Let’s try to avoid stirring shit up for the sake of stirring shit up, shall we?IE wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:59 am I still don't think the playground pecking order has been fully established. How do we know whose non-professional opinions are better? Or who is liked better? These are important things.
I guess I'll go with the person I agree with on each topic - you know, the smart one.
Bears Franchise Direction: Everything's Awful/Things Aren't So Bad/Etc.
Moderator: wab
- UOK
- Site Admin
- Posts: 25174
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
- Has thanked: 109 times
- Been thanked: 939 times
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20655
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 232 times
- Been thanked: 805 times
My advice:IE wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:59 am I still don't think the playground pecking order has been fully established. How do we know whose non-professional opinions are better? Or who is liked better? These are important things.
I guess I'll go with the person I agree with on each topic - you know, the smart one.
Continue to post what you think.
If it is stupid, the board will continue to let you know.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12500
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 523 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
- Contact:
That was supposed to be comedy, FYI.G08 wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 12:26 pmMy advice:IE wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2020 9:59 am I still don't think the playground pecking order has been fully established. How do we know whose non-professional opinions are better? Or who is liked better? These are important things.
I guess I'll go with the person I agree with on each topic - you know, the smart one.
Continue to post what you think.
If it is stupid, the board will continue to let you know.
But what is that response? Some kind of a bully bible thing? The concept that you're stupid if you don't agree with some ostensible majority on the board... is itself stupid and illogical. Larger numbers of wrong people don't make something right. Or the loudest/most repetitive often aren't right, in their role of self-nominated arbiters of reality or what is acceptable to discuss. That makes the board dumber and less hospitable.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20655
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 232 times
- Been thanked: 805 times
Mine was common senseIE wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:08 amThat was supposed to be comedy, FYI.
But what is that response? Some kind of a bully bible thing? The concept that you're stupid if you don't agree with some ostensible majority on the board... is itself stupid and illogical. Larger numbers of wrong people don't make something right. Or the loudest/most repetitive often aren't right, in their role of self-nominated arbiters of reality or what is acceptable to discuss. That makes the board dumber and less hospitable.
Let's hash this out because I'm growing tired of reading the same conversation about these issues. This is about as bluntly as I can put it:
I am not sure how criticism is considered bullying, unless you are that self-righteous or feel you are above reproach.
An example: pointing to an apple and declaring it is an orange isn't considered stupid because it deviates from some "majority on the board". It is wrong, painstakingly wrong.
Mind you, this is applies to everyone who freely shares their thoughts on a message board. Some people will agree, others will disagree. But if you say things like "Jesper Horsted is better than Greg Olsen early in his career", or that "Akiem Hicks is 5% better than Nick Williams", you're you're going to get roasted. Not because it is bullying, but because (excuse my bluntness here) it is preposterously stupid.
Members not calling these posts out is what will make this board dumber; not some "self-nominated arbiters" you are fictitiously creating to protect your feelings. Based on recent exchanges you've had, it appears vague and passive-aggressive posts will only add to the ire you draw from other posters, but I digress.
Last edited by G08 on Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12500
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 523 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
- Contact:
I used the term (bullying) to describe the responses that were intended to squash conversation rather than either contribute or move on without comment. I think self righteous might be an appropriate term - but I'd apply it to the folks who need to make sure others aren't talking about things that don't pass their purity tests.
Perhaps there should be a "purity / sacred cows" list pinned, so people know what to think and also what human land mines to avoid. It would help people to know that it is perfectly fine for example to believe that Mitch Trubisky is the next Drew Brees - but heaven forbid anyone suggest the marginal utility of Hicks might be small enough to make changes to help the team. A list would really help.
Perhaps there should be a "purity / sacred cows" list pinned, so people know what to think and also what human land mines to avoid. It would help people to know that it is perfectly fine for example to believe that Mitch Trubisky is the next Drew Brees - but heaven forbid anyone suggest the marginal utility of Hicks might be small enough to make changes to help the team. A list would really help.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 20655
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Location: Football Hell
- Has thanked: 232 times
- Been thanked: 805 times
Forget the "purity / sacred cows" list; maybe you can die for the sins of the unpure since you already pinned yourself up on that crossIE wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2020 9:54 am I used the term (bullying) to describe the responses that were intended to squash conversation rather than either contribute or move on without comment. I think self righteous might be an appropriate term - but I'd apply it to the folks who need to make sure others aren't talking about things that don't pass their purity tests. Perhaps there should be a "purity / sacred cows" list pinned, so people know what to think and also what human land mines to avoid. It would help people to know that it is perfectly fine to believe that Mitch Trubisky is the next Drew Brees - but heaven forbid anyone suggest the marginal utility of Hicks might be small enough to make changes to help the team. Oh my!
9 PLAYOFF APPEARANCES IN THE PAST 35 SEASONS
-
- Journeyman
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2020 6:21 pm
- Has thanked: 119 times
- Been thanked: 30 times
UOK edit: Nope.
- BreadNCircuses
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 514
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:34 pm
- Has thanked: 27 times
- Been thanked: 83 times
2023 Preseason Downside prediction:
5-6 wins, never really healthy all season, a constant shuffling.
We're potentially in a position to draft in the Top 5 again, depending on the Carolina team, and probably have a low-teens (or better) pick ourselves.
5-6 wins, never really healthy all season, a constant shuffling.
We're potentially in a position to draft in the Top 5 again, depending on the Carolina team, and probably have a low-teens (or better) pick ourselves.
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4628
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 799 times
- Been thanked: 338 times
Slingshot engaged.
- Bears Whiskey Nut
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11073
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:06 am
- Location: Oak Park, IL
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 523 times
Just so much frustration on the board right now. The QB position is completely up in the air, and there is no faith that this franchise will get it right. We don't have a ton of cap space, and there is no 1st round pick for Pace to fuck up again. We're sort of mired in a bunch of shit, and inevitably, it will come out in our interactions with each other. Let's all take a deep breath and remember game day chat memes, and the fact that G08 gets grumpy with us in our irreverence to the beloved.
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5196
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 279 times
A lot of the frustration has been caused by Ryan Pace, a guy who I have pretty well supported. We have clearly improved and developed a very good defense in his tenure. But it's his failure with R1 picks and aggressiveness resulting in traded away draft picks that is tough to swallow in a time when we're cap strapped. Pace has compensated for failing in R1 with FA signings though. Kevin White bad... Alan Robinson good. Leonard Floyd bad... Robert Quinn... good (presumably). And of course, in his entire time here, he has yet to get the QB right, which is particularly maddening to Chicago Bear fans.Bears Whiskey Nut wrote: ↑Wed Feb 26, 2020 9:04 amJust so much frustration on the board right now. The QB position is completely up in the air, and there is no faith that this franchise will get it right. We don't have a ton of cap space, and there is no 1st round pick for Pace to fuck up again. We're sort of mired in a bunch of shit, and inevitably, it will come out in our interactions with each other. Let's all take a deep breath and remember game day chat memes, and the fact that G08 gets grumpy with us in our irreverence to the beloved.
I will say though that when you significantly improve your team over several years, it's the natural order of things to move from flush with cap room to not so much. Trading for a dynamic game changer like Kahlil Mack was a bold move that also had dramatic cap consequences. The problem is that it's much easier to live with being cap dry after you win the big one. See the Chicago Blackhawks.
Just rambling.......
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.