Fox is trying to protect his job? Er... it doesn't seem to be going too well in that regard does it?botfly10 wrote:fuck everythingG08 wrote:Mitch just said on the 5 sacks that some of them were him "protecting the football".
That's awesome, coach the aggressiveness and playmaking out of him.
I fucking hate this team.
Fuck Pace for letting Fox waste this season cause he is trying to protect his job instead of develop the rookie
Maybe Trubisky just ain't that good.
Moderator: wab
- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6058
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 1831 times
Arise Sir Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXdXRP6Hi-U
PapaDongo wrote:these excuses don't make sense to me at least, how does the playcall impact mechanics? Mechanics are on the player not the coaches choice of run or pass.Funkster wrote:Just stop, Trubisky has shown some rookie mistakes but he also is 100% being handcuffed by piss poor coaching and play calling, period. The poor kid doesn't have a chance and his mechanics are regressing because of it, resulting in inaccurate throws. Boo to you, BOO BOO BOO!
Maybe you can understand Clay Matthews explanation better?
Clay Matthews on Mitch Trubisky:
“His pocket presence will come along. You have to take advantage of that. That’s exactly what we did. We ended up with five sacks, a number of quarterback pressures and hurries. That’s what you expect to do when a team is so one dimensional."
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
- staleystarch
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:08 pm
I would wager more rookies played like crap than rookies came in looking great or just good. As for MT, we are seeing gradual improvement.docc wrote:Might want to judge Trubisky at LEAST after his first offseason..
Dam this is stupid...
Watching the game 60 YEARS..
Many other good/great QBS had way more experience and better support but struggled WAY WORSE than Trubisky..
Think
"We don’t know exactly what we’re doing” -- John Fox
I don't see anything in there about throwing mechanics. Clay?Funkster wrote:PapaDongo wrote:these excuses don't make sense to me at least, how does the playcall impact mechanics? Mechanics are on the player not the coaches choice of run or pass.Funkster wrote:Just stop, Trubisky has shown some rookie mistakes but he also is 100% being handcuffed by piss poor coaching and play calling, period. The poor kid doesn't have a chance and his mechanics are regressing because of it, resulting in inaccurate throws. Boo to you, BOO BOO BOO!
Maybe you can understand Clay Matthews explanation better?
Clay Matthews on Mitch Trubisky:
“His pocket presence will come along. You have to take advantage of that. That’s exactly what we did. We ended up with five sacks, a number of quarterback pressures and hurries. That’s what you expect to do when a team is so one dimensional."
It's, at its absolute best, intentionally obtuse to not acknowledge how the constant pressure he's faced from passing almost exclusively out of obvious passing situations with zero competent wide receivers can affect mechanics.PapaDongo wrote:I don't see anything in there about throwing mechanics. Clay?Funkster wrote:PapaDongo wrote:these excuses don't make sense to me at least, how does the playcall impact mechanics? Mechanics are on the player not the coaches choice of run or pass.Funkster wrote:Just stop, Trubisky has shown some rookie mistakes but he also is 100% being handcuffed by piss poor coaching and play calling, period. The poor kid doesn't have a chance and his mechanics are regressing because of it, resulting in inaccurate throws. Boo to you, BOO BOO BOO!
Maybe you can understand Clay Matthews explanation better?
Clay Matthews on Mitch Trubisky:
“His pocket presence will come along. You have to take advantage of that. That’s exactly what we did. We ended up with five sacks, a number of quarterback pressures and hurries. That’s what you expect to do when a team is so one dimensional."
And that's at its absolute best.
Docc to the fucking rescue. The play calling is atrocious, the OL has been suspect, the WR's...enough said. But lets blame a rookie QB with 13 college starts? I don't think anybody here is confused with the idea that Trubisky has arrived already, as we all knew he would need time. Fix these other issues, give Trubisky game experience and then see whether he sucks or not.docc wrote:Might want to judge Trubisky at LEAST after his first offseason..
Dam this is stupid...
Watching the game 60 YEARS..
Many other good/great QBS had way more experience and better support but struggled WAY WORSE than Trubisky..
Think
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7388
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 575 times
- Been thanked: 1015 times
you dont have to even go back 60 years!docc wrote:Might want to judge Trubisky at LEAST after his first offseason..
Dam this is stupid...
Watching the game 60 YEARS..
Many other good/great QBS had way more experience and better support but struggled WAY WORSE than Trubisky..
Think
all you had to do was watch jared goff after a few starts last year vs. what he looks like this year.
- Teddy KGB
- Pro Bowler
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 1:43 am
- Has thanked: 128 times
- Been thanked: 62 times
AGREED.Hematite wrote:Docc to the fucking rescue. The play calling is atrocious, the OL has been suspect, the WR's...enough said. But lets blame a rookie QB with 13 college starts? I don't think anybody here is confused with the idea that Trubisky has arrived already, as we all knew he would need time. Fix these other issues, give Trubisky game experience and then see whether he sucks or not.docc wrote:Might want to judge Trubisky at LEAST after his first offseason..
Dam this is stupid...
Watching the game 60 YEARS..
Many other good/great QBS had way more experience and better support but struggled WAY WORSE than Trubisky..
Think
Sent from my SM-G920T using Tapatalk
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5196
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 280 times
Not just picking on you here, since you're not alone to say this... He's the 2nd overall pick therefore...........PapaDongo wrote:I'm not hating on anyone, just being objective. It isn't about love/hate and it's not about sacks/interceptions. If Trubisky thinks taking sacks is a good thing because you at least don't give up the ball, we need a coach to do better with him. I can't believe people have such low expectations for a 2nd pick overall that they are arguing about sacks being better than interceptions.RING4CHI wrote:Please. If he threw INTs on those plays instead of taking sacks, that's what your Trubisky hate thread would be about.PapaDongo wrote:I posted about that in another thread and some guy went crazy. Taking sacks to protect the ball is for cucks.G08 wrote:Mitch just said on the 5 sacks that some of them were him "protecting the football".
That's awesome, coach the aggressiveness and playmaking out of him.
I fucking hate this team.
How about some touchdowns? How about throwing beyond the LOS on third down?
That thinking fails to take into account what the guy actually did in college in preparation to enter the NFL. 13 college starts. That's it. Didn't call plays in the huddle or take snaps from center. Didn't do NFL style reads.
Playing NFL QB is way WAY different from that. By all indications, the plan was to let him sit most or all of his rookie year. Why? Because he wasn't ready.
So they threw him out there when they knew he wasn't fully prepared, because Mike Glennon sucked so badly. And they are dialing back the game plan.
Does that mean he sucks? Possibly. But when you throw the kid out there knowing he's not fully prepared, is that a reflection on him or somebody else???
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- crueltyabc
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
- Location: Dallas TX
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
I think I’ve been less impressed than a lot of guys on this board but see no reason to believe he will be bad. If it turns out he’s a serviceable game manager type guy, then at least we have a cheap one for a few years while we look to add weapons around him etc. considering how often guys are just straight busts, I’m not complaining
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
xyt in the discord chats
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29940
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
I think you saw him get more comfortable yesterday. He doesn't have great pocket awareness, and you can tell his timing with the merry go round or WR's is off...but I think that will come with experience and a consistent group of weapons. I'm just glad they finally opened it up a bit for him.crueltyabc wrote:I think I’ve been less impressed than a lot of guys on this board but see no reason to believe he will be bad. If it turns out he’s a serviceable game manager type guy, then at least we have a cheap one for a few years while we look to add weapons around him etc. considering how often guys are just straight busts, I’m not complaining
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He can be our Alex Smith and I would be more than OK with that. But even Alex needed the right coaching to reach his potential. Does anybody really believe this staff can do that for Trubs?wab wrote:I think you saw him get more comfortable yesterday. He doesn't have great pocket awareness, and you can tell his timing with the merry go round or WR's is off...but I think that will come with experience and a consistent group of weapons. I'm just glad they finally opened it up a bit for him.crueltyabc wrote:I think I’ve been less impressed than a lot of guys on this board but see no reason to believe he will be bad. If it turns out he’s a serviceable game manager type guy, then at least we have a cheap one for a few years while we look to add weapons around him etc. considering how often guys are just straight busts, I’m not complaining
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Exactly. Most of us tend to have short memories when the red mist falls.RustyTrubisky wrote:you dont have to even go back 60 years!docc wrote:Might want to judge Trubisky at LEAST after his first offseason..
Dam this is stupid...
Watching the game 60 YEARS..
Many other good/great QBS had way more experience and better support but struggled WAY WORSE than Trubisky..
Think
all you had to do was watch jared goff after a few starts last year vs. what he looks like this year.
But I would dare to say that you could put any HOF QB (like Favre, Elway, Manning) in his rookie season behind a makeshift OL, with no starting X and Z receivers, no no 1 or no 2 TE, and a one dimensional gameplan called by conservative coaches, and he would struggle. Before anyone jumps on me, I'm not saying Mitch is a future HOFer. Just that any QB in that situation will struggle in some way.
I get that everyone's hacked off. I am too. Big time. But let's let the red mist blow away, take a breath and give Mitch a break. A lot of colleges operate the spread system these days, and so the step up to an NFL pro style system is bigger. Mitch has only started 5 games.
Bleeding Navy and Orange!!! GO BEARS!!
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20672
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 234 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
Nope... but know who has been working daily with Alex Smith?Hematite wrote:He can be our Alex Smith and I would be more than OK with that. But even Alex needed the right coaching to reach his potential. Does anybody really believe this staff can do that for Trubs?wab wrote:I think you saw him get more comfortable yesterday. He doesn't have great pocket awareness, and you can tell his timing with the merry go round or WR's is off...but I think that will come with experience and a consistent group of weapons. I'm just glad they finally opened it up a bit for him.crueltyabc wrote:I think I’ve been less impressed than a lot of guys on this board but see no reason to believe he will be bad. If it turns out he’s a serviceable game manager type guy, then at least we have a cheap one for a few years while we look to add weapons around him etc. considering how often guys are just straight busts, I’m not complaining
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Matt Nagy.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- Bad Flanders
- MVP
- Posts: 1923
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 10:35 pm
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 6 times
sigh.
someone doesn't remember life before Cutler.
Chill, give the kid time, Rome was not built in a day. Look at Dak without Elliot yesterday... there is more to a team than a QB... obviously Green Bay knows that now too.
someone doesn't remember life before Cutler.
Chill, give the kid time, Rome was not built in a day. Look at Dak without Elliot yesterday... there is more to a team than a QB... obviously Green Bay knows that now too.
- Atkins&Rebel
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2187
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 123 times
I think Trubisky's main problem is two-fold IMO.t
1. He has a conservative coach who is handcuffing him and telling him to stick to the play...maybe for good reason, but at some point Fox and Loggains need to just turn him loose and hope he grows from his mistakes on turnovers, instead of the lack of them by eating the ball when he could throw it away or force a ball and try to let his receiver make a play.
2. Nothing in this offense is natural to him yet.
He has to think about all the verbiage; he has to think about keeping his mechanics just right; he has to think about where the receivers are supposed to be in each play and then adjust to where they actually are; he has to think about pressure and protections and he has to think about not making turnovers and trying to gauge when it's OK to take a shot on any given play.
None of this is 2nd nature to him yet, especially given how much he has to worry about playing in the conservative format Fox has dictated.
1. He has a conservative coach who is handcuffing him and telling him to stick to the play...maybe for good reason, but at some point Fox and Loggains need to just turn him loose and hope he grows from his mistakes on turnovers, instead of the lack of them by eating the ball when he could throw it away or force a ball and try to let his receiver make a play.
2. Nothing in this offense is natural to him yet.
He has to think about all the verbiage; he has to think about keeping his mechanics just right; he has to think about where the receivers are supposed to be in each play and then adjust to where they actually are; he has to think about pressure and protections and he has to think about not making turnovers and trying to gauge when it's OK to take a shot on any given play.
None of this is 2nd nature to him yet, especially given how much he has to worry about playing in the conservative format Fox has dictated.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20672
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 234 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
Remember how much Ryan Pace was pimping Trubisky's ability to throw the football from a multitude of platforms? Where has that been? Oh, I know! It literally has been coached out of him and has been traded in for tucking his tail between his legs and taking a sack.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
An Andy Reid disciple with Mitch Trubisky could be a match made in heaven. I'd go balls to the walls if this were to happen!G08 wrote:Nope... but know who has been working daily with Alex Smith?Hematite wrote:He can be our Alex Smith and I would be more than OK with that. But even Alex needed the right coaching to reach his potential. Does anybody really believe this staff can do that for Trubs?wab wrote:I think you saw him get more comfortable yesterday. He doesn't have great pocket awareness, and you can tell his timing with the merry go round or WR's is off...but I think that will come with experience and a consistent group of weapons. I'm just glad they finally opened it up a bit for him.crueltyabc wrote:I think I’ve been less impressed than a lot of guys on this board but see no reason to believe he will be bad. If it turns out he’s a serviceable game manager type guy, then at least we have a cheap one for a few years while we look to add weapons around him etc. considering how often guys are just straight busts, I’m not complaining
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Matt Nagy.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29940
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2031 times
I really think you are overblowing the notion that his skills are being coached out of him. I get it, Fox is conservative, but Trubisky isn't being coached into a pussy. He's doing what he's told. Inherently there isn't really anything wrong with that. When he gets a coach that maximizes his talent, he's not going to be all "well Fox made me take a sack rather than take a chance for 12 games, so I'll probably just keep doing that".G08 wrote:Remember how much Ryan Pace was pimping Trubisky's ability to throw the football from a multitude of platforms? Where has that been? Oh, I know! It literally has been coached out of him and has been traded in for tucking his tail between his legs and taking a sack.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20672
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 234 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
It's worth a look, I would think. The guy played the position and has been with Reid for 10 seasons.Hematite wrote:An Andy Reid disciple with Mitch Trubisky could be a match made in heaven. I'd go balls to the walls if this were to happen!G08 wrote:Nope... but know who has been working daily with Alex Smith?Hematite wrote:He can be our Alex Smith and I would be more than OK with that. But even Alex needed the right coaching to reach his potential. Does anybody really believe this staff can do that for Trubs?wab wrote:I think you saw him get more comfortable yesterday. He doesn't have great pocket awareness, and you can tell his timing with the merry go round or WR's is off...but I think that will come with experience and a consistent group of weapons. I'm just glad they finally opened it up a bit for him.crueltyabc wrote:I think I’ve been less impressed than a lot of guys on this board but see no reason to believe he will be bad. If it turns out he’s a serviceable game manager type guy, then at least we have a cheap one for a few years while we look to add weapons around him etc. considering how often guys are just straight busts, I’m not complaining
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Matt Nagy.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
Good or bad, I see Carmichael Jr. as being more in line with Pace. It's a copycat league and Pace has done nothing to hide his copying of the Saints blueprint. I believe Carmichael Jr. runs a Coryell based offense, whereas Nagy obviously is west coast. With Trubisky's talents and factoring in the weather in Chicago, which system do you all believe would work best here?G08 wrote:It's worth a look, I would think. The guy played the position and has been with Reid for 10 seasons.Hematite wrote:An Andy Reid disciple with Mitch Trubisky could be a match made in heaven. I'd go balls to the walls if this were to happen!G08 wrote:Nope... but know who has been working daily with Alex Smith?Hematite wrote:He can be our Alex Smith and I would be more than OK with that. But even Alex needed the right coaching to reach his potential. Does anybody really believe this staff can do that for Trubs?wab wrote:I think you saw him get more comfortable yesterday. He doesn't have great pocket awareness, and you can tell his timing with the merry go round or WR's is off...but I think that will come with experience and a consistent group of weapons. I'm just glad they finally opened it up a bit for him.crueltyabc wrote:I think I’ve been less impressed than a lot of guys on this board but see no reason to believe he will be bad. If it turns out he’s a serviceable game manager type guy, then at least we have a cheap one for a few years while we look to add weapons around him etc. considering how often guys are just straight busts, I’m not complaining
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Matt Nagy.
With the way the saints are running the ball and staying somewhat balanced on offense lately, Carmichael is intriguing. I'm just not sure if he's HC material?
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5196
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 280 times
Excellent points. I'd add that certain necessary "time" skills just aren't natural to him yet. Like having to get rid of the ball before "thousand five". And processing the pre-snap stuff while keeping an eye on the play clock.Atkins&Rebel wrote:I think Trubisky's main problem is two-fold IMO.t
1. He has a conservative coach who is handcuffing him and telling him to stick to the play...maybe for good reason, but at some point Fox and Loggains need to just turn him loose and hope he grows from his mistakes on turnovers, instead of the lack of them by eating the ball when he could throw it away or force a ball and try to let his receiver make a play.
