How much is Jordan Howard worth to you?

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

At what price, do you trade Jordan Howard?

I wouldn't trade him
9
24%
2nd round pick
12
32%
3rd round pick
14
37%
3rd round comp pick
0
No votes
4th round pick
2
5%
4th round comp pick
0
No votes
5th rounder
0
No votes
5th round comp pick
0
No votes
6th rounder
1
3%
7th rounder
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 38
User avatar
Dardango
Journeyman
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:39 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 20 times

All of this almost makes me want to see a trade, just to show how terrible an idea it was. The core problem will remain Nagy's pass-happy A.D.D. You can put the second coming of Tony Dorsett back there, but if your coach can't find a clue to use his talents, they don't matter. Say what you want about speed (and #34 was never the fastest guys in the world), Howard is a grinder and there's something to be said about that when the flash and dash gets figured out. Philly proved that they had the Cohen matrix figured for most of the game and absent the late discovery of the double-move by Robinson, Nagy was without a strong alternative route. Also, the way Nagy likes to pass, you better have a back who can put a hat on a linebacker, when one breaks through the way Howard does consistently. Despite all the talk of physical attributes, the guy is a top-six running back in this league who beat out Jeremy Langford and Kadeem Carey, that Nagy routinely chucked aside to put Mizzell and Cunningham on the field. If that makes any kind of sense to anyone, I say trade the guy to some team that recognizes his value and abilities.
User avatar
Dardango
Journeyman
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 1:39 pm
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 20 times

User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4600
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 763 times
Been thanked: 328 times

Dardango wrote:All of this almost makes me want to see a trade, just to show how terrible an idea it was. The core problem will remain Nagy's pass-happy A.D.D. You can put the second coming of Tony Dorsett back there, but if your coach can't find a clue to use his talents, they don't matter. Say what you want about speed (and #34 was never the fastest guys in the world), Howard is a grinder and there's something to be said about that when the flash and dash gets figured out. Philly proved that they had the Cohen matrix figured for most of the game and absent the late discovery of the double-move by Robinson, Nagy was without a strong alternative route. Also, the way Nagy likes to pass, you better have a back who can put a hat on a linebacker, when one breaks through the way Howard does consistently. Despite all the talk of physical attributes, the guy is a top-six running back in this league who beat out Jeremy Langford and Kadeem Carey, that Nagy routinely chucked aside to put Mizzell and Cunningham on the field. If that makes any kind of sense to anyone, I say trade the guy to some team that recognizes his value and abilities.
But, if that's the way they are going to use a back, why wouldn't you trade him if you needed picks? Just saying.

I love howard and I think he is vital. I just don't know if Nagy thinks that way and I also believe he would like a main back that is a little more fluid catching out of the backfield and explosive.
User avatar
Atkins&Rebel
Head Coach
Posts: 2177
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 123 times

If Nagy committed to the run, I'd want to not only keep Howard, but also extend him now for 3-4 more years.

Nagy's use of RB's show his philosophy towards running in general. We know that Mizzell shouldn't touch the ball but he's in there when Howard or Cohen would be much better suited to the various plays that Mizzel sees action in. If Nagy truly wants a committee, then Howard is being wasted and will leave when he has the chance so I'd jump at the chance to get a pick in the 2-3 range for him this year.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
User avatar
AZ_Bearfan
MVP
Posts: 1491
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:49 pm
Location: Mesa, AZ
Has thanked: 131 times
Been thanked: 77 times

The Marshall Plan wrote:I'm not trying to be negative on Jordan Howard because I do like him, but if he went to GB their offense would be easier to predict. If he's in the game, its a run and odds are he's not getting targeted on a pass.
Yeah, that's probably more realistic. I just feel like a pounder would open up the play action game for Erin and I really don't want to see that.
Image
EricTighe
MVP
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Keep him since there is no need to trade to him. Nagy just needs to learn how to be more committed to the running the ball with Howard. In other quit getting cute by bringing Mizzell in to try and confuse peeps. Let Howard run to the outside so peeps don't crash the box everytime he gets the damn ball.
User avatar
Atkins&Rebel
Head Coach
Posts: 2177
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Jason La Confora is reporting that Pace is actively shopping Howard at the combine
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4600
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 763 times
Been thanked: 328 times

