Question on Floyd
Moderator: wab
- Yogi da Bear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:43 pm
- Has thanked: 224 times
- Been thanked: 403 times
If we cut Floyd now, do we lose Floyd's contribution to the compensatory pick process. Normally, if you cut a player that player doesn't contribute to the process. Are we in fact cutting Floyd or simply removing the fifth year option (if we choose to do that)? If Floyd isn't our roster next year, is he included in the compensatory pick calculation? Anybody know?
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 799 times
- Been thanked: 338 times
He would factor into the compensatory pick calculation if they rescind the 5th year option from everything I have read.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
I didn't think so originally. I had a extensive back and forth with one of the Over The Cap guys on Twitter a few weeks ago and he insisted he would factor into the comp formula.
The part I find weird is the CBA doesn't really address the ability to "rescind" an option year. It's very clear that the contract wouldn't be guaranteed (save for injury), but doesn't make any provision on the type of transaction that would occur. And there's actually a specific appendix on the CBA which is a proforma of what info you give a player who has their contract terminated (reason for terminating and type of termination) , no special language/type for a 5th year option.
On top of that, no apparent history of this actually ever happening to a 5th year option guy.
But he sounded pretty confident, it is his job to know and the comp formula, unlike the CBA is very secretive. So, take his word for it, but it's never happened so I'm not holding my breath exactly.
The part I find weird is the CBA doesn't really address the ability to "rescind" an option year. It's very clear that the contract wouldn't be guaranteed (save for injury), but doesn't make any provision on the type of transaction that would occur. And there's actually a specific appendix on the CBA which is a proforma of what info you give a player who has their contract terminated (reason for terminating and type of termination) , no special language/type for a 5th year option.
On top of that, no apparent history of this actually ever happening to a 5th year option guy.
But he sounded pretty confident, it is his job to know and the comp formula, unlike the CBA is very secretive. So, take his word for it, but it's never happened so I'm not holding my breath exactly.
Robert Griffin and cb Kevin Johnson were both released before their 5th year options kicked in...
I agree with the OTC expert that the Bears would be eligible to receive a comp pick in the overall formula.
I agree with the OTC expert that the Bears would be eligible to receive a comp pick in the overall formula.
Last edited by Drone7 on Sun Mar 15, 2020 8:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29916
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2007 times
I legitimately think they are going to try and trade him.
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 799 times
- Been thanked: 338 times
If they keep him, at that cap hit, I don't see anyway there can be an serious QB competition.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Thanks for the info! I was unsuccessful in finding examples before of released 5th year option guys (and OTCBrad couldn't name any examples either fwiw).
Based on that, the OTC pick cancelation chart from those years don't include either of these guys in their formula. Granted not an authoritative source. Also for both the losing and gaining teams in those moves, they wouldn't have been in the draft comp either way, so potentially kind of a false negative scenario. Still...
Edit-actually CLE was draft comp eligible when they signed RGIII in 2016.
https://overthecap.com/compensatory-dra ... ion-chart/
Click on 2017 tab.
https://www.dawgsbynature.com/2017/2/24 ... -confirmed
This article claims he didn't factor in the formula but they were over the max even if RGIII had counted, so another possible false negative scenario.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Two more link:
https://nflcommunications.com/Pages/NFL ... Clubs.aspx
Formal NFL communication on 2017 draft comps. Does not list RGIII in the gained column for CLE.
And for clarification no 2:
https://nflcommunications.com/Pages/NFL ... -----.aspx
Kevin Johnson not appearing in this year's formula for Houstons net losses.
https://nflcommunications.com/Pages/NFL ... Clubs.aspx
Formal NFL communication on 2017 draft comps. Does not list RGIII in the gained column for CLE.
And for clarification no 2:
https://nflcommunications.com/Pages/NFL ... -----.aspx
Kevin Johnson not appearing in this year's formula for Houstons net losses.
- Grizzled
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5641
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 635 times
- Been thanked: 514 times
It's a good question but shouldn't be the overriding factor. The Bears can't keep Floyd at $13M if they want to make any other moves this year. They need to restructure to a more favorable long term contract. It's possible they could work out a one year "prove it" deal with him although I'd have to think he's walking if they rescind the 5th year.
Drafts are like snowflakes, no two are alike.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Great another example!
Does not show up on OTCs chart, nor on the NFLs press release of 2019 comp picks (would have shown under Indy's gains)
https://nflcommunications.com/Pages/NFL ... UBS--.aspx
So I think we can put the pick comp to bed for Floyd.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
I agree it can't be an overriding factor. Even if he were comp pick eligible, the best case scenario for a replacement for him is likely another comp pick guy who would just offset any "gain" from Floyd.Grizzled wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 8:05 am It's a good question but shouldn't be the overriding factor. The Bears can't keep Floyd at $13M if they want to make any other moves this year. They need to restructure to a more favorable long term contract. It's possible they could work out a one year "prove it" deal with him although I'd have to think he's walking if they rescind the 5th year.
