar for a guy
You can trade significant picks for a guy

But you DON'T DO BOTH
Isn't that how most trades are? You give up picks and take over the salary... Not every trade is like how Washington was helping out another team like Denver... That was a gift horse not the norm.

Giving up 2 1sts sucks at draft time but really for a proven pass rusher I would easily give up 2 because you're not guaranteed 2 1sts would net you someone that 'gets it' like Mack. Pass rush against Aaron Rodgers for instance... If he can get AR to think about the rush compared to the past 10 years of garbage he's seen on the Bears is worth every penny IMHO. We don't have that many holes to fill other than depth at this point and a great PR specialist. I'm so FN sick of watching that guy smile and have a good old time against us. Makes me sick as a fan of this team. Just my 2 cents... >.<

I find it hard to believe we would be in the position to draft Bosa for instance this year... And what we would have to give up to do so would be more than what is spent on Mack. PFF had both our starting tackles (the only other spot that's somewhat of a need) as being solid... Not spectacular but you could do a lot worse and even then how many Ts fail or become decent interior linemen out of college? Proven guys are worth the price at pass rush and QB... that's why they're the highest paid positions in the league.
”Damn -- Khalil Mack had another strip sack?” Gruden asked rhetorically, shaking his head at the Oakland Raiders assistant coaches in his midst. “Are you ... kidding me?”
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

Knuckles wrote:
Moriarty wrote:This comes up every time a talented player is rumored available.


You can pay top dollar for a guy
You can trade significant picks for a guy

But you DON'T DO BOTH
Isn't that how most trades are? You give up picks and take over the salary... Not every trade is like how Washington was helping out another team like Denver... That was a gift horse not the norm.

Giving up 2 1sts sucks at draft time but really for a proven pass rusher I would easily give up 2 because you're not guaranteed 2 1sts would net you someone that 'gets it' like Mack. Pass rush against Aaron Rodgers for instance... If he can get AR to think about the rush compared to the past 10 years of garbage he's seen on the Bears is worth every penny IMHO. We don't have that many holes to fill other than depth at this point other than a great PR specialist. I'm so FN sick of watching that guy smile and have a good old time against us. Makes me sick as a fan of this team. Just my 2 cents... >.<

I find it hard to believe we would be in the position to draft Bosa for instance this year... And what we would have to give up to do so would be more than what is spent on Mack.

I’m right there with you! Give up a 1st for a potential stud or for solidified stud? The only reason I would even consider a Mack trade is the bears are stacked with young talent on relatively cheap contracts and the have plenty of cap to absorb Mack’s new contract. I think he would be the difference maker!
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7375
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 567 times
Been thanked: 1000 times

" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
User avatar
Sugashane
Player of the Month
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:35 am
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 21 times

I'm fine with trading picks. Let's be real, White is an injury bust, Floyd has been ok as a passrusher but that is it, Trubisky has a ton of potential but needs a lot of coaching up, and Smith is a rookie ILB. Can't make any judgement on Tru or Smith yet but I'm hopeful.

Since Urlacher (and before Pace) we have Olsen, Harris, Fuller and Long as the only guys who haven't been abortions on the field. That is a crap history of busts. I'd trade the picks for Mack and pay him.
Image
User avatar
Knuckles
Player of the Month
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 1:49 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Funkster wrote:
Knuckles wrote:
Moriarty wrote:This comes up every time a talented player is rumored available.


You can pay top dollar for a guy
You can trade significant picks for a guy

But you DON'T DO BOTH
Isn't that how most trades are? You give up picks and take over the salary... Not every trade is like how Washington was helping out another team like Denver... That was a gift horse not the norm.

Giving up 2 1sts sucks at draft time but really for a proven pass rusher I would easily give up 2 because you're not guaranteed 2 1sts would net you someone that 'gets it' like Mack. Pass rush against Aaron Rodgers for instance... If he can get AR to think about the rush compared to the past 10 years of garbage he's seen on the Bears is worth every penny IMHO. We don't have that many holes to fill other than depth at this point other than a great PR specialist. I'm so FN sick of watching that guy smile and have a good old time against us. Makes me sick as a fan of this team. Just my 2 cents... >.<

I find it hard to believe we would be in the position to draft Bosa for instance this year... And what we would have to give up to do so would be more than what is spent on Mack.

