A realistic goal is an improvement of 4 to possibly 5 wins.wab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:54 am I still think we should be cautious with our expectations for 23. Poles has all the resources in the world right now, but they aren't going to upgrade 80% of this roster in one offseason.
I think a wildcard spot should be the goal, but let's not get too far out over our skis. It's still going to be a very young team.
Random Salary Cap Musings and Questions
Moderator: wab
- Grizzled
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5619
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 633 times
- Been thanked: 507 times
Drafts are like snowflakes, no two are alike.
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5192
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 342 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
I agree. We lead the league in cap space, but I'd be willing to bet we also lead the league in contracts to write to fill the 53.wab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:54 am I still think we should be cautious with our expectations for 23. Poles has all the resources in the world right now, but they aren't going to upgrade 80% of this roster in one offseason.
I think a wildcard spot should be the goal, but let's not get too far out over our skis. It's still going to be a very young team.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5012
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1215 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
That's setting expectations too low.Grizzled wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:55 amA realistic goal is an improvement of 4 to possibly 5 wins.wab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:54 am I still think we should be cautious with our expectations for 23. Poles has all the resources in the world right now, but they aren't going to upgrade 80% of this roster in one offseason.
I think a wildcard spot should be the goal, but let's not get too far out over our skis. It's still going to be a very young team.
I stress, it's not a matter of if he spends the money. It's how he does it. And there's enough that one or two flops shouldn't kill his roster build.
8 win teams are still largely teams ridden with holes. He doesn't need to find multiple All Pros and fill every hole to make an 8 win team (especially with Fields at QB and hopefully taking the next step).
- malk
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3630
- Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 7:10 am
- Has thanked: 133 times
- Been thanked: 208 times
Even with a perfect offseason it can still go to gell quickly. If you get a few injuries to key players then that could be a season derailed right there, or at least knock us back from a 10/11 win team to a 7/8 win one.
But the playoffs absolutely has to be the goal absent anything catastrophic. We're 5 new starters plus health (or better depth) away from being a playoff team. We can absolutely get that in one offseason with the resources we have.
But the playoffs absolutely has to be the goal absent anything catastrophic. We're 5 new starters plus health (or better depth) away from being a playoff team. We can absolutely get that in one offseason with the resources we have.
"I wouldn't take him for a conditional 7th. His next contract will pay him more than he could possibly contribute.".
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
Noted Brain Genius Malk, Summer 2018.
(2020 update, wait, was I right...)
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4039
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 698 times
- Been thanked: 902 times
In association football we call it “silly season” which I think is appropriate.
Bears could be like the Bengals last season.
Bears could be like the Bengals last season.
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 388 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
Unlikely.
People kept bringing up the Bengals last offseason and I had to keep reminding people that the Bengals did 2 full rebuilding seasons before they had their "overnight success" in year 3.
Everyone wants the amazing results without the suffering and the wait time.
The Bears will bump next year.
They might even make the playoffs (although I wouldn't bet that way, even odds)
But they are in no way ready for coming within a hair of a SB championiship.
They've got at least another year of growth to go - and that assumes Fields can take the next step, which is in no way a sure thing.
If it turns out they don't have the QB, they're just a bumper car spinning wildly.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 388 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
He could, theoretically, get fewer signings and front-load the hell out of them.The Cooler King wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:43 am I stress, it's not a matter of if he spends the money. It's how he does it.
That meets the cash spend requirements, buys you less this year, but frees up more for future years.
Not advocating hard for or against that right now, but just suggesting it is possible and makes sense in rare circumstances, which this may fit.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5012
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1215 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
I mean I think he'll already front load a bit.Moriarty wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 11:24 amHe could, theoretically, get fewer signings and front-load the hell out of them.The Cooler King wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 10:43 am I stress, it's not a matter of if he spends the money. It's how he does it.
That meets the cash spend requirements, buys you less this year, but frees up more for future years.
Not advocating hard for or against that right now, but just suggesting it is possible and makes sense in rare circumstances, which this may fit.
When I have looked at other big spending teams, they usually spend less than 10% up front (Year 1 cash against average annual value). If they need to spend $150M in cash against an effective cap space of $10M thats already built in that they'll be at high end on up fronting. Are they just gon a straight double it and pre-pay all the year 2 salaries of every major signing?
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 388 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
There's all kinds of creative things you can do. Actually, paying all of year 2 up front is a great option.
