Bears Acquire Joe Thuney
Moderator: wab
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 15420
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 2161 times
- Been thanked: 3727 times
I’m not criticizing it, I’m happy with it. It’s just an observation if that’s alright with you
- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 2530 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
LOL....oh you didn't want to debate over semantics with Rich but with me you will? Thank you very little.dplank wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 8:12 am I’m not criticizing it, I’m happy with it. It’s just an observation if that’s alright with you

How 'bout changing the observation tower view to one looking at the future then?

- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9753
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 3833 times
- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 2530 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
Glad you posted this because I just posted in another thread about this.
While we assume the Bears will want to extend Thuney we don't know if that's assured or that Thuney will accept an offer of an extension vs hitting FA. Until he we offer an extension and he accepts it we have to count him as a one year rental. It would be smart for the Bears to get this done prior to the draft but what if they don't for whatever reason?
It creates yet another reason for why they may consider drafting Campbell as a hedge against not being able to retain Thuney. So there's not one but two possible scenarios for him. 1) you draft him to compete at LT, and 2) you draft him to replace Thuney in the event he can't be extended. In either case Campbell doesn't have to start at either spot day one so all through camp and preseason he can be evaluated at LT.
I would think that by Sept we'd know whether or not Thuney will be extended. If so Campbell continues to compete for the LT spot. If not and it looks as though Thuney may not be extended then we already have his replacement on the roster and under a rookie contract. This isn't to say what we should do or will do it's just one more scenario for Poles and Co to consider.
It's not altogether different than what we were facing with Keenan Allen last year when we went ahead and drafted Odunze despite having traded for Allen. It's just solid three dimensional thinking to see it this way.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 32532
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 3572 times
The biggest difference is that 3 WR are often on the field at the same time, whereas two left guards are ... not.Bearfacts wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 3:41 am It's not altogether different than what we were facing with Keenan Allen last year when we went ahead and drafted Odunze despite having traded for Allen. It's just solid three dimensional thinking to see it this way.
- Shadow
- MVP
- Posts: 1076
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2022 11:47 am
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 275 times
Though in Detroit Ben Johnson did run 2 LTs at the same time....other times 2 RTs. He likes his 3 Tackle set trick plays. Maybe he runs a 2 LG set with Braxton declaring as a receiving target.wab wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:08 amThe biggest difference is that 3 WR are often on the field at the same time, whereas two left guards are ... not.Bearfacts wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 3:41 am It's not altogether different than what we were facing with Keenan Allen last year when we went ahead and drafted Odunze despite having traded for Allen. It's just solid three dimensional thinking to see it this way.
Bears are actually dating the Prom Queen, who would have thought it?
What alternate universe is this?
Did I fall down the wrong trouser leg of time?

What alternate universe is this?
Did I fall down the wrong trouser leg of time?



