Page 3 of 3

Re: R2, P39: James Daniels, C - Iowa

Posted: Thu May 03, 2018 9:20 am
by G08
Hiestand is the reason that I really don't give a shit who lines up where -- so long as that is their fixed position moving forward. If that means Daniels at OC, great; if that means he plays LG, super.

Re: R2, P39: James Daniels, C - Iowa

Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2019 6:53 pm
by DaSuperfan
RING4CHI wrote:Just allow me to get this out of my system:

Image
Just curious, after his rookie season, are you still in the "Don't like the pick" category? Honestly, I loved the pick at the time and I think he's a young pillar on our line for a long time.

Re: R2, P39: James Daniels, C - Iowa

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2019 10:08 am
by wab
DaSuperfan wrote:
RING4CHI wrote:Just allow me to get this out of my system:

Image
Just curious, after his rookie season, are you still in the "Don't like the pick" category? Honestly, I loved the pick at the time and I think he's a young pillar on our line for a long time.
He didn't like it because of Iowa. Had nothing to do with Daniels. Ringer just hates Iowa.

Re: R2, P39: James Daniels, C - Iowa

Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2019 6:33 pm
by DaSuperfan
wab wrote:
DaSuperfan wrote:
RING4CHI wrote:Just allow me to get this out of my system:

Image
Just curious, after his rookie season, are you still in the "Don't like the pick" category? Honestly, I loved the pick at the time and I think he's a young pillar on our line for a long time.
He didn't like it because of Iowa. Had nothing to do with Daniels. Ringer just hates Iowa.
Ahhhh okay, so he'll hate him forever lol.