Yes, you can have too many RB's. Most teams carry three. After NO, we probably have the best 3 (top-to-bottom, overall) in the entire NFL. You could certainly make that argument. All bring unique skill-sets, and serve their purpose beautifully.BabyBear wrote:Pfft....because you can have too many?Richie wrote:Because we don't already have a compliment to Howard...
And Cohen? He's a gadget. Not a compliment.
Howard - 1st and 2nd down power back, moves the chains
Cohen - Receiving RB, change of pace runner and gadget player who you can move around
Cunningham - Best pass-pro back, very good in all things related to the passing game
We have all of the bases covered at RB. There are 22 positions on offense and defense combined. RB is 22nd on our list of needs. With our main two RB's being 22 and 23 years old, you could argue that nobody needs a RB LESS than we do.
So, stop being ridiculous. Like you are in the rest of your posts.