I trust pace. If he trades him and gets a replacement via draft pick like a 3rd or 4th I am fine with it.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29805
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 1956 times

Jason La Confora is literally the worst source for Bears related news.
User avatar
Boris13c
Hall of Famer
Posts: 15958
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 11:30 am
Location: The Bear Nebula
Has thanked: 38 times
Been thanked: 103 times

I think Howard can still be an effective functioning piece of this offense even if his role changes from the traditional one he is used to ... and for that reason, I voted not to trade him

but if Nagy and Pace think otherwise, I of course would not argue that, and would expect them to get the most for him they could in a trade ... out of respect for Howard, it would be nice if he does leave to get sent to where he can flourish rather than just dumping him
"Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things."
George Carlin
User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8059
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 306 times

He was only targeted 26x. He had 20 receptions, 76% catch rate. I remember a few passes not being the best (incompletions). He looked to have better hands. I think he could be used more in the passing game and he would not be so predictable. I think Nagy just needs to try to put him in different situations.

I know the team doesn't get off the bus running, but if they do not get as tough as an inside runner as Howard is, it will affect the team in certain situations.
sturf
Journeyman
Posts: 107
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 1:32 pm

It seems Nagy's offense and even Helfrich's Oregon offense was built on stretching the field laterally and confusing the defense. Nagy is looking to make the linebackers freeze, and he wants his running back to take advantage of that indecision by hitting holes fast.

It seems Howard as a slower zone cutback runner needs the linebackers to attack and over pursue opening cutback in order to get big gains.

If the above is correct then making Howard more effective is in conflict with making the offense the most effective? I'm still in favor of keeping Howard this season because I don't think there is actual value in trading him and his catching and pass blocking definitely has improved.
Mr.Irrelevant
Player of the Month
Posts: 377
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2015 5:46 pm
Been thanked: 11 times

I would trade Howard for a third round pick simply because I think there will some RBs available then that would make good replacements for him, and he's going to be coming out of contract in another year anyway.

That said, if I were another team I wouldn't trade him for a third round pick for exactly the same reason.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29805
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 1956 times

Howard's biggest attributes are patience and vision. He's great at waiting for holes to develop...not so great at anticipating that they WILL develop and hitting the hole as it opens (which is why he had a lot of tackles behind the line and ran into the backs of a lot of his linemen).
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4600
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 763 times
Been thanked: 328 times

As much as I like Howard if Nagy and pace see him as an impediment to the offense I think his 3.7 ypc is very replaceable via the draft.
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

I picked a 3rd round because that’s what I feel is a fair value. The other question is if/when it happens who do you replace him with?
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8059
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 120 times
Been thanked: 306 times

I really don't see the Bears getting a 3rd back. If they are shopping him, it almost comes across as desparate. Can't see any team offering a 3rd. A 5th maybe and the Bears should NOT take it.
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25142
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 108 times
Been thanked: 923 times

I don't see the Bears shopping Howard, but if they did move him, a 3rd would be a rich haul. I think that's how negotiations would start, but not where they would finish.
Image
User avatar
Funkster
MVP
Posts: 1851
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 6:35 pm

I don’t think Howard is going anywhere either but it does make some sense if they were trying to get the most value out of him before moving on, that would be now. A 3rd is fair and isn’t asking to much for a player that can stay healthy, averages 4.3 YPC and 8 TDs a year. For how innovative Nagy is, it’s nuts to think he can’t figure out how to use him. Or is it he’s just to stubborn?
“Protect this fucking house, go all out, leave that shit out on the field, let’s have some fun, makes some plays baby ” Mitch Trubisky #believethesleeve
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29805
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 1956 times

I would suspect the 3rd is the starting point because that's realistically the highest comp pick they could get. Why move him for less?
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4600
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 763 times
Been thanked: 328 times

Funkster wrote:I don’t think Howard is going anywhere either but it does make some sense if they were trying to get the most value out of him before moving on, that would be now. A 3rd is fair and isn’t asking to much for a player that can stay healthy, averages 4.3 YPC and 8 TDs a year. For how innovative Nagy is, it’s nuts to think he can’t figure out how to use him. Or is it he’s just to stubborn?
It’s just fit. Just like how you don’t use 295lb 4-3 defensive ends in 3-4 olb positions or have a bunch of really good but slower possession receivers in a deep threat offense. Can they do some aspects of it well, absolutely. Will the scheme perform as well as it could with someone having a better skill set, absolutely not.

