Bears have met with 15 RBs

College football and the NFL Draft

Moderator: wab

User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

So how big of factor is the 40 time when a guy like Kareem Hunt ran a 4.66 and 4.62 at the combine?
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20623
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 795 times

southdakbearfan wrote:So how big of factor is the 40 time when a guy like Kareem Hunt ran a 4.66 and 4.62 at the combine?
Eh, not very. You want to see how quickly the back can identify and hit the hole. I think short area burst/quickness is more important here than long speed.

I think that's why we seem to be in love with Singletary and Williams.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 620 times
Been thanked: 619 times

G08 wrote:
southdakbearfan wrote:So how big of factor is the 40 time when a guy like Kareem Hunt ran a 4.66 and 4.62 at the combine?
Eh, not very. You want to see how quickly the back can identify and hit the hole. I think short area burst/quickness is more important here than long speed.

I think that's why we seem to be in love with Singletary and Williams.
Hunt ran better at his pro day, even with pro day adjustments factored in, FWIW.

The Bears run an inside zone scheme, so being able to run between the tackles is important. And Singletary has that. I see the vision you mention, but don't much see the burst.

I dunno. I'm no expert, just a passionate fan behind a keyboard.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29885
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

G08 wrote:
RB/FB (SHR= Shrine Game) (LOC= Local Pro Day)

Josh Jacobs (Alabama) PRI
Miles Sanders (Penn St) COM/PRI
Trayveon Williams (Texas A&M) COM/PRI/PRO
Devin Singletary (FAU) COM/PRO/PRI/WRK
RyQuell Armstead (Temple) WRK/PRI
Mike Weber (Ohio State) PRO/PRI
Alexander Mattison (Boise St) PRI
Bruce Anderson (North Dakota St) SRB
Devine Ozigbo (Nebraska) PRO
Myles Gaskin (Washington) PRI
Benny Snell (Kentucky) COM
Bryce Love (Stanford) COM
James Williams (Wash St) COM
Lexington Thomas (UNLV) LOC
Antoine Connor (Upper Iowa) LOC
Out of these dudes, and assuming Sanders is long gone (he will be), I like, in order:
Trayveon Williams
Bruce Anderson
James Williams
Devin Singletary

I am also not super in love with Singletary for all of the aforementioned reasons.

After those, I like Devine Ozigbo and RyQuell Armstead. But I feel like they are just more wiggly versions of Jordan Howard.

The wildcard is Love. Had we kept Howard, I would have been all in on Love as a redshirt. Now that the Bears may actually need to count on a rookie RB to play meaningful snaps, I'm not sure how I'd feel about drafting him.
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 620 times
Been thanked: 619 times

Yeah, Sanders would top my list. I have some concerns about him, but overall I think he's got the fewest warts. Weber is probably right below him.

I don't love Traveon Williams, but would understand with the pick and could see him, if everything breaks right, maybe turning into a poor man's LeSean McCoy. I do really like Dexter Williams and think he'd fit, but the character red flags in his past could scare the Bears off, and it'd be hard to blame them for it.

After that, my list would be something like: RyQuell Armstead, Ty Johnson from Maryland, Alexander Mattison, Devine Ozigbo. James Williams in a cluster.

From FCS, I like Dom Bragalone III (Lehigh) more than Bruce Anderson. Less productive last season (though their 2017 seasons are more comparable) but a better athlete.

wab wrote:The wildcard is Love. Had we kept Howard, I would have been all in on Love as a redshirt. Now that the Bears may actually need to count on a rookie RB to play meaningful snaps, I'm not sure how I'd feel about drafting him.
Same, really. I can't figure out where I'd slot Love.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
Atkins&Rebel
Head Coach
Posts: 2184
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 123 times

thunderspirit wrote:
G08 wrote:
southdakbearfan wrote:So how big of factor is the 40 time when a guy like Kareem Hunt ran a 4.66 and 4.62 at the combine?
Eh, not very. You want to see how quickly the back can identify and hit the hole. I think short area burst/quickness is more important here than long speed.

I think that's why we seem to be in love with Singletary and Williams.
Hunt ran better at his pro day, even with pro day adjustments factored in, FWIW.

The Bears run an inside zone scheme, so being able to run between the tackles is important. And Singletary has that. I see the vision you mention, but don't much see the burst.

I dunno. I'm no expert, just a passionate fan behind a keyboard.
Hunt also dropped weight a little to help gain some quickness
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Atkins&Rebel wrote:
thunderspirit wrote:
G08 wrote:
southdakbearfan wrote:So how big of factor is the 40 time when a guy like Kareem Hunt ran a 4.66 and 4.62 at the combine?
Eh, not very. You want to see how quickly the back can identify and hit the hole. I think short area burst/quickness is more important here than long speed.

I think that's why we seem to be in love with Singletary and Williams.
Hunt ran better at his pro day, even with pro day adjustments factored in, FWIW.