2. Nothing in this offense is natural to him yet.
He has to think about all the verbiage; he has to think about keeping his mechanics just right; he has to think about where the receivers are supposed to be in each play and then adjust to where they actually are; he has to think about pressure and protections and he has to think about not making turnovers and trying to gauge when it's OK to take a shot on any given play.
None of this is 2nd nature to him yet, especially given how much he has to worry about playing in the conservative format Fox has dictated.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20672
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 234 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
We've tried both in Chicago... I'd prefer Nagy only because it *should* be similar verbiage and footwork for Trubisky. Payton I don't believe employs the various drops that Martz did when he brought his Coryell system here.Hematite wrote:Good or bad, I see Carmichael Jr. as being more in line with Pace. It's a copycat league and Pace has done nothing to hide his copying of the Saints blueprint. I believe Carmichael Jr. runs a Coryell based offense, whereas Nagy obviously is west coast. With Trubisky's talents and factoring in the weather in Chicago, which system do you all believe would work best here?G08 wrote:It's worth a look, I would think. The guy played the position and has been with Reid for 10 seasons.Hematite wrote:An Andy Reid disciple with Mitch Trubisky could be a match made in heaven. I'd go balls to the walls if this were to happen!G08 wrote:Nope... but know who has been working daily with Alex Smith?Hematite wrote:He can be our Alex Smith and I would be more than OK with that. But even Alex needed the right coaching to reach his potential. Does anybody really believe this staff can do that for Trubs?wab wrote: I think you saw him get more comfortable yesterday. He doesn't have great pocket awareness, and you can tell his timing with the merry go round or WR's is off...but I think that will come with experience and a consistent group of weapons. I'm just glad they finally opened it up a bit for him.
Matt Nagy.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
Nagy? Really? I just don't see him having enough experience as an OC let alone promoting him to a HC.
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
- Pagan
- MVP
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:19 am
- Location: South Bend, Indiana
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
1st if all:
Everyone has the right to be potentially salty after a loss, & the title of the post shouldn't be off limits, who knows... Maybe Trib Ain't that good..
(Only Time will tell)
2ndly:
Don't create thoughtlessly controversial, emotionally driven, overreaction posts.
Please.
(This post is CLEARLY all of those things)
Last Point:
Good for you; you got yourself a 6+ thread with your name next to it!
Don't confuse # of responses with popularity.
This isn't the kind of attention that you'll enjoy for long.
I look forward to reading less dumb things from some of you sooner.
Everyone has the right to be potentially salty after a loss, & the title of the post shouldn't be off limits, who knows... Maybe Trib Ain't that good..
(Only Time will tell)
2ndly:
Don't create thoughtlessly controversial, emotionally driven, overreaction posts.
Please.
(This post is CLEARLY all of those things)
Last Point:
Good for you; you got yourself a 6+ thread with your name next to it!
Don't confuse # of responses with popularity.
This isn't the kind of attention that you'll enjoy for long.
I look forward to reading less dumb things from some of you sooner.
Yup.Pagan wrote:1st if all:
Everyone has the right to be potentially salty after a loss, & the title of the post shouldn't be off limits, who knows... Maybe Trib Ain't that good..
(Only Time will tell)
2ndly:
Don't create thoughtlessly controversial, emotionally driven, overreaction posts.
Please.
(This post is CLEARLY all of those things)
Last Point:
Good for you; you got yourself a 6+ thread with your name next to it!
Don't confuse # of responses with popularity.
This isn't the kind of attention that you'll enjoy for long.
I look forward to reading less dumb things from some of you sooner.
I really have no problem in what I am seeing. AT ALL.
We are seeing someone develop, and that's a good thing. Pretty sure he could go out there and sling the ball aroundd but what can come of that? A few more TDs mixed in with 2ints a game? Only time will tell with any developing rookie QBs. He may not be "winning games" for the Bears, but he isn't loosing them either. As a fan, I actually look forward to games on sundays now. Not because I expect a win or see anything of greatness of sorts. But I get to watch someone progress, even if it's slow progress. Most of us are not delusional enough to think the Bears are going to win a championship this year. So this is kind of a perfect situation right now where your Potential Franchise QB is gaining a ton of experience without numbers good or bad, but he is still gaining knowledge. He has shown he has the skill so what they are doing with him is good IMO. For the long term.... loosing these games isn't a terrible thing either, the team has shown some things to be happy about. loosing these games stinks a bit but we will get a better draft pick so...