Fiddling with numbers for 4 60M
(a bit exaggerated, maybe, but for illustration)
20M 10/10/10/10 = 15/15/15/15
flat
20M 19/1/10/10 = 24/6/15/15
yr 2 prepaid - transfers cap space from 2023 to 2024
40M 5/5/5/5 = 15/15/15/15
excessive bonus - gives you 45M spend right away
4M 40/1/1/14 = 41/2/2/15
also high cash spend, lets you bail on yr 4 if you want, transfers cap space from 2023 to 2024 & 25
Fiddling with numbers for 4 60M
(a bit exaggerated, maybe, but for illustration)
20M 10/10/10/10 = 15/15/15/15
flat
20M 19/1/10/10 = 24/6/15/15
yr 2 prepaid - transfers cap space from 2023 to 2024
40M 5/5/5/5 = 15/15/15/15
excessive bonus - gives you 45M spend right away
4M 40/1/1/14 = 41/2/2/15
also high cash spend, lets you bail on yr 4 if you want, transfers cap space from 2023 to 2024 & 25
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5012
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1215 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
I'm not totally following the proposals there, but yea they all seem highly unusual.
But even if you did purposefully forward 2024 base salaries, I think it's more than fair to question if it's excessive in nature because even with a traditional big FA spend year, they'd still project to have good flexibility in 2024. The cap is there to use, and the best laid plans are easily wrecked. They punted one year hard. I don't like getting overly cute trying to maximize some windows 2+ years away. Always be building. They aren't gonna ruin themselves with one big FA offseason (that they've basically backed into)
But even if you did purposefully forward 2024 base salaries, I think it's more than fair to question if it's excessive in nature because even with a traditional big FA spend year, they'd still project to have good flexibility in 2024. The cap is there to use, and the best laid plans are easily wrecked. They punted one year hard. I don't like getting overly cute trying to maximize some windows 2+ years away. Always be building. They aren't gonna ruin themselves with one big FA offseason (that they've basically backed into)
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5012
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1215 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Getting really micro with it as well, there are some edge reasons to prefer base salaries over bonuses, at least for future years. It's a balance (up front payment of course being nice), but I'm not convinced its as easy as it sounds.
There's what's possible of course, but also looking to the market for realistic expectations. If I can't ground ideas in market consensus I'm gonna immediately be skeptical of its viability.
There's what's possible of course, but also looking to the market for realistic expectations. If I can't ground ideas in market consensus I'm gonna immediately be skeptical of its viability.
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3864
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 616 times
wab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:54 am I still think we should be cautious with our expectations for 23. Poles has all the resources in the world right now, but they aren't going to upgrade 80% of this roster in one offseason.
I think a wildcard spot should be the goal, but let's not get too far out over our skis. It's still going to be a very young team.
This. I do think a winning record (i.e., 9-8) is possible if things go well.
Even if Da'Ron Payne/Dre'Mont Jones or Charles Omenihu/Arden Key don't make it to free agency to help the Bears on defense, the Bears should be able to improve the offense. Some combination of Jawaan Taylor/Trey Pipkins/Greg Little at tackle and Connor McGovern/Evan Brown at C/G makes the offensive line much more palatable. I'd be surprised if the Bears showed interest in DJ Chark or Parris Campbell at WR but I wouldn't be with flyers on Olamide Zaccheaus/Trent Sherfield, or even Ashton Dulin.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6869
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 388 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
side note
While this will probably change a bit (as other teams slash more people & money in the offseason than the Bears), it's still hilarious that Ryan Pace's dead money structuring lives on.the Bears will be carrying baggage in the form of $21 million in dead cap in 2023. That's the projected fourth-highest mark in the NFL.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5012
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1215 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Eehhh, that number is almost all Quinn driven. Of course about half of it would have hit eventually, but like you said it's a timing thing. Because he was traded instead of eventually cut, we see it all there now projected, but teams taking on some dead cap happens once cuts are processed. Plus he made the decision to bring him back and convert additional base for the trade, thus increasing the dead cap, but thats not really any reflection of old regime (yes the base salary is, but it was unguaranteed at that point).Moriarty wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:47 pm side note
While this will probably change a bit (as other teams slash more people & money in the offseason than the Bears), it's still hilarious that Ryan Pace's dead money structuring lives on.the Bears will be carrying baggage in the form of $21 million in dead cap in 2023. That's the projected fourth-highest mark in the NFL.