I’m right there with you! Give up a 1st for a potential stud or for solidified stud? The only reason I would even consider a Mack trade is the bears are stacked with young talent on relatively cheap contracts and the have plenty of cap to absorb Mack’s new contract. I think he would be the difference maker!
Mack would make Floyd, Goldman and Hicks that much better... It would be one of the top dlines in the league instantly. Maybe knock off a good 1/2 second to 1 second off of the average time AR has to pass the ball each play and I would love to see that. That's FN HUGE lol... Wipe that GD smirk off his face!
”Damn -- Khalil Mack had another strip sack?” Gruden asked rhetorically, shaking his head at the Oakland Raiders assistant coaches in his midst. “Are you ... kidding me?”
User avatar
Knuckles
Player of the Month
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 1:49 pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Sugashane wrote:I'm fine with trading picks. Let's be real, White is an injury bust, Floyd has been ok as a passrusher but that is it, Trubisky has a ton of potential but needs a lot of coaching up, and Smith is a rookie ILB. Can't make any judgement on Tru or Smith yet but I'm hopeful.

Since Urlacher (and before Pace) we have Olsen, Harris, Fuller and Long as the only guys who haven't been abortions on the field. That is a crap history of busts. I'd trade the picks for Mack and pay him.
Exactly! A proven guy is worth it... We can't get all caught up in the Cutler deal. QB is hard to find and cost a ton if there's someone that even sort of resembles a starter but a guy like Mack is easier to judge because there's just too many variables in a QB like OC for instance and talent around them like WRs ect. A pass rusher either you have it or you don't (for the most part). It's easier to predict what he can do unless the player himself has character issues and I don't see that with Mack (at least what I've read).

I don't blame the Bears for spending what they did on Cutler... Hell I blame them more for not building the team and coaching staff around him more than what he did as QB. I still don't like Jay I think he didn't want to be coached anyway (tell Martz to go F himself for instance). But you don't have to look much further than what Peppers did in GB at the age he did it to see that what even a decent pass rusher can do to a dline if he's above average and solid. Mack is in his prime and a FN beast! Who's the last guy on this team that got more than 10 sacks a year? I seriously can't remember maybe Tommie Harris?
”Damn -- Khalil Mack had another strip sack?” Gruden asked rhetorically, shaking his head at the Oakland Raiders assistant coaches in his midst. “Are you ... kidding me?”
User avatar
Sugashane
Player of the Month
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:35 am
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Knuckles wrote:
Sugashane wrote:I'm fine with trading picks. Let's be real, White is an injury bust, Floyd has been ok as a passrusher but that is it, Trubisky has a ton of potential but needs a lot of coaching up, and Smith is a rookie ILB. Can't make any judgement on Tru or Smith yet but I'm hopeful.

Since Urlacher (and before Pace) we have Olsen, Harris, Fuller and Long as the only guys who haven't been abortions on the field. That is a crap history of busts. I'd trade the picks for Mack and pay him.
Exactly! A proven guy is worth it... We can't get all caught up in the Cutler deal. QB is hard to find and cost a ton if there's someone that even sort of resembles a starter but a guy like Mack is easier to judge because there's just too many variables in a QB like OC for instance and talent around them like WRs ect. A pass rusher either you have it or you don't (for the most part). It's easier to predict what he can do unless the player himself has character issues and I don't see that with Mack (at least what I've read).

I don't blame the Bears for spending what they did on Cutler... Hell I blame them more for not building the team and coaching staff around him more than what he did as QB. I still don't like Jay I think he didn't want to be coached anyway (tell Martz to go F himself for instance). But you don't have to look much further than what Peppers did in GB at the age he did it to see that what even a decent pass rusher can do to a dline if he's above average and solid. Mack is in his prime and a FN beast! Who's the last guy on this team that got more than 10 sacks a year? I seriously can't remember maybe Tommie Harris?
Amen. Going and getting Jay wasn't a bad move, trading away Olsen was. I hate how everyone says "But that 3rd was used to get Marshall!" Who gives a shit? We had another 3rd that was used on Brandon Hardin. Putting Hester as a number one was a disastrous move, having chumps like Roy Williams, Earl Bennett, Kellen Davis, etc to be his offensive cast with an OL that Garza was easily the best lineman on was a garbage move. Rotating has-beens at OC repeatedly was the icing on the cake. Literally every terrible move the Bears COULD have done to ruin Jay... they did. Pace looks like he is doing everything he can to avoid that with his hiring of Nagy and QB-minded coaches and stacking of support cast. Power runner with receiving HB, WR to stretch the field and possession guy with a history of being a #1, TEs to act as safety nets, etc.

