Has anyone heard if it is mandatory one game suspension because he bumped a ref? I know this is a homer thought but it didnt seem like it was towards the ref and the way they took forever to decide the call, maybe the felt that way too ( lol wishful thinking ).
Would be nice not to see him miss a game, but I would rather he miss the Miami game than the Patriots game.
Update: Akiem Hicks will NOT be suspended
Moderator: wab
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
I don't think he will get suspended. He doesn't have a history of this stuff. I think the ref was being a little bit of a baby about it, but whatever. The ref was still pushing him away like 10 yards away from the play.
- UOK
- Site Admin
- Posts: 25147
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
- Has thanked: 108 times
- Been thanked: 926 times
There was a kluge of bodies and the ref got shoved because he got involved in the mix. Hicks was seeing red and a tiny man in a zebra coat got in the way. Nothing malicious. Fine for sure, but suspension? I'd hope not.
- AZ_Bearfan
- MVP
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:49 pm
- Location: Mesa, AZ
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 77 times
How about Bilal Nichols coming in and playing pretty well? The depth on this team is so good, Hicks can sit for a half a game and we're still disrupting the backfield.
- AZ_Bearfan
- MVP
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:49 pm
- Location: Mesa, AZ
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 77 times
Hicks took it pretty well. Didn't run around yelling about "unfairness". I appreciate that he sat on the bench instead of causing a scene going in to the locker room.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
I believe there's a some nuance there. He can stay on the bench if he's disqualified, but he has to go to the locker room if he's ejected.AZ_Bearfan wrote:Hicks took it pretty well. Didn't run around yelling about "unfairness". I appreciate that he sat on the bench instead of causing a scene going in to the locker room.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
And yeah, it's going to be tough keeping Nichols off the field.
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
As a former official, if you think initiated contact with you is intentional by a player, it's an automatic ejection no matter how slight and no questions asked. My guess is that he'll get the automatic 1 game suspension, but will appeal and could get the suspension overturned based on if he was pushed or something like that.wab wrote:I don't think he will get suspended. He doesn't have a history of this stuff. I think the ref was being a little bit of a baby about it, but whatever. The ref was still pushing him away like 10 yards away from the play.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
I thought if you were ejected that you had to go to the locker room.AZ_Bearfan wrote:Hicks took it pretty well. Didn't run around yelling about "unfairness". I appreciate that he sat on the bench instead of causing a scene going in to the locker room.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- Atkins&Rebel
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2177
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
But that's a good problem to have! It also makes it easier to have a great D line rotation so guys can go full speed every time they're on the fieldwab wrote:And yeah, it's going to be tough keeping Nichols off the field.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
OK. I missed that.wab wrote:I believe there's a some nuance there. He can stay on the bench if he's disqualified, but he has to go to the locker room if he's ejected.AZ_Bearfan wrote:Hicks took it pretty well. Didn't run around yelling about "unfairness". I appreciate that he sat on the bench instead of causing a scene going in to the locker room.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- LacertineForest
- MVP
- Posts: 1635
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
- Location: Madison, WI
- Has thanked: 1751 times
- Been thanked: 323 times
It was disheartening to see Hicks get ejected, but getting more playing time for young guys is a good thing, especially when you've got a 35-3 lead or whatever it was right before the half.
Yeah, he didn’t leave at first, but I read somewhere that he eventually did and was real P.O’d when he did.cblaz11 wrote:He left the field..and tossed his jersey AND PADS into the stands lol
Bullard made a big stop on a run play also...Nice to see some depth behind Hicks and Goldman.
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
Nichols is a beast. Both him and RRH are going to be good rotational DL. Both have outstanding quickness off of the snap.wab wrote:And yeah, it's going to be tough keeping Nichols off the field.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8411
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 909 times
- Been thanked: 1277 times
I think Nichols is amazing. A guy that big who moves that fast and with that power. Just awesome.AZ_Bearfan wrote:How about Bilal Nichols coming in and playing pretty well? The depth on this team is so good, Hicks can sit for a half a game and we're still disrupting the backfield.
Miller is still my guy but it wouldn't surprise me if Nichols was the best player taken in this draft.
Where was Roquan?