Also a 5th or 6th round pick is nice but won't make up for a bad FA period.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Well that's the whole issue that IMO got convulated and lost in this and misled people.
An option is either exercised or not. After it's excecised their isn't a special "rescind" transaction. So for a 5th year rookie option, that exercise occurs the year before. After that, it's just a normal roster termination. It's spelled out that it's not guaranteed - save for injury). But that's it.
The veteran option "loophole" is apparently what got closed in terms of the comp formula. Those options are exercised in the offseason in question and were truely always kind of a bogus workaround to release vets without technically terminating their contract.
I'm not a pro at this sort of stuff, but I've been an "amateur capologist" across sports for many years as I do find these things interesting. The biggest thing I've learned is to be specific with words cuz they make a difference, and check back to the source material. In this case, option rescinding is just not a thing that actually exists.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8004
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 518 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
The Cooler King wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 12:11 pm
The veteran option "loophole" is apparently what got closed in terms of the comp formula.
Is there a link to this? (Not doubting just want to read further)
I didn't see anything on the CBA doing anything to this - and IIRC as of this season the declining an option still counted for the Comp formula
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8004
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 518 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
Found it:RichH55 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:05 amThe Cooler King wrote: ↑Sun Mar 15, 2020 12:11 pm
The veteran option "loophole" is apparently what got closed in terms of the comp formula.
Is there a link to this? (Not doubting just want to read further)
I didn't see anything on the CBA doing anything to this - and IIRC as of this season the declining an option still counted for the Comp formula
Great find by you - Thank you
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Yep that's where I originally heard it. Then that spawned the whole Floyd discussion/debate.
To me this does change the dynamic of Mitch a little. I decline the option and keep the franchise/transition tag in my back pocket if he breaks out.
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6889
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 390 times
- Been thanked: 706 times
Apologies that I'm on really short sleep and struggling with this -
Is the conclusion then "Pulling his option and letting him go doesn't get comp credit"?
Is the conclusion then "Pulling his option and letting him go doesn't get comp credit"?
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8004
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 518 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
Absolutely has to be Moriarty - the only case for it was how the Option was classified
AND come to find out -the Option thing is dead outright.
(I think? Though I keep thinking on it - and there has to be some classification on that 5th year option otherwise no 1st Rounder who plays out his contract would ever count as to the Comp Pick formula)
AND come to find out -the Option thing is dead outright.
(I think? Though I keep thinking on it - and there has to be some classification on that 5th year option otherwise no 1st Rounder who plays out his contract would ever count as to the Comp Pick formula)
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 799 times
- Been thanked: 338 times
If you never pick up the option in the first place then I believe they would count.RichH55 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 17, 2020 10:09 am Absolutely has to be Moriarty - the only case for it was how the Option was classified
AND come to find out -the Option thing is dead outright.
(I think? Though I keep thinking on it - and there has to be some classification on that 5th year option otherwise no 1st Rounder who plays out his contract would ever count as to the Comp Pick formula)
- BearsFanInMN
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 772
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:58 pm
- Location: Phoenix/Tempe
- Has thanked: 201 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
Guess we'll know shortly as decision date is tomorrow
MOTML League: Eskimo Brothers
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Its really pretty simple (to me at least).southdakbearfan wrote: ↑Tue Mar 17, 2020 10:17 amIf you never pick up the option in the first place then I believe they would count.RichH55 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 17, 2020 10:09 am Absolutely has to be Moriarty - the only case for it was how the Option was classified
AND come to find out -the Option thing is dead outright.
(I think? Though I keep thinking on it - and there has to be some classification on that 5th year option otherwise no 1st Rounder who plays out his contract would ever count as to the Comp Pick formula)
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS RESCINDING THE 5TH YEAR OPTION.
OTCBrad still using the rescinded verbiage in this context is pretty careless IMO. His contract is being terminated, just like any other release /cut. It just happens that the contract has no guarantees.
As long as a guy is not released (and i think meets an experience threshold) he is comp pick eligible. If he is released, he isn't eligible. Now an option, on the other hand, has its own transaction type. You can decline to exercise an option and that's not a release.
The only thing they changed this year was on vet options. Teams like Balt were using it as a loophole to boost their comp formula specifically and the NFL changed the comp pick formula. They aren't extending that logic to the rookie 5th year option, becuase it's not negotiated, per OTCBrad, (and I'd guess because the option has to be exercised a full year in advance).
So a 1st round pick can net a comp pick if
1. Their option is declined
2. Their option is exercised
They can't net a comp pick if their contract is terminated (aka cut/released).