Last guy before Pep to get over 10 sacks was Mark freaking Anderson. The Bears' one year wonder got 12 his rookie deal, mostly clean up sacks IIRC. Had one really productive year in NE too.

Getting Mack is the star power we need. We have hopes for Smith, but really we only have Hicks on defense. Fuller has a chance to boom, Amos was damn good, Jackson showed a ton of potential last year, DT is solid-not-great, Goldman is the same, Floyd too, etc. He could make the rest of the defense better, and we have Tru on a rookie deal. THIS is the time to make a play.
Image
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

Sugashane wrote:
Knuckles wrote:
Sugashane wrote:I'm fine with trading picks. Let's be real, White is an injury bust, Floyd has been ok as a passrusher but that is it, Trubisky has a ton of potential but needs a lot of coaching up, and Smith is a rookie ILB. Can't make any judgement on Tru or Smith yet but I'm hopeful.

Since Urlacher (and before Pace) we have Olsen, Harris, Fuller and Long as the only guys who haven't been abortions on the field. That is a crap history of busts. I'd trade the picks for Mack and pay him.
Exactly! A proven guy is worth it... We can't get all caught up in the Cutler deal. QB is hard to find and cost a ton if there's someone that even sort of resembles a starter but a guy like Mack is easier to judge because there's just too many variables in a QB like OC for instance and talent around them like WRs ect. A pass rusher either you have it or you don't (for the most part). It's easier to predict what he can do unless the player himself has character issues and I don't see that with Mack (at least what I've read).

I don't blame the Bears for spending what they did on Cutler... Hell I blame them more for not building the team and coaching staff around him more than what he did as QB. I still don't like Jay I think he didn't want to be coached anyway (tell Martz to go F himself for instance). But you don't have to look much further than what Peppers did in GB at the age he did it to see that what even a decent pass rusher can do to a dline if he's above average and solid. Mack is in his prime and a FN beast! Who's the last guy on this team that got more than 10 sacks a year? I seriously can't remember maybe Tommie Harris?
Amen. Going and getting Jay wasn't a bad move, trading away Olsen was. I hate how everyone says "But that 3rd was used to get Marshall!" Who gives a shit? We had another 3rd that was used on Brandon Hardin. Putting Hester as a number one was a disastrous move, having chumps like Roy Williams, Earl Bennett, Kellen Davis, etc to be his offensive cast with an OL that Garza was easily the best lineman on was a garbage move. Rotating has-beens at OC repeatedly was the icing on the cake. Literally every terrible move the Bears COULD have done to ruin Jay... they did. Pace looks like he is doing everything he can to avoid that with his hiring of Nagy and QB-minded coaches and stacking of support cast. Power runner with receiving HB, WR to stretch the field and possession guy with a history of being a #1, TEs to act as safety nets, etc.

Last guy before Pep to get over 10 sacks was Mark freaking Anderson. The Bears' one year wonder got 12 his rookie deal, mostly clean up sacks IIRC. Had one really productive year in NE too.

Getting Mack is the star power we need. We have hopes for Smith, but really we only have Hicks on defense. Fuller has a chance to boom, Amos was damn good, Jackson showed a ton of potential last year, DT is solid-not-great, Goldman is the same, Floyd too, etc. He could make the rest of the defense better, and we have Tru on a rookie deal. THIS is the time to make a play.
That's one of the best explanations of the Cutler situation that I've ever read. Cutler took so much shit, but hardly anybody stops to think about the supporting cast, or lackthereof, around him.
Image
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6869
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 388 times
Been thanked: 700 times

Knuckles wrote:
Sugashane wrote:I'm fine with trading picks. Let's be real, White is an injury bust, Floyd has been ok as a passrusher but that is it, Trubisky has a ton of potential but needs a lot of coaching up, and Smith is a rookie ILB. Can't make any judgement on Tru or Smith yet but I'm hopeful.

