I think Mills has a lot to work with.
At the same time, there's no guarantee a player with physical gifts will develop. I like his chances, mind you; but like all draft picks (especially QBs), he's a calculated risk.
Moderator: wab
I think Mills has a lot to work with.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
I dont have a very strong opinion either way, i'm pretty numb at this point, but like half of his highlight throws do very much feel like "in the pros, that would be deflected/picked off." Dude is definitely raw.G08 wrote: ↑Tue Mar 30, 2021 9:11 amYep, he also feathers the ball into the receiver too much, which allows for defenders to not only break up the pass but intercept it too. Needs to figure out how to maintain accuracy while keeping velocity.
Those touch passes won't fly with DBs that run 4.3-4.4.
Question is if he can improve/develop that (I'm of the opinion he can).
thedraftnetwork.com wrote:If you like pro size, accuracy from adjusted platforms, pre-snap recognition, and toughness, he’s probably your guy. With his little experience as a starter and elite recruiting background, it won’t be surprising to see NFL teams take a swing on him in Day 2, considering the potential for development still remaining.
But to present Mills as a solid gamble is more representative of the class than anything he’s put on film. You get better tools from Mond, dual-threat ability from Newman, and more consistency and experience from Trask. Each is a dart throw, and you can take which one you like—but unfortunately, neither Mills nor any of the other options really hold up relative to Day 2 quarterbacks of the past.
Brad Biggs wrote:Mills is an interesting prospect and some evaluators I’ve spoken with say he’s very similar to Alabama’s Mac Jones. Obviously, Jones was surrounded by a ton more talent and played against greater competition at the highest level. But they’re built similarly, have similar traits and strengths and Mills has a bigger arm. If more than a couple teams feel this way about Mills — that he’s a solid prospect similar to Jones in some respects — he will be drafted later but I’m not sure he will be a “late-round pick” if that is what you are getting at. I think chances are good he is a Day 2 selection and you’re talking about a guy who has played in a pro-style offense, so that would be a major plus. He would be interesting if the Bears could add him to the mix while filling other needs as well. Some I have spoken with think he has more upside than Florida’s Kyle Trask or Texas A&M’s Kellen Mond, guys you’ve probably heard a lot more about going back to last college season.
I'd take him mid day 2, maybe 4th round. Problem is, I don't think he lasts that long. I'll bet he goes mid 3rd round.EricTighe wrote: ↑Sat Mar 20, 2021 11:33 am Everything you want to know about the kid.
https://www.profootballnetwork.com/davi ... arterback/
Sleeper for only so long.
Yep, or in a trade down in the second.
I hear ya. What jumps out to me is his anticipation, he'll let the ball go before his receiver has even gotten out of his break (I'm talking 10-15 yards from where the ball ends up). He manipulates safeties well, etc.crueltyabc wrote: ↑Thu Apr 01, 2021 1:56 pm He seems extremely OK to me. His highlights are like "here he is executing the offense". Apparently I want my college QBs doing something with their feet or making big throws on the run. I see a guy throwing from a clean pocket to an open receiver and I wonder how often he'll see that in the NFL. All of that said... he does seem like a Pace/Nagy guy to me
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
He throws with so much touch that I personally wish I could see him fire 15-20 yard outs from the opposite hash with velocity, just to see what he's got in that arm of his.wulfy wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 9:11 am The UCLA game was Mills equivalent of Mitch's Sun Bowl and will be cited by whoever drafts him.
I like Mills a lot ... not more than any of the Top 5, but in my mind there are just as many questions about Trey Lance as there are with Davis Mills. I've read a few places that Mills has a "passable"/"adequate" arm .... I fundamentally disagree with that - he has a very good arm.
I'd be happy with Mills in the Second.
I can see that... the negative Nancy in me sees a little bit of Kevin Hogan.
Terrific question. I would say for him it would be more cerebral: execution, checking into the correct play based on what the defense is showing you, and learning when to put more on your fastball based on the size of the throwing window.crueltyabc wrote: ↑Mon Apr 05, 2021 12:01 pm Where is there room for improvement, btw, if he already does everything right and he doesn't really dominate?