Update: Akiem Hicks will NOT be suspended

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

User avatar
Atkins&Rebel
Head Coach
Posts: 2184
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 123 times

wab wrote:And yeah, it's going to be tough keeping Nichols off the field.
But that's a good problem to have! It also makes it easier to have a great D line rotation so guys can go full speed every time they're on the field
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 278 times

wab wrote:
AZ_Bearfan wrote:Hicks took it pretty well. Didn't run around yelling about "unfairness". I appreciate that he sat on the bench instead of causing a scene going in to the locker room.
I believe there's a some nuance there. He can stay on the bench if he's disqualified, but he has to go to the locker room if he's ejected.
OK. I missed that.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
cblaz11
MVP
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:02 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 119 times

He left the field..and tossed his jersey AND PADS into the stands lol

Bullard made a big stop on a run play also...Nice to see some depth behind Hicks and Goldman.
User avatar
LacertineForest
MVP
Posts: 1665
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 1825 times
Been thanked: 333 times

It was disheartening to see Hicks get ejected, but getting more playing time for young guys is a good thing, especially when you've got a 35-3 lead or whatever it was right before the half.
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

cblaz11 wrote:He left the field..and tossed his jersey AND PADS into the stands lol

Bullard made a big stop on a run play also...Nice to see some depth behind Hicks and Goldman.
Yeah, he didn’t leave at first, but I read somewhere that he eventually did and was real P.O’d when he did.
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11061
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 520 times

wab wrote:And yeah, it's going to be tough keeping Nichols off the field.
Nichols is a beast. Both him and RRH are going to be good rotational DL. Both have outstanding quickness off of the snap.
Image
User avatar
Umbali
MVP
Posts: 1049
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:32 pm
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 87 times

I love seeing the residual affect Mack is having on this team.
Fantasy Team: Peanut Punchers
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8426
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 911 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

AZ_Bearfan wrote:How about Bilal Nichols coming in and playing pretty well? The depth on this team is so good, Hicks can sit for a half a game and we're still disrupting the backfield.
I think Nichols is amazing. A guy that big who moves that fast and with that power. Just awesome.

Miller is still my guy but it wouldn't surprise me if Nichols was the best player taken in this draft.

Where was Roquan?
Image
User avatar
Bad Flanders
MVP
Posts: 1923
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:35 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 6 times

My son was just pointing out the strength everywhere in the roster. He asked what I thought we were going to look for in the next draft and I said I wasn't sure. The more we thought about it the more we decided that... yeah... right tackle... but it's not like there aren't options there. It might actually be a best available situation simply because there are NO glaring holes. Although then I decided they will be looking for some talent to fill holes that the Mack deal will inevitably open due to lack of cap space... but still, this has to be the most complete and deepest roster we've had in quite a while.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29900
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2001 times

Bad Flanders wrote:My son was just pointing out the strength everywhere in the roster. He asked what I thought we were going to look for in the next draft and I said I wasn't sure. The more we thought about it the more we decided that... yeah... right tackle... but it's not like there aren't options there. It might actually be a best available situation simply because there are NO glaring holes. Although then I decided they will be looking for some talent to fill holes that the Mack deal will inevitably open due to lack of cap space... but still, this has to be the most complete and deepest roster we've had in quite a while.
I was thinking about this today too.

S - should they let Amos go.
RB - should they decide to replace Howard
RT - if the Coward experiment doesn't pan out
OG - depth and a future replacement for long
NT - a proper backup for Goldman
CB - if they can't retain Callahan

But aside from maaaaaybe RT, there really isn't a huge "need" spot. Definitely a draft for building quality depth.
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3878
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 623 times
Been thanked: 624 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:Where was Roquan?
Running around a lot without much to show for it, from what I remember.

(I haven't rewatched the game, so I could be off-base.)
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29900
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2001 times

thunderspirit wrote:
The Marshall Plan wrote:Where was Roquan?
Running around a lot without much to show for it, from what I remember.

(I haven't rewatched the game, so I could be off-base.)
Covering OJ Howard (until he went out).
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11061
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 520 times

thunderspirit wrote:
The Marshall Plan wrote:Where was Roquan?
Running around a lot without much to show for it, from what I remember.

