Is Mike Gisecki the next Travis Kelce?

College football and the NFL Draft

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
Hematite
Player of the Month
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:05 pm

I know Chicago just drafted Shaheen, but Gisecki has to be on Nagy's radar with that athleticism and speed. 6' 5" and a 41 inch vertical......He was the New Jersey state slam dunk winner in high school.

40 Yard Dash
4.54

Bench Press
22.0

Vertical Jump
41.5

3 Cone Drill
6.76

If Fuller and Prince return and Pace signs Watkins or Robinson is it worth using a 2nd round pick on this guy?
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5192
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 278 times

He's not a TE. He's a WR. TEs are expected to be able to block someone.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Hematite
Player of the Month
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:05 pm

I agree his blocking is weak. But this guy is a mismatch made in heaven.
Middleguard
MVP
Posts: 1667
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 120 times

Were any of the TEs invited to the combine good blockers in college? Clearly, none of them are built like linemen.

[Aside] Back in the day, split ends (X) were expected to block at least as much as receive, and for tight ends a reception was almost as unlikely as a tackle-eligible reception is today. I think "chip" is as much as can be expected for a TE nowdays.
User avatar
IotaNet
MVP
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 am
Location: Minneapolis (Chicago Native)
Has thanked: 284 times
Been thanked: 212 times

Middleguard wrote:Were any of the TEs invited to the combine good blockers in college? Clearly, none of them are built like linemen.

[Aside] Back in the day, split ends (X) were expected to block at least as much as receive, and for tight ends a reception was almost as unlikely as a tackle-eligible reception is today. I think "chip" is as much as can be expected for a TE nowdays.
I tend to agree. Some of these 6’5” pass catchers are more like tall, thick wideouts than Mike Ditka or even Ozzie Newsome.
“Never let your ego get so close to your position that when your position falls, your ego falls with it.”

- Colin Powell
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

It's not like it's something they can't learn or grow into. Heck Mercedes Lewis stunk as a blocker and now he is one of the best at the end of his career.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

southdakbearfan wrote:It's not like it's something they can't learn or grow into. Heck Mercedes Lewis stunk as a blocker and now he is one of the best at the end of his career.
Yeah, but that usually happens (like with Lewis) when you get old and can't run any more.
Hematite
Player of the Month
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:05 pm

IotaNet wrote:
Middleguard wrote:Were any of the TEs invited to the combine good blockers in college? Clearly, none of them are built like linemen.

[Aside] Back in the day, split ends (X) were expected to block at least as much as receive, and for tight ends a reception was almost as unlikely as a tackle-eligible reception is today. I think "chip" is as much as can be expected for a TE nowdays.
I tend to agree. Some of these 6’5” pass catchers are more like tall, thick wideouts than Mike Ditka or even Ozzie Newsome.
And then the question becomes, how do you stop him. To big for most CB's, and to fast for most LB's. The kid is an athletic freak. I'd really consider him at the bottom of the 2nd or early 3rd if that somehow became an option.
User avatar
IotaNet
MVP
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 am
Location: Minneapolis (Chicago Native)
Has thanked: 284 times
Been thanked: 212 times

Hematite wrote: ... And then the question becomes, how do you stop him. To big for most CB's, and to fast for most LB's. The kid is an athletic freak. I'd really consider him at the bottom of the 2nd or early 3rd if that somehow became an option.
Hmmm ... so then he and Shaeen become our version of Sampson/Olajuwan?

I can think of worse outcomes. :toast:
“Never let your ego get so close to your position that when your position falls, your ego falls with it.”

- Colin Powell
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5192
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 278 times

Middleguard wrote:Were any of the TEs invited to the combine good blockers in college? Clearly, none of them are built like linemen.
You need to watch his tape. There's a clear difference between "not good" and almost entirely ineffective, even against guys smaller than he is.

That's not to say he won't be a desirable NFL player. But you have to be realistic and call him what he is... a 250# WR. He's not a TE.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5192
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 278 times

IotaNet wrote:
Hematite wrote: ... And then the question becomes, how do you stop him. To big for most CB's, and to fast for most LB's. The kid is an athletic freak. I'd really consider him at the bottom of the 2nd or early 3rd if that somehow became an option.
Hmmm ... so then he and Shaeen become our version of Sampson/Olajuwan?

I can think of worse outcomes. :toast:
Great reference. :thumbsup:

But it shows your age. I wonder how many folks on here had to look that one up. :evilgrin:
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
Hiphopopotamos
Head Coach
Posts: 3535
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:56 pm

Mikefive wrote:
IotaNet wrote:
Hematite wrote: ... And then the question becomes, how do you stop him. To big for most CB's, and to fast for most LB's. The kid is an athletic freak. I'd really consider him at the bottom of the 2nd or early 3rd if that somehow became an option.
Hmmm ... so then he and Shaeen become our version of Sampson/Olajuwan?