It’s not that they can’t be successful with him, it’s could they be better with a different style of running back combined with the fact that they won’t put money in him long term so they could get return now vs waiting a year for a compensatory pick.

3rd is a starting point but if they had a handful of guys they like and thought would be available I think a 4th would get it done.

If it does happen I would prefer it to be a draft day trade when you know what you can grab at that moment. Bills could be a potential partner.
User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5189
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 340 times
Been thanked: 278 times

southdakbearfan wrote:
Funkster wrote:I don’t think Howard is going anywhere either but it does make some sense if they were trying to get the most value out of him before moving on, that would be now. A 3rd is fair and isn’t asking to much for a player that can stay healthy, averages 4.3 YPC and 8 TDs a year. For how innovative Nagy is, it’s nuts to think he can’t figure out how to use him. Or is it he’s just to stubborn?
It’s just fit. Just like how you don’t use 295lb 4-3 defensive ends in 3-4 olb positions or have a bunch of really good but slower possession receivers in a deep threat offense. Can they do some aspects of it well, absolutely. Will the scheme perform as well as it could with someone having a better skill set, absolutely not.

It’s not that they can’t be successful with him, it’s could they be better with a different style of running back combined with the fact that they won’t put money in him long term so they could get return now vs waiting a year for a compensatory pick.

3rd is a starting point but if they had a handful of guys they like and thought would be available I think a 4th would get it done.

If it does happen I would prefer it to be a draft day trade when you know what you can grab at that moment. Bills could be a potential partner.
I think you're 100% right. But these kinds of things bother me. On some level, I feel like good coaches should be able to modify their scheme to utilize good players. And Jordan Howard, while somewhat limited in what he does, is a good, effective player. Good coaches don't take good players and make them into guys who need replaced. Bad coaches do that.

How is it that... If you're in the camp that says Jordan Howard needs to go, then you weren't also in favor of Mike Martz trading away Greg Olsen? No 20/20 hindsight allowed here.

(Note that I'm not really throwing dirt at Matt Nagy. He DID adjust with more zone blocking at the end of the year and Jordan Howard got a lot of his effectiveness back.)
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20555
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 753 times

I'd like to preface this by saying I loved what Jordan Howard did in John Fox's offense. He is tailor fucking made for a pure zone blocking scheme... but that's not what we are doing here. This offense craves a dynamic back that has excellent vision, can make people miss in the hole, and can keep defenses honest by being a threat in the passing game.

Jordan Howard is not that dude, in my opinion.

I'll take anything from a 5th round pick or higher because I don't think he's a Chicago Bear after the 2019-2020 season as he enters free agency.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

User avatar
Mikefive
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5189
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
Has thanked: 340 times
Been thanked: 278 times

G08 wrote:I'd like to preface this by saying I loved what Jordan Howard did in John Fox's offense. He is tailor fucking made for a pure zone blocking scheme... but that's not what we are doing here. This offense craves a dynamic back that has excellent vision, can make people miss in the hole, and can keep defenses honest by being a threat in the passing game.

Jordan Howard is not that dude, in my opinion.

I'll take anything from a 5th round pick or higher because I don't think he's a Chicago Bear after the 2019-2020 season as he enters free agency.
So you were fine with the Bears trading away Greg Olsen because he didn't fit Mike Martz's scheme? If not, why not since you could respond similarly then as you do now?
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".

Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 4600
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 763 times
Been thanked: 328 times

Mikefive wrote:
G08 wrote:I'd like to preface this by saying I loved what Jordan Howard did in John Fox's offense. He is tailor fucking made for a pure zone blocking scheme... but that's not what we are doing here. This offense craves a dynamic back that has excellent vision, can make people miss in the hole, and can keep defenses honest by being a threat in the passing game.

Jordan Howard is not that dude, in my opinion.

I'll take anything from a 5th round pick or higher because I don't think he's a Chicago Bear after the 2019-2020 season as he enters free agency.
So you were fine with the Bears trading away Greg Olsen because he didn't fit Mike Martz's scheme? If not, why not since you could respond similarly then as you do now?
Mike Martz's system only proved successful when it was being operated by a HOF QB, HOF WR1, 2 other Probowl WR's, HOF RB, HOF LT and a very good offensive line and proved to be disastrous outside of that, even prior to the trade of olsen. It was flat out dumb.

The Nagy/Reid system is quite the opposite and in KC it has had 4 different but very effective leading rushers the last 5 seasons.
User avatar
Atkins&Rebel
Head Coach
Posts: 2177
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 3:56 pm
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 123 times

Bringing up Olsen's past situation is irrelevant. Howard can't do what we need our RB position to be able to do. Olsen could do everything but block so should have been effective in Martz's offense. My feeling is that either Olsen didn't want to be here anymore or someone got sick of him.
I will kill you if you cut me at the knees. You will drink with me when invited and stay til I say so. We only listen to American Music. I make men nervous with just my presence. I expect an apology if you hold. I throw linemen at QB's. Believe the Lore!
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29805
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 127 times
Been thanked: 1956 times

Olsen was NOT a fit in Martz's offense. But we all saw what a dope Martz was and knew he wasn't a long term solution as an offensive playcaller for the Bears. So people were upset that a cornerstone player was being traded away because he was a bad fit in an offense being run by a guy that was only going to be around for a year or two.

That's not the case with Howard. Nagy isn't a short term fix.

Also...another difference between Olsen and Howard is that Howard physically can't do what this offense requires from him. In Olsen's case, he was never really given the opportunity to prove he could or couldn't (he could).
User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20555
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 753 times

Mikefive wrote:
G08 wrote:I'd like to preface this by saying I loved what Jordan Howard did in John Fox's offense. He is tailor fucking made for a pure zone blocking scheme... but that's not what we are doing here. This offense craves a dynamic back that has excellent vision, can make people miss in the hole, and can keep defenses honest by being a threat in the passing game.

Jordan Howard is not that dude, in my opinion.

I'll take anything from a 5th round pick or higher because I don't think he's a Chicago Bear after the 2019-2020 season as he enters free agency.
So you were fine with the Bears trading away Greg Olsen because he didn't fit Mike Martz's scheme? If not, why not since you could respond similarly then as you do now?
Apples to oranges... Martz wasn't going to be the offensive coordinator "for the foreseeable future". Nagy is here for the long-haul and the sooner he gets his ideal RB the better. Plus, Martz never utilized a TE in his career (some genius, huh?).

The long and the short of this is that Howard can't do what Nagy's offense craves. He's not explosive, he won't really make people miss in the hole, and he clearly is not a legitimate threat in the passing game. You want a good example of what I'm talking about? Look at this play from Hunt... THIS is what our offense needs:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6hZ0LnoXsbE" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

User avatar
G08
Hall of Famer
Posts: 20555
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
Location: Football Hell
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 753 times

wab wrote:Olsen was NOT a fit in Martz's offense. But we all saw what a dope Martz was and knew he wasn't a long term solution as an offensive playcaller for the Bears. So people were upset that a cornerstone player was being traded away because he was a bad fit in an offense being run by a guy that was only going to be around for a year or two.

That's not the case with Howard. Nagy isn't a short term fix.

Also...another difference between Olsen and Howard is that Howard physically can't do what this offense requires from him. In Olsen's case, he was never really given the opportunity to prove he could or couldn't (he could).
Just saw your reply... 100% what I am talking about.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS

EricTighe
MVP
Posts: 1219
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 62 times

The world. I love the kid. Great person, excellent work ethic, perfect teammate and the consummate pro.

If we are not going to use him the let him walk and I will watch the games he plays in. But enough of the trade rumors. Either trade him or let him know where he stands. The Bears owe him that much.
Post Reply