Bears have worst pass pro in NFL

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12160
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1241 times
Been thanked: 2207 times



User avatar
The Cooler King
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5012
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 1215 times
Been thanked: 348 times

I'm trying to understand the implication of the fat shaded area. Is that violatility? And then why is the league average so tight?
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6875
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 388 times
Been thanked: 702 times

It's such a simultaneous train wreck.

How do you know how much to blame:

Bad WR separation?
Bad protection?
Holding the ball too long?
Finding the open man?
Bad playcalling?
Terrible play design?


You have to do multiple flushes and start over
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

Why are they calculating probability when the data is actual? Maybe I just don't like their way of saying it. If they're saying that's the future probability I think that's nonsense. I'm pretty sure as the season progresses JF1 and the Bears will approach the league averages. They may not hit - but it will trend that way and it should be noticeable.

I think it already is, actually. If you take out the Cleveland game the picture also looks dramatically different. I don't think any game since looked at all like Cleveland. I think there is a big difference between the comprehensive failure of the Cleveland game and the hit/miss we've seen since that was a combination of bad blocking, other players letting him down and JF1 mistakes or learning curve. He DOES get pressured quickly sometimes. But many other times that isn't the case. He's just not finding people or people aren't in synch with him and such. I really think that will get better. It couldn't get worse. If I were the Bear coaches I'd be looking hard at who is going to present the friendliest targets for him. The TEs clearly are (8 catches on 9 targets). Herbert was 5 for 5 too. If he can catch, can they please try to run some screens? Is that too complicated for the rookie?
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25167
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 938 times

Image
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12160
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1241 times
Been thanked: 2207 times

Yea seemed like this all day. Baldy usually gets it right IMO, and he does here. It's remarkable how bad our OL has been protecting the QB. That NextGen stat is a timing stat, time to pressure - that has nothing to do with reads or WR's or anything else. That's simply us getting beat up front over and over and over and over again. It's the root of our problem and has been since Nagy came to town.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29885
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

dplank wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 5:06 pm Yea seemed like this all day. Baldy usually gets it right IMO, and he does here. It's remarkable how bad our OL has been protecting the QB. That NextGen stat is a timing stat, time to pressure - that has nothing to do with reads or WR's or anything else. That's simply us getting beat up front over and over and over and over again. It's the root of our problem and has been since Nagy came to town.
The bears actually had one of the most promising offensive lines in 2018. In 2018, Leno/Daniels/Whitehair all made the pro bowl (not that means a lot).

Injuries and blocking scheme changes every year are what have been the problem.
User avatar
The Cooler King
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5012
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 1215 times
Been thanked: 348 times

wab wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 5:11 pm
dplank wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 5:06 pm Yea seemed like this all day. Baldy usually gets it right IMO, and he does here. It's remarkable how bad our OL has been protecting the QB. That NextGen stat is a timing stat, time to pressure - that has nothing to do with reads or WR's or anything else. That's simply us getting beat up front over and over and over and over again. It's the root of our problem and has been since Nagy came to town.
The bears actually had one of the most promising offensive lines in 2018. In 2018, Leno/Daniels/Whitehair all made the pro bowl (not that means a lot).

Injuries and blocking scheme changes every year are what have been the problem.
OIines are like elite Ds to me. If you're not actively replenishing they have a life span of like 2 years.
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5192
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 278 times

Playing a very young QB before he has the protections down and can quickly react to the coverage is also a significant contributor for sure.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6875
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 388 times
Been thanked: 702 times

UOK wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 4:55 pm
I don't know what their assignments were, but I'm dubious about blaming that on Peters.

2 guys are coming on the outside and there's no way he can manage both. Apparently the blocking scheme involves the LG and C doubling the NT, 4 more guys staying in to block 2 more guys on the line...and then Peters has to get 1 guy and the back has to come across the QB to pick up the other??

That looks like disasterously bad assignments to me, either by design in the playbook, or by at line (non) adustments.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6116
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 98 times

I think it was both. Peter's saw the pressure and new his job was to ride his guy inside, but also new the free rusher would get a straight path to the QB.

He did the wrong thing and didnt concentrate on his job. He clearly hesitated, almost as if you could see his thoughts. "This isnt going to work". The design was flawed but he also didnt do his job.
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

That was the assignment. Peters had Barrett and Herbert is supposed to block the safety. He whiffed, and the safety caused the fumble (ball protection, kid). Barrett beat Peters too but who knows if Herbert took the safety out (like we've seen Williams do - he's a good blocker) maybe JF1 had somebody to get the ball to. Or at least being able to see Barrett escape out to the right where all the blocking seemed to be.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12160
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1241 times
Been thanked: 2207 times

They had two free runners and we were in max protect. It’s awful.
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6875
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 388 times
Been thanked: 702 times

mmmc_35 wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 8:19 pm I think it was both. Peter's saw the pressure and new his job was to ride his guy inside, but also new the free rusher would get a straight path to the QB.

