View unanswered posts | View active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Search for:
Author Message
 Post subject: Biggs 10 RB Prospects
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 7:27 am 
Offline
Pro Bowler

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:02 pm
Posts: 453
https://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/f ... story.html

Great write up...For me, I don’t want to trade Howard unless someone blows us away with an offer. That said, if the right guy falls I’m good with taking him and and giving him a year to backup Howard.

Guys who stand out for me...Darrell Henderson, Dexter Williams, and Bryce Love. Henderson and Williams have game breaking speed that I want in our next RB. Love would be the steal of the draft if he drops to the 4th or 5th and he can be dangerous on the field with Cohen.


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2019 12:48 pm 
Offline
Head Coach
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Posts: 2999
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Game breaking speed is nice, but low on the priority list for me in a RB. I prefer a guy who can consistently gain positive yards after contact. You're always going to run into 3rd or 4th and short and you have to have to be able to convert those. Further, forcing the defense to respect the guy you can hand the ball to also weakens their pass rush and coverage.

_________________
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 1:07 am 
Offline
Journeyman
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 26, 2018 9:35 am
Posts: 118
Even if we draft one I'd rather keep Howard. I wouldn't trade him for below a high 4th, and with him being in his final year I just don't see anyone throwing anything near that out for him.

I want depth, and if Howard is to get injured (or the rookie if we would trade Howard) then I don't want Cohen trying to handle 20+ touches. I want the rookie to be able to start working his way in and show he can take on the bellcow back role, not just throwing him in. Plus we have been burned with White having ridiculous injury woes. While not his fault and beyond an abnormality, it cost the Bears a lot as they were banking on him being a major player.

I'd like to see Cohen get 6-9 carries per game and 5-7 targets in the pass game, then see Howard and the rookie combine for 22+ carries (assuming we have about 28 carries per game like last year). Whoever is producing gets the lion's share. Hopefully the rookie is the one who really gets rolling and shows he is the future of the position for a while.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 8:38 am 
Offline
Pro Bowler
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
Posts: 414
Sugashane wrote:
Even if we draft one I'd rather keep Howard. I wouldn't trade him for below a high 4th, and with him being in his final year I just don't see anyone throwing anything near that out for him.

I want depth, and if Howard is to get injured (or the rookie if we would trade Howard) then I don't want Cohen trying to handle 20+ touches. I want the rookie to be able to start working his way in and show he can take on the bellcow back role, not just throwing him in. Plus we have been burned with White having ridiculous injury woes. While not his fault and beyond an abnormality, it cost the Bears a lot as they were banking on him being a major player.

I'd like to see Cohen get 6-9 carries per game and 5-7 targets in the pass game, then see Howard and the rookie combine for 22+ carries (assuming we have about 28 carries per game like last year). Whoever is producing gets the lion's share. Hopefully the rookie is the one who really gets rolling and shows he is the future of the position for a while.


Erik Lambert had an aggressive concept for a trade involving Howard and knowing Pace I wouldn't completely rule it out if he could pull it off.

He offers Oakland our 2019 3rd (#87) and a 2020 2nd for their 2019 2nd (#35) and takes Josh Jacobs provided he's still on the board. Then he trades Howard to Buffalo for their #10 pick in round 4. Oakland has three 2019 #1 picks already so getting a 3rd for swapping their 2019 2nd for the 2020 2nd we own might tempt them.

We don't lose much ground trading the 3rd if we can get Buffalo's 4th and we give Oakland back the 2020 2nd we got in the Mack trade for their 2019 2nd and our 2019 3rd. Pretty slick way to get a bell cow back now who can step in as a starter this year and has tools Howard lacks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2019 9:18 am 
Offline
Pro Bowler

Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:02 pm
Posts: 453
My thought process is that we are upgrading Mizell not Howard..We need Howard if we’re committed to a SB run in 2019.

Speed is absolutely important to me at RB...Vision is number 1, but speed is up there. We need a guy whos speed scares people.


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2019 8:49 am 
Offline
Head Coach
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Posts: 4637
You would think as a team insider Briggs could have put something better than this out there.


