Mitch Trubisky & General Quarterback Banter

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
User avatar
Ormazd
MVP
Posts: 1492
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 7:08 pm
Location: Peoples Republic of Virginia
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 6 times

I cosign this opinion. Always hated the nickname.
IE wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 10:42 am I just can't take anything seriously when someone calls their own starting QB "Biscuit". I don't care if he becomes a top 10 QB. Calling him Biscuit sounds like someone referring to Timmay! from South Park. Please please please... anything else. I'll never get used to it. Calling him Shithead would be better.

I personally believe that alone is what is holding him back - nobody has accountability when their nickname is Biscuit. It's like "here - here's a treat... now go ahead and suck because you only need to live up to the expectations your nickname sets".

Edit: One thing worse than wanting to see your QB use one of their better talents (their legs) is to see him out there as a destination QB for any defense who knows a) where he is going to be, and b) that he has questionable protection. Don't like my Tark reference? Pick another. But not at least partially exploiting 10's skills and nature to keep the defenses more honest...is a mistake.
Image
User avatar
AZ_Bearfan
MVP
Posts: 1492
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:49 pm
Location: Mesa, AZ
Has thanked: 135 times
Been thanked: 77 times

Mariotta was a classic system QB in college. I watched alot of him back in the day and the thing that really stood out about his game was his utter lack of pocket awareness. They schemed around it in college, but the NFL is a different beast and has no place for QB's who can't feel pressure coming. He ends up rushing his reads because he has zero clue how much time he has before he gets sacked, or he takes off and runs when his pocket is still clean.

No thank you to signing him.
Image
User avatar
VA_Mountain_Bear
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 800
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:19 am
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 46 times

Guys, I keep seeing people forget how much further behind in development reps Bisky is compared to Mahomes or Watson (to whom he willbe endlessly compared). the kid had 13 games under his belt post-high school when we drafted him, and you can basically discard all of the games played under Fox-they were as valuable to being a QB in this system as trying to get better at your golf swing by moving the greens.

Bisky has a lot of upside, and he has some area of weakness. He has done well for us overall, and the struggles this year I think can be mostly attributed to the horrendous Oline play he has gotten. I don't think Brady, Rodgers, or Mahomes would have looked very good behind that line weeks 1-4. No I am not overlooking his areas where he needs to grow still, but credit some areas of growth so far. Last year he rarely rotated his hip into the throws but is improving on this, it was following his arm, his foot work was jumpier and it has settled more. Give him some real blocking in passes, and for the run to set up passing, and lets see what transpires. But seriously ya'll, aren't you at least happy to see a guy who can develop after nearly a lifetime of watching a QB carousel of bums?
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8428
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 913 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

How about we give Truth the running game and o-line from last year? A serviceable TE would be nice too.

This is the same guy we had last year. The speed got turned up on him at the same time his support system massively degraded. That's a recipe for disaster.

I won't blame him for that. I believe Truth can be a really good QB in this league, but he's gotta have at least an average support system no different than any other QB.
Image
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5196
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 343 times
Been thanked: 280 times

IE wrote: Wed Oct 16, 2019 9:16 am
The Marshall Plan wrote: Tue Oct 15, 2019 3:03 pm

Ok so that’s a pretty strong level of dislike. To me, Floyd is like a SBD fart where everybody smells it and at first they blame the dog until Dad starts laughing, but the smell just won’t leave the room.

What about The Truth? As in Trubisky?
I like The Truth - it has all kinds of meaning, from meaning really great to meaning the unfortunate reality that slaps us all in the face. :)

I just feel the Biscuit name is clownish, and hope it doesn't stick and become widespread. In the early 80's I was in a frat at U of I and as a pledge we had this lineup where we were forced to do all kinds of silly stuff. Most of it was fun/funny. Everyone was far less than sober. With the actives smoking cigars and sipping Jack and yelling. lol. One thing they had us do one time was go through the line of maybe 20 of us and every guy had to come up with an euphemism for a stiff dick. Under pressure, a few guys came up with things silly and embarrassing. And so naturally, everyone started calling them that as a nickname. That's how things happen. To this day 35+ years later people still refer to John as "Bone Wad" and Mark as "Stiffy". These guys are in their mid-50s. ROFL

So that's my deep dark fear, that "Biscuit" will stick to Mitch, with announcers and writers poking fun of him about it (like I would if I wasn't a Bear fan). I'm hoping something kind of cool happens on the field and he gets a good nickname organically. Anything but Biscuit. I'd actually prefer to call him Bone Wad. Hehe
Seems to me that a nickname like "the truth" implies something clear and proven, and Mitch is anything but that. That strikes me as a mindless homer nickname, which doesn't even fit you guys who are embracing it. So I'm a bit baffled by that. But I don't really mind "Biscuit" either, so there's that difference in perspective as well. How about "Brisket", since that takes a long time to cook? :-p
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

The Truth could also allude to the type of conclusion Tennessee came to re: MM. :)

I'm mostly kidding about all this stuff (although I really do think Biscuit is unnecessarily dorky sounding).

