RB Prospect Talk: Trayveon Williams, Texas A&M

College football and the NFL Draft

Moderator: wab

User avatar
DaSuperfan
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

BamaBear09 wrote:
DaSuperfan wrote:I feel like Barnes or Harris are a little too similar to Mike Davis in terms of skill set. All 3 of them are not very fast and have long speed. All of them seem to be capable receivers out of the backfield. I think the Bears are looking for a back that has a different style than what they already have in Davis and Cohen. They want a back that has a mixture of both of Davis/Cohen's skillset. Meaning a guy that can handle 10-15 touches a game and be explosive by running in between the tackles, outside zone or catching the ball out of the backfield. I don't see Barnes or Harris being that explosive. I could be wrong though.
Barnes had a faster 20 yard shuttle, as well as a better LG and vertical than Miles Sanders.... at 15 pounds heavier... his RAS score was 9.8 at the combine...
I get that, but if you watch some of his tape, he doesn't appear to have that elite athleticism translate on the field with explosiveness. He's not bad, all I'm saying is on tape he doesn't seem to offer a skillset that's a whole lot different than what Mike Davis brings. Again, that could just be my perception.
Never Die Easy
User avatar
DaSuperfan
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

G08 wrote:He's an alpha and well-respected team leader, I think Pace is going to love that.

He doesn't have an elite burst or cutting ability, BUT he does impress me with cutting at full speed (not as deep of a cut, mind you) which muddies up a defenders shot to hit him. Kid runs with more power than I expected too.

Smaller back but I like him, I like his vision, his hands and mostly his pass blocking. If Darrell Henderson is there in the 3rd I think he's the pick, if he's not I think it's Williams (assuming we go RB there).
That's an interesting point regarding his cutting ability at full speed, because I was listening to a podcast by EJ Snyder who's really good at breaking down draft prospects and he mentioned that very same thing. He also said that Miles Sanders has an excellent lateral jump cut, but he loses a lot of momentum when he does and doesn't accelerate all that fast. He wasn't very high on Sanders and says he didn't see a lot of explosiveness watching his tape. He did really like Williams though and said he checks off more boxes for Nagy and Pace. We'll see.
Never Die Easy
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20672
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 235 times
Been thanked: 815 times

DaSuperfan wrote:
G08 wrote:He's an alpha and well-respected team leader, I think Pace is going to love that.

He doesn't have an elite burst or cutting ability, BUT he does impress me with cutting at full speed (not as deep of a cut, mind you) which muddies up a defenders shot to hit him. Kid runs with more power than I expected too.

Smaller back but I like him, I like his vision, his hands and mostly his pass blocking. If Darrell Henderson is there in the 3rd I think he's the pick, if he's not I think it's Williams (assuming we go RB there).
That's an interesting point regarding his cutting ability at full speed, because I was listening to a podcast by EJ Snyder who's really good at breaking down draft prospects and he mentioned that very same thing. He also said that Miles Sanders has an excellent lateral jump cut, but he loses a lot of momentum when he does and doesn't accelerate all that fast. He wasn't very high on Sanders and says he didn't see a lot of explosiveness watching his tape. He did really like Williams though and said he checks off more boxes for Nagy and Pace. We'll see.
I hated Williams' cone (7.44), if he was a 7.00 guy you'd see that on his tape and in his cutting ability. He's someone that's going to see the hole, hit it, and put his shoulder down and get you everything he can. Again, that is all well and great but his size does give me a little worry about injury... probably shouldn't be a 25-30 carry per game back, which oddly enough fits right into our rotation.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
User avatar
SC Bear
Journeyman
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:22 pm
Location: Greer, SC

It seems to me the Bears are targeting 3 running backs based on their projected draft range.
They are: Williams late 3rd to mid 4th, Mike Weber mid 4th to early 5th, and Alexander Mattison 5th or 6th round. Dan Durkin has written an extensive piece on each and you can read it on the internet-Dan Durkin and then the name of the player. Good film on each.
In his draft guide Bugler rates Williams #8 rb, Weber #17, and Mattison #14.
Kevin Scott rates Williams-12, Weber not it top 15, and Mattison--6
I'm sure some of you subscribe to other draft guides and it would be interesting to see their thoughts.
Based on their draft range and Durkins' articles I think he believes it is one of these 3
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3893
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 628 times
Been thanked: 628 times

I pick up Ourlads every year. They have Trayveon as a 3rd round value (their 5th ranked back on their updated board), Weber as a 4th round value (9th), and Mattison as a 5th round value (19th).

FWIW, I like Brugler's work a lot and buy his guide every year too. I also buy The Draft Network cos they do great in-depth stuff. TDN has Williams as a 4th round value (#10 ranked RB), Mattison a notch lower at #11 (also 4th round), and Weber as a 5th round value ( #18 rank).
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
SC Bear
Journeyman
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:22 pm
Location: Greer, SC

If you subscribe to the Atlantic you get brugler for free.
Post Reply