If there was ever a time to be a fan of high level or elite QB play, then it is right now.
In this context when I say elite or high level I'm evaluating the individual not like a Top 5 thing that's limited by statistical categorization.
In no order:
1) The GOAT
2) Mahomes
3) Rodgers
4) Allen
5) Herbert
6) Burrow (I just love watching Burrow and Chase play together. Every play I look for the bomb.)
7) Murray
8) Lamar Jackson
9) OK fine I'll put Dak on here
10) IDK if Russell Wilson is elite or high level anymore
11) Watson. If this guy wasn't so allegedly addicted to hand jobs he'd be out there rockin' it too and he'd be way up high on this list.
Honorable mention to Stafford. He's had a great career, but it was squandered in Detroit. Hopefully he's got a solid 5 years in LA doing good things.
All of these guys play at such a high level. A true blue NFL fan would see a game with any one of these teams and be like yeah I'm watching that one.
That list doesn't factor in the crop of QBs that were drafted this year. I'm biased against Lawrence so screw him. But Fields and Jones could easily make that list one day. Maybe even next year.
It isn't even just that they're good QBs. It's how they play. You've got your pocket passers. Your mobile guys. We need a lefty in there but whatever.
I've been watching football since the mid-80s. I don't EVER remember it being this deep with the QBs.
Thoughts?
Are We In A New Golden Age Of QBs?
Moderator: wab
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8428
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 913 times
- Been thanked: 1294 times
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3632
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 208 times
I'm interested to see how this pans out:
Brady taking less (and then cap shenanigans with Tampa to give him extra talent) is part of the reason why he's the GOAT.
Mahomes and Allen going into the part of their career with big cap hits and having to adjust for less talent around them.
Herbert, Burrow, Murray and Jackson all on rookie deals.
Prescott, Wilson and Watson at the bottom of that list now they're on market rate deals.
Then Rodgers as a GOAT level player.
Brady has next year but after that I don't see him sticking around for a rebuild, but if they draft well he'll likely stick to less money to keep ring chasing. Legendary smarts!
Of the rest, will Mahomes and Allen trend towards Prescott and Wilson or is a new age beginning. I'm guessing that their success is partially down to teams around them being hamstrung by paying Goff, Cousins, Wentz, Ryan, Tannehill, Garoppolo etc. $30m per year. But we'll see, I've been wrong before!
Brady taking less (and then cap shenanigans with Tampa to give him extra talent) is part of the reason why he's the GOAT.
Mahomes and Allen going into the part of their career with big cap hits and having to adjust for less talent around them.
Herbert, Burrow, Murray and Jackson all on rookie deals.
Prescott, Wilson and Watson at the bottom of that list now they're on market rate deals.
Then Rodgers as a GOAT level player.
Brady has next year but after that I don't see him sticking around for a rebuild, but if they draft well he'll likely stick to less money to keep ring chasing. Legendary smarts!
Of the rest, will Mahomes and Allen trend towards Prescott and Wilson or is a new age beginning. I'm guessing that their success is partially down to teams around them being hamstrung by paying Goff, Cousins, Wentz, Ryan, Tannehill, Garoppolo etc. $30m per year. But we'll see, I've been wrong before!
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2249
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
- Has thanked: 2068 times
- Been thanked: 386 times
We had some pretty good QB play in the 2000s and early 2010s. I think it's way to early to see if this group passes them.
What it does say that us fans have been spoiled. That is a good thing. Well, maybe not us Bears fans, but other NFL fans have been spoiled. Our QBs still can't pass out the ghost of Sid Luckman.
What it does say that us fans have been spoiled. That is a good thing. Well, maybe not us Bears fans, but other NFL fans have been spoiled. Our QBs still can't pass out the ghost of Sid Luckman.
- IotaNet
- MVP
- Posts: 1527
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 am
- Location: Minneapolis (Chicago Native)
- Has thanked: 292 times
- Been thanked: 223 times
I think it's about the evolution of the game.
1) The rules have been heavily skewed toward offense. High scores sell tickets and attract eyeballs.
2) The player safety rules also favor Quarterback play. Gone are the days when QB's were targets for being clobbered silly. That leads to more creativity and success at the position. "Roughing the passer" is a real thing and defenses are being coached to avoid it.
3) Coaches and GM's have become way more open-minded about what makes up a successful quarterback. 20 years ago, a tiny guy like Kyler Murray wouldn't have gotten serious consideration as an NFL quarterback. Russell Wilson came into the league 10 years ago and there were all kinds of questions about his height.
4) Teams have now made the decision to tailor their offenses around the strengths of a particular QB instead of making the QB fit their system. Lamar Jackson is the most obvious example (and some feel that the jury is still out on that) but look at the local situation. We've been SCREAMING that Nagy should have tailored his offense to JF1 and we rode him out of town on a rail because he didn't.
