How much is Jordan Howard worth to you?

[Otis Day]

He was only targeted 26x. He had 20 receptions, 76% catch rate. I remember a few passes not being the best (incompletions). He looked to have better hands. I think he could be used more in the passing game and he would not be so predictable. I think Nagy just needs to try to put him in different situations.

I know the team doesn't get off the bus running, but if they do not get as tough as an inside runner as Howard is, it will affect the team in certain situations.

[sturf]

It seems Nagy's offense and even Helfrich's Oregon offense was built on stretching the field laterally and confusing the defense. Nagy is looking to make the linebackers freeze, and he wants his running back to take advantage of that indecision by hitting holes fast.

It seems Howard as a slower zone cutback runner needs the linebackers to attack and over pursue opening cutback in order to get big gains.

If the above is correct then making Howard more effective is in conflict with making the offense the most effective? I'm still in favor of keeping Howard this season because I don't think there is actual value in trading him and his catching and pass blocking definitely has improved.

[Mr.Irrelevant]

I would trade Howard for a third round pick simply because I think there will some RBs available then that would make good replacements for him, and he's going to be coming out of contract in another year anyway.

That said, if I were another team I wouldn't trade him for a third round pick for exactly the same reason.

[wab]

Howard's biggest attributes are patience and vision. He's great at waiting for holes to develop...not so great at anticipating that they WILL develop and hitting the hole as it opens (which is why he had a lot of tackles behind the line and ran into the backs of a lot of his linemen).

[southdakbearfan]

As much as I like Howard if Nagy and pace see him as an impediment to the offense I think his 3.7 ypc is very replaceable via the draft.

[Funkster]

I picked a 3rd round because that’s what I feel is a fair value. The other question is if/when it happens who do you replace him with?

[Otis Day]

I really don't see the Bears getting a 3rd back. If they are shopping him, it almost comes across as desparate. Can't see any team offering a 3rd. A 5th maybe and the Bears should NOT take it.

[UOK]

I don't see the Bears shopping Howard, but if they did move him, a 3rd would be a rich haul. I think that's how negotiations would start, but not where they would finish.

[Funkster]

I don’t think Howard is going anywhere either but it does make some sense if they were trying to get the most value out of him before moving on, that would be now. A 3rd is fair and isn’t asking to much for a player that can stay healthy, averages 4.3 YPC and 8 TDs a year. For how innovative Nagy is, it’s nuts to think he can’t figure out how to use him. Or is it he’s just to stubborn?

[wab]

I would suspect the 3rd is the starting point because that's realistically the highest comp pick they could get. Why move him for less?

[southdakbearfan]

I don’t think Howard is going anywhere either but it does make some sense if they were trying to get the most value out of him before moving on, that would be now. A 3rd is fair and isn’t asking to much for a player that can stay healthy, averages 4.3 YPC and 8 TDs a year. For how innovative Nagy is, it’s nuts to think he can’t figure out how to use him. Or is it he’s just to stubborn?

It’s just fit. Just like how you don’t use 295lb 4-3 defensive ends in 3-4 olb positions or have a bunch of really good but slower possession receivers in a deep threat offense. Can they do some aspects of it well, absolutely. Will the scheme perform as well as it could with someone having a better skill set, absolutely not.

It’s not that they can’t be successful with him, it’s could they be better with a different style of running back combined with the fact that they won’t put money in him long term so they could get return now vs waiting a year for a compensatory pick.

3rd is a starting point but if they had a handful of guys they like and thought would be available I think a 4th would get it done.

If it does happen I would prefer it to be a draft day trade when you know what you can grab at that moment. Bills could be a potential partner.

[Mikefive]

I don’t think Howard is going anywhere either but it does make some sense if they were trying to get the most value out of him before moving on, that would be now. A 3rd is fair and isn’t asking to much for a player that can stay healthy, averages 4.3 YPC and 8 TDs a year. For how innovative Nagy is, it’s nuts to think he can’t figure out how to use him. Or is it he’s just to stubborn?

It’s just fit. Just like how you don’t use 295lb 4-3 defensive ends in 3-4 olb positions or have a bunch of really good but slower possession receivers in a deep threat offense. Can they do some aspects of it well, absolutely. Will the scheme perform as well as it could with someone having a better skill set, absolutely not.

It’s not that they can’t be successful with him, it’s could they be better with a different style of running back combined with the fact that they won’t put money in him long term so they could get return now vs waiting a year for a compensatory pick.

3rd is a starting point but if they had a handful of guys they like and thought would be available I think a 4th would get it done.

If it does happen I would prefer it to be a draft day trade when you know what you can grab at that moment. Bills could be a potential partner.