The Bears run an inside zone scheme, so being able to run between the tackles is important. And Singletary has that. I see the vision you mention, but don't much see the burst.

I dunno. I'm no expert, just a passionate fan behind a keyboard.
Hunt also dropped weight a little to help gain some quickness
Yep 4.57 pro day time.

It wasn’t a knock on Hunt, it was to show quick 40 times or slow 40 times don’t necessarily mean anything. It was more a knock on the 40 times being the end all for runningbacks in the draft. It has to be at a certain level for sure, something 4.6 or south but I would rather make a judgement off of film than 40 times and all the pundits keep bumping up guys based on 40’s vs production.
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

southdakbearfan wrote:So how big of factor is the 40 time when a guy like Kareem Hunt ran a 4.66 and 4.62 at the combine?
Combine scores don't matter according to this study: (Although on page 12 there does appear to be a correlation between 40 yard dash time and running backs oddly enough.)

https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~aldous/R ... l_Park.pdf

Anecdotally this makes sense to me.

All of these players have accumulated statistics that made them worthy of being invited to the combine and then drafted. How many QBs that were dominant in college got drafted in the top ten and then became busts? A lot. I doubt they forgot how to throw a football given how they did in college. It has to be more of a function of being drafted by a bad team with presumably bad coaching because that's how they got that high draft choice more often than not to begin with.

So much of it has to be scheme fit, work ethic, being at the right place at the right time, strength of schedule, etc. etc. etc.
Image
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6875
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 388 times
Been thanked: 702 times

Atkins&Rebel wrote:Walter's list of everyone we've met with:
SR - Senior Bowl meeting.
EW - East-West Shrine meeting.
COM - Combine meeting.
INT - Interested.
VINT - Very Interested.

And then suddenly I lost interest



Image
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
Atkins&Rebel
Head Coach
Posts: 2184
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Moriarty wrote:
Atkins&Rebel wrote:Walter's list of everyone we've met with:
SR - Senior Bowl meeting.
EW - East-West Shrine meeting.
COM - Combine meeting.
INT - Interested.
VINT - Very Interested.

And then suddenly I lost interest



Image
I think the timing of each meeting is important vs when we signed Davis. I'm still wondering if we draft a RB before round 7.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
User avatar
DaSuperfan
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

How about Bryce Love? I think if his medicals pan out (and I trust our medical staff now as they correctly assessed Meredith) - he could be a steal sort of how Pace stole Eddie Jackson in R4 back in 2017. Jackson was also coming off an injury, didn't do any pre-draft workouts and was sort of a forgotten guy in the draft.

When Love is healthy, he's a legit back IMO that has near R1 talent.
Never Die Easy
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20623
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 795 times

https://www.profootballfocus.com/news/d ... -nfl-draft" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
DaSuperfan
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

Exactly my thoughts. It all depends on the medicals and if the Bears medical staff can evaluate his injury correctly. If his medicals are in the clear, he should be considered in R3 or R4 - and you most likely won't have to trade up to get him.
Never Die Easy
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20623
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 795 times

He claims to be ready by the middle of training camp, which I think is aggressive. Draft him if you feel like his medicals are clean and PUP him until week 6. That would put him around 10 months with his rehab and I'm of the opinion you can get by with Davis/Cohen/Whoever
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

G08 wrote:He claims to be ready by the middle of training camp, which I think is aggressive. Draft him if you feel like his medicals are clean and PUP him until week 6. That would put him around 10 months with his rehab and I'm of the opinion you can get by with Davis/Cohen/Whoever
Maybe, but only if he really drops in the draft. You can't count on a 10 month recovery or even a full recovery with ACL's. Look at Meredith.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20623
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 795 times

FWIW Love said he expects to be full-go by July 8th.

https://twitter.com/mattschneidman/stat ... 2566183936" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 620 times
Been thanked: 619 times

The question is, how much risk are you willing to take on?
What if he's not ready to go?
What if he never is?

On the flip side, what if he does come all the way back?

I like Love a lot. I think he fits what Nagy wants of his backs nearly perfectly...if he's the same guy we saw before his ACL.

Ordinarily, I'd be okay with rolling dice on that kind of risk in Round 4.
But ordinarily, the Bears have more than one Day 2 pick to mitigate that kind of gamble.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20623
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 795 times

thunderspirit wrote:The question is, how much risk are you willing to take on?
What if he's not ready to go?
What if he never is?

On the flip side, what if he does come all the way back?

I like Love a lot. I think he fits what Nagy wants of his backs nearly perfectly...if he's the same guy we saw before his ACL.

Ordinarily, I'd be okay with rolling dice on that kind of risk in Round 4.
But ordinarily, the Bears have more than one Day 2 pick to mitigate that kind of gamble.
That's the rub... my opinion is all contingent upon the Bears liking his medicals.