-
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3106
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
- Has thanked: 3991 times
- Been thanked: 769 times
I don't think Thuney will get talked to after an extension until after the draft plays out unless they need extra space to make a roster move.
- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 2530 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
For starters right now we're not assured of having Thuney for more than one year. If we don't offer an extension or he declines one he's a FA in 2026. So that's at least a consideration. We also don't know how the Bears view Braxton Jones beyond 2025. He also becomes a FA in 2026 if not extended and it won't be cheap. We're probably talking around $20 mil AAV give or take a mil. Is he our longer term guy at LT?wab wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 8:08 amThe biggest difference is that 3 WR are often on the field at the same time, whereas two left guards are ... not.Bearfacts wrote: Thu Mar 13, 2025 3:41 am It's not altogether different than what we were facing with Keenan Allen last year when we went ahead and drafted Odunze despite having traded for Allen. It's just solid three dimensional thinking to see it this way.
IF Campbell is on the board at #10 he's arguably a player who could play either position depending on need. If drafted I believe they will give him a shot at LT during camp and preseason. Since both positions are covered now and he doesn't necessarily need to start and can be prepared for both spots pending the outcome of any decision regarding extensions for both players. At worst he's a viable backup for both.
The topic of an extension for Kyler Gordon keeps coming up but seldom is Braxton Jones mentioned as well and now Thuney. I'd like to think Poles and Co are doing a little thinking ahead here.
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 15420
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 2161 times
- Been thanked: 3727 times
I'm still on Campbell or Graham at 10 if either is there. What FA has changed for me is it has opened up my thinking on Jeanty, which was a hard no for me before. I could see one of the other highly rated DL at 10 also. I'm not sure a trade down will be available to us, but certainly an option if it is. I do want to add another OL to the mix with one of our top 4 picks, another DL also, and a RB. Then the 4th pick can be anywhere but I'm looking at S and LB for succession planning. WR can wait until later rounds as can TE IMO.
- Arkansasbear
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6159
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 620 times
- Been thanked: 1084 times
You got me back on the Campbell train I started on, but with the interior locked up my concerns about him being able to stay at LT kind of take him off the board at 10. If they draft him and say he is going to be the LT, I'll role with it, but I can't get there on my own.dplank wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 9:14 am I'm still on Campbell or Graham at 10 if either is there. What FA has changed for me is it has opened up my thinking on Jeanty, which was a hard no for me before. I could see one of the other highly rated DL at 10 also. I'm not sure a trade down will be available to us, but certainly an option if it is. I do want to add another OL to the mix with one of our top 4 picks, another DL also, and a RB. Then the 4th pick can be anywhere but I'm looking at S and LB for succession planning. WR can wait until later rounds as can TE IMO.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 32532
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 3572 times
I'm out on trying to find a LT in this draft. If they want to try Campbell there, then I won't complain about it, but there are other prospects that aren't as much of a guess...and I'm over the team guessing with high draft picks.
I firmly believe it will be either Jeanty or a defensive player.
If it isn't Jeanty, I believe it will come down to one of the following guys:
Jaylon Walker
Kenneth Grant
Mykel Williams
Will Johnson
I firmly believe it will be either Jeanty or a defensive player.
If it isn't Jeanty, I believe it will come down to one of the following guys:
Jaylon Walker
Kenneth Grant
Mykel Williams
Will Johnson
- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 2530 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
After hearing Greg Gabriel's comment about an extension for Thuney I'm convinced it will happen. Thuney appears to be quite happy he was traded to Chicago so he should be amenable to an extension with some added guaranteed $$$ and we'd be foolish not to get him extended.
That brings me back to Campbell and whether the Bears have him on their board as a LT or strictly as a LG. His arm length is well below what Poles prefers but what about Johnson and Roushar? Of the two top alternatives Simmons arm length is just 33" so maybe a 1/4" more. Is he still rehabbing his knee? Will he be ready for camp?
Banks measure 33 1/2" but quite a few teams have him marked down as an OG. How do the Bears seen him? And how do they see Amegadjie right now? Do they have enough belief in his ascension that we can go into 2025 with just Jones and him as our LT? There's also a decision to be made regarding an extension for Jones.
My intuition tells me that given the $$$ Poles just put into the IOL and with Wright due an extension next year it's hard to see him spending $20 mil AAV on an extension for Jones if he can draft a rookie LT and do a reset of that contract. Having already drafted Amegadjie may also make that decision easier to make.
We can also consider that with a win now OS in place what are our chances of having another top ten pick in the near future and a shot at a top rookie LT? Maybe we're at a point where having filled nearly all of the starting slots we need to be thinking a year ahead since a rookie LT won't need to be a day one starter.
Three players would be competing at LT throughout camp and preseason. By then we should have a pretty good idea of where to rank them and we need one to be the swing OT anyway so I don't see it as a waste even if Jones still starts. If not he can be traded before deadline if it's unlikely he'd accept a lower extension offer.
That brings me back to Campbell and whether the Bears have him on their board as a LT or strictly as a LG. His arm length is well below what Poles prefers but what about Johnson and Roushar? Of the two top alternatives Simmons arm length is just 33" so maybe a 1/4" more. Is he still rehabbing his knee? Will he be ready for camp?
Banks measure 33 1/2" but quite a few teams have him marked down as an OG. How do the Bears seen him? And how do they see Amegadjie right now? Do they have enough belief in his ascension that we can go into 2025 with just Jones and him as our LT? There's also a decision to be made regarding an extension for Jones.
My intuition tells me that given the $$$ Poles just put into the IOL and with Wright due an extension next year it's hard to see him spending $20 mil AAV on an extension for Jones if he can draft a rookie LT and do a reset of that contract. Having already drafted Amegadjie may also make that decision easier to make.
We can also consider that with a win now OS in place what are our chances of having another top ten pick in the near future and a shot at a top rookie LT? Maybe we're at a point where having filled nearly all of the starting slots we need to be thinking a year ahead since a rookie LT won't need to be a day one starter.
Three players would be competing at LT throughout camp and preseason. By then we should have a pretty good idea of where to rank them and we need one to be the swing OT anyway so I don't see it as a waste even if Jones still starts. If not he can be traded before deadline if it's unlikely he'd accept a lower extension offer.
- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 22897
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Has thanked: 705 times
- Been thanked: 1591 times
Reading and hearing a lot of Jeanty smoke today and I don't like itwab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:23 am I'm out on trying to find a LT in this draft. If they want to try Campbell there, then I won't complain about it, but there are other prospects that aren't as much of a guess...and I'm over the team guessing with high draft picks.
I firmly believe it will be either Jeanty or a defensive player.
If it isn't Jeanty, I believe it will come down to one of the following guys:
Jaylon Walker
Kenneth Grant
Mykel Williams
Will Johnson

Cam Skattebo Bet with RichH55
$100 donated to charity of winner's choice

$100 donated to charity of winner's choice
- If he goes in rounds 1, 2, or 3 -- G08 wins
- If he goes in round 4 -- It's a (tush) push
- If he goes after round 4 -- RichH55 wins

- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 2530 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
You're gonna hear a lot of that all the way up to the draft just like you did with CW last year. Some believe he's a generational RB and others don't. But you can bet your bippy that with some much indecision about where he my go his agents are doing all they can to pump him up in the media. And Poles isn't gonna tip his hand either.G08 wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 11:52 amReading and hearing a lot of Jeanty smoke today and I don't like itwab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:23 am I'm out on trying to find a LT in this draft. If they want to try Campbell there, then I won't complain about it, but there are other prospects that aren't as much of a guess...and I'm over the team guessing with high draft picks.
I firmly believe it will be either Jeanty or a defensive player.
If it isn't Jeanty, I believe it will come down to one of the following guys:
Jaylon Walker
Kenneth Grant
Mykel Williams
Will Johnson![]()
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4634
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 1103 times
- Been thanked: 921 times
Yeah, I think the chance of the Bears drafting a tackle at all in remote. They drafted one last year (whatever your feelings on Amegadjie) and still have Braxton for one more rookie-year contract.wab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:23 am I'm out on trying to find a LT in this draft. If they want to try Campbell there, then I won't complain about it, but there are other prospects that aren't as much of a guess...and I'm over the team guessing with high draft picks.
I firmly believe it will be either Jeanty or a defensive player.
If it isn't Jeanty, I believe it will come down to one of the following guys:
Jaylon Walker
Kenneth Grant
Mykel Williams
Will Johnson
Plus there aren't a whole lot of prospects this year who fit the physical profile Poles has sought: you've got Cameron Williams (Texas) and Emery Jones Jr (LSU) who come close, maybe Jalen Travis (Iowa St via Princeton), and perhaps they think Jonah Savaiinaea (Arizona) can stick outside in the NFL, but other than that there isn't much beyond lottery tickets in the form of late Day 3 flyers and UDFAs/camp invites.
KFFL refugee.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct

- G08
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 22897
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:34 pm
- Has thanked: 705 times
- Been thanked: 1591 times
I like Aireontae Ersery quite a bit if he's there at #39...thunderspirit wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 12:06 pmYeah, I think the chance of the Bears drafting a tackle at all in remote. They drafted one last year (whatever your feelings on Amegadjie) and still have Braxton for one more rookie-year contract.wab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:23 am I'm out on trying to find a LT in this draft. If they want to try Campbell there, then I won't complain about it, but there are other prospects that aren't as much of a guess...and I'm over the team guessing with high draft picks.
I firmly believe it will be either Jeanty or a defensive player.
If it isn't Jeanty, I believe it will come down to one of the following guys:
Jaylon Walker
Kenneth Grant
Mykel Williams
Will Johnson
Plus there aren't a whole lot of prospects this year who fit the physical profile Poles has sought: you've got Cameron Williams (Texas) and Emery Jones Jr (LSU) who come close, maybe Jalen Travis (Iowa St via Princeton), and perhaps they think Jonah Savaiinaea (Arizona) can stick outside in the NFL, but other than that there isn't much beyond lottery tickets in the form of late Day 3 flyers and UDFAs/camp invites.
Cam Skattebo Bet with RichH55
$100 donated to charity of winner's choice

$100 donated to charity of winner's choice
- If he goes in rounds 1, 2, or 3 -- G08 wins
- If he goes in round 4 -- It's a (tush) push
- If he goes after round 4 -- RichH55 wins

- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8473
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 692 times
- Been thanked: 1319 times
If you get the Thuney extension, forget Campbell (and probably Simmons, too).Bearfacts wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 11:49 am After hearing Greg Gabriel's comment about an extension for Thuney I'm convinced it will happen. Thuney appears to be quite happy he was traded to Chicago so he should be amenable to an extension with some added guaranteed $$$ and we'd be foolish not to get him extended.
That brings me back to Campbell and whether the Bears have him on their board as a LT or strictly as a LG. His arm length is well below what Poles prefers but what about Johnson and Roushar? Of the two top alternatives Simmons arm length is just 33" so maybe a 1/4" more. Is he still rehabbing his knee? Will he be ready for camp?
There'd be no interior jobs available for at least 2, maybe 3 years. And you can't take guys that aren't built for T when you have no Plan B ability to move them inside.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 2530 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
That more or less depends on how the Bears see the various LT prospects. Did Kelvin Banks whose arms are 33 1/2" present better as a LT than Will Campbell and his sub 33" arms? Is Justin Simmons whose 33" arms put him right on the borderline a better prospect than the others if fully recovered from his knee injury?Moriarty wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 12:27 pmIf you get the Thuney extension, forget Campbell (and probably Simmons, too).Bearfacts wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 11:49 am After hearing Greg Gabriel's comment about an extension for Thuney I'm convinced it will happen. Thuney appears to be quite happy he was traded to Chicago so he should be amenable to an extension with some added guaranteed $$$ and we'd be foolish not to get him extended.
That brings me back to Campbell and whether the Bears have him on their board as a LT or strictly as a LG. His arm length is well below what Poles prefers but what about Johnson and Roushar? Of the two top alternatives Simmons arm length is just 33" so maybe a 1/4" more. Is he still rehabbing his knee? Will he be ready for camp?
There'd be no interior jobs available for at least 2, maybe 3 years. And you can't take guys that aren't built for T when you have no Plan B ability to move them inside.
I don't have those answers but the Bears have to be discussing them among themselves. I'm on the side of those who believe Campbell can play LT and are willing to try him there and allow him to prove it. Whether or not the Bears are in on that I don't know and neither do you or any of the rest of us.
Poles prefers LT who are taller and have longer arms. We have two of those now so maybe we stick with them. But Poles isn't the only one whose drafting for the offense any longer. He'll have input from Johnson and Roushar and that will count for a lot. I'm not making predictions just analyzing possibilities.
- Arkansasbear
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6159
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 620 times
- Been thanked: 1084 times
Knowing what I know if I was in charge of the draft, I don't think I'd draft one. Have to hit on a guy that can play LT. I just don't have a good feeling about any of them such that I'd draft one at 10. There a couple of guys that might make me look in the second, but most of them appear to be RT. But if they think Campbell can play LT, I think he's in play if he is on the board. Just don't know how they view him.thunderspirit wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 12:06 pmYeah, I think the chance of the Bears drafting a tackle at all in remote. They drafted one last year (whatever your feelings on Amegadjie) and still have Braxton for one more rookie-year contract.wab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 10:23 am I'm out on trying to find a LT in this draft. If they want to try Campbell there, then I won't complain about it, but there are other prospects that aren't as much of a guess...and I'm over the team guessing with high draft picks.
I firmly believe it will be either Jeanty or a defensive player.
If it isn't Jeanty, I believe it will come down to one of the following guys:
Jaylon Walker
Kenneth Grant
Mykel Williams
Will Johnson
Plus there aren't a whole lot of prospects this year who fit the physical profile Poles has sought: you've got Cameron Williams (Texas) and Emery Jones Jr (LSU) who come close, maybe Jalen Travis (Iowa St via Princeton), and perhaps they think Jonah Savaiinaea (Arizona) can stick outside in the NFL, but other than that there isn't much beyond lottery tickets in the form of late Day 3 flyers and UDFAs/camp invites.
If we make some trades and pick up some late round picks, I read about the kid from U Conn today that could be this years Braxton Jones, so maybe that could happen.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 32532
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 3572 times
I'm sticking to my guns in saying that I'll be very surprised if they draft a pure OT prospect this year. I like Caleb Rogers on day 2, but he's probably an interior player that can play OT in a pinch.
Poles and Co do a pretty good job at looking ahead at drafts too, and next year there are probably 5 solid R1 tackles (not tackles who are probably guards that you hope can play tackle).
Plus...the team has openly talked about the possibility of moving Wright to LT as an option. It's not out of the question that Wright could move to LT and KA could slot in at RT if they decided to move on from Jones. (Whether you think this is wise is a separate conversation).
Poles and Co do a pretty good job at looking ahead at drafts too, and next year there are probably 5 solid R1 tackles (not tackles who are probably guards that you hope can play tackle).
Plus...the team has openly talked about the possibility of moving Wright to LT as an option. It's not out of the question that Wright could move to LT and KA could slot in at RT if they decided to move on from Jones. (Whether you think this is wise is a separate conversation).
- Arkansasbear
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6159
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 620 times
- Been thanked: 1084 times
Good point about next year's draft. Of those 5 how many do you think can hold down LT?wab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:47 pm I'm sticking to my guns in saying that I'll be very surprised if they draft a pure OT prospect this year. I like Caleb Rogers on day 2, but he's probably an interior player that can play OT in a pinch.
