Can We Talk About Witzman and the Right Side of the O Line?

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

User avatar
ramentaschen
Assistant Coach
Posts: 684
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 4:29 am
Been thanked: 7 times

Thoughts please on whether this dude is just a one year stop gap guy and if he has been effective in the run game. Also, replace Massie in 2019?
Image
cblaz11
MVP
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:02 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 119 times

He’s played ok...Once he gets his hands on you guys struggle to separate. He was very slow out of the gate on passing off blocks but he’s improved.

Personally, I think Massie has played very well this year. Heading into next year we have Whitehair, Daniels, and, Leno returning for sure. I think Coward is a guy they view as a future starter, just not sure if it’s at OG or OT. Long could end up a cap casualty next year although I’m not certain about his contract details.

Massies deal is up this offseason, I’d like him back but only if it’s close to what he’s getting now. Maybe a 2 year deal at like 11 million. (He’s only 29)
cblaz11
MVP
Posts: 1294
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 7:02 pm
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 119 times

Also, I think it should be noted that Pace has Leno locked up through 2021 at a very conservative 9 million per year. When you look at left tackle money, and compare what he’s accomplished and how he’s playing, that’s a steal. To me, that contract is a big reason we were able to get Mack. Having your young LT locked up at that cost allows a lot of flexibility.
User avatar
malk
Head Coach
Posts: 3630
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
Has thanked: 133 times
Been thanked: 208 times

At 29 I expect Massie will be looking at how many years/total guarantee rather than maximising the average per year over a shorter period. Wagner bumped up the market last year which is a pain for our cap but I'd hope we can keep hold of Massie without having to increase much, if we want.

Pace needs to be looking at where savings can be made in preparation for Trubisky, we've got two more years on the rookie deal, then it jumps to a little over $20m then we'll be looking down the barrel of $30m per year.

Being able to cut him after a couple of years is definitely some flexibility the team would like!
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".

Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.

(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11040
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 517 times

I brought this up shortly after he started filling in for Long. I think Witzmann has done a really nice job in pass pro, because he knows this offense and knows how to block the pass plays. I think he has been pretty poor in run blocking, which is why they always seem to run the ball to the left. He isn't the road grader that Long was. I think he's the type of player that could be coached up by Heistand and make improvements in that area, but I guarantee you Nagy values his pass blocking more than anything else.

I think the whole line has done a good job this year. Don't know much about Coward, except that he was a former defensive lineman. He has good size. If Massie demands too much, maybe he steps in.
Image
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20622
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 223 times
Been thanked: 793 times

He's just a guy. Not sure what the future holds for Long but I won't be surprised if the right side of our line is overhauled next season.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

"Wallet white, phone is pink, case is clear, nails are clear, lips are pink – your girl LOVE 'em!"
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

He's nothing great. His pass pro is decent, and it's miles better than his run blocking. I'm honestly surprised he's playing over Kush, because Kush...while not overly talented, is a better rounded player. So I wonder if the neck thing is worse than originally thought.

Witzmann is a classic journeyman. He might stick as a swing guy/replacement for Sowell next season, but I don't think he's a long term starter.

As far as Massey goes, he's steady and reliable. He's played pretty well, but they kept Coward on the 53 for a reason.

I'm with G08, I think the right side looks completely different next year.
User avatar
bearsfaninaz
Head Coach
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

I see Long staying personally with Coward becoming our RT depending on draft of course.
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

bearsfaninaz wrote:I see Long staying personally with Coward becoming our RT depending on draft of course.
Yep, Wintzmann is a stopgap that is performing ok which means he hasn't shit the bed.

I see Long staying and Massie will depend on dollars/length. He just seems like a guy that could drop off quickly back to his previous norm.
User avatar
KhalilSackDaddy
Practice Squad
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm

He's better then Kush was, and I thought Kush played pretty well last year, both have struggled at run blocking though. Need to find a more reliable backup OG, Long cannot seem to stay healthy, so even if he's the starter next year, need a guy that can step in and play at a higher level then their current backups.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

Witzmann was baaaaad today. Leno didn’t have a great day either. Oh, and Whitehair’s snap problems surfaced again today.

But Witzmann was baaaaad.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12156
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1239 times
Been thanked: 2207 times

Whitehair's snaps weren't that bad. Daniel's inability to catch them was straight out of a horror movie. He was worse today than Craig Krenzel.
User avatar
Bears Whiskey Nut
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11040
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
Location: Oak Park, IL
Has thanked: 79 times
Been thanked: 517 times

dplank wrote:Whitehair's snaps weren't that bad. Daniel's inability to catch them was straight out of a horror movie. He was worse today than Craig Krenzel.
I have to agree with this. None of those snaps were egregious, and should have been handled. I mean, WTF was up with Daniel fumbling the ball before he could even hand it off to Howard. That was ridiculous. The guy LOST it when the pressure was on in OT.
Image
EricTighe
MVP
Posts: 1220
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 63 times

Some of Whitehairs snaps were bad. The one that hit Daniels in the face mask was perfect.

