Foreman to Bears

For all things Chicago Bears

Moderator: wab

User avatar
Grizzled
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5623
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
Has thanked: 635 times
Been thanked: 509 times

thunderspirit wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 6:33 am
Grizzled wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:39 am Not a bad signing but why Homer? He's not really special at anything except for having fresh legs because of lack of use. Why not Jaamal Williams, signed for $4M per year, and draft a guy?
Jamaal Williams: 4.59 40-yd
D'Onta Foreman: 4.49 40-yd
Travis Homer: 4.48 40-yd

That's why.
Not real convincing. I can see Williams or Freeman, Homer leaves me in the dark for being helpful or necessary.
Drafts are like snowflakes, no two are alike.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12156
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1239 times
Been thanked: 2207 times

Homer is an upgrade to Ebner. RB3 who can catch, run in a pinch, and play good ST.

Ebner sucked I’m hoping he’s a goner.

I like Jamaal Williams too, but we chose Foreman over him - not Homer.

Plus, plenty of great Simpsons joke opportunities with Homer, bonus.
User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 25166
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 109 times
Been thanked: 936 times

dplank wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 8:41 am Homer is an upgrade to Ebner. RB3 who can catch, run in a pinch, and play good ST.

Ebner sucked I’m hoping he’s a goner.

I like Jamaal Williams too, but we chose Foreman over him - not Homer.

Plus, plenty of great Simpsons joke opportunities with Homer, bonus.
Ebner had a pile of opportunities to stand out last year and took advantage of precisely none of them. I'm with you. There's the door.
Image
User avatar
Grizzled
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5623
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
Has thanked: 635 times
Been thanked: 509 times

Ebner didn't cut it as a RB3. Poles has his reasons for picking up Homer instead of teying to fill the hole on the draft.
Drafts are like snowflakes, no two are alike.
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

Yep. In a year where all disappointment was taken by me with a grain of salt ... Ebner stood out as disappointing with no excuse. Boo.

Homer is the top ST cover guy in the league - so that is also a big part of why they grabbed him.

I knew Foreman was potentially available and am surprised that Carolina let him move on for that price. There has to be something more too it - like Poles promised him a legit chance to win the RB1 job in Chicago, or the concept of proving himself and earning an in-season extension with a team who has the money was attractive to him.

I like RB competitions where every time a guy goes out there he's fighting to win the main job. RB platooning breeds competition. You're only as good as your last carry, or block.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
wulfy
MVP
Posts: 1595
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 137 times
Been thanked: 296 times
Contact:

Compliments Herbert's style well - any 411 on him from a pass protection perspective?
User avatar
crueltyabc
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5133
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
Location: Dallas TX
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 234 times

Not discussed here is that the Bears are (in a way) kneecapping the Panthers by signing FAs they maybe wanted to re-sign. Any little bit helps to ensure that round 1 pick next year is a good one
xyt in the discord chats
User avatar
The Cooler King
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5012
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 1215 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Ebner can clear as a PS probably and might make a few appearances as a PS gameday elevation for special teams. Good role to have and I doubt any team poaches him.

It's a good RB room. The only complaint is it's very role specific. The more Herbert can improve him pass blocking and receiving such that the personnel isn't so obvious to scheme - the better it will be. So hoping he feels the pressure and wants to be great and is working to cover his gaps still.
User avatar
The Cooler King
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5012
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 1215 times
Been thanked: 348 times

crueltyabc wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:29 am Not discussed here is that the Bears are (in a way) kneecapping the Panthers by signing FAs they maybe wanted to re-sign. Any little bit helps to ensure that round 1 pick next year is a good one
I feel like that may be a bit too much over thinking. Not raiding a playoff team roster lol
User avatar
crueltyabc
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5133
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
Location: Dallas TX
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 234 times

The Cooler King wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:32 am
crueltyabc wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:29 am Not discussed here is that the Bears are (in a way) kneecapping the Panthers by signing FAs they maybe wanted to re-sign. Any little bit helps to ensure that round 1 pick next year is a good one
I feel like that may be a bit too much over thinking. Not raiding a playoff team roster lol
Cmon bro this is the season for overthinking and overhoping!
xyt in the discord chats
EricTighe
MVP
Posts: 1220
Joined: Fri Aug 26, 2016 1:13 pm
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 63 times

Love this pick up.
User avatar
BreadNCircuses
Assistant Coach
Posts: 513
Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2019 1:34 pm
Has thanked: 26 times
Been thanked: 83 times

a friend calls him a "B-minus Derrick Henry"

I completely expect us to draft another mid to late round RB. I wouldn't be surprised to see that happen almost every year, and just keep the committee rotation flowing
keep adding a new guy to that room every year and the talent will get on the field. Guys who can't stand out sit on the practice squad and then fall off the team. Rinse and repeat.
2023 Preseason Downside prediction:
5-6 wins, never really healthy all season, a constant shuffling.
We're potentially in a position to draft in the Top 5 again, depending on the Carolina team, and probably have a low-teens (or better) pick ourselves.
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

The Cooler King wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:31 am The more Herbert can improve him pass blocking and receiving such that the personnel isn't so obvious to scheme - the better it will be. So hoping he feels the pressure and wants to be great and is working to cover his gaps still.
We need to kill the narrative that Juice is bad at pass pro. He's just not - he's graded as just slightly worse than Monty. IF Monty is indeed a *good* pass blocker then Juice is respectable too - already.
wulfy wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:24 am Compliments Herbert's style well - any 411 on him from a pass protection perspective?
D'Onta's pass pro grade was abysmal in '22. But it was only like 14 snaps - so very small sample and I'm hoping that they saw something in his overall tape that helped alleviate their concerns in the area.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
The Cooler King
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5012
Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
Has thanked: 1215 times
Been thanked: 348 times

IE wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 12:04 pm
The Cooler King wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:31 am The more Herbert can improve him pass blocking and receiving such that the personnel isn't so obvious to scheme - the better it will be. So hoping he feels the pressure and wants to be great and is working to cover his gaps still.
We need to kill the narrative that Juice is bad at pass pro. He's just not - he's graded as just slightly worse than Monty. IF Monty is indeed a *good* pass blocker then Juice is respectable too - already.
wulfy wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 11:24 am Compliments Herbert's style well - any 411 on him from a pass protection perspective?
D'Onta's pass pro grade was abysmal in '22. But it was only like 14 snaps - so very small sample and I'm hoping that they saw something in his overall tape that helped alleviate their concerns in the area.
If we're going off just PFF grades they were pretty similar last year, but DM has scored much higher in past. But the total pass block snaps must count for something and I think we can give some credence to how coaches use them to tell us who they think was better.

The "eye test" whether it's mine or tape guys who I generally respect I think also say the same thing. Heard plenty of rumblings about it during training camp and such as well.

The good news it's its probably 90% effort and practice. No reason be can't be a respectable blocker if he wants to. Receiving might be slight more skill oriented than just effort, but he should have good athletic tools with the question just being hands. Some guys just have catching yips or something.
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 12500
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 523 times
Been thanked: 700 times
Contact:

The Cooler King wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 12:19 pm
IE wrote: Fri Mar 17, 2023 12:04 pm

We need to kill the narrative that Juice is bad at pass pro. He's just not - he's graded as just slightly worse than Monty. IF Monty is indeed a *good* pass blocker then Juice is respectable too - already.



D'Onta's pass pro grade was abysmal in '22. But it was only like 14 snaps - so very small sample and I'm hoping that they saw something in his overall tape that helped alleviate their concerns in the area.
If we're going off just PFF grades they were pretty similar last year, but DM has scored much higher in past. But the total pass block snaps must count for something and I think we can give some credence to how coaches use them to tell us who they think was better.

The "eye test" whether it's mine or tape guys who I generally respect I think also say the same thing. Heard plenty of rumblings about it during training camp and such as well.

The good news it's its probably 90% effort and practice. No reason be can't be a respectable blocker if he wants to. Receiving might be slight more skill oriented than just effort, but he should have good athletic tools with the question just being hands. Some guys just have catching yips or something.
Agreed that usage can be an indicator. But it isn't necessarily "is bad" on the one not chosen. "More established" will almost always weigh heavier with the coaches who want to reduce risk.

Juice's near-Monty level performance in the opportunities he did have to me are encouraging, and certainly don't warrant a narrative that he's not good in pass pro. "We don't know as well"? OK fine. But the narrative has a level of some sort of certainty to it, and it isn't fair to Juice IMO.

The "eye test" IS a problem for Juice, because he had a super-visible and memorable ST whiff on a blocked punt/TD. Personally I believe that colors people's opinion about his pass pro more than how he actually did in pass pro.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
User avatar
crueltyabc
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5133
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
Location: Dallas TX
Has thanked: 81 times
Been thanked: 234 times

xyt in the discord chats
Post Reply