What Do You Think of Coach Nagy’s Use of Mizzell?
Moderator: wab
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11079
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 524 times
Mizzell looks to have pretty good hands.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:13 pm
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 63 times
In retrospect, I hate this guy on the field when it costs Howard and Cunningham touches.EricTighe wrote:We are 8-4 who are we to say who should start?
I am going to eat these words most likely,
but
CUT HIS ASS!
- bearsfaninaz
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2303
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 6:33 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 7 times
I don't like it. Takes touches away from either Howard and Cohen and he's been meh running when he's had the chance. Ok receiver out of backfield but I'd rather have Howard in there.
- KhalilSackDaddy
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm
He's Cohen light. Gonna get touches b/c Cunningham is out. He got 5 touches(2 receptions) it's not like he's really taking anythign away from either guy. Both need rest at times.Bears Whiskey Nut wrote:Mizzell looks to have pretty good hands.
- VA_Mountain_Bear
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 19 times
- Been thanked: 46 times
^ This man all the way!Pagan wrote:Tons of great responses on this thread & exactly why I see the Bears owning this division for the next 5+ years.
The Bears are already the most obviously complete & talented roster in the division.
They're also the youngest, and the which means that most of the players are still scratching the surface & ascending!
All of this discounting any future offseason moves that Pace will undoubtably make.
We've all had to witness such terrible franchise bungle for so many years, and it can be difficult to see or accept what is obviously before us.
We look like the youngest and best team in the division and getting to own it for 5+ years (or at least CAN potentially) is awesome. Getting to see the Pack lose on the final years of Rodgers b/c were just better as a whole team is like a gift of karma. Seeing Detroit lose on the same with Stafford brings be joy. Watching the Vikes star D age out and them waste that $ on Cousins not winning the division gives me chills.
As to the OP and the use of Mizzell I am conflicted. I want Howard or Cohen in so when I see Mizzell I wince. However, Benny is older, and if Nagy wants to test out Mizzell to get a good feel of whether he wants him going forwards into next year or if a new 3rd string RB is needed is probably a good thing. To Mizzell's credit he has never had this much action in his career and seems to be getting slightly better each game.
However, I want us to put a waiver claim on Kareem Hunt, and damn the PR. IF Nagy and Pace think they can work with his issues, and even if he has to miss all of 2019, he is literally the perfect RB for Nagy's system. The debate about Howard could be over, and as much as I love Howard, he could move onto a team that wants to run a scheme better suited to him. Then ponder the idea of Defenses trying to deal with Cohen and Hunt on the field with all the other play-makers...and try not to get excited.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29943
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2032 times
If the Bears put in a waiver claim on Hunt while Howard, on of the best people in the NFL, languishes on the bench... I will lose respect for the Bears almost immediately.VA_Mountain_Bear wrote:^ This man all the way!Pagan wrote:Tons of great responses on this thread & exactly why I see the Bears owning this division for the next 5+ years.
The Bears are already the most obviously complete & talented roster in the division.
They're also the youngest, and the which means that most of the players are still scratching the surface & ascending!
All of this discounting any future offseason moves that Pace will undoubtably make.
We've all had to witness such terrible franchise bungle for so many years, and it can be difficult to see or accept what is obviously before us.
We look like the youngest and best team in the division and getting to own it for 5+ years (or at least CAN potentially) is awesome. Getting to see the Pack lose on the final years of Rodgers b/c were just better as a whole team is like a gift of karma. Seeing Detroit lose on the same with Stafford brings be joy. Watching the Vikes star D age out and them waste that $ on Cousins not winning the division gives me chills.
As to the OP and the use of Mizzell I am conflicted. I want Howard or Cohen in so when I see Mizzell I wince. However, Benny is older, and if Nagy wants to test out Mizzell to get a good feel of whether he wants him going forwards into next year or if a new 3rd string RB is needed is probably a good thing. To Mizzell's credit he has never had this much action in his career and seems to be getting slightly better each game.
However, I want us to put a waiver claim on Kareem Hunt, and damn the PR. IF Nagy and Pace think they can work with his issues, and even if he has to miss all of 2019, he is literally the perfect RB for Nagy's system. The debate about Howard could be over, and as much as I love Howard, he could move onto a team that wants to run a scheme better suited to him. Then ponder the idea of Defenses trying to deal with Cohen and Hunt on the field with all the other play-makers...and try not to get excited.
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 208 times
A thousand times this!wab wrote:If the Bears put in a waiver claim on Hunt while Howard, on of the best people in the NFL, languishes on the bench... I will lose respect for the Bears almost immediately.VA_Mountain_Bear wrote:^ This man all the way!Pagan wrote:Tons of great responses on this thread & exactly why I see the Bears owning this division for the next 5+ years.
The Bears are already the most obviously complete & talented roster in the division.
They're also the youngest, and the which means that most of the players are still scratching the surface & ascending!
All of this discounting any future offseason moves that Pace will undoubtably make.
We've all had to witness such terrible franchise bungle for so many years, and it can be difficult to see or accept what is obviously before us.
We look like the youngest and best team in the division and getting to own it for 5+ years (or at least CAN potentially) is awesome. Getting to see the Pack lose on the final years of Rodgers b/c were just better as a whole team is like a gift of karma. Seeing Detroit lose on the same with Stafford brings be joy. Watching the Vikes star D age out and them waste that $ on Cousins not winning the division gives me chills.
As to the OP and the use of Mizzell I am conflicted. I want Howard or Cohen in so when I see Mizzell I wince. However, Benny is older, and if Nagy wants to test out Mizzell to get a good feel of whether he wants him going forwards into next year or if a new 3rd string RB is needed is probably a good thing. To Mizzell's credit he has never had this much action in his career and seems to be getting slightly better each game.
However, I want us to put a waiver claim on Kareem Hunt, and damn the PR. IF Nagy and Pace think they can work with his issues, and even if he has to miss all of 2019, he is literally the perfect RB for Nagy's system. The debate about Howard could be over, and as much as I love Howard, he could move onto a team that wants to run a scheme better suited to him. Then ponder the idea of Defenses trying to deal with Cohen and Hunt on the field with all the other play-makers...and try not to get excited.
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11079
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 524 times
Let a shittier team deal with the media firestorm and fallout that he will create. It's not worth it to me to try and add that, to what is a REALLY good locker room right now. Besides, dealing with a player like that is not McCaskey's or Pace's MO, in my opinion.G08 wrote:A lot of executives are stating that Hunt will be playing in the league next year. I'd fucking love to have him here.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20672
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
Truth... I don't see Ginny signing off on the deal.Bears Whiskey Nut wrote:Let a shittier team deal with the media firestorm and fallout that he will create. It's not worth it to me to try and add that, to what is a REALLY good locker room right now. Besides, dealing with a player like that is not McCaskey's or Pace's MO, in my opinion.G08 wrote:A lot of executives are stating that Hunt will be playing in the league next year. I'd fucking love to have him here.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- Pagan
- MVP
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:19 am
- Location: South Bend, Indiana
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
COMPLETELY AGREE.G08 wrote:Truth... I don't see Ginny signing off on the deal.Bears Whiskey Nut wrote:Let a shittier team deal with the media firestorm and fallout that he will create. It's not worth it to me to try and add that, to what is a REALLY good locker room right now. Besides, dealing with a player like that is not McCaskey's or Pace's MO, in my opinion.G08 wrote:A lot of executives are stating that Hunt will be playing in the league next year. I'd fucking love to have him here.
This is what makes & will CONTINUE to make this newly rebuilt Bears franchise so exciting = They have & will continue to have high moral character as a prerequisite to wagering the Bears uniform.
Right now you've got a young talented team on the rise that's overflowing with leaders/solid human beings that you don't have to cringe at the thought of your children idolizing.
The Chicago Bears do it the right way.
That being said, after seeing the video, I honestly don't know what the circumstances to this altercation are.. he's definitely in the wrong either way & NFL players usually (wisely) have security to handle such things.
After watching very short silenced clips.. I Def would say that there's nothing good about it, it's a terrible look for him... but let's not confuse him with Ray Rice based off of what we've seen & the lack of time to process.
- KhalilSackDaddy
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm
It wont happen, no way, not after the Ray McDonald fiasco and not w/video evidence. But the best most coherent point I've read about the idea of trying to get him is this. If he's playing in the league next year, do you want him helping you, or a team like GB or another North division?G08 wrote:A lot of executives are stating that Hunt will be playing in the league next year. I'd fucking love to have him here.
I personally don't want him, but it's a valid point. It's one thing if, like the 'skins w/Foster, only 1 team looks at him. But chances are multiple teams will look at him. I think I even saw that KC said they hope to have a shot to bring him back if he's done the right things.
If all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you?It wont happen, no way, not after the Ray McDonald fiasco and not w/video evidence. But the best most coherent point I've read about the idea of trying to get him is this. If he's playing in the league next year, do you want him helping you, or a team like GB or another North division?
“Taylor, we've run out of timeouts. Go in there and get hurt.”
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3631
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 208 times
And if you said jump in the river I would because, it would probably be a good idea.mohner1 wrote:If all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you?It wont happen, no way, not after the Ray McDonald fiasco and not w/video evidence. But the best most coherent point I've read about the idea of trying to get him is this. If he's playing in the league next year, do you want him helping you, or a team like GB or another North division?
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
- KhalilSackDaddy
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm
Not even close to the same situation here. He likely WILL be playing and there won't be any harm to the team that signs him; other then lost money if he muffs up again.mohner1 wrote:If all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you?It wont happen, no way, not after the Ray McDonald fiasco and not w/video evidence. But the best most coherent point I've read about the idea of trying to get him is this. If he's playing in the league next year, do you want him helping you, or a team like GB or another North division?
There are limited top end resources in the NFL and there are multiple teams competing for those resources.
btw, I said it won't happen, so not sure why you even responded the way you did; if I say it wont it's the but there's a reason it should it's the very definition of not doing what everyone else is doing.
My comment wasn't intended to be directed at you, I realize you're not making that argument. I was responding to the silliness of the argument you say has been proposed. I provided an equally silly response to make a point.mohner1 wrote:
Quote:
It wont happen, no way, not after the Ray McDonald fiasco and not w/video evidence. But the best most coherent point I've read about the idea of trying to get him is this. If he's playing in the league next year, do you want him helping you, or a team like GB or another North division?
If all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you?
Not even close to the same situation here. He likely WILL be playing and there won't be any harm to the team that signs him; other then lost money if he muffs up again.
There are limited top end resources in the NFL and there are multiple teams competing for those resources.
btw, I said it won't happen, so not sure why you even responded the way you did; if I say it wont it's the but there's a reason it should it's the very definition of not doing what everyone else is doing.
So he will play next year. I can't deny that won't happen, it probably will, but just because some teams will give him a shot means the bears should too? BS
“Taylor, we've run out of timeouts. Go in there and get hurt.”
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20672
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
Regarding Mizzell... it tells me that Howard's a goner next year and we're going to be searching for a 3 down feature back.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- KhalilSackDaddy
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm
Well that's the conundrum. If he ends up w/GB or Minny and for the next 2-3 years helps prevent the Bears from going to the playoffs was it worth taking the moral high ground when your job(talking about the teams) is to get to the playoffs?mohner1 wrote:My comment wasn't intended to be directed at you, I realize you're not making that argument. I was responding to the silliness of the argument you say has been proposed. I provided an equally silly response to make a point.mohner1 wrote:
Quote:
It wont happen, no way, not after the Ray McDonald fiasco and not w/video evidence. But the best most coherent point I've read about the idea of trying to get him is this. If he's playing in the league next year, do you want him helping you, or a team like GB or another North division?
If all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you?
Not even close to the same situation here. He likely WILL be playing and there won't be any harm to the team that signs him; other then lost money if he muffs up again.
There are limited top end resources in the NFL and there are multiple teams competing for those resources.
btw, I said it won't happen, so not sure why you even responded the way you did; if I say it wont it's the but there's a reason it should it's the very definition of not doing what everyone else is doing.
So he will play next year. I can't deny that won't happen, it probably will, but just because some teams will give him a shot means the bears should too? BS
He's a shit human, I don't want him on the Bears, but if the NFL says he can play; well he's also one of the best rb's in the nfl and can help your team get a shot at a sb. It would be stupid not to consider it, but I hope they don't. And i hope he doesn't end up on the NFCN.
- KhalilSackDaddy
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2018 12:11 pm
I think Mizzell getting carries is more about Cunningham being hurt, Howard .G08 wrote:Regarding Mizzell... it tells me that Howard's a goner next year and we're going to be searching for a 3 down feature back.
Bears are 8th in rushing attempts this year, it's not like they aren't running; and Howard is 8th in rushing attempts for all RB's. It's not like he isn't getting carries.
I think the main thing is that the Bears are running more plays, which allows for more passes and more rb's to get a shot at the ball also. It also might be b/c Howard hasn't been as effective most games so going w/another back might give Nagy a shot at the play he wants.
- Pagan
- MVP
- Posts: 1408
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:19 am
- Location: South Bend, Indiana
- Has thanked: 40 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Yep KSD,KhalilSackDaddy wrote:I think Mizzell getting carries is more about Cunningham being hurt, Howard .G08 wrote:Regarding Mizzell... it tells me that Howard's a goner next year and we're going to be searching for a 3 down feature back.
Bears are 8th in rushing attempts this year, it's not like they aren't running; and Howard is 8th in rushing attempts for all RB's. It's not like he isn't getting carries.
I think the main thing is that the Bears are running more plays, which allows for more passes and more rb's to get a shot at the ball also. It also might be b/c Howard hasn't been as effective most games so going w/another back might give Nagy a shot at the play he wants.
some of us were making these same points at the start of this thread.
Howard didn't go from a franchise record setting RB to a terrible RB.
Like most problems, it's a combination problem.
Everyone seems to like 1 nice some issue/person to place blame on~ makes thinking easier.
It's a combo of new scheme/player fit & execution.
Also.. there's absolutely NO guarantee that Howard is gone next year, that's an assumption.
There's every possibility still that this line & the backs click with this scheme still.
More importantly... Howard still has a whole year left (after this one) on his cheap rookie deal.
=
Unlikely he's gone.
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11079
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 524 times
Look. You don't get rid of a RB, under a rookie contract, with that much talent. This offseason will be ALL ABOUT learning how to incorporate Howard into Nagy's offense. A lot of this year is Nagy evaluating what he has, and how the pieces work together.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20672
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 235 times
- Been thanked: 815 times
That's the thing though, man. Howard's skill-set limits what Nagy can do from a play-design standpoint. This offense needs a back who is an equal threat in the run and pass game so you don't tip your hand when he's in the backfield. Howard isn't that guy, as much as I love the guy.Bears Whiskey Nut wrote:Look. You don't get rid of a RB, under a rookie contract, with that much talent. This offseason will be ALL ABOUT learning how to incorporate Howard into Nagy's offense. A lot of this year is Nagy evaluating what he has, and how the pieces work together.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS