2022-23 Playoffs

For all non-Bears happenings in the National Football League

Moderator: wab

User avatar
LacertineForest
MVP
Posts: 1660
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 1804 times
Been thanked: 333 times

I'm with @RustinFields on this one - While I agree that the system should be improved via the use of booth decisions and technology, the nature of the subjectivity of these calls means that I think you're going to have problems no matter what system you have. It certainly doesn't seem to be hurting the NFL's viewership, and we've had plenty of other championship altering calls in recent years (the egregious non-PI call in the Saints-Rams NFCCG in 2019 comes to mind).
Last edited by LacertineForest on Mon Jan 30, 2023 1:09 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7375
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 567 times
Been thanked: 1000 times

And that's all I'm saying. It's not that the current system doesnt suck, I just dont think that an army of sky judges (and it has to be an army, because there's an array of camera angles to review) making subjective calls isnt the solution people think it is.
I dont know what the answer is, and I'm glad it's not my job to come up with one, because i'd die penniless.
Image
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7375
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 567 times
Been thanked: 1000 times

also
Image
User avatar
Rusty Trombagent
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7375
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 567 times
Been thanked: 1000 times

Image
User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8074
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 122 times
Been thanked: 314 times

I think replays have ruined the game, not the actual replay rule. Back in the early to mid 70s, you didn't get the # of replays you get now. Replays have made everyone question the call. The D Smith catch/no catch, in live action it looked like a helluva catch. Present day NFL, 50 camera angles and they finally got one that showed incomplete. In the 70s there likely would not have been but one replay and everyone would have thought it was a catch. If you are going to have all these angles, use them what the hell. Instead of going overboard on replays, cut down on them, eff it.

And for one to say the unsportsmanlike penalty was minor, what the hell? It is an obvious rules, really a black and white rule. Mahomes was clearly 2-3 steps out of bounds, you can't shove a guy when he is there. It was a dumbass play by the Bengal.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29880
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1995 times

They've basically neutered the refs ability to referee. The production value of the game has gone up exponentially and the level of refereeing has stayed the same.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 29880
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1995 times

What could have been...

User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8423
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 910 times
Been thanked: 1294 times

wab wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 4:59 pm What could have been...

Mahomes would be a backup like Mitch if he got McNagied early on in his career.
Image
User avatar
Grizzled
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5619
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
Has thanked: 633 times
Been thanked: 507 times

The Marshall Plan wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 5:04 pm
wab wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 4:59 pm What could have been...

Mahomes would be a backup like Mitch if he got McNagied early on in his career.
The Bears seem to be good at that. They told Joe Montana they were going to take him in the 3rd round and didn't.
Drafts are like snowflakes, no two are alike.
Post Reply