Bradley Sowell is now #85 and a Tight End
Taquan Mizzell is now #11 and a Wide Receiver
Bradley Sowell & Taquan Mizzell change positions, numbers
Moderator: wab
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4645
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 339 times
Next step. Mizzell is cut.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29951
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2035 times
Fringe players officially switching positions is usually the beginning of the end.
- mmmc_35
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6118
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
- Has thanked: 105 times
- Been thanked: 99 times
The Sowell thing is interesting. Mizzel is fodder. Sowell had made this team a few years now, and was used as a blocking TE with a TD.
Like already said generally this means a player doesn't make the team, but Sowell seems different. Maybe they are looking for more big packages.
Like already said generally this means a player doesn't make the team, but Sowell seems different. Maybe they are looking for more big packages.
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4645
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 339 times
I think Sowell sticks.
Mizzell was bad at rb and I don’t see him breaking in at wr with this group.
Mizzell was bad at rb and I don’t see him breaking in at wr with this group.
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2730
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
Sowell provides some depth and versatility. He could be a hard cut at the bottom of the roster.
Mizzel needs to be gone so you're not tempted to use him. I was kind of pulling for him. I wish him well, just somewhere else.
Mizzel needs to be gone so you're not tempted to use him. I was kind of pulling for him. I wish him well, just somewhere else.
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4645
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 339 times
I also look at the Sowell # change as more of a elimination of a problem. He was only brought in as an extra blocker in a fullback or TE role and I don't believe he ever played as a true lineman at all. This change eliminates the need to report in as an eligible receiver and a possible penalty. It also doesn't give the defense a prompt that "Hey, something different is happening here on this play".
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11083
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 525 times
I think Kerrith Whyte was the end of Mizzell. Thank God.
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5196
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 280 times
Bears Whiskey Nut wrote:I think Kerrith Whyte was the end of Mizzell. Thank God.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6919
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 395 times
- Been thanked: 712 times
wab wrote:Fringe players officially switching positions is usually the beginning of the end.
Mizzell is fringe, but Sowell isn't. He's been the top T backup for 2 yrs (with lots of OL snaps in 2017) and they cut Compton (who went on to be a full time starter at G for Minn) because they preferred Sowell.southdakbearfan wrote:I also look at the Sowell # change as more of a elimination of a problem. He was only brought in as an extra blocker in a fullback or TE role and I don't believe he ever played as a true lineman at all. This change eliminates the need to report in as an eligible receiver and a possible penalty. It also doesn't give the defense a prompt that "Hey, something different is happening here on this play".
Moving him is weird.
Maybe it means they have a lot of confidence in Coward stepping up. Or maybe a complete lack of confidence in any of their other TEs to block.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- Boris13c
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 15969
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
- Location: The Bear Nebula
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
southdakbearfan wrote:Next step. Mizzell is cut.
probably ... just don't see value to keeping him
but, maybe Ryan Pace can use his position changes to spin it as a sign of his diversity as a player and get a 5th or 6th round draft pick for him from someone before the acquiring team knows any better
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
George Carlin
- VA_Mountain_Bear
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 46 times
Mizzell is a goner is what this tells me. Sowell may be able to find a place on the team but no tears if he leaves.
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4645
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 811 times
- Been thanked: 339 times
Which wide receiver is not twice the threat/prospect/player than mizzell at that position. I don’t think he can make the practice squad as a Wr. I am pretty sure it was laid out for him that he wasn’t making it as a rb, both due to performance and look at who they brought in with Patterson (being a hybrid and explosive), Davis(versatile), Montgomery(high pick, workhorse, versatile), Cohen(explosive and proven), Whyte(explosive). All of them bring something more than mizzell in each aspect where they are comparable. .Boris13c wrote:southdakbearfan wrote:Next step. Mizzell is cut.
probably ... just don't see value to keeping him
but, maybe Ryan Pace can use his position changes to spin it as a sign of his diversity as a player and get a 5th or 6th round draft pick for him from someone before the acquiring team knows any better
Would you be willing to cut Wims or Hall over mizzell? Ridley, Robinson, Miller, Gabriel, Patterson are 100% locks. Wimms has way more upside. Hall is explosive.
Mizzell is kind of a fringe pro, maybe, at RB. At WR I don’t know that he is even that.
I would actually put money down on him being cut fairly early in training camp barring weird injuries or unless someone is just flat out to lost with the playbook.
Sowell makes a lot of sense as a blocking TE. Especially if coward has come along under HH.
- AZ_Bearfan
- MVP
- Posts: 1492
- Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:49 pm
- Location: Mesa, AZ
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 77 times
I didn't even consider this. Nagy is one sneaky mofo.southdakbearfan wrote:I also look at the Sowell # change as more of a elimination of a problem..... This change eliminates the need to report in as an eligible receiver and a possible penalty.
- Otis Day
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8095
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
- Location: Armpit of IL.
- Has thanked: 124 times
- Been thanked: 322 times
I think teams would be aware of Sowell when he came in no matter what the # was on his jersey.
Some dude on the SCORE over the lunch hour was saying Sowell would have a better shot at making the roster at TE than the Raymond (UDFA) would. I am not seeing it. I also don't think it is a slight to Shaheen.
The only thing it really says to me, he wasn't good enough to be the swing OT.
Some dude on the SCORE over the lunch hour was saying Sowell would have a better shot at making the roster at TE than the Raymond (UDFA) would. I am not seeing it. I also don't think it is a slight to Shaheen.
The only thing it really says to me, he wasn't good enough to be the swing OT.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20673
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
I like the number change for Sowell... I kind of think they did this so he doesn't have to declare himself eligible every time he comes in and, well, is eligible to receive the ball.
Sneaky, sneaky!
Sneaky, sneaky!
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS