Justin Fields Megathread - Steelers Edition

For all non-Bears happenings in the National Football League

Moderator: wab

User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14155
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1798 times
Been thanked: 3125 times

Rooting for injury here, bad person or not lol
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 31104
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 196 times
Been thanked: 2737 times

Yeah, I mean I'm not rooting for some life altering injury. Give me a high ankle sprain, turf toe, broken fingers on his throwing hand... something minor that keeps him out for a handful of games.
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5756
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 589 times
Been thanked: 985 times

wab wrote: Thu Oct 31, 2024 11:08 am Yeah, I mean I'm not rooting for some life altering injury. Give me a high ankle sprain, turf toe, broken fingers on his throwing hand... something minor that keeps him out for a handful of games.
Or just super poor performance
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8463
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 3094 times

Fields had a couple of carries today in the Steeler win over the Ravens so add those to his snap count!

Wilson's closing in on 300 snaps whilst Fields is just shy of 400 so still all to play for! :applaud:
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5756
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 589 times
Been thanked: 985 times

HisRoyalSweetness wrote: Sun Nov 17, 2024 7:20 pm Fields had a couple of carries today in the Steeler win over the Ravens so add those to his snap count!

Wilson's closing in on 300 snaps whilst Fields is just shy of 400 so still all to play for! :applaud:
How great would it be for Fields to end up starting the last few games and he wins by a snap thanks to those carries.
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8463
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 110 times
Been thanked: 3094 times

It was even better. Fields played 3 snaps!

The Steelers have run 654 plays plus had 64 snaps on which there were accepted penalties, so 718 plays altogether.

Fields has played 398 snaps so currently 55.4%.

He'll likely fall below the 51% threshold after the Steelers next game assuming Wilson remains healthy.

At their current rate the Steelers will play around 1,220 snaps by the end of the regular season. (I assume the trade clause doesn't include playoffs.)

The target for Fields is therefore around 623 snaps, so another 225, to hit 51%.

The Steelers averaged fewer plays with Fields starting (65 versus a season average of 72) so that would likely require him to play 3.5 full games. That's half of those they have remaining.
User avatar
Ditka’s dictaphone
Head Coach
Posts: 4849
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 1119 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Is the target 51% or 50.1%?
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural

Image
User avatar
Ditka’s dictaphone
Head Coach
Posts: 4849
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 1119 times
Been thanked: 1164 times

Fields had one passing attempt against the Browns and 3 rushing attempts

Nice of the Browns to win - tank is on :D
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural

Image
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8967
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 643 times
Been thanked: 759 times

Ditka’s dictaphone wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 5:22 pm Is the target 51% or 50.1%?
I Thought it's 50.1% - but I think I'm wrong

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/397 ... ell-wilson

They use 51% here
User avatar
Shadow
Crafty Veteran
Posts: 883
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:47 am
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 203 times

From a press release.
* Back in March, Fields was sent over to Pittsburgh in exchange for a 2025 sixth-round pick that could move up to a fourth pick if Fields played in 51% of their snaps.
A new Era begins in the NFC North!

Bears didn't get the memo.... :frustrated: :sick: :angry:
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14155
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1798 times
Been thanked: 3125 times

Yea we need an injury there or we are screwed
User avatar
Otis Day
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8403
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Armpit of IL.
Has thanked: 167 times
Been thanked: 453 times

Russ is cooking! Good line there in Pittsburgh, going to make it hard for a injury induced by a sack.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14155
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1798 times
Been thanked: 3125 times

Otis Day wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:27 am Russ is cooking! Good line there in Pittsburgh, going to make it hard for a injury induced by a sack.
They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5756
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 589 times
Been thanked: 985 times

dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:33 am
Otis Day wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:27 am Russ is cooking! Good line there in Pittsburgh, going to make it hard for a injury induced by a sack.
They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
As much as I love Fields, I don't know how we'd be doing him as our QB.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14155
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1798 times
Been thanked: 3125 times

We went 5-2 down the stretch with him last year, and he started 4-2 with Pittsburgh. So it feel counterintuitive to think he wouldn’t be winning here had he stayed and we made these moves.
User avatar
LacertineForest
Head Coach
Posts: 2071
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 2804 times
Been thanked: 510 times

dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:33 am
Otis Day wrote: Mon Dec 02, 2024 8:27 am Russ is cooking! Good line there in Pittsburgh, going to make it hard for a injury induced by a sack.
They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
Just #4 would have gotten us to 8-4 right now. Your plan gets you wins, but do you really think Fields is good enough to beat the defenses in this division alone, let alone win you playoff games? There's a reason Russ won the starting job in Pittsburgh.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 14155
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 1798 times
Been thanked: 3125 times

LacertineForest wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:44 am
dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:33 am

They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
Just #4 would have gotten us to 8-4 right now. Your plan gets you wins, but do you really think Fields is good enough to beat the defenses in this division alone, let alone win you playoff games? There's a reason Russ won the starting job in Pittsburgh.
I don't know and that's the rub here. I really really like what I see in Caleb, and long term that may turn out to be the better play. I'm just lamenting this season in particular - as for how it all pans out, only time will tell.
User avatar
LacertineForest
Head Coach
Posts: 2071
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:39 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Has thanked: 2804 times
Been thanked: 510 times

dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:52 am
LacertineForest wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:44 am

Just #4 would have gotten us to 8-4 right now. Your plan gets you wins, but do you really think Fields is good enough to beat the defenses in this division alone, let alone win you playoff games? There's a reason Russ won the starting job in Pittsburgh.
I don't know and that's the rub here. I really really like what I see in Caleb, and long term that may turn out to be the better play. I'm just lamenting this season in particular - as for how it all pans out, only time will tell.
That's totally fair. We all had high hopes and it's just been a disaster, for the most part. At least Caleb has looked like the goods, and I think we got a good one in Rome, as well. Can you imagine how it would feel if Caleb looked like '23 Bryce Young out there? :sick:
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 4211
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 880 times
Been thanked: 769 times

As someone who was a Fields guy, who loved Frazier in the draft last year, who was pretty high on Verse, and was uncertain about Williams: I'm glad I wasn't in charge.

Williams is so much better as a rookie QB than Fields is as a Y4 QB that there's no way trading Williams away was the move to make.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
:shocked:
User avatar
Arkansasbear
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5756
Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
Has thanked: 589 times
Been thanked: 985 times

LacertineForest wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:44 am
dplank wrote: Tue Dec 03, 2024 10:33 am

They keep talking about their rookie C like he's the next great C in Steelers long history of great C's. It makes me sick every time I hear it. As much as I love Caleb, I still think that we're in better shape had we:

1. Traded down for a haul and kept Justin as our QB
2. Targeted Verse and Frazier, while still drafting Odunze. (Note, this is not pure hindsight, this was discussed prior to the draft as the plan for the trade down)
3. Not signed Keenan Allen and signed another DL or OL instead (DJ Reader + one of the higher paid G's)
4. Fired Flus and Hired Harbaugh

If this was Poles plan, we'd be 8-4 minimum right now.
Just #4 would have gotten us to 8-4 right now. Your plan gets you wins, but do you really think Fields is good enough to beat the defenses in this division alone, let alone win you playoff games? There's a reason Russ won the starting job in Pittsburgh.
If we had fired Flus and hired Johnson, I think that would have solves all our problems. We are in the hunt to win the division and practically have a playoff spot locked up.
Post Reply