He did the wrong thing and didnt concentrate on his job. He clearly hesitated, almost as if you could see his thoughts. "This isnt going to work". The design was flawed but he also didnt do his job.
That's one of two things that occurred to me.

The other is that maybe he's looking that way because he can't believe Whitehair is staying with the interior double team and not switching.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
docc
Head Coach
Posts: 3824
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2011 4:33 pm
Location: Outpost of Reality S.E. Arizona
Has thanked: 969 times
Been thanked: 179 times

A roll out right with that "protection" may have been better than the suicide attempts..
User avatar
BearsFanInMN
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 772
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:58 pm
Location: Phoenix/Tempe
Has thanked: 201 times
Been thanked: 40 times

Two 2nd round guard, UDFA center, washouts and 7th rounders at tackle (plus a future HOF who’s 39 and back from retirement). Anyone surprised? I think the only help I’ve seen is a smurf WR when we occasionally chip.

We haven’t prioritized OL since Finks which coincidentally was when we had success even with crap at most of the skill positions.
MOTML League: Eskimo Brothers
User avatar
karhu
Head Coach
Posts: 2050
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2016 10:20 pm
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 373 times

That play needs its own truth and reconciliation commission.

Where was the communication? Why did Peters have to wonder which blitzer to block? Why did he eventually choose the guy he did, leaving Herbert a longer path to the other guy?

Who was responsible for identifying the defensive front? Why didn't they say anything? Were they not supposed to?

If we're in max pro and we've left at least one guy free on the QB's blind side while doubling everything in sight from the NT on down to the right, can the QB motion a TE over to the left? If not, why not?

If the QB knows that it's a pass play, and two guys are lining up wide of his unaided LT, can he check out of the largely pointless play fake? If not, why not?

Speaking of that play fake, why include it in a play that has your line setting up to pass-block?

If two blitzers are lining up outside our 39-year-old fisherman/LT, and the play is specifically designed to prevent the RB from helping block one of them, the free guy is the QB's man, right? So why didn't he direct Herbert to simply go block him?

Why call it max pro when it only works if the other team lines up where your blockers are?

Sheesh, I could go on. But that one play raises so many questions about how responsibility is assigned and carried out. I might not live long enough for Fields and Mustipher to write about it in their memoirs, so I want to know now. Or soon.
So much road and so few places, so much friendliness and so little intimacy, so much flavour and so little taste.

Friendship is better than fighting, but fighting is more useful.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20623
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 795 times



This is how you ruin young QBs, and ties into my fear of trotting him out too soon.

Oh well.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6116
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Moriarty wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 9:39 pm
mmmc_35 wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 8:19 pm I think it was both. Peter's saw the pressure and new his job was to ride his guy inside, but also new the free rusher would get a straight path to the QB.

He did the wrong thing and didnt concentrate on his job. He clearly hesitated, almost as if you could see his thoughts. "This isnt going to work". The design was flawed but he also didnt do his job.
That's one of two things that occurred to me.

The other is that maybe he's looking that way because he can't believe Whitehair is staying with the interior double team and not switching.
That easily could be. Which as you mention it fits the protection better. It's simple step left protection. Whitehair needs to pass his guy off. Peter's took a 45 drop set. Hes set up in and realized Whitehair isnt in the zone because he doubles the nose. So yeah your right. Or the protection was super fucked.
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11040
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 518 times

Moriarty wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 4:42 pm It's such a simultaneous train wreck.

How do you know how much to blame:

Bad WR separation?
Bad protection?
Holding the ball too long?
Finding the open man?
Bad playcalling?
Terrible play design?


You have to do multiple flushes and start over
Yeah. It's a little of columns A - EE.
Image
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

dplank wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 9:30 pm They had two free runners and we were in max protect. It’s awful.
Yeah - so they were heavy on the right and the FS comes up on the left to try to take advantage of that. Am I wrong in saying that the protection was fine if Peters just is a little more athletic and Herbert does his job? (I love Herbert and what a future he has)

I saw mmm say it is a simple step left protection - but is it? It seems like they had everyone accounted for on the left (and doubling Veia to help Mustipher in pass pro makes sense to me). It seems like with the LB and FS coming one of those TEs could have drifted across to where they weren't and it could have been a fine play.

But that's what we're dealing with here, where the Bears have little margin of error. Peters has to succeed at something he's often too old to do. Herbert has to succeed at something he's just green at doing & not had to do a lot of (make critical blocks). JF1 has to read defenses and process things more quickly with less experience than most NFL QBs. And he needs to find WRs he's not used to playing with and frankly who aren't very good. It has always sort of been the nature of Nagy's offense (which are still the plays Lazor is calling, unfortunately) - maybe good design if things go perfectly. But things have to go perfectly.

