Packers have agreed a 1 year extension with Love

For all non-Bears happenings in the National Football League

Moderator: wab

Post Reply
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Head Coach
Posts: 4184
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 38 times
Been thanked: 880 times

Packers, Jordan Love agree to one-year contract extension

The Green Bay Packers and quarterback Jordan Love have agreed to terms on a one-year contract extension that makes his deal run through 2024, according to a person familiar with the situation.

The person spoke to The Associated Press on the condition of anonymity because the extension hasn’t been announced.

Although the person didn’t reveal terms, ESPN and NFL Network reported that the extension included $13.5 million in guaranteed money and could be worth up to $22.5 million.
...

Tuesday marked the deadline day for teams to decide whether to pick up the fifth-year options on contracts for their 2020 first-round draft picks. The fifth-year option on Love’s deal would have been worth about $20.3 million.

Packers general manager Brian Gutekunst had been asked Saturday after the draft about the option and that coming deadline.

“It’s a lot of money for a guy who hasn’t played, but at the same time, obviously we’re moving forward with him,” Gutekunst said at the time. “So we’ll figure that out by Tuesday.”

The two sides instead agreed on this extension.
...

Full article: https://chicago.suntimes.com/2023/5/2/2 ... -extension
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 27862
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 1057 times

Interesting. You don't see this a lot...a player taking a one year extension for less money than the option year. In fact I don't think I've ever seen it.
User avatar
Bearfacts
MVP
Posts: 1391
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
Location: Colorado
Has thanked: 342 times
Been thanked: 75 times

Somewhat of a lack of confidence on GB's side for sure if not on Love's side as well. Kind of a go along to get along decision.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6352
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 267 times
Been thanked: 355 times

Its a smart contract for the club

They didn't Jacob Brisket it
User avatar
LacertineForest
MVP
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 781 times
Been thanked: 113 times

I'm not quite sure I understand it from Love's perspective, though - seems like he let the Packers give him a lesser deal than his 5th year option would have been worth for basically nothing. What were the Packers going to do if he said, "no, I've been a good soldier - I want something for helping you out of your stupid contract decision with Rodgers"? If he sucks, they're just going to cut him and draft a new guy. I would think Love could have asked for a bit more in return for helping them out, but maybe I'm missing something.
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6074
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 247 times
Been thanked: 466 times

LacertineForest wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:18 am I'm not quite sure I understand it from Love's perspective, though - seems like he let the Packers give him a lesser deal than his 5th year option would have been worth for basically nothing. What were the Packers going to do if he said, "no, I've been a good soldier - I want something for helping you out of your stupid contract decision with Rodgers"? If he sucks, they're just going to cut him and draft a new guy. I would think Love could have asked for a bit more in return for helping them out, but maybe I'm missing something.
If they cut him, he gets less somewhere else as a reclamation project.

And (highly drafted but not established as quality) QBs never get the same amount of time and opportunity anywhere else than they do with the team that drafted them.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
User avatar
LacertineForest
MVP
Posts: 1082
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 781 times
Been thanked: 113 times

Moriarty wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:38 am
LacertineForest wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:18 am I'm not quite sure I understand it from Love's perspective, though - seems like he let the Packers give him a lesser deal than his 5th year option would have been worth for basically nothing. What were the Packers going to do if he said, "no, I've been a good soldier - I want something for helping you out of your stupid contract decision with Rodgers"? If he sucks, they're just going to cut him and draft a new guy. I would think Love could have asked for a bit more in return for helping them out, but maybe I'm missing something.
If they cut him, he gets less somewhere else as a reclamation project.

And (highly drafted but not established as quality) QBs never get the same amount of time and opportunity anywhere else than they do with the team that drafted them.
I understand that if they cut him it's because he wasn't very good and he's got to try and catch on somewhere else, which likely won't work out very well for him (for the reasons you mentioned).

What I maybe don't get is his actual value to the team this year - seems to me like they need him this year, so he should try to capitalize on that and get more guaranteed money over the two years (at least as much as the 5th year option would have given him).

For example, if the Packers had picked up the 5th year option, they would have owed him around $20MM this year, right? If he sucks and they cut him next year, he would still have earned that money. With the new deal, he's only guaranteed $13MM if that same scenario happens. To me, that's $7MM he left on the table for nothing. If he does perform well, he earns roughly the same amount of money (over 2 years, though) AND he gives them another year to work out a contract instead of putting the pressure on GB to get one done this year. I also understand that he can't control the Packers not picking up his option, but it seems like the 5th-year option should have provided a baseline for negotiations.