I can think of worse outcomes. :toast:
Great reference. :thumbsup:

But it shows your age. I wonder how many folks on here had to look that one up. :evilgrin:


I'm old enough to know that ultimately that experiment didn't work out and Houston had to trade Sampson away after 3.5 seasons.
Holy Shit - We got Justin Fields!

In my former life I was known as FencikFanatic.

Oh, and if you were wondering - yes I'm real. And I'm fantastic.
User avatar
malk
Head Coach
Posts: 3630
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
Has thanked: 133 times
Been thanked: 208 times

Hiphopopotamos wrote:
Mikefive wrote:
IotaNet wrote:
Hematite wrote: ... And then the question becomes, how do you stop him. To big for most CB's, and to fast for most LB's. The kid is an athletic freak. I'd really consider him at the bottom of the 2nd or early 3rd if that somehow became an option.
Hmmm ... so then he and Shaeen become our version of Sampson/Olajuwan?

I can think of worse outcomes. :toast:
Great reference. :thumbsup:

But it shows your age. I wonder how many folks on here had to look that one up. :evilgrin:


I'm old enough to know that ultimately that experiment didn't work out and Houston had to trade Sampson away after 3.5 seasons.
Injuries. Seems pretty apt for a Bears comparison.
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".

Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.

(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
User avatar
IotaNet
MVP
Posts: 1513
Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:04 am
Location: Minneapolis (Chicago Native)
Has thanked: 284 times
Been thanked: 212 times

malk wrote:
Hiphopopotamos wrote:
Mikefive wrote:
IotaNet wrote:
Hematite wrote: ... And then the question becomes, how do you stop him. To big for most CB's, and to fast for most LB's. The kid is an athletic freak. I'd really consider him at the bottom of the 2nd or early 3rd if that somehow became an option.
Hmmm ... so then he and Shaeen become our version of Sampson/Olajuwan?

I can think of worse outcomes. :toast:
Great reference. :thumbsup:

But it shows your age. I wonder how many folks on here had to look that one up. :evilgrin:


I'm old enough to know that ultimately that experiment didn't work out and Houston had to trade Sampson away after 3.5 seasons.
Injuries. Seems pretty apt for a Bears comparison.
Yeah, I went way back -- I'm old enough to be a Grandpa and that one definitely gives it away. (I don't care, tho -- Grandbabies rock!)

And unfortunately, the injury thing is part of the comparison. We simply can't catch a break where that's concerned. :frustrated:
“Never let your ego get so close to your position that when your position falls, your ego falls with it.”

- Colin Powell
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5192
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 278 times

IotaNet wrote:
malk wrote:
Hiphopopotamos wrote:
Mikefive wrote:
IotaNet wrote:
Hematite wrote: ... And then the question becomes, how do you stop him. To big for most CB's, and to fast for most LB's. The kid is an athletic freak. I'd really consider him at the bottom of the 2nd or early 3rd if that somehow became an option.
Hmmm ... so then he and Shaeen become our version of Sampson/Olajuwan?

I can think of worse outcomes. :toast:
Great reference. :thumbsup:

But it shows your age. I wonder how many folks on here had to look that one up. :evilgrin:


I'm old enough to know that ultimately that experiment didn't work out and Houston had to trade Sampson away after 3.5 seasons.
Injuries. Seems pretty apt for a Bears comparison.
Yeah, I went way back -- I'm old enough to be a Grandpa and that one definitely gives it away. (I don't care, tho -- Grandbabies rock!)

And unfortunately, the injury thing is part of the comparison. We simply can't catch a break where that's concerned. :frustrated:
I thought it would be neat to have grandkids. My underestimation. :D
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6116
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 98 times

I really do like him as a recieving threat. I question Shaheens ability in that area. I would like a move TE drafted but this guy will go to high.
User avatar
Adipost
MVP
Posts: 1295
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2016 5:54 am

Travis Kelce was not regarded as an athletic freak coming out of college...

Kelce has been a tremendous run blocker throughout his career for the Bearcats, but really elevated his game as a receiver in his senior season. He isn't a tremendous athlete, but he does a lot of things very well. It's a deep tight end class, but Kelce's play suggests that he should be highly sought after.
Hematite
Player of the Month
Posts: 399
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2016 10:05 pm

Adipost wrote:Travis Kelce was not regarded as an athletic freak coming out of college...

Kelce has been a tremendous run blocker throughout his career for the Bearcats, but really elevated his game as a receiver in his senior season. He isn't a tremendous athlete, but he does a lot of things very well. It's a deep tight end class, but Kelce's play suggests that he should be highly sought after.
I was focused more on what role he plays for KC's offense and whether Gisecki would fill that role well in our offense. The fact that Gisecki is an athletic freak just makes him more intriquing!
Post Reply