#10 Pick Supposedly Available

Grizzled · Mon Apr 19, 2021 7:49 am

The Cowboys apparently would be willing to trade their #10 pick if Kylie Pitts isn't available. The Bears would have to give up #20, probably #52 and next year's first to move up. I'm betting Pace would do this if Jones/Fields/Lance was still available.

IE · Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:39 am

IF they could package up the 3rd, 5th and 6ths to end up with a legit OT and a legit CB I'd be down. But only for Fields not those other guys.

Arkansasbear · Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:57 am

I want no part of a trade up for anyone that cost that much. We have far too many needs and I'm not sold on any of the QB who might be there.

EricTighe · Mon Apr 19, 2021 9:12 am

If we can't get FIelds then I am in favor of moving down. Lots of talent in this draft with guys who opted out this year who have dropped because of it. The problem is finding someone to move down with. We could be stuck with 20.

Moriarty · Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:02 am

Grizzled wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 7:49 am The Cowboys apparently would be willing to trade their #10 pick if Kylie Pitts isn't available. The Bears would have to give up #20, probably #52 and next year's first to move up. I'm betting Pace would do this if Jones/Fields/Lance was still available.

Looking at trade charts, I was startled to see that 20 + 52 was approximately equal to 10.
Like you, I was expecting more needed.

For Fields, I could buy that. Not for the others.
Pace, I could see doing it for any of the above.

Hoog · Mon Apr 19, 2021 10:43 am

I don't think you are going to get a ready to start QB at #10 (Fields- maybe) so are we in a position to trade a ton of assets again (like we did for Mack)? Are we good enough right now to win enough games with who we have? I see it as we need to refill in so many areas, I'm not sure we can afford the luxury of giving up a ton of assets again. If Fields is there, big maybe, but otherwise take Darisaw and lets go.

wulfy · Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:13 pm

For Fields or even Lance at that point of the draft, I'm your Huckleberry.

Hell No for Mac Jones. I don't want to give up a single pick for him - but would draft him at 20.

IotaNet · Mon Apr 19, 2021 1:17 pm

Arkansasbear wrote: ↑Mon Apr 19, 2021 8:57 am I want no part of a trade up for anyone that cost that much. We have far too many needs and I'm not sold on any of the QB who might be there.

This

Lawrence
Wilson
Fields

IMO, everyone else is just speculation and will probably be over-drafted. (That includes Jones and Lance)

I'd be hard-pressed to give up any future first-rounders for any of them.

The Marshall Plan · Mon Apr 19, 2021 4:52 pm

Absolutely not.