The NY Jets want to trade up to #20 overall from their 2nd round pick. They offer: #34, #66, #129. (2,3,5)
Pace decided(or was told) to not trade up prior to the draft.
These players are off the board:
Trevor Lawrence QB
Zach Wilson QB
DeVonta Smith WR
Justin Fields QB
Penei Sewell OT
Ja'Marr Chase WR
Micah Parsons OLB/ILB
Trey Lance QB
Rashawn Slater OT
Patrick Surtain II CB
Caleb Farley CB
Alijah Vera-Tucker OL
Christian Darrisaw OT
Kyle Pitts TE
Mac Jones QB
Jeremiah Owusu-Koramoah OLB
Gregory Rousseau EDGE
Jaylen Waddle WR
Jaycee Horn CB
What do you do?
Draft Scenario: Trade Back Option
Moderator: wab
-
Atkins&Rebel
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2184
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
-
Atkins&Rebel
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2184
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Personally I'd take the deal: 34, 52, 66, 84 is a lot of equity with the possibility that Trask can still fall, lots of OT's available in day 2 and even a few WR's that would rebuild our offense to being competitive.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
-
thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3864
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 615 times
That's awfully rich to move up fourteen spots. Not saying they wouldn't, mind you.
With only Sewell and Darrisaw off the board (I consider both Slater and Vera-Tucker to be guard prospects) I'd take the deal.
With only Sewell and Darrisaw off the board (I consider both Slater and Vera-Tucker to be guard prospects) I'd take the deal.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
-
DevilsProspect
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2020 5:37 pm
- Location: Atlantic City, NJ
I would with no second thought.
Then again, almost every scenario I want bears to move back in similar fashion. Unless a no brained pick falls I see no reason not to. I’m dead set on taking an OT with the bears first pick. But since it looks pretty deep there, if you can move back a bit and get more capital AND get a good OT prospect it’s a win win.
Then again, almost every scenario I want bears to move back in similar fashion. Unless a no brained pick falls I see no reason not to. I’m dead set on taking an OT with the bears first pick. But since it looks pretty deep there, if you can move back a bit and get more capital AND get a good OT prospect it’s a win win.
AC 46Blitz
-
Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 388 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
Absolutely in.
But it's pretty academic. Pace will very likely be dealing away the 20 for a QB.
But it's pretty academic. Pace will very likely be dealing away the 20 for a QB.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
-
Atkins&Rebel
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2184
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
Trade value chart has it as 850 for #20 and 863 for the jets picks. Trading into the 1st does require some premium and I could see the Jets being eager for 3 1st rounders to build aroundthunderspirit wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:26 am That's awfully rich to move up fourteen spots. Not saying they wouldn't, mind you.
With only Sewell and Darrisaw off the board (I consider both Slater and Vera-Tucker to be guard prospects) I'd take the deal.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
-
Arkansasbear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4907
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 684 times
I'd do it and I agree it's pretty close based on "charts"Atkins&Rebel wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 11:06 amTrade value chart has it as 850 for #20 and 863 for the jets picks. Trading into the 1st does require some premium and I could see the Jets being eager for 3 1st rounders to build aroundthunderspirit wrote: ↑Fri Feb 12, 2021 12:26 am That's awfully rich to move up fourteen spots. Not saying they wouldn't, mind you.
With only Sewell and Darrisaw off the board (I consider both Slater and Vera-Tucker to be guard prospects) I'd take the deal.
But as you point out there is a premium to get back into the first round due to the 5th year option that comes with the pick. (the difference in pick 32 and 33 is only 10). I don't think 13 points gets you there. But if we traded 3rd round picks with them and moved back three spots and they threw in pick 137, I think that's gets you closer to actual value the way teams view it with the 5th year option.
-
Grizzled
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 633 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
The Jets have #23 from the Seahawks, not sure they’d offer that particular trade. I’d be open to other teams wanting #20 from lower in the 1st or high in the 2nd and offering two 2s and change. The OTs from ND, Oklahoma State, and North Dakota State should still be available as well as some good IOL talent, can generally be obtained lower in the draft.
Drafts are like snowflakes, no two are alike.