Thank god the bye week is over.

Looks like Mitch is going to play this weekend, and I'm pleased to have now heard Nagy say how crazy he'd be to not take advantage of 10's legs. No shit, Sherlock! Show us!
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
BreadNCircuses
Assistant Coach
Posts: 517
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:34 pm
Has thanked: 27 times
Been thanked: 86 times

Well, Mahomes left the game last night with a dislocated kneecap. Watson keeps getting hit.

My wild-ass prediction is Trubisky will have a longer career than both of them.
2023 Preseason Downside prediction:
5-6 wins, never really healthy all season, a constant shuffling.
We're potentially in a position to draft in the Top 5 again, depending on the Carolina team, and probably have a low-teens (or better) pick ourselves.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29947
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 2035 times

BreadNCircuses wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:52 am Well, Mahomes left the game last night with a dislocated kneecap. Watson keeps getting hit.

My wild-ass prediction is Trubisky will have a longer career than both of them.
Yeah, that knee didn't look great.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20673
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 235 times
Been thanked: 815 times

wab wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:54 am
BreadNCircuses wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 6:52 am Well, Mahomes left the game last night with a dislocated kneecap. Watson keeps getting hit.

My wild-ass prediction is Trubisky will have a longer career than both of them.
Yeah, that knee didn't look great.
I think he's done for the year if he tore ligaments. If he didn't, reports say he could be back in 3 to 4 weeks.

Still... QB in a bum ankle so you QB sneak him? Dumb.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

G08 wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:21 am
wab wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:54 am

Yeah, that knee didn't look great.
I think he's done for the year if he tore ligaments. If he didn't, reports say he could be back in 3 to 4 weeks.

Still... QB in a bum ankle so you QB sneak him? Dumb.
The latest reports are “no major damage” and he’ll be out about 3 weeks.
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

G08 wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 10:21 am
wab wrote: Fri Oct 18, 2019 9:54 am

Yeah, that knee didn't look great.
I think he's done for the year if he tore ligaments. If he didn't, reports say he could be back in 3 to 4 weeks.

Still... QB in a bum ankle so you QB sneak him? Dumb.

I've never been a big fan of QB sneak plays ... short yardage you need to get, that is what your RB is for

and I agree with you on Mahomes - he was already gimpy, so why in the world risk him further on something like that?
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6062
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 63 times
Been thanked: 1832 times

Great, so Mahomes is out for the Chiefs' games against the Packers and Vikings, but should be well back into the groove by the time their game with the Bears comes around.
User avatar
docc
Head Coach
Posts: 3834
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Outpost of Reality S.E. Arizona
Has thanked: 993 times
Been thanked: 183 times

To be the best..you need to beat the beat.
.otherwise we just can hope every team Brears play need to lose the top player for us to win..
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25191
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 947 times

I believe we’re watching the final few games of Mitch Trubisky as a Bear. They’ll IR him out of “concern” for his injury, but it’s a face-saving benching.

Pace will trade him for scraps and they’ll have another version of the 2019 Kicker Battle in 2020, but with the QB position.
Image
User avatar
Bearfanuk
Assistant Coach
Posts: 669
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 3:48 am
Location: England
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Not defending mitch but most would struggle with this just terrible play calling.

What we are watching is an actual offensive genius in play up against a guy whose had smoke piped up his ass and is now being schooled.
Have a great day
User avatar
WP.1
Player of the Month
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:03 am
Been thanked: 1 time

and without one single real QB game winning drive.


those 2 drives - with one good pass - dont count.
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

Bearfanuk wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 6:02 pm Not defending mitch but most would struggle with this just terrible play calling.

What we are watching is an actual offensive genius in play up against a guy whose had smoke piped up his ass and is now being schooled.
I don’t like the play calling either but any play caller would look bad if their quarterback couldn’t his wide open receivers and had the pocket awareness of a tree stump.
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4644
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 810 times
Been thanked: 339 times

Bearfanuk wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 6:02 pm Not defending mitch but most would struggle with this just terrible play calling.

What we are watching is an actual offensive genius in play up against a guy whose had smoke piped up his ass and is now being schooled.
I agree with this.

Mitch isn't playing well, but the playcalling is atrocious at best. 5 running plays the first half, which included the always great shotgun dive of tarik up the gut. 7 total for the game?

If the line is so bad they cannot run, then defenses have the advantage, which is why most of the receivers are running 5 yd patterns.

Blocking scheme needs to be changed, they need to put it to mitch that you make one read, take off looking to pass while scrambling, and use his tools he has while trying to develop the others.

Our offensive line has really taken a shit, worse than our QB.
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

Just a random exercise to see if I think Trubisky is better than any NFL starting quarterbacks. Without ranking them, I'll just go by division.

NE - LOL
BUF - Debatable with Josh Allen. I've never thought Allen was any good though.
NYJ - Give me Darnold without even thinking about it
MIA - Fitzmagic is better, which is sad.

KC - LOL
OAK - Carr is better
DEN - Flacco blows, but he's better
LAC - LOL

BAL - Jackson easy
CLE - Even with Mayfield's warts he's far more proven
PIT - Big Ben all day
CIN - Daltown also sucks, but still he's better

IND - Nope
HOU - Nope
JAX - I'd take either of their quarterbacks
TEN - You could argue he's better than Tannehill. You'd be wrong, but you could argue it.

DAL - Nope
PHI - Nope
NYG - He might be better than Jones today, but not for very long if he is
WAS - Keenum is the definition of journeyman. We'd also probably have 1 or 2 more wins with him

SF - Nope
SEA - LOL
LAR - Easily Goff
ARI - Murray is already better

GB - LOL
DET - LOL
MIN - Even their joke of a quarterback is far more proven

NO - LOL, they have two or three better quarterbacks. And one of them would also be the best tight end on our roster
CAR - I think Kyle Allen is already better
TB - Winston is turning into a disaster, so this one is just a dumpster fire, so maybe you could argue it
ATL - Nope

I'd trade him for virtually any starting qb in the NFL, and many of their backups as well. What we need to look into is if Minshew works out, do they trade Foles? He'd make this team much more dangerous.
Rakshir
Pro Bowler
Posts: 443
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 10:37 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times

You may want to reconsider Indy, Brisket been tearing it up
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

Rakshir wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 8:21 pm You may want to reconsider Indy, Brisket been tearing it up
Sorry, "Nope" refers to Trubisky being better than that guy. They easily have a better quarterback than us.
Richie
MVP
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 18 times

southdakbearfan wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 7:15 pm
Bearfanuk wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 6:02 pm Not defending mitch but most would struggle with this just terrible play calling.

What we are watching is an actual offensive genius in play up against a guy whose had smoke piped up his ass and is now being schooled.
I agree with this.

Mitch isn't playing well, but the playcalling is atrocious at best. 5 running plays the first half, which included the always great shotgun dive of tarik up the gut. 7 total for the game?

If the line is so bad they cannot run, then defenses have the advantage, which is why most of the receivers are running 5 yd patterns.

Blocking scheme needs to be changed, they need to put it to mitch that you make one read, take off looking to pass while scrambling, and use his tools he has while trying to develop the others.

Our offensive line has really taken a shit, worse than our QB.
I really don't think there's a legitimate argument to suggest that we should be running more. We created plenty of 3rd and short to intermediates today without running. In fact, I think we did that MOST of the time. We didn't need to run in order to do that. We needed Mitch to complete passes (some of them rudimentary) in order to extend drives. He didn't.

When you gain between 0 and 2 yards on most every run (if positive yardage, at all) with your RB's. You don't just keep doing it because some antiquated conventional wisdom says that you should. That's insanity. I thought we did a fine job picking up small chunks on first/second down with the short passing game. Which is a fine substitute for running.

There's just no excuse here for Mitch anymore. Under any kind of duress he turns into a trembling mess and his mechanics become totally foreign to him. It's disgusting watching him play QB.

You can hope Mitch gets it going... but at this point? You are just saying a prayer. There's nothing else going on. There's nothing to hang your hat on anymore. The excuses are gone. People can't be deluded and keep up this merry-go-round of the blame game.

I haven't listened to any post-game... I think I'll vomit if I hear Nagy or anyone be positive about "not quitting at the end with two touchdown drives". Utterly useless garbage time nonsense.
Richie
MVP
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 18 times

BR0D1E86 wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 7:53 pm Just a random exercise to see if I think Trubisky is better than any NFL starting quarterbacks. Without ranking them, I'll just go by division.

NE - LOL
BUF - Debatable with Josh Allen. I've never thought Allen was any good though.
NYJ - Give me Darnold without even thinking about it
MIA - Fitzmagic is better, which is sad.

KC - LOL
OAK - Carr is better
DEN - Flacco blows, but he's better
LAC - LOL

BAL - Jackson easy
CLE - Even with Mayfield's warts he's far more proven
PIT - Big Ben all day
CIN - Daltown also sucks, but still he's better

IND - Nope
HOU - Nope
JAX - I'd take either of their quarterbacks
TEN - You could argue he's better than Tannehill. You'd be wrong, but you could argue it.