Come on guys we lost for one reason and Nagy needs to own it. Calling a timeout with 17 seconds to go with anyone but Devin Hester as your return man is a mistake.
But other then that mistake we were left wondering how they beat us like the Patriots were left wondering twice.
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

EricTighe wrote:Some of Whitehairs snaps were bad. The one that hit Daniels in the face mask was perfect.

Come on guys we lost for one reason and Nagy needs to own it. Calling a timeout with 17 seconds to go with anyone but Devin Hester as your return man is a mistake.
But other then that mistake we were left wondering how they beat us like the Patriots were left wondering twice.
I can't believe people are actually blaming that timeout.
EricTighe
MVP
Posts: 1220
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 63 times

MoFugger wrote:
EricTighe wrote:Some of Whitehairs snaps were bad. The one that hit Daniels in the face mask was perfect.

Come on guys we lost for one reason and Nagy needs to own it. Calling a timeout with 17 seconds to go with anyone but Devin Hester as your return man is a mistake.
But other then that mistake we were left wondering how they beat us like the Patriots were left wondering twice.
I can't believe people are actually blaming that timeout.

Why not? Not attacking, but my son and I were thinking the same thing at halftime. As were many Bears fans that my son reads online.
User avatar
bearsfaninaz
Head Coach
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

MoFugger wrote:
EricTighe wrote:Some of Whitehairs snaps were bad. The one that hit Daniels in the face mask was perfect.

Come on guys we lost for one reason and Nagy needs to own it. Calling a timeout with 17 seconds to go with anyone but Devin Hester as your return man is a mistake.
But other then that mistake we were left wondering how they beat us like the Patriots were left wondering twice.
I can't believe people are actually blaming that timeout.
Why not? Was a bad decision. Giants were going to run out clock and Nagy took it way later than should have if wanted ball back. The team lost momentum the next play and never really got it back.
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

EricTighe wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
EricTighe wrote:Some of Whitehairs snaps were bad. The one that hit Daniels in the face mask was perfect.

Come on guys we lost for one reason and Nagy needs to own it. Calling a timeout with 17 seconds to go with anyone but Devin Hester as your return man is a mistake.
But other then that mistake we were left wondering how they beat us like the Patriots were left wondering twice.
I can't believe people are actually blaming that timeout.

Why not? Not attacking, but my son and I were thinking the same thing at halftime. As were many Bears fans that my son reads online.
in hindsight it was a stupid idea, but it's not anywhere near the reason we lost.
Not being able to protect a quarterback that has no business being in a uniform is the reason. That and allowing the Giants to continually convert third Downs in the second half.
The announcer kept harping on that time out during the game too. I wanted to reach through my television rip out his larynx.
allowing them to cut our lead to four points with an entire half to go is not the reason we lost the game.
User avatar
bearsfaninaz
Head Coach
Posts: 2303
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 7 times

MoFugger wrote:
EricTighe wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
EricTighe wrote:Some of Whitehairs snaps were bad. The one that hit Daniels in the face mask was perfect.

Come on guys we lost for one reason and Nagy needs to own it. Calling a timeout with 17 seconds to go with anyone but Devin Hester as your return man is a mistake.
But other then that mistake we were left wondering how they beat us like the Patriots were left wondering twice.
I can't believe people are actually blaming that timeout.

Why not? Not attacking, but my son and I were thinking the same thing at halftime. As were many Bears fans that my son reads online.
in hindsight it was a stupid idea, but it's not anywhere near the reason we lost.
Not being able to protect a quarterback that has no business being in a uniform is the reason. That and allowing the Giants to continually convert third Downs in the second half.
The announcer kept harping on that time out during the game too. I wanted to reach through my television rip out his larynx.
allowing them to cut our lead to four points with an entire half to go is not the reason we lost the game.
Remind me again how much they lost by?
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

bearsfaninaz wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
EricTighe wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
EricTighe wrote:Some of Whitehairs snaps were bad. The one that hit Daniels in the face mask was perfect.

Come on guys we lost for one reason and Nagy needs to own it. Calling a timeout with 17 seconds to go with anyone but Devin Hester as your return man is a mistake.
But other then that mistake we were left wondering how they beat us like the Patriots were left wondering twice.
I can't believe people are actually blaming that timeout.

Why not? Not attacking, but my son and I were thinking the same thing at halftime. As were many Bears fans that my son reads online.
in hindsight it was a stupid idea, but it's not anywhere near the reason we lost.
Not being able to protect a quarterback that has no business being in a uniform is the reason. That and allowing the Giants to continually convert third Downs in the second half.
The announcer kept harping on that time out during the game too. I wanted to reach through my television rip out his larynx.
allowing them to cut our lead to four points with an entire half to go is not the reason we lost the game.
Remind me again how much they lost by?
Irrelevant.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1997 times

Jesus. The pick 6 was way more relevant to why the Bears lost than the timeout.
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4624
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 795 times
Been thanked: 336 times

they lost for a lot of reasons, poor decisions by the QB, poor decisions by the coach, defense being gassed and not stopping them, fumbles, take your pick. All of them added up to a loss.
User avatar
KhalilSackDaddy
Practice Squad
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm

wab wrote:Jesus. The pick 6 was way more relevant to why the Bears lost than the timeout.