Am I reading this wrong? Is it just the "unknown" factor that reduces his value so much? Seems to me that the new deal offers him no upside, other than just having $13MM guaranteed no matter what happens.
User avatar
RustinFields
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6517
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 346 times
Been thanked: 534 times

Moriarty wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:38 am
LacertineForest wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:18 am I'm not quite sure I understand it from Love's perspective, though - seems like he let the Packers give him a lesser deal than his 5th year option would have been worth for basically nothing. What were the Packers going to do if he said, "no, I've been a good soldier - I want something for helping you out of your stupid contract decision with Rodgers"? If he sucks, they're just going to cut him and draft a new guy. I would think Love could have asked for a bit more in return for helping them out, but maybe I'm missing something.
If they cut him, he gets less somewhere else as a reclamation project.

And (highly drafted but not established as quality) QBs never get the same amount of time and opportunity anywhere else than they do with the team that drafted them.
Yes, but if you get some game time, you then get the greatest gift of all, which is a lifetime as a journeymen backup! You still make millions and get to keep your childhood memories. Nathan Peterman and Mike Glennon, I'm looking at you. :|
User avatar
pus
Head Coach
Posts: 2451
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
Location: Earth
Has thanked: 1434 times
Been thanked: 136 times

RustinFields wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 7:30 am
Moriarty wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:38 am

If they cut him, he gets less somewhere else as a reclamation project.

And (highly drafted but not established as quality) QBs never get the same amount of time and opportunity anywhere else than they do with the team that drafted them.
Yes, but if you get some game time, you then get the greatest gift of all, which is a lifetime as a journeymen backup! You still make millions and get to keep your childhood memories. Nathan Peterman and Mike Glennon, I'm looking at you. :|
This is true.
"..maybe we as Bears fans just aren't used to seeing a QB operate an NFL offense, throw to the spot where the WR is going to be, or look off defenders."
-wab

"I feel bad for the guys he gets to coach."
-pus on Nagy
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 3960
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 222 times
Been thanked: 104 times

From what I have read it isn’t a pay cut, but the contract is actually a bit higher, the bonus’s allow to move the cap hit to the following season.

This makes sense given Roger’s $50 million dead cap hit this season, to free up space for 23 and move a large potion of Loves cap hit to 24 when Roger’s is off the books.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6352
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 267 times
Been thanked: 355 times

RustinFields wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 7:30 am
Moriarty wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:38 am

If they cut him, he gets less somewhere else as a reclamation project.

And (highly drafted but not established as quality) QBs never get the same amount of time and opportunity anywhere else than they do with the team that drafted them.
Yes, but if you get some game time, you then get the greatest gift of all, which is a lifetime as a journeymen backup! You still make millions and get to keep your childhood memories. Nathan Peterman and Mike Glennon, I'm looking at you. :|
I'm looking at Chase Daniel and Charlie Whitehurst - they nailed the assignment more than anyone.
User avatar
RustinFields
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6517
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 346 times
Been thanked: 534 times

RichH55 wrote: Mon May 08, 2023 5:13 pm
RustinFields wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 7:30 am

Yes, but if you get some game time, you then get the greatest gift of all, which is a lifetime as a journeymen backup! You still make millions and get to keep your childhood memories. Nathan Peterman and Mike Glennon, I'm looking at you. :|
I'm looking at Chase Daniel and Charlie Whitehurst - they nailed the assignment more than anyone.
So many years in the league with so few starts for the both of them. I'd love to see backup QB's charted that way, would be a weirdly fascinating breakdown.
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 27862
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 72 times
Been thanked: 1057 times

RichH55 wrote: Mon May 08, 2023 5:13 pm
RustinFields wrote: Fri May 05, 2023 7:30 am

Yes, but if you get some game time, you then get the greatest gift of all, which is a lifetime as a journeymen backup! You still make millions and get to keep your childhood memories. Nathan Peterman and Mike Glennon, I'm looking at you. :|
I'm looking at Chase Daniel and Charlie Whitehurst - they nailed the assignment more than anyone.
Chad Henne too
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Head Coach
Posts: 3634
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 201 times
Been thanked: 345 times

LacertineForest wrote: Thu May 04, 2023 11:18 am I'm not quite sure I understand it from Love's perspective, though - seems like he let the Packers give him a lesser deal than his 5th year option would have been worth for basically nothing. What were the Packers going to do if he said, "no, I've been a good soldier - I want something for helping you out of your stupid contract decision with Rodgers"? If he sucks, they're just going to cut him and draft a new guy. I would think Love could have asked for a bit more in return for helping them out, but maybe I'm missing something.
If he doesn't take it and the don't use the 5ht year option, I guess he runs the chance of he stinks it up this year and when he contract ends, he gets basically nothing. I he takes a few million less to make sure he gets at least another $13M.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6352
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 267 times
Been thanked: 355 times

wab wrote: Tue May 09, 2023 10:04 am
RichH55 wrote: Mon May 08, 2023 5:13 pm

I'm looking at Chase Daniel and Charlie Whitehurst - they nailed the assignment more than anyone.
Chad Henne too
He actually played some though- was never Caleb Hanie out there.

Charlie in the NFL 2006-2016? Started 9 Games?

Thats impressive
Post Reply