Since Urlacher (and before Pace) we have Olsen, Harris, Fuller and Long as the only guys who haven't been abortions on the field. That is a crap history of busts. I'd trade the picks for Mack and pay him.
Exactly! A proven guy is worth it...
They aren't. Not even close.

If you don't believe me, go back and make a list of every veteran player traded for a R1 pick or more since the catastrophic Herschel Walker trade of 1989. Figure out whether the team that gave picks wound up happy with the deal or regretting it.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5192
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 278 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:It doesn't take much to convince me to trade for an elite player. I wanted the Bears to trade for Marcus Peters.

With Mack, and anybody else, it all depends on the cost and from what I've read online (take it for what its worth) we're looking at multiple picks similar to the Jared Allen trade. One first and two third round picks.

No way. Especially not with the new rules in the league. I'm not saying to avoid having a push rush period, but I'm not sure I want an elite guy that the refs might key in on. I could be totally wrong, but in the same way the big hit rules negated having a home run hitting safety I'm thinking a top tier pass rusher isn't something you want to tie up cap dollars on anymore. Yes, draft a guy, but I'm not sure about the position given the new rules.
I heard that Oakland wanted 2 #1s. I wouldn't do that. And I'm not one to trade #1s because you don't trade #1s and pay big $$$ as that screws your cap. But in this case, I'd have to think about it if it's just a #1, although I wish I was more confident about this year. I'd be far more inclined to trade a pick in the 20's as opposed to one in the lower teens. I did predict a 7-9 year this year and still feel pretty good about that.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
Sugashane
Player of the Month
Posts: 258
Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:35 am
Has thanked: 39 times
Been thanked: 21 times

Moriarty wrote:
Knuckles wrote:
Sugashane wrote:I'm fine with trading picks. Let's be real, White is an injury bust, Floyd has been ok as a passrusher but that is it, Trubisky has a ton of potential but needs a lot of coaching up, and Smith is a rookie ILB. Can't make any judgement on Tru or Smith yet but I'm hopeful.

Since Urlacher (and before Pace) we have Olsen, Harris, Fuller and Long as the only guys who haven't been abortions on the field. That is a crap history of busts. I'd trade the picks for Mack and pay him.
Exactly! A proven guy is worth it...
They aren't. Not even close.

If you don't believe me, go back and make a list of every veteran player traded for a R1 pick or more since the catastrophic Herschel Walker trade of 1989. Figure out whether the team that gave picks wound up happy with the deal or regretting it.
Not going back that far, but since 2000 it hasn't been terrible, especially since the majority of 1st rounders don't pan out. Jared Allen was fantastic for MIN (the most like this scenario), Keyshawn Johnson won a Super Bowl with the Bucs, John Abraham was damn good for the Falcons for a long time, Jason Peters was the best LT in the NFL for years for the Eagles, etc.

This isn't Bledsoe, Trent Green or Carson Palmer on the downtrend, someone with Randy Moss' attitude issues, etc. This is a top 5 player on the defensive side of the ball IMO. This isn't an act of desperation like Bradford to the Vikings.

It is easy to find failure in the NFL. Look at the majority of our 1sts since 2000. Look at how many FA busts we have had. It is the same throughout the league. Trading picks is a risk but this is safer than landing a stud in the middle of the draft IMO.
Image
User avatar
ramentaschen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 684
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:29 am
Been thanked: 7 times

Since we are talking about defensive linemen:

The Lions just cut DL Cornelius Washington to save money towards their cap. He's not an expensive player and has a history with us. Would the Bears be interested in getting him back for depth if he comes cheap?
Cornelius Washington | Defensive Lineman | #90
Team: Unsigned Free Agent
Age / DOB: (28) / 9/10/1989
Ht / Wt: 6'4' / 280
College: Georgia
Drafted: 2013 / Rd. 6 (188) / CHI

