3 Draft Scenarios... Pick Your Favorite
Moderator: wab
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
I don't think Chubb makes it out of the top 7. If he were to fall out of the top 5, I assume teams would be falling all over themselves trying to trade up.
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7336
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 555 times
- Been thanked: 967 times
I've just got chubb penciled in as my "player everyone authoritatively says is going really high and then slips a bit" for the year. His hype started too early in the offseason and as more players move up the board (and more teams jockey for QB's) he'll land right in our lap.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20560
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 209 times
- Been thanked: 758 times
I think 3 QBs are absolutely going to go in the top 7, which leaves Barkley/Nelson/Chubb/Fitzpatrick/Edwards. I'm fine with any of those 5 players and I don't think we have the juice to move up from 8 to 6 if someone is falling.
Last edited by G08 on Wed Mar 21, 2018 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 204 times
Our defence is still crying out for a standout playmaker. Hicks is there or there abouts but we need another (and for Hicks to get more rest). Edmunds is the only player I see that makes it to 8 who can fill that role, be it at edge or as an ILB.
Nelson might be a 10 year all pro but even then I don't think that value above another solid guard is enough for our team right now. It's a bit of a luxury pick for me.
Nelson might be a 10 year all pro but even then I don't think that value above another solid guard is enough for our team right now. It's a bit of a luxury pick for me.
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
Hicks got paid. He came through. Bears need to stop killing him on snaps.malk wrote:Our defence is still crying out for a standout playmaker. Hicks is there or there abouts but we need another (and for Hicks to get more rest).
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3625
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 204 times
That's why we need another standout. Without a second difference maker they'll keep running Hicks into the ground. I hope it's Leonard but I think his ceiling is very, very good rather than great.Middleguard wrote:Hicks got paid. He came through. Bears need to stop killing him on snaps.malk wrote:Our defence is still crying out for a standout playmaker. Hicks is there or there abouts but we need another (and for Hicks to get more rest).
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
- Umbali
- MVP
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2017 10:32 pm
- Has thanked: 41 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
Based on those options I went number 3. My heart wanted to go 1 or 2 because I like both round 1 options, however I think of O line dominance in front of a young QB and I think that is so valuable.
I love adding great potential to the defense...but I want Trubisky to never get happy feet and to trust his line.
I love adding great potential to the defense...but I want Trubisky to never get happy feet and to trust his line.
Fantasy Team: Peanut Punchers
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3829
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 603 times
If I have to pick one of these three, it'd be #1, largely because I'm not really a Carter fan.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
As you know, I'm an Edmunds fan... obvi. But I'm curious as to why you think he's draftable at 8 but Davenport is too raw to take in the same spot?
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20560
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 209 times
- Been thanked: 758 times
Level of competition worries me a bunch, and with Edmunds I love the versatility he affords Fangio and this defense (I don't believe Davenport can do that). Vic can drop him into coverage and blitz a corner, he can put him on a RB and blitz an inside linebacker, etc. I think with Aaron Rodgers still in this division, we need to find a way to fuck with him and coverages. 6'5" 253 lbs dudes with 34.5" arms that run 4.54 are rare. He needs work, it's purely projection, but I strongly feel that if anyone can get the most out of this kid, it's Vic Fangio.wab wrote:As you know, I'm an Edmunds fan... obvi. But I'm curious as to why you think he's draftable at 8 but Davenport is too raw to take in the same spot?
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
I happen to agree with you.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20560
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 209 times
- Been thanked: 758 times
Plus with Floyd having similar athletic traits, you can ostensibly use him in that "joker" role defensively since he already knows the system. This way you can tell Edmunds to just rush the passer and work on learning the nuances of the defense as the season progresses.wab wrote:I happen to agree with you.
It'll take him time to get a feel for moves, counter-moves etc but there is nothing wrong with using him like Aldon Smith (granted Aldon Smith rushed a ton in college, but much to my surprise it seemed like a lot of his success came from the 3-technique rather than outside). Hand usage, leverage, and winning with speed should be his focus right now.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
If Nelson is gone, Edmunds is my guy. But I still want to figure out a way to get Rolland-Jones on the roster.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20560
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 209 times
- Been thanked: 758 times
I don't "love" anyone this year like I did in years past. When pick 8 comes around and Nelson is there, I'm good with it. If it's Edmunds, great. Davenport, Fitzpatrick, Ward are all fine with me.wab wrote:If Nelson is gone, Edmunds is my guy. But I still want to figure out a way to get Rolland-Jones on the roster.