I think you're 100% right. But these kinds of things bother me. On some level, I feel like good coaches should be able to modify their scheme to utilize good players. And Jordan Howard, while somewhat limited in what he does, is a good, effective player. Good coaches don't take good players and make them into guys who need replaced. Bad coaches do that.

How is it that... If you're in the camp that says Jordan Howard needs to go, then you weren't also in favor of Mike Martz trading away Greg Olsen? No 20/20 hindsight allowed here.

(Note that I'm not really throwing dirt at Matt Nagy. He DID adjust with more zone blocking at the end of the year and Jordan Howard got a lot of his effectiveness back.)

[G08]

I'd like to preface this by saying I loved what Jordan Howard did in John Fox's offense. He is tailor fucking made for a pure zone blocking scheme... but that's not what we are doing here. This offense craves a dynamic back that has excellent vision, can make people miss in the hole, and can keep defenses honest by being a threat in the passing game.

Jordan Howard is not that dude, in my opinion.

I'll take anything from a 5th round pick or higher because I don't think he's a Chicago Bear after the 2019-2020 season as he enters free agency.

[Mikefive]

I'd like to preface this by saying I loved what Jordan Howard did in John Fox's offense. He is tailor fucking made for a pure zone blocking scheme... but that's not what we are doing here. This offense craves a dynamic back that has excellent vision, can make people miss in the hole, and can keep defenses honest by being a threat in the passing game.

Jordan Howard is not that dude, in my opinion.

I'll take anything from a 5th round pick or higher because I don't think he's a Chicago Bear after the 2019-2020 season as he enters free agency.

So you were fine with the Bears trading away Greg Olsen because he didn't fit Mike Martz's scheme? If not, why not since you could respond similarly then as you do now?

[southdakbearfan]

I'd like to preface this by saying I loved what Jordan Howard did in John Fox's offense. He is tailor fucking made for a pure zone blocking scheme... but that's not what we are doing here. This offense craves a dynamic back that has excellent vision, can make people miss in the hole, and can keep defenses honest by being a threat in the passing game.

Jordan Howard is not that dude, in my opinion.

I'll take anything from a 5th round pick or higher because I don't think he's a Chicago Bear after the 2019-2020 season as he enters free agency.

So you were fine with the Bears trading away Greg Olsen because he didn't fit Mike Martz's scheme? If not, why not since you could respond similarly then as you do now?

Mike Martz's system only proved successful when it was being operated by a HOF QB, HOF WR1, 2 other Probowl WR's, HOF RB, HOF LT and a very good offensive line and proved to be disastrous outside of that, even prior to the trade of olsen. It was flat out dumb.

The Nagy/Reid system is quite the opposite and in KC it has had 4 different but very effective leading rushers the last 5 seasons.

[Atkins&Rebel]

Bringing up Olsen's past situation is irrelevant. Howard can't do what we need our RB position to be able to do. Olsen could do everything but block so should have been effective in Martz's offense. My feeling is that either Olsen didn't want to be here anymore or someone got sick of him.

[wab]

Olsen was NOT a fit in Martz's offense. But we all saw what a dope Martz was and knew he wasn't a long term solution as an offensive playcaller for the Bears. So people were upset that a cornerstone player was being traded away because he was a bad fit in an offense being run by a guy that was only going to be around for a year or two.

That's not the case with Howard. Nagy isn't a short term fix.

Also...another difference between Olsen and Howard is that Howard physically can't do what this offense requires from him. In Olsen's case, he was never really given the opportunity to prove he could or couldn't (he could).

[G08]

I'd like to preface this by saying I loved what Jordan Howard did in John Fox's offense. He is tailor fucking made for a pure zone blocking scheme... but that's not what we are doing here. This offense craves a dynamic back that has excellent vision, can make people miss in the hole, and can keep defenses honest by being a threat in the passing game.

Jordan Howard is not that dude, in my opinion.

I'll take anything from a 5th round pick or higher because I don't think he's a Chicago Bear after the 2019-2020 season as he enters free agency.

So you were fine with the Bears trading away Greg Olsen because he didn't fit Mike Martz's scheme? If not, why not since you could respond similarly then as you do now?

Apples to oranges... Martz wasn't going to be the offensive coordinator "for the foreseeable future". Nagy is here for the long-haul and the sooner he gets his ideal RB the better. Plus, Martz never utilized a TE in his career (some genius, huh?).

The long and the short of this is that Howard can't do what Nagy's offense craves. He's not explosive, he won't really make people miss in the hole, and he clearly is not a legitimate threat in the passing game. You want a good example of what I'm talking about? Look at this play from Hunt... THIS is what our offense needs:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hZ0LnoXsbE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[G08]

Olsen was NOT a fit in Martz's offense. But we all saw what a dope Martz was and knew he wasn't a long term solution as an offensive playcaller for the Bears. So people were upset that a cornerstone player was being traded away because he was a bad fit in an offense being run by a guy that was only going to be around for a year or two.