Unsigned Free Agent

Lions released DE Cornelius Washington.
The move saves Detroit $2.7 million in cap space. Washington set career-highs with 24 tackles and 2.5 sacks over 487 defensive snaps last season
Career Stats
Year Tackles Sacks Interceptions Fumb Misc KO Ret Punt Ret
Year Team G Solo Ast Total Sack Yds Yd/Sk Int Yds IntTD Rec TD Frcd Pass D Sfty Yds TD Yds TD
2013 CHI 2 1 0 1 0.0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2014 CHI 13 6 3 9 1.0 1 1.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2015 CHI 1 0 0 0 0.0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
2016 CHI 15 14 6 20 2.0 12 6.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0
2017 DET 15 15 9 24 2.5 12 4.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0
Image
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29880
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1995 times

I used to love me some CornWash but the Bears don't really need him anymore and he's never healthy.
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:
Sugashane wrote:
Knuckles wrote:
Sugashane wrote:I'm fine with trading picks. Let's be real, White is an injury bust, Floyd has been ok as a passrusher but that is it, Trubisky has a ton of potential but needs a lot of coaching up, and Smith is a rookie ILB. Can't make any judgement on Tru or Smith yet but I'm hopeful.

Since Urlacher (and before Pace) we have Olsen, Harris, Fuller and Long as the only guys who haven't been abortions on the field. That is a crap history of busts. I'd trade the picks for Mack and pay him.
Exactly! A proven guy is worth it... We can't get all caught up in the Cutler deal. QB is hard to find and cost a ton if there's someone that even sort of resembles a starter but a guy like Mack is easier to judge because there's just too many variables in a QB like OC for instance and talent around them like WRs ect. A pass rusher either you have it or you don't (for the most part). It's easier to predict what he can do unless the player himself has character issues and I don't see that with Mack (at least what I've read).

I don't blame the Bears for spending what they did on Cutler... Hell I blame them more for not building the team and coaching staff around him more than what he did as QB. I still don't like Jay I think he didn't want to be coached anyway (tell Martz to go F himself for instance). But you don't have to look much further than what Peppers did in GB at the age he did it to see that what even a decent pass rusher can do to a dline if he's above average and solid. Mack is in his prime and a FN beast! Who's the last guy on this team that got more than 10 sacks a year? I seriously can't remember maybe Tommie Harris?
Amen. Going and getting Jay wasn't a bad move, trading away Olsen was. I hate how everyone says "But that 3rd was used to get Marshall!" Who gives a shit? We had another 3rd that was used on Brandon Hardin. Putting Hester as a number one was a disastrous move, having chumps like Roy Williams, Earl Bennett, Kellen Davis, etc to be his offensive cast with an OL that Garza was easily the best lineman on was a garbage move. Rotating has-beens at OC repeatedly was the icing on the cake. Literally every terrible move the Bears COULD have done to ruin Jay... they did. Pace looks like he is doing everything he can to avoid that with his hiring of Nagy and QB-minded coaches and stacking of support cast. Power runner with receiving HB, WR to stretch the field and possession guy with a history of being a #1, TEs to act as safety nets, etc.

Last guy before Pep to get over 10 sacks was Mark freaking Anderson. The Bears' one year wonder got 12 his rookie deal, mostly clean up sacks IIRC. Had one really productive year in NE too.

Getting Mack is the star power we need. We have hopes for Smith, but really we only have Hicks on defense. Fuller has a chance to boom, Amos was damn good, Jackson showed a ton of potential last year, DT is solid-not-great, Goldman is the same, Floyd too, etc. He could make the rest of the defense better, and we have Tru on a rookie deal. THIS is the time to make a play.
That's one of the best explanations of the Cutler situation that I've ever read. Cutler took so much shit, but hardly anybody stops to think about the supporting cast, or lackthereof, around him.

and the return of Cutler to the discussions yet again :lol:

Image
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

I can't let the Cutler years go. I just can't.

And yes, I watch Very Cavallari for the Cutler parts.
Image
User avatar
ramentaschen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 684
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:29 am
Been thanked: 7 times

I didn't know where to put this but I thought it was interesting enough to note and comment on today:
Jets released K Cairo Santos
I remember not too long ago when we signed him still injured (probably), had him play one game for us I think, then IR'd him for the next year so he could be our future kicker.

Another guy we took a risk on and didn't pan out either for us or anyone else.

Injuries, man. Injuries.
Image
Post Reply