DAL - Nope
PHI - Nope
NYG - He might be better than Jones today, but not for very long if he is
WAS - Keenum is the definition of journeyman. We'd also probably have 1 or 2 more wins with him

SF - Nope
SEA - LOL
LAR - Easily Goff
ARI - Murray is already better

GB - LOL
DET - LOL
MIN - Even their joke of a quarterback is far more proven

NO - LOL, they have two or three better quarterbacks. And one of them would also be the best tight end on our roster
CAR - I think Kyle Allen is already better
TB - Winston is turning into a disaster, so this one is just a dumpster fire, so maybe you could argue it
ATL - Nope

I'd trade him for virtually any starting qb in the NFL, and many of their backups as well. What we need to look into is if Minshew works out, do they trade Foles? He'd make this team much more dangerous.
Jameis Winston is basically Jay Cutler and I would gladly take Cutler over Mitch. By a mile.

So, there's not a single QB worse. Josh Allen is becoming pretty damn solid. IMO

Mitch Trubisky is the worst starting QB in football and probably worse than a good handful of backups. He's probably the 40th-50th NFL QB you would want QB'ing a game for you.
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11079
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 524 times

Has anyone considered that the play calling sucks, partly because Nagy is realizing he can only call 10% of the playbook, because his QB can execute a basic read and pass. He can’t diagnose simple defenses.
Image
User avatar
bearsfaninaz
Head Coach
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Bears Whiskey Nut wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 10:14 pm Has anyone considered that the play calling sucks, partly because Nagy is realizing he can only call 10% of the playbook, because his QB can execute a basic read and pass. He can’t diagnose simple defenses.
I honestly hope this is true in a sense. Would mean trubisky is the problem, and we can fix that. However idk anymore. If the QB is struggling and all you do is call pass plays with little to no run or play action is it the QB or the play caller?
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11079
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 524 times

bearsfaninaz wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 10:48 pm
Bears Whiskey Nut wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 10:14 pm Has anyone considered that the play calling sucks, partly because Nagy is realizing he can only call 10% of the playbook, because his QB can execute a basic read and pass. He can’t diagnose simple defenses.
I honestly hope this is true in a sense. Would mean trubisky is the problem, and we can fix that. However idk anymore. If the QB is struggling and all you do is call pass plays with little to no run or play action is it the QB or the play caller?
Well. That’s kind of the big gaping hole in my theory.
Image
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11079
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 524 times

If Pace and Nagy want to salvage their “regime” they need to make some decisions really fast. No more protecting Mitch in pressers, no more solidarity talk about all the good work that was put in. They need to un-fuck this situation as fast as possible. In my opinion it starts with IR’ing Mitch, claiming he re-injured the shoulder and he has to have surgery. Trading a piece or two, and a 2nd round pick for a serviceable QB on the last year of their deal, from a team that sucks. Anyone is better than what we have right now. However if Pace and Nagy decide to ride the Trubisky train to hell, we’ll be rebuilding again in 2021.
Image
User avatar
bearsfaninaz
Head Coach
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Bears Whiskey Nut wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 10:59 pm If Pace and Nagy want to salvage their “regime” they need to make some decisions really fast. No more protecting Mitch in pressers, no more solidarity talk about all the good work that was put in. They need to un-fuck this situation as fast as possible. In my opinion it starts with IR’ing Mitch, claiming he re-injured the shoulder and he has to have surgery. Trading a piece or two, and a 2nd round pick for a serviceable QB on the last year of their deal, from a team that sucks. Anyone is better than what we have right now. However if Pace and Nagy decide to ride the Trubisky train to hell, we’ll be rebuilding again in 2021.
Out of curiosity what QB would you think is available from other teams?
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15969
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 41 times
Been thanked: 113 times

Trubisky has me baffled with some of his decisions and throws

I've seen him drop a perfect back shoulder pass to a well covered receiver and get a TD and I've seen him miss a wide open receiver to kill drives

I've seen him look off the safety and hit a nice deep crossing route and I've seen him stare at his receiver the whole way and give up an easy interception

I've seen him roll out and find the open man for a key reception to keep a drive alive and I've seen him look at a double covered receiver and stubbornly throw it anyway for an interception

and I've seen him do each of these things in the same game

his inconsistency is maddening
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11079
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 524 times

Boris13c wrote: Sun Oct 20, 2019 11:04 pm Trubisky has me baffled with some of his decisions and throws

I've seen him drop a perfect back shoulder pass to a well covered receiver and get a TD and I've seen him miss a wide open receiver to kill drives

I've seen him look off the safety and hit a nice deep crossing route and I've seen him stare at his receiver the whole way and give up an easy interception

I've seen him roll out and find the open man for a key reception to keep a drive alive and I've seen him look at a double covered receiver and stubbornly throw it anyway for an interception

and I've seen him do each of these things in the same game

his inconsistency is maddening
Go watch Brett Kollmann’s piece on Trubisky. He says the exact same thing.
Image
Post Reply