Poles and Co do a pretty good job at looking ahead at drafts too, and next year there are probably 5 solid R1 tackles (not tackles who are probably guards that you hope can play tackle).
Plus...the team has openly talked about the possibility of moving Wright to LT as an option. It's not out of the question that Wright could move to LT and KA could slot in at RT if they decided to move on from Jones. (Whether you think this is wise is a separate conversation).
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 32532
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 3572 times
I think most of the potential R1 guys can. It's obviously early, but right now I see the following guys as top 40 prospects who can play LT.Arkansasbear wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:56 pmGood point about next year's draft. Of those 5 how many do you think can hold down LT?wab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:47 pm I'm sticking to my guns in saying that I'll be very surprised if they draft a pure OT prospect this year. I like Caleb Rogers on day 2, but he's probably an interior player that can play OT in a pinch.
Poles and Co do a pretty good job at looking ahead at drafts too, and next year there are probably 5 solid R1 tackles (not tackles who are probably guards that you hope can play tackle).
Plus...the team has openly talked about the possibility of moving Wright to LT as an option. It's not out of the question that Wright could move to LT and KA could slot in at RT if they decided to move on from Jones. (Whether you think this is wise is a separate conversation).
Kadyn Proctor, Alabama
Francis Mauigoa, Miami
Earnest Greene, Georgia
Elijah Pritchett, Nebraska
Blake Miller, Clemson
Tosh Baker, Notre Dame
Pritchett fits the LT profile that Poles seems to focus on the most, and he happens to be an early favorite of mine in general. Mauigoa and Miller have primarily played on the right side, but they both have skills that translate to LT.
Fernando Carmona is another potential top 40 guy, but teams are going to have to decide if he's a turd of a human first.
- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 2530 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
That's the $10 mil question and then if we end up with a pick at #20 or above what are the chances of getting one of the best? Theoretically they could wait until next March before extending Jones to see if they had a shot at replacing him or if they believed they had a solution in house but IMHO it should be Amegadjie not Wright.Arkansasbear wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:56 pmGood point about next year's draft. Of those 5 how many do you think can hold down LT?wab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:47 pm I'm sticking to my guns in saying that I'll be very surprised if they draft a pure OT prospect this year. I like Caleb Rogers on day 2, but he's probably an interior player that can play OT in a pinch.
Poles and Co do a pretty good job at looking ahead at drafts too, and next year there are probably 5 solid R1 tackles (not tackles who are probably guards that you hope can play tackle).
Plus...the team has openly talked about the possibility of moving Wright to LT as an option. It's not out of the question that Wright could move to LT and KA could slot in at RT if they decided to move on from Jones. (Whether you think this is wise is a separate conversation).
My intuition tells me they still aren't pleased enough with Jones to extend him but if playing next to Thuney that changes maybe they do. But extensions for both Jones and Wright back to back along with the costs of the IOL are gonna get pricey. Having a LT on a rookie deal for another 4 years solves that problem to a degree.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 32532
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 3572 times
Only if that LT is actually an LT and plays. Otherwise you wast up to two years of that rookie deal.Bearfacts wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:46 pmThat's the $10 mil question and then if we end up with a pick at #20 or above what are the chances of getting one of the best? Theoretically they could wait until next March before extending Jones to see if they had a shot at replacing him or if they believed they had a solution in house but IMHO it should be Amegadjie not Wright.Arkansasbear wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 3:56 pm
Good point about next year's draft. Of those 5 how many do you think can hold down LT?
My intuition tells me they still aren't pleased enough with Jones to extend him but if playing next to Thuney that changes maybe they do. But extensions for both Jones and Wright back to back along with the costs of the IOL are gonna get pricey. Having a LT on a rookie deal for another 4 years solves that problem to a degree.
- Bearfacts
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3541
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2018 8:33 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 2530 times
- Been thanked: 593 times
That would be the whole point wouldn't it? And going even farther they would have to be pretty certain that draftee would be better than either Braxton Jones and Kiran Amegadjie or why draft him at all? We're in a position where he would not necessarily have to play day one but you'd want him starting at some point in year one.wab wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 7:43 pmOnly if that LT is actually an LT and plays. Otherwise you wast up to two years of that rookie deal.Bearfacts wrote: Mon Mar 17, 2025 5:46 pm
That's the $10 mil question and then if we end up with a pick at #20 or above what are the chances of getting one of the best? Theoretically they could wait until next March before extending Jones to see if they had a shot at replacing him or if they believed they had a solution in house but IMHO it should be Amegadjie not Wright.
My intuition tells me they still aren't pleased enough with Jones to extend him but if playing next to Thuney that changes maybe they do. But extensions for both Jones and Wright back to back along with the costs of the IOL are gonna get pricey. Having a LT on a rookie deal for another 4 years solves that problem to a degree.
None of us can make that call. Jones is a middle of the road LT. Even after three years as a starter he still has some holes in his game. If in their opinion he's topped out it's tough to see them wanting to pay big money to extend him vs giving someone less costly a shot. That either Amegadjie or a rookie draftee.
- Heinz D.
- MVP
- Posts: 1680
- Joined: Fri May 06, 2022 4:29 pm
- Location: Tri-State area
- Has thanked: 1779 times
- Been thanked: 329 times
Oh! Tell me more! Should I do a dive?

My mother's love was inexplicably linked to kickball.