(I haven't rewatched the game, so I could be off-base.)
I've watched it a couple of times. He had some pretty good tackles at the line of scrimmage, and was flying around the field. He'll get better as the year goes along, but I think he's playing pretty well for a rookie.
Image
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8426
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 911 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

wab wrote:
Bad Flanders wrote:My son was just pointing out the strength everywhere in the roster. He asked what I thought we were going to look for in the next draft and I said I wasn't sure. The more we thought about it the more we decided that... yeah... right tackle... but it's not like there aren't options there. It might actually be a best available situation simply because there are NO glaring holes. Although then I decided they will be looking for some talent to fill holes that the Mack deal will inevitably open due to lack of cap space... but still, this has to be the most complete and deepest roster we've had in quite a while.
I was thinking about this today too.

S - should they let Amos go.
RB - should they decide to replace Howard
RT - if the Coward experiment doesn't pan out
OG - depth and a future replacement for long
NT - a proper backup for Goldman
CB - if they can't retain Callahan

But aside from maaaaaybe RT, there really isn't a huge "need" spot. Definitely a draft for building quality depth.
The right side of the line needs to be addressed. I don't think Massie is that great and Long seems to get injured a lot.
Image
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

The Marshall Plan wrote:
wab wrote:
Bad Flanders wrote:My son was just pointing out the strength everywhere in the roster. He asked what I thought we were going to look for in the next draft and I said I wasn't sure. The more we thought about it the more we decided that... yeah... right tackle... but it's not like there aren't options there. It might actually be a best available situation simply because there are NO glaring holes. Although then I decided they will be looking for some talent to fill holes that the Mack deal will inevitably open due to lack of cap space... but still, this has to be the most complete and deepest roster we've had in quite a while.
I was thinking about this today too.

S - should they let Amos go.
RB - should they decide to replace Howard
RT - if the Coward experiment doesn't pan out
OG - depth and a future replacement for long
NT - a proper backup for Goldman
CB - if they can't retain Callahan

But aside from maaaaaybe RT, there really isn't a huge "need" spot. Definitely a draft for building quality depth.
The right side of the line needs to be addressed. I don't think Massie is that great and Long seems to get injured a lot.
I think Massie is fine, if completely unspectacular. He’s also most likely gone after this year, so he definitely needs to be replaced.

Getting another young interior lineman would be good too. I don’t trust Kyle Long’s health.
User avatar
GSH
MVP
Posts: 1007
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles

Anyone seen word yet on what Akiem's punishment is? missing any game time?
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

GSH wrote:Anyone seen word yet on what Akiem's punishment is? missing any game time?
Nothing announced I don’t think. I’m hoping the fact that he missed a half keeps him from a suspension, but we’ll see.
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25171
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 939 times

@AdamHoge

Some good news for the #Bears: Akiem Hicks will not be suspended for making contact with an official in Sunday’s win over the Bucs, per source.
Image
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11061
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 520 times

UOK wrote:@AdamHoge

Some good news for the #Bears: Akiem Hicks will not be suspended for making contact with an official in Sunday’s win over the Bucs, per source.
Good. He doesn't have a history, so that makes sense.
Image
User avatar
GSH
MVP
Posts: 1007
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2014 12:50 am
Location: Los Angeles

sweet
User avatar
Umbali
MVP
Posts: 1049
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:32 pm
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 87 times

nice...good to hear :)
Fantasy Team: Peanut Punchers
User avatar
bearsfaninaz
Head Coach
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

I was nervous about this, but this was great news today. They probably had a better view of what happened than the cell phone view it looked like what we saw in broadcast lol
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5193
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 278 times

Good news! There must've been some mitigating factor.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

I am happy there was no suspension, but I am really curious as to why

can't recall the last time someone got bounced for contact with an official and wasn't punished later for that ejection ... he did bump the official, probably by accident as he was arguing with an opposing player ... but in most cases I can recall, accident or not, you're ejected and then more happens later
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
Middleguard
MVP
Posts: 1667
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 120 times

What happens to the fines players pay to the league?
User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8079
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 315 times

The money goes to different charities.
User avatar
Pagan
MVP
Posts: 1408
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:19 am
Location: South Bend, Indiana
Has thanked: 40 times
Been thanked: 3 times

This is (now old) & great news!

As for Roquan Smith.. He's currently ranked 2nd in team tackles after starting only 3 NFL games in his rookie season.
Roquan will be an absolute beast mid~late season... Everyone needs to at least TRY to chill out on their unrealistic expectations.
Image
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20651
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 229 times
Been thanked: 804 times

Good. I thought the ejection was unnecessary.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

Image
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

G08 wrote:Good. I thought the ejection was unnecessary.

watch the replay ... he did make voluntary contact with an official, and by the rules, that is an automatic ejection
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
Post Reply