Nagy doesn't want or need a feature back so this kid, theoretically, doesn't need to be active until after week 6. You can live with giving the bulk of the carries to Davis/Cohen/Patterson. Tricky thing is if the Bears put Love on the 53 and he's active on game days he's going to need to be contributing heavily on special teams.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29885
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 132 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

If you draft Love in say...R4, you almost have to draft another RB in the 7th.
User avatar
DaSuperfan
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

wab wrote:If you draft Love in say...R4, you almost have to draft another RB in the 7th.
Just as long as that 2nd RB in R7 isn't Rodney Anderson. :)
Never Die Easy
User avatar
alexwilkins
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 972
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 2:00 am
Location: North Pole, AK
Has thanked: 13 times
Been thanked: 54 times

Can someone breakdown Miles Sanders for me? I don’t get the hype at all...
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 620 times
Been thanked: 619 times

With Sanders it's all about projecting his traits and flashes. He's been productive but hasn't done what he'll be asked to do with the Bears consistently. The risk associated with him is that he won't be able to do what you need. He has the traits, though, and flashes them frequently.

His shortcomings are less physical athleticism than others.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

alexwilkins wrote:Can someone breakdown Miles Sanders for me? I don’t get the hype at all...
https://walterfootball.com/scoutingrepo ... anders.php

https://walterfootball.com/draft2019RB.php

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNCXEx-ns5c&t=77s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmuYS11-4Ls

If the RB position was valued more in the NFL he would be drafted higher than current projections (rounds 2 to 3 per Walter Football). Not much wear and tear on him at all. Only one full season as the starter due to playing behind Barkley. From what I can find online (I have not watched any Penn State college football this past season.), Penn State runs a zone blocking scheme which matches what the Bears tried doing last year. Penn State also runs RPOs. The transition to Nagy's offense should be pretty smooth. I don't see why he couldn't be a three down back for us.

With us having 10 picks next year it wouldn't bother me at all if we used some of that and traded up for him this year. I think what could happen is that we trade up for him, a bunch of people complain that we overpaid, but in reality we don't need 10 picks next year and its worth making a trade up to get our guy.
Image
BR0D1E86
MVP
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2017 10:50 am

The Marshall Plan wrote:
alexwilkins wrote:Can someone breakdown Miles Sanders for me? I don’t get the hype at all...
https://walterfootball.com/scoutingrepo ... anders.php

https://walterfootball.com/draft2019RB.php

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNCXEx-ns5c&t=77s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmuYS11-4Ls

If the RB position was valued more in the NFL he would be drafted higher than current projections (rounds 2 to 3 per Walter Football). Not much wear and tear on him at all. Only one full season as the starter due to playing behind Barkley. From what I can find online (I have not watched any Penn State college football this past season.), Penn State runs a zone blocking scheme which matches what the Bears tried doing last year. Penn State also runs RPOs. The transition to Nagy's offense should be pretty smooth. I don't see why he couldn't be a three down back for us.

With us having 10 picks next year it wouldn't bother me at all if we used some of that and traded up for him this year. I think what could happen is that we trade up for him, a bunch of people complain that we overpaid, but in reality we don't need 10 picks next year and its worth making a trade up to get our guy.
I have no problem with Pace using one of next year’s picks to get his guy this year, but I don’t want to waste them. They can always trade for a 2021 pick and stock up on future pics that way too.
User avatar
SC Bear
Journeyman
Posts: 246
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:22 pm
Location: Greer, SC

Mattisson from Boise either 7th or FA
User avatar
mmmc_35
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6116
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 12:25 am
Has thanked: 105 times
Been thanked: 98 times

Sanders has all the traits you would expect with a top tier RB. I have heard some say he isn't eplosive off a cut but I disagree. He has rarely good vision, balance, good hands,
and can make his own yards. Realistically without Barkley herw would have had an amazing career.
User avatar
DaSuperfan
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

With Sanders I see a back that is decent in most traits but he doesn't possess one trait that "wows" you. Jack of all trades, master of none IMO. I don't think I'd trade up for him. If he's there at 87, sure pull the trigger. But I wouldn't trade future picks to get him.
Never Die Easy
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 620 times
Been thanked: 619 times

SC Bear wrote:Mattisson from Boise either 7th or FA
I like Mattison quite a bit as well.

Don't think he'll make it to Round 7 (though stranger things have certainly happened), but I'd be happy with him as a Bear.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20623
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 225 times
Been thanked: 795 times

Nice twitter thread on Singletary here:

https://twitter.com/DanDeYoung80/status ... 6788136960" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
DaSuperfan
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 996
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:44 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 9 times

G08 wrote:Nice twitter thread on Singletary here:

https://twitter.com/DanDeYoung80/status ... 6788136960" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Saw that, it was a good read. However, I'm not that high on Singletary in Nagy's offense. I think the Bears need a back that can take it to the house on occasion. Singletary has excellent vision but he's not that explosive. If the Bears end up going with him, fine, but I just can't see backs like him, Montgomery, Snell, etc. fitting into what Nagy wants to do at the RB position. I know they've met with him a couple of times.
Never Die Easy
Post Reply