2023 Rule Changes

For all non-Bears happenings in the National Football League

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Head Coach
Posts: 3145
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 19 times
Been thanked: 414 times

Rule changes submitted by teams for consideration:
Source: https://www.nfl.com/news/eagles-proposa ... ubmissions
  • Allow players to wear No. 0 as a jersey number and allow kickers and punters to wear any numeral between 0-49 and 90-99.
    (Philadelphia Eagles)
  • Permit a team to maintain possession of the ball after a score by substituting one offensive play -- fourth-and-20 from the kicking team's 20-yard line – in place of an onside kick attempt.
    (Philadelphia Eagles)
  • Make the adjustment of the play clock following an instant replay reversal consistent with other timing rules.
    (Los Angeles Chargers)
  • Expand the coaches' challenge system to include personal fouls called on the field.
    (Detroit Lions)
  • Provide clubs more opportunities for a third challenge.
    (Detroit Lions)
  • Expand the Replay Official's jurisdiction to allow for consultation regarding penalty assessment.
    (Detroit Lions)
  • Expand the Replay Official's jurisdiction to allow for review on failed fourth down attempts.
    (Houston Texans)
  • Make fouls for Roughing the Passer called on the field subject to replay assist and/or review by a coach's challenge.
    (Los Angeles Rams)
  • Expand the crackback prohibition to players who go in motion and go beyond the center to block ("split-flow block") a defender below the waist.
    (New York Jets)
The Eagles jersey number submission is just trivial and unnecessary. I still don't like the previous rule change. I preferred it when a jersey number helped identify a player's position. I'm not a fan of their proposal to replace onside kicks either.

The other submissions on the other hand seem much more sensible. I hate these restrictions on what you can challenge and what can be reviewed. How many times have we seen bad calls on personal fouls and roughing calls in the past couple of seasons, with perfectly legitimate tackles and hits being flagged?
HurricaneBear
MVP
Posts: 1608
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
Has thanked: 555 times
Been thanked: 88 times

I actually like all those proposals except for the 4th and 20 one.

I love the number change proposal but then again I'm pretty sure I'm in the minority on here about liking the last number rule change. I hate when they restrict players numbers. Let them play with what number they want to
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5285
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 246 times

HisRoyalSweetness wrote: Mon Mar 13, 2023 7:59 pm Rule changes submitted by teams for consideration:
Source: https://www.nfl.com/news/eagles-proposa ... ubmissions
  • Permit a team to maintain possession of the ball after a score by substituting one offensive play -- fourth-and-20 from the kicking team's 20-yard line – in place of an onside kick attempt.
    (Philadelphia Eagles)
I understand the desire to get rid of onsides, but this is crazy.


Miss an onside kick and the receiving team has the ball around the 45(?).

Throw an incompletion and the "receiving team" gets the ball at the 20. That's close to automatic points (probably 90% FG rate from there).
Even a 15 yd completion into a soft zone turns it over at the 35.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
Post Reply