I'm even good with Landry if we trade back to 11 or 12.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
yeah, there isn't a guy i'm dying to have. nor is there a guy where I'm like, no goddamn way
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3829
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 603 times
I like Edmunds a lot.
I like Davenport a lot too.
Edmunds reminds me some of Anthony Barr, but honestly I kind of see a millionaire's De'Vondre Campbell in him.
Davenport reminds me a little of on-the-field Aldon Smith. Not nearly as strong, but the same kind of speed-to-power conversion.
I like Davenport a lot too.
Edmunds reminds me some of Anthony Barr, but honestly I kind of see a millionaire's De'Vondre Campbell in him.
Davenport reminds me a little of on-the-field Aldon Smith. Not nearly as strong, but the same kind of speed-to-power conversion.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- staleystarch
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:08 pm
None of these are my favorite. I have not drunk the "we fixed the receiver problem" kool-aid. I do think, post combine, a pick at number 8 for a WR would be a reach. I do think we should grab one in the 2nd. I'll go for my favorite.
1. Q. Nelson
2. DJ Moore
1. Q. Nelson
2. DJ Moore
"We don’t know exactly what we’re doing” -- John Fox
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
So, what WR goes then? And even after cutting someone, Moore isn't going to be higher than 5 on the depth chart.staleystarch wrote:None of these are my favorite. I have not drunk the "we fixed the receiver problem" kool-aid. I do think, post combine, a pick at number 8 for a WR would be a reach. I do think we should grab one in the 2nd. I'll go for my favorite.
1. Q. Nelson
2. DJ Moore
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3829
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 603 times
Furthermore, I really like Moore; but there's every reason to think he will be the first WR off the board, and that's likely to happen in Round One.wab wrote:So, what WR goes then? And even after cutting someone, Moore isn't going to be higher than 5 on the depth chart.staleystarch wrote:None of these are my favorite. I have not drunk the "we fixed the receiver problem" kool-aid. I do think, post combine, a pick at number 8 for a WR would be a reach. I do think we should grab one in the 2nd. I'll go for my favorite.
1. Q. Nelson
2. DJ Moore
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- staleystarch
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:08 pm
I agree there is a very good chance Moore is gone by the second. I have also heard a few say, they are the minority, but could be right, that Moore could be the first WR taken.thunderspirit wrote:Furthermore, I really like Moore; but there's every reason to think he will be the first WR off the board, and that's likely to happen in Round One.wab wrote:So, what WR goes then? And even after cutting someone, Moore isn't going to be higher than 5 on the depth chart.staleystarch wrote:None of these are my favorite. I have not drunk the "we fixed the receiver problem" kool-aid. I do think, post combine, a pick at number 8 for a WR would be a reach. I do think we should grab one in the 2nd. I'll go for my favorite.
1. Q. Nelson
2. DJ Moore
"We don’t know exactly what we’re doing” -- John Fox
- staleystarch
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:08 pm
We had the worse WR in the league last year. If you think we went into free agency and fixed the WR corps so much that Moore would be our 5th receiver I don't know how to respond.wab wrote:So, what WR goes then? And even after cutting someone, Moore isn't going to be higher than 5 on the depth chart.staleystarch wrote:None of these are my favorite. I have not drunk the "we fixed the receiver problem" kool-aid. I do think, post combine, a pick at number 8 for a WR would be a reach. I do think we should grab one in the 2nd. I'll go for my favorite.
1. Q. Nelson
2. DJ Moore
"We don’t know exactly what we’re doing” -- John Fox
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
This is an interesting question. For me, I really am not sold on Carter, but I love Wynn as a move OG who I think will fit perfectly with what Nagy/Helfrich want to do. The more I looked at it, I don't think Wynn gets to 39. And while I do value Nelson over Edmunds, I'm pretty confident that Edmunds will ultimately be a stud, even if it may not be as an edge guy. So I went Edmunds/Wynn.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
The Bears have like the the third most dollars tied up in their WR'sstaleystarch wrote:We had the worse WR in the league last year. If you think we went into free agency and fixed the WR corps so much that Moore would be our 5th receiver I don't know how to respond.wab wrote:So, what WR goes then? And even after cutting someone, Moore isn't going to be higher than 5 on the depth chart.staleystarch wrote:None of these are my favorite. I have not drunk the "we fixed the receiver problem" kool-aid. I do think, post combine, a pick at number 8 for a WR would be a reach. I do think we should grab one in the 2nd. I'll go for my favorite.
1. Q. Nelson
2. DJ Moore
The Bears top receiving targets next year are going to be Robinson, Gabriel, and Burton
The Bears are going to give White every chance to succeed
The Bears WR depth chart is Robinson, Gabriel, Meredith, White, Bellamy...so Moore would be ahead of Bellamy
The Bears are only allowed to use one football
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3829
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 603 times
In staleystarch's defense, if DJ Moore inexplicably slid to #37, I would probably draft him as I think he's a top-15 talent in this draft. I'd figure out the depth chart later.wab wrote:The Bears have like the the third most dollars tied up in their WR'sstaleystarch wrote:We had the worse WR in the league last year. If you think we went into free agency and fixed the WR corps so much that Moore would be our 5th receiver I don't know how to respond.wab wrote:So, what WR goes then? And even after cutting someone, Moore isn't going to be higher than 5 on the depth chart.staleystarch wrote:None of these are my favorite. I have not drunk the "we fixed the receiver problem" kool-aid. I do think, post combine, a pick at number 8 for a WR would be a reach. I do think we should grab one in the 2nd. I'll go for my favorite.
1. Q. Nelson
2. DJ Moore
The Bears top receiving targets next year are going to be Robinson, Gabriel, and Burton
The Bears are going to give White every chance to succeed
The Bears WR depth chart is Robinson, Gabriel, Meredith, White, Bellamy...so Moore would be ahead of Bellamy
The Bears are only allowed to use one football
But as much as I like Moore, I cannot possibly justify taking him at #8, or even after a trade-down on Day 1.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20560
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 209 times
- Been thanked: 758 times
I'll go out on a limb and say we do not draft a WR with our first 3 picks. Looking at the clouds of talent as they're stacked in my head, I think the first round will be an EDGE rusher (unless someone like Barkley/Nelson is there) and the second round will be an interior lineman. At pick #39 I'm of the opinion we should have first round OL talent available when it's our turn to pick (*cough* Billy Price *cough*).
Round 4 and beyond I would imagine we take a developmental OT, an ILB and a DL.
Round 4 and beyond I would imagine we take a developmental OT, an ILB and a DL.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
I'm not sure Price or Daniels get out of the first round. We may be in trouble in round 2 value wise for interior OL if that happens.G08 wrote:I'll go out on a limb and say we do not draft a WR with our first 3 picks. Looking at the clouds of talent as they're stacked in my head, I think the first round will be an EDGE rusher (unless someone like Barkley/Nelson is there) and the second round will be an interior lineman. At pick #39 I'm of the opinion we should have first round OL talent available when it's our turn to pick (*cough* Billy Price *cough*).
Round 4 and beyond I would imagine we take a developmental OT, an ILB and a DL.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
Yeah, I see a bunch of linemen coming off the board in the bottom half of round 1. If somehow the Bears don't land Nelson they'd be better off waiting to draft a couple OL with their 4th round picks. It also would hurt my feelings to see them trade back in the second and pick up a 3rd.Hematite wrote:I'm not sure Price or Daniels get out of the first round. We may be in trouble in round 2 value wise for interior OL if that happens.G08 wrote:I'll go out on a limb and say we do not draft a WR with our first 3 picks. Looking at the clouds of talent as they're stacked in my head, I think the first round will be an EDGE rusher (unless someone like Barkley/Nelson is there) and the second round will be an interior lineman. At pick #39 I'm of the opinion we should have first round OL talent available when it's our turn to pick (*cough* Billy Price *cough*).
Round 4 and beyond I would imagine we take a developmental OT, an ILB and a DL.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20560
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 209 times
- Been thanked: 758 times
Price partially tore his pec at the Combine, I'm hoping that knocks him down a bit. Even if he does go earlier than our pick, we should still have options (I wouldn't be surprised if we drafted an OT with the intention of kicking him inside to OG):Hematite wrote:I'm not sure Price or Daniels get out of the first round. We may be in trouble in round 2 value wise for interior OL if that happens.G08 wrote:I'll go out on a limb and say we do not draft a WR with our first 3 picks. Looking at the clouds of talent as they're stacked in my head, I think the first round will be an EDGE rusher (unless someone like Barkley/Nelson is there) and the second round will be an interior lineman. At pick #39 I'm of the opinion we should have first round OL talent available when it's our turn to pick (*cough* Billy Price *cough*).
Round 4 and beyond I would imagine we take a developmental OT, an ILB and a DL.
Isaiah Wynn
Austin Corbett
Braden Smith
Frank Ragnow
etc
If there's a run on interior OL then great, see what positional value falls into your lap and go from there. We need help and depth at a handful of positions.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
I don't know what it is, but I have this feeling that if they don't get Nelson, they aren't going to worry too much about the interior OL and just let Heistand see what he can do with the guys they have, save for maybe a later round pick.