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2019 11:56 pm 
Offline
Crafty Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Posts: 903
Both Nagy and Pace were asked about RB's today at the combine and both mentioned vision as the primary trait they look for. Looking at the type of RB's that have the chance to be available at the end of R3 that have great vision to me are:

Devin Singletary - I think he has some of the best vision in the entire class
David Montgomery - I'm not a huge fan of his because the lack of top end speed, but his vision is outstanding
Miles Sanders - I think he's got underrated vision and cutting ability
Darrell Henderson - Probably not as good of vision as the others, but very solid and is surprisingly elusive

_________________
Never Die Easy


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 8:54 am 
Offline
Head Coach
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Posts: 4637
DaSuperfan wrote:
Both Nagy and Pace were asked about RB's today at the combine and both mentioned vision as the primary trait they look for. Looking at the type of RB's that have the chance to be available at the end of R3 that have great vision to me are:


Well Jordan Howard has excellent vision. Laugh.


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 9:23 am 
Offline
Journeyman
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 02, 2018 1:49 pm
Posts: 241
DaSuperfan wrote:
Both Nagy and Pace were asked about RB's today at the combine and both mentioned vision as the primary trait they look for. Looking at the type of RB's that have the chance to be available at the end of R3 that have great vision to me are:

Devin Singletary - I think he has some of the best vision in the entire class
David Montgomery - I'm not a huge fan of his because the lack of top end speed, but his vision is outstanding
Miles Sanders - I think he's got underrated vision and cutting ability
Darrell Henderson - Probably not as good of vision as the others, but very solid and is surprisingly elusive




Sanders reminds me of Barry Sanders (the cuts and balance)... My fav running back so far in this draft. I love the way he runs and makes defenders look stupid. He's so fun to watch. He might have messed up though in his combine interview. He was asked what teams he spoke to and he brought up the Bears and sort of stumbled over the next sentence saying ‘‘They told me, maybe if I’m available, they might take a ... they’re going to take a ... they might take a running back,’’ he said. ‘‘Because I don’t know the situation with Jordan Howard.’’ He might have given too much away and if there's another team interested they will certainly leapfrog us now.

For a second option what if they kept Howard this year and picked up Love (assuming he drops because of the injury)? That would give him a year to get back into the swing of things after the ACL. His timeframe for returning looks to be somewhat similar to Robinsons last year (from what I gather). But, if they keep Howard then they can bring him along slowly. Love is the other RB I like he's so fast if he returns to form he would be an excellent back for us as well and might drop (he was considered a 1st or 2nd round pick before injury).

If the Bears get either of those two I'd be happy. The other RBs I've watched film on just don't do it for me. Either they have great vision but are slow - or - fast but have a thin build or run too upright for my liking or are just not exciting to watch. There's a ton of average RBs that would work but the two I mentioned are IMHO the most fun to watch and shifty/speedy in their own ways. Sanders though man, he carried an entire D for 10 yards on top of being shifty and able to take it to the house any play. That's the type of back that screams Chicago.

_________________
”Damn -- Khalil Mack had another strip sack?” Gruden asked rhetorically, shaking his head at the Oakland Raiders assistant coaches in his midst. “Are you ... kidding me?”


Top
 Profile  
 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2019 1:56 pm 
Offline
Crafty Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Posts: 903
mmmc_35 wrote:
DaSuperfan wrote:
Both Nagy and Pace were asked about RB's today at the combine and both mentioned vision as the primary trait they look for. Looking at the type of RB's that have the chance to be available at the end of R3 that have great vision to me are:


Well Jordan Howard has excellent vision. Laugh.


Laugh all you want. I'm just telling you what I heard. Howard has good vision but he's simply not a dual threat in the passing game. Nagy and Pace won't publicly admit that, but I have a gut feeling the type of RB Nagy wants is a guy that has good vision and good speed that can get big chunks of yards in a hurry - but not just on the ground, through the air as well. Howard hasn't shown that he can be a matchup mismatch in the passing game.

_________________
Never Die Easy


Top
 Profile  
 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group