I don't know, my glass is 3/4 full and can give two shits what the negative Nancy's say at this point.
- o-pus #40 in B major
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2796
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 2482 times
- Been thanked: 259 times
46Blitz wrote:Yup.Pagan wrote:1st if all:
Everyone has the right to be potentially salty after a loss, & the title of the post shouldn't be off limits, who knows... Maybe Trib Ain't that good..
(Only Time will tell)
2ndly:
Don't create thoughtlessly controversial, emotionally driven, overreaction posts.
Please.
(This post is CLEARLY all of those things)
Last Point:
Good for you; you got yourself a 6+ thread with your name next to it!
Don't confuse # of responses with popularity.
This isn't the kind of attention that you'll enjoy for long.
I look forward to reading less dumb things from some of you sooner.
I really have no problem in what I am seeing. AT ALL.
We are seeing someone develop, and that's a good thing. Pretty sure he could go out there and sling the ball aroundd but what can come of that? A few more TDs mixed in with 2ints a game? Only time will tell with any developing rookie QBs. He may not be "winning games" for the Bears, but he isn't loosing them either. As a fan, I actually look forward to games on sundays now. Not because I expect a win or see anything of greatness of sorts. But I get to watch someone progress, even if it's slow progress. Most of us are not delusional enough to think the Bears are going to win a championship this year. So this is kind of a perfect situation right now where your Potential Franchise QB is gaining a ton of experience without numbers good or bad, but he is still gaining knowledge. He has shown he has the skill so what they are doing with him is good IMO. For the long term.... loosing these games isn't a terrible thing either, the team has shown some things to be happy about. loosing these games stinks a bit but we will get a better draft pick so...
I don't know, my glass is 3/4 full and can give two shits what the negative Nancy's say at this point.
There is a GM named Poles
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
Not really trying to be overly negative and don't really need the lecture on making a thread or posting about a subject to whoever that guy was up above this post that is being super critical, but I do think ya gotta prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
Just saying, Tru might never show anything unless the right stuff is around him. Bears need to get Tru consistency but he can't get anything like that his first year.
Then they fire the coaches? Tru will have a new system to learn. Tru will have to get his mechanics fixed, Tru will have to be coachable by a whole new staff. Then what happens if they don't get results, say it's freaking McDaniels? Now they start to ruin Tru like all the other QBs we've had since Jim Miller.
There are quarterbacks that come in and make wins happen, and there are projects. Tru needs some work.
Just saying, Tru might never show anything unless the right stuff is around him. Bears need to get Tru consistency but he can't get anything like that his first year.
Then they fire the coaches? Tru will have a new system to learn. Tru will have to get his mechanics fixed, Tru will have to be coachable by a whole new staff. Then what happens if they don't get results, say it's freaking McDaniels? Now they start to ruin Tru like all the other QBs we've had since Jim Miller.
There are quarterbacks that come in and make wins happen, and there are projects. Tru needs some work.
I agree! Switching to competent offensive coaches has done nothing good for Goff. I'd rather Trubisky hand off every first down and try his hardest to complete 3rd and longs his whole career while under pressure. Because that is the winning formula for developing a QB.PapaDongo wrote:Not really trying to be overly negative and don't really need the lecture on making a thread or posting about a subject to whoever that guy was up above this post that is being super critical, but I do think ya gotta prepare for the worst and hope for the best.
Just saying, Tru might never show anything unless the right stuff is around him. Bears need to get Tru consistency but he can't get anything like that his first year.
Then they fire the coaches? Tru will have a new system to learn. Tru will have to get his mechanics fixed, Tru will have to be coachable by a whole new staff. Then what happens if they don't get results, say it's freaking McDaniels? Now they start to ruin Tru like all the other QBs we've had since Jim Miller.
There are quarterbacks that come in and make wins happen, and there are projects. Tru needs some work.