You might call it a golden age and you wouldn't be wrong -- but there are a lot of factors that have contributed.
1) The rules have been heavily skewed toward offense. High scores sell tickets and attract eyeballs.
2) The player safety rules also favor Quarterback play. Gone are the days when QB's were targets for being clobbered silly. That leads to more creativity and success at the position. "Roughing the passer" is a real thing and defenses are being coached to avoid it.
3) Coaches and GM's have become way more open-minded about what makes up a successful quarterback. 20 years ago, a tiny guy like Kyler Murray wouldn't have gotten serious consideration as an NFL quarterback. Russell Wilson came into the league 10 years ago and there were all kinds of questions about his height.
4) Teams have now made the decision to tailor their offenses around the strengths of a particular QB instead of making the QB fit their system. Lamar Jackson is the most obvious example (and some feel that the jury is still out on that) but look at the local situation. We've been SCREAMING that Nagy should have tailored his offense to JF1 and we rode him out of town on a rail because he didn't.
You might call it a golden age and you wouldn't be wrong -- but there are a lot of factors that have contributed.
“Never let your ego get so close to your position that when your position falls, your ego falls with it.”
- Colin Powell
- Colin Powell
- Arkansasbear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4952
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 478 times
- Been thanked: 698 times
Not yet the New Golden age. That won't get hear until 2023 when Fields is the best QB in the NFL.
Each and every generation had it easier from a QB/offensive standpoint than the one before it, both rule and scheme wise. I think people understand that you can't judge the numbers of today's players vs QB play in 00's. Just like the 00's vs the 80's/90's. So on and so forth. An average QB NFL season now would be pro bowl material just 13-14 years ago. I looked like a year ago or something. The average QB (even back in a 16 game season) threw for 4k yards like 24-25 TD's and 11-12 INT's with a 92 rating or something. Like a 4.4 TD% and 2.1 INT%. That's a REALLY good season back in the late 00's.IotaNet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:35 am I think it's about the evolution of the game.
1) The rules have been heavily skewed toward offense. High scores sell tickets and attract eyeballs.
2) The player safety rules also favor Quarterback play. Gone are the days when QB's were targets for being clobbered silly. That leads to more creativity and success at the position. "Roughing the passer" is a real thing and defenses are being coached to avoid it.
3) Coaches and GM's have become way more open-minded about what makes up a successful quarterback. 20 years ago, a tiny guy like Kyler Murray wouldn't have gotten serious consideration as an NFL quarterback. Russell Wilson came into the league 10 years ago and there were all kinds of questions about his height.
4) Teams have now made the decision to tailor their offenses around the strengths of a particular QB instead of making the QB fit their system. Lamar Jackson is the most obvious example (and some feel that the jury is still out on that) but look at the local situation. We've been SCREAMING that Nagy should have tailored his offense to JF1 and we rode him out of town on a rail because he didn't.
You might call it a golden age and you wouldn't be wrong -- but there are a lot of factors that have contributed.
So, it's not like QB's will be considered great because they're posting numbers that would otherwise be historically solid. You're judged vs your modern counterparts. So, I don't think the whole "it's easier to put up big numbers nowadays" thing is a factor. You can still see who is elite and who is not.
I think what people mean by a possible "golden age" at QB isn't that a bunch of guys will post eye popping numbers. It's that instead of 3-4 guys jousting among themselves in the elite category. You might see 6-7 guys neck and neck over the course of an extended period of time.
The rest, I definitely am with you, though.
- crueltyabc
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
- Location: Dallas TX
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
A few years ago I had some fear that the product was going to decline as the guys drafted in the early 2000s retired. Instead it looks like they've been replaced and there are still going to be at least 8-10 very high level QBs for the next decade. I certainly hope and currently believe that Fields will be one of them
xyt in the discord chats
- Boris13c
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 15969
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
- Location: The Bear Nebula
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 113 times
don't know if it will be a golden age or not, but it sure is fun to watch ... it will be even more fun when OUR guy gets the coaching and support he needs to join the party and the discussion
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
George Carlin
- IotaNet
- MVP
- Posts: 1527
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 am
- Location: Minneapolis (Chicago Native)
- Has thanked: 292 times
- Been thanked: 223 times
I just came across an excellent article on today's SI.com that does a great job of expanding/elaborating on the point I was trying to make.IotaNet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:35 am I think it's about the evolution of the game.
3) Coaches and GM's have become way more open-minded about what makes up a successful quarterback. 20 years ago, a tiny guy like Kyler Murray wouldn't have gotten serious consideration as an NFL quarterback. Russell Wilson came into the league 10 years ago and there were all kinds of questions about his height.