That's not the case with Howard. Nagy isn't a short term fix.

Also...another difference between Olsen and Howard is that Howard physically can't do what this offense requires from him. In Olsen's case, he was never really given the opportunity to prove he could or couldn't (he could).

Just saw your reply... 100% what I am talking about.

[EricTighe]

The world. I love the kid. Great person, excellent work ethic, perfect teammate and the consummate pro.

If we are not going to use him the let him walk and I will watch the games he plays in. But enough of the trade rumors. Either trade him or let him know where he stands. The Bears owe him that much.

[Knuckles]

Olsen was NOT a fit in Martz's offense. But we all saw what a dope Martz was and knew he wasn't a long term solution as an offensive playcaller for the Bears. So people were upset that a cornerstone player was being traded away because he was a bad fit in an offense being run by a guy that was only going to be around for a year or two.

That's not the case with Howard. Nagy isn't a short term fix.

Also...another difference between Olsen and Howard is that Howard physically can't do what this offense requires from him. In Olsen's case, he was never really given the opportunity to prove he could or couldn't (he could).

Add in he needs to change the blocking scheme for Howard to be effective... Not the ideal situation.

I like Howard as a person/player but I've never been a huge fan of how he runs. Personally, I like scat backs or a hybrid like Miles Sanders... Much more fun to watch than a bruiser as a #1 back and a lot more difficult to gameplan for especially with all the other tallent we have on this offense. Don't get me wrong we need a bruiser but a 3rd string type that does some short yardage plays and closes out games.

[G08]

Rumors that teams had offered as high as a third round pick for Howard last season but Pace didn't want to go into the year with no proven back.

I'd have to think, if the right offer presents itself Howard may be gone on or around draft day. I really like Miles Sanders for this offense but I don't know if he's going to make it to the bottom of round 3.

[wab]

Rumors that teams had offered as high as a third round pick for Howard last season but Pace didn't want to go into the year with no proven back.

I'd have to think, if the right offer presents itself Howard may be gone on or around draft day. I really like Miles Sanders for this offense but I don't know if he's going to make it to the bottom of round 3.

I've been wondering if the Bears don't package their 3rd with Howard to try and move up. The Jets are the team that make the most sense to me. Gase would make him a star again.

[Atkins&Rebel]

It makes sense for a few teams besides NYJ to be interested in Howard:
Atlanta: Freeman coming off an injury and Coleman a FA.
Buffalo: They need a steady lead rusher to take the pressure off Allen. Shady doesn't scare anyone anymore.
Indianapolis: Mack is the man when healthy, but Howard is a nice 1-2 punch to have and they have a ton of cap space.
Jacksonville: Fournette is an injury prone head case. Howard could be the man there.
Oakland: They have 3 RB's on their roster who wouldn't start for the AAF league. Martin and Lynch are FA's
Philadelphia: Not a lot of cap space so a cheap year of Howard may appeal to them in place of Ajayi.

[wab]

I'm not taking anything less than a 3rd for Howard, since that is the best possible comp pick they could get for him. I'm not fully on board with trading him, but I feel like it'll happen.

[G08]

Rumors that teams had offered as high as a third round pick for Howard last season but Pace didn't want to go into the year with no proven back.

I'd have to think, if the right offer presents itself Howard may be gone on or around draft day. I really like Miles Sanders for this offense but I don't know if he's going to make it to the bottom of round 3.

I've been wondering if the Bears don't package their 3rd with Howard to try and move up. The Jets are the team that make the most sense to me. Gase would make him a star again.

Very, very good point. Loggains is there as well.

[46Blitz]

I'm not taking anything less than a 2nd even if they have to package a 5th or 6th to do so. Also would have to sign a guy like Coleman and draft a guy like Love.

I'm a huge fan of a guy like Howard. High character guy who thumps. Unfortunately he is limited in this offense and kinda holds it back. Even so, I want to be convinced that the replacement is better.

[Middleguard]

Rumors that teams had offered as high as a third round pick for Howard last season but Pace didn't want to go into the year with no proven back.

Bears' running backs last year:
Cohen 495 offensive snaps
Mizzell 70 offensive snaps
Cunningham 37 offensive snaps
= 602 offensive snaps by RBs 'not Howard'

Howard 624 offensive snaps

Who's pretending that the Bears don't value Howard? (don't value him properly? well maybe that)

[alexwilkins]

A bit of a stretch, but the Steelers have Bud Dupree, Javon Hargrave, and Cam Heyward hitting free agency in the next couple years. If we could swing a Second and one of them?

[alexwilkins]

I voted not to trade him, but that’d be hard deal to pass up.