- Bad Flanders
- MVP
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:35 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 6 times
My son was just pointing out the strength everywhere in the roster. He asked what I thought we were going to look for in the next draft and I said I wasn't sure. The more we thought about it the more we decided that... yeah... right tackle... but it's not like there aren't options there. It might actually be a best available situation simply because there are NO glaring holes. Although then I decided they will be looking for some talent to fill holes that the Mack deal will inevitably open due to lack of cap space... but still, this has to be the most complete and deepest roster we've had in quite a while.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
I was thinking about this today too.Bad Flanders wrote:My son was just pointing out the strength everywhere in the roster. He asked what I thought we were going to look for in the next draft and I said I wasn't sure. The more we thought about it the more we decided that... yeah... right tackle... but it's not like there aren't options there. It might actually be a best available situation simply because there are NO glaring holes. Although then I decided they will be looking for some talent to fill holes that the Mack deal will inevitably open due to lack of cap space... but still, this has to be the most complete and deepest roster we've had in quite a while.
S - should they let Amos go.
RB - should they decide to replace Howard
RT - if the Coward experiment doesn't pan out
OG - depth and a future replacement for long
NT - a proper backup for Goldman
CB - if they can't retain Callahan
But aside from maaaaaybe RT, there really isn't a huge "need" spot. Definitely a draft for building quality depth.
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3829
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 603 times
Running around a lot without much to show for it, from what I remember.The Marshall Plan wrote:Where was Roquan?
(I haven't rewatched the game, so I could be off-base.)
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
Covering OJ Howard (until he went out).thunderspirit wrote:Running around a lot without much to show for it, from what I remember.The Marshall Plan wrote:Where was Roquan?
(I haven't rewatched the game, so I could be off-base.)
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
I've watched it a couple of times. He had some pretty good tackles at the line of scrimmage, and was flying around the field. He'll get better as the year goes along, but I think he's playing pretty well for a rookie.thunderspirit wrote:Running around a lot without much to show for it, from what I remember.The Marshall Plan wrote:Where was Roquan?
(I haven't rewatched the game, so I could be off-base.)
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8411
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 909 times
- Been thanked: 1277 times
The right side of the line needs to be addressed. I don't think Massie is that great and Long seems to get injured a lot.wab wrote:I was thinking about this today too.Bad Flanders wrote:My son was just pointing out the strength everywhere in the roster. He asked what I thought we were going to look for in the next draft and I said I wasn't sure. The more we thought about it the more we decided that... yeah... right tackle... but it's not like there aren't options there. It might actually be a best available situation simply because there are NO glaring holes. Although then I decided they will be looking for some talent to fill holes that the Mack deal will inevitably open due to lack of cap space... but still, this has to be the most complete and deepest roster we've had in quite a while.
S - should they let Amos go.
RB - should they decide to replace Howard
RT - if the Coward experiment doesn't pan out
OG - depth and a future replacement for long
NT - a proper backup for Goldman
CB - if they can't retain Callahan
But aside from maaaaaybe RT, there really isn't a huge "need" spot. Definitely a draft for building quality depth.
I think Massie is fine, if completely unspectacular. He’s also most likely gone after this year, so he definitely needs to be replaced.The Marshall Plan wrote:The right side of the line needs to be addressed. I don't think Massie is that great and Long seems to get injured a lot.wab wrote:I was thinking about this today too.Bad Flanders wrote:My son was just pointing out the strength everywhere in the roster. He asked what I thought we were going to look for in the next draft and I said I wasn't sure. The more we thought about it the more we decided that... yeah... right tackle... but it's not like there aren't options there. It might actually be a best available situation simply because there are NO glaring holes. Although then I decided they will be looking for some talent to fill holes that the Mack deal will inevitably open due to lack of cap space... but still, this has to be the most complete and deepest roster we've had in quite a while.
S - should they let Amos go.
RB - should they decide to replace Howard
RT - if the Coward experiment doesn't pan out
OG - depth and a future replacement for long
NT - a proper backup for Goldman
CB - if they can't retain Callahan
But aside from maaaaaybe RT, there really isn't a huge "need" spot. Definitely a draft for building quality depth.
Getting another young interior lineman would be good too. I don’t trust Kyle Long’s health.
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11017
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 77 times
- Been thanked: 516 times
Good. He doesn't have a history, so that makes sense.UOK wrote:@AdamHoge
Some good news for the #Bears: Akiem Hicks will not be suspended for making contact with an official in Sunday’s win over the Bucs, per source.