They really need to run the ball even more - like 30-35 times minimum. Because when they are trying to pass JF1 has to carry the whole world on his shoulders. And when they DO try to pass it better be play action or rollouts for big chunks and something they practice and give JF1 at least some chance to get the timing down (e.g. have the D rushing him hard in practice and making him release the ball under 2.5 seconds). I don't get the sense that he has any timing familiarity with any of the WRs. Especially not ARob. It is almost like they need more "sandlot" guys out there for when things break down. Because running precise routes doesn't mean shit if you're covered and the QB is scrambling. Too bad Anthony Miller is such a knucklehead - because he's the kind of WR JF1 needs when things aren't perfect.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29885
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

Peters looks like screwed this up, but it's ultimately Mustipher that is responsible for this complete breakdown - and to a lesser extent Simmons.

They are heavy to the right and the play action is to the right, so Simmons is supposed to block down on Suh but he doesn't. He starts to slide that way but he jumps back to the right and just sort of stands there with his arms out.

Daniels...who is supposed to take Vea with Mustipher, starts sliding towards Vea...sees this Simmons fuck up, and takes Suh.

Here's where the root of the problem is though: Mustipher.

Based on this play design, Whitehair should take Barrett instead of Vea, but he sees how Vea is aligned to the left of the center in the A gap and knows that Daniels won't be able to get there and Mustipher has no chance in hell taking Vea on alone. Mustipher either missed making the adjustment or made the wrong call.

Peters should take take Barrett with Whitehair or pick up the blitz, but he sees Whitehair helping Mustipher instead so he has to make a split decision on taking Barrett or Winfield and ended up getting neither.

Herbert is supposed to pick up anyone who gets past James on the right or be there for a dump off because that's where the fake goes.

There's no way in hell he can get back to the left and based on how he's moving, he's not supposed to.
TheWorldBreaker
MVP
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:57 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 120 times



I don’t know what Peters was doing…he was so athletic and had such good feet when he was young that maybe he could flash at a blitzer and recover in time to stop his guy but not now.

The QB getting sacked in two seconds while being in max protection is just so Bears.
User avatar
Grizzled
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5623
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
Has thanked: 635 times
Been thanked: 510 times

UOK wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 4:55 pm
Herbert can't whiff on his blocks.
Drafts are like snowflakes, no two are alike.
Richie
MVP
Posts: 1913
Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:37 pm
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 18 times

And he helps us in no way, shape, or form with his inability to read the field. Creating hesitation and a penchant for holding the ball far too long.

Oh, and his baseball pitcher windup has to be fixed or his career will be short lived. I am not totally hating on Fields or giving up on him. However, you can't just hide from behind the usual line of excuses for him. He's been BAD as well.

I really would like to see him sit down. Dalton clearly gives us the best chance to win right now. Not only that, Fields is going to get himself killed and further destroy his mechanics/psyche in the process.

Where did this big windup to his throw come anyway? I rewatched his Ohio State highlights and he didn't have that going on.
TheWorldBreaker
MVP
Posts: 1117
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:57 pm
Has thanked: 30 times
Been thanked: 120 times

Richie wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:33 am And he helps us in no way, shape, or form with his inability to read the field. Creating hesitation and a penchant for holding the ball far too long.

Oh, and his baseball pitcher windup has to be fixed or his career will be short lived. I am not totally hating on Fields or giving up on him. However, you can't just hide from behind the usual line of excuses for him. He's been BAD as well.

I really would like to see him sit down. Dalton clearly gives us the best chance to win right now. Not only that, Fields is going to get himself killed and further destroy his mechanics/psyche in the process.

Where did this big windup to his throw come anyway? I rewatched his Ohio State highlights and he didn't have that going on.
I’m old enough to remember when the media and many fans were saying Nagy was the biggest idiot in the NFL for not immediately starting Fields and thinking Dalton gave them the best chance to win.

Kind of funny how fast a media narrative can change. I wonder where the Bears would be if they’d started Dalton after the Oakland game.

Fields would probably be feeling a lot better about himself and the Bears might have beaten the Packers…
User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8076
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 315 times

If Winfield didn't get him Barrett would have.

Herbert being a rook, this being play action, it probably didn't cross his mind to say fuck it and immediately go left to protect Fields.
User avatar
Burl
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 937
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 8:28 am
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 227 times

This is EXACTLY the situation that the 'start Dalton' crowd was warning against.
Barring some drastic change in direction, Fields is going to end up as just one more in a long line of prospects who this organization failed.

How many times do we have to watch this unfold before we learn?
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25167
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 938 times

Image
User avatar
The Cooler King
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5012
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 1215 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Burl wrote: Tue Oct 26, 2021 10:59 am This is EXACTLY the situation that the 'start Dalton' crowd was warning against.
Barring some drastic change in direction, Fields is going to end up as just one more in a long line of prospects who this organization failed.

How many times do we have to watch this unfold before we learn?
This org may well blow the opportunity, but sitting him a year wouldn't have changed that either.
Post Reply