"Patrick Mahomes and the evolving NFL draft quarterback evaluation: How the Chiefs' QB changed the way Todd McShay scouts the position"
https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2022/stor ... s-position
It's an excellent read. Here are a couple of excerpts:
<<Mahomes' evaluation and his greatness in spite of the mechanics still carries significance for me today. Why? Because it fundamentally changed the way I scout quarterbacks for the draft.>>
<<The continued success and the ability to hit those nonstandard throws on a consistent basis made me reconsider how I evaluate the position, and my scouting mentality absolutely shifted.>>
<<It didn't take long for another quarterback to come along with similar traits. The Arizona Cardinals' Kyler Murray was from a similar college system (Oklahoma) and had that same baseball background ... His game had a lot of improv and wasn't always pretty, but like Mahomes, he had results. Murray was the first pick overall that year, and he has since been one of the better quarterbacks in the NFL when healthy>>
Bottom line for me is that this new crop of QB's is bringing a whole different paradigm to the game and the decision-makers and evaluators have opened their mind to the differences.
“Never let your ego get so close to your position that when your position falls, your ego falls with it.”
- Colin Powell
- Colin Powell
- Burl
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 939
- Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2020 8:28 am
- Has thanked: 29 times
- Been thanked: 227 times
I remember a time when there was Manning/Brady as the elite QBs.
Then Palmer was like the next best guy with Favre in the mix and you had dudes like Hasselbeck and Delhomme making multiple pro bowls.
This was before the ascendence of Brees I guess.
Then Palmer was like the next best guy with Favre in the mix and you had dudes like Hasselbeck and Delhomme making multiple pro bowls.
This was before the ascendence of Brees I guess.
- Yogi da Bear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2609
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 4:43 pm
- Has thanked: 228 times
- Been thanked: 404 times
IotaNet wrote: ↑Mon Jan 24, 2022 11:35 am I think it's about the evolution of the game.
1) The rules have been heavily skewed toward offense. High scores sell tickets and attract eyeballs.
2) The player safety rules also favor Quarterback play. Gone are the days when QB's were targets for being clobbered silly. That leads to more creativity and success at the position. "Roughing the passer" is a real thing and defenses are being coached to avoid it.
3) Coaches and GM's have become way more open-minded about what makes up a successful quarterback. 20 years ago, a tiny guy like Kyler Murray wouldn't have gotten serious consideration as an NFL quarterback. Russell Wilson came into the league 10 years ago and there were all kinds of questions about his height.
4) Teams have now made the decision to tailor their offenses around the strengths of a particular QB instead of making the QB fit their system. Lamar Jackson is the most obvious example (and some feel that the jury is still out on that) but look at the local situation. We've been SCREAMING that Nagy should have tailored his offense to JF1 and we rode him out of town on a rail because he didn't.
You might call it a golden age and you wouldn't be wrong -- but there are a lot of factors that have contributed.
Couldn't agree with this more. In fact, I'd go so far as to say that it's not so much a "Golden Age" as a "Golden Evolution."
And I'd like to add another factor to it--the gradual acceptance of black QBs. Look at how many of those QBs you mention are athletic black QBs. And this inclusion has also affected the development of white QBs. They've had to become more athletic themselves. Look at the measurables of guys like Herbert and Allen. There's nothing that demoralizes a defense more than a QB running for a first down after you already effectively covered up all his other weapons. There aren't too many Sonny Jurgensons out there...well, maybe Mac Jones. lol
So I think that this is not just a Golden Age. This is a Golden Age that's going to continue as more and more athletic kids are going to be taught that QB position and let loose. And the general measurable athletic ability of QBs across is going to be increasingly developed.
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7388
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 1017 times
I think about this constantly. It was just a few years ago that, after peyton retired and brees/brady/rodgers' retirement looked imminent, there was so much hand wringing that we'd somehow never see that level of qb play ever again.crueltyabc wrote: ↑Tue Jan 25, 2022 12:20 pm A few years ago I had some fear that the product was going to decline as the guys drafted in the early 2000s retired. Instead it looks like they've been replaced and there are still going to be at least 8-10 very high level QBs for the next decade. I certainly hope and currently believe that Fields will be one of them
- crueltyabc
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
- Location: Dallas TX
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
Don't be too hard on the handwringers. It's easy to lose faith when you're looking at an EJ Manual, Geno Smith, Mike Glennon draft class
xyt in the discord chats
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7388
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 576 times
- Been thanked: 1017 times
i see you conveniently left DA GOAT MATT BARKLEY off that list.crueltyabc wrote: ↑Wed Jan 26, 2022 2:05 pm Don't be too hard on the handwringers. It's easy to lose faith when you're looking at an EJ Manual, Geno Smith, Mike Glennon draft class
- crueltyabc
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
- Location: Dallas TX
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
I didn't want to enrage the Matt Barkley stans
xyt in the discord chats
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3632
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 208 times
*whistles*
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)