It was, but the TO seemed to have changed the momentum of the game. Giants all of a sudden felt like they had a legit shot again after they got the 1st down and a fg.

Both were big parts of the loss.
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

KhalilSackDaddy wrote:
wab wrote:Jesus. The pick 6 was way more relevant to why the Bears lost than the timeout.

It was, but the TO seemed to have changed the momentum of the game. Giants all of a sudden felt like they had a legit shot again after they got the 1st down and a fg.

Both were big parts of the loss.
Because down 7 at the half they would have thought they had no shot?
User avatar
VA_Mountain_Bear
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 798
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:19 am
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 44 times

Lots of things contributed. Gabriel not catching anything except for when he fumbles and lets them score. Miller dropping that pass at the 1 making us kick FG (if we get td there and still get the online kick and a td we win), coach choices, Chase being pretty bad early on not leading Robinson so dbs can swat the ball, locking onto only Robinson, never throwing the ball away to aviod sacks, never except once just going down for his sack instead of running backwards, the early Int, the Time out, ect....

Thank god we get Trubisky back next week.

But while I felt shitty during the game I am fine now guys. Wanna know why? Our whole division lost so we maintain the same lead for the playoff race! :-) I mean it still sucks losing to a crap team, but we were down our starting QB. Look across the league upsets every where, Saints losing to Boys, Panthers losing to Bucs, Pack losing to Cardinals, Colts getting shut out.....it was one out of whack weekend.
User avatar
KhalilSackDaddy
Practice Squad
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm

MoFugger wrote:
KhalilSackDaddy wrote:
wab wrote:Jesus. The pick 6 was way more relevant to why the Bears lost than the timeout.

It was, but the TO seemed to have changed the momentum of the game. Giants all of a sudden felt like they had a legit shot again after they got the 1st down and a fg.

Both were big parts of the loss.
Because down 7 at the half they would have thought they had no shot?
Down 10 at half if they don't get the 1st and a fg, which they don't if Nagy doesn't call the TO. That O had done nothing all half, the 7 points they had was from a def pick 6. That NY O was defeated and Nagy gave them an ounce of life.
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

KhalilSackDaddy wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
KhalilSackDaddy wrote:
wab wrote:Jesus. The pick 6 was way more relevant to why the Bears lost than the timeout.

It was, but the TO seemed to have changed the momentum of the game. Giants all of a sudden felt like they had a legit shot again after they got the 1st down and a fg.

Both were big parts of the loss.
Because down 7 at the half they would have thought they had no shot?
Down 10 at half if they don't get the 1st and a fg, which they don't if Nagy doesn't call the TO. That O had done nothing all half, the 7 points they had was from a def pick 6. That NY O was defeated and Nagy gave them an ounce of life.
Halftime score was 14-10. Without the FG they're down 7.
User avatar
KOP_Snake
Head Coach
Posts: 2132
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:15 pm
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 41 times

I think the final 20 points given up in the 2nd half/OT hurt more than the 3 at the end of the half.
User avatar
KhalilSackDaddy
Practice Squad
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm

MoFugger wrote:
KhalilSackDaddy wrote:
MoFugger wrote:
KhalilSackDaddy wrote:
wab wrote:Jesus. The pick 6 was way more relevant to why the Bears lost than the timeout.

It was, but the TO seemed to have changed the momentum of the game. Giants all of a sudden felt like they had a legit shot again after they got the 1st down and a fg.

Both were big parts of the loss.
Because down 7 at the half they would have thought they had no shot?
Down 10 at half if they don't get the 1st and a fg, which they don't if Nagy doesn't call the TO. That O had done nothing all half, the 7 points they had was from a def pick 6. That NY O was defeated and Nagy gave them an ounce of life.
Halftime score was 14-10. Without the FG they're down 7.
yep, but the NY O has scored 0 and done nothing that entire half, that 7 points was the Oglegtree pick 6. The NY team was ready to just run out the clock, w/the TO they decided to take a shot and it worked out in their favor; that TO gave them all the momentum going into half; and it carried over w/a TD on the first drive of the 3rd qtr.

And really, what was Nagy thinking was going to happen if they got the ball back? Chase was going to drive the ball and get a score? Not w/the way he was playing he wasn't. Just a bad decision that killed his teams momentum.
MoFugger
Head Coach
Posts: 2730
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 9:55 am
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 7 times

Fine. You win. Nagy lost the game by calling a time out in the 2nd qtr. If not for that, the Bears were a guaranteed victory.
Fire him now.
Post Reply