(none of thats a criticism of Poles, but it still is largely a reflection of choices made that could have appears different vis a vie dead caps, given different circumstances under his control)
Next big chunk is Smiths dead cap and same situation. Smith was in 5th year option of rookie scale which wasn't determined by prior regime.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7995
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 516 times
- Been thanked: 605 times
thunderspirit wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:40 pmwab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:54 am I still think we should be cautious with our expectations for 23. Poles has all the resources in the world right now, but they aren't going to upgrade 80% of this roster in one offseason.
I think a wildcard spot should be the goal, but let's not get too far out over our skis. It's still going to be a very young team.
This. I do think a winning record (i.e., 9-8) is possible if things go well.
Even if Da'Ron Payne/Dre'Mont Jones or Charles Omenihu/Arden Key don't make it to free agency to help the Bears on defense, the Bears should be able to improve the offense. Some combination of Jawaan Taylor/Trey Pipkins/Greg Little at tackle and Connor McGovern/Evan Brown at C/G makes the offensive line much more palatable. I'd be surprised if the Bears showed interest in DJ Chark or Parris Campbell at WR but I wouldn't be with flyers on Olamide Zaccheaus/Trent Sherfield, or even Ashton Dulin.
Jawaan Taylor at LT would scare the heck out of me TBH
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29880
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1995 times
Same. I don't even know if I'd be excited about him at RT. He's been pretty bad up until this season.RichH55 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:28 pmthunderspirit wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 12:40 pm
This. I do think a winning record (i.e., 9-8) is possible if things go well.
Even if Da'Ron Payne/Dre'Mont Jones or Charles Omenihu/Arden Key don't make it to free agency to help the Bears on defense, the Bears should be able to improve the offense. Some combination of Jawaan Taylor/Trey Pipkins/Greg Little at tackle and Connor McGovern/Evan Brown at C/G makes the offensive line much more palatable. I'd be surprised if the Bears showed interest in DJ Chark or Parris Campbell at WR but I wouldn't be with flyers on Olamide Zaccheaus/Trent Sherfield, or even Ashton Dulin.
Jawaan Taylor at LT would scare the heck out of me TBH
I still think they fill RT in free agency and draft a guard/tackle type.
Carter surprised me when he was in there at RG... he looked like he belonged, and he looked bigger than 6'3...he was helmet-to-helmet with Reiff and Jones...
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7995
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 516 times
- Been thanked: 605 times
Guards grow on treeswab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:47 pmSame. I don't even know if I'd be excited about him at RT. He's been pretty bad up until this season.
I still think they fill RT in free agency and draft a guard/tackle type.
Carter surprised me when he was in there at RG... he looked like he belonged, and he looked bigger than 6'3...he was helmet-to-helmet with Reiff and Jones...
I am interested in McGary at RT - really liked him during Senior Bowl week - Though in fairness I really don't know how hes been doing with Atlanta
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29880
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1995 times
He's been fine. This was probably his best year. He battled some nagging injuries early in his career and seemed to have some trouble adjusting to the right side.RichH55 wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:58 pmGuards grow on treeswab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 2:47 pm
Same. I don't even know if I'd be excited about him at RT. He's been pretty bad up until this season.
I still think they fill RT in free agency and draft a guard/tackle type.
Carter surprised me when he was in there at RG... he looked like he belonged, and he looked bigger than 6'3...he was helmet-to-helmet with Reiff and Jones...
I am interested in McGary at RT - really liked him during Senior Bowl week - Though in fairness I really don't know how hes been doing with Atlanta
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8423
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 910 times
- Been thanked: 1294 times
This is exactly how you get 40 years of futility.wab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:54 am I still think we should be cautious with our expectations for 23. Poles has all the resources in the world right now, but they aren't going to upgrade 80% of this roster in one offseason.
I think a wildcard spot should be the goal, but let's not get too far out over our skis. It's still going to be a very young team.
Always managing expectations.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29880
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1995 times
*temperingThe Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:08 pmThis is exactly how you get 40 years of futility.wab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:54 am I still think we should be cautious with our expectations for 23. Poles has all the resources in the world right now, but they aren't going to upgrade 80% of this roster in one offseason.
I think a wildcard spot should be the goal, but let's not get too far out over our skis. It's still going to be a very young team.
Always managing expectations.
And the 40 years of inconsistent success has more to do with a the QB problems than tempering expectations.
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3864
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 616 times
FWIW, I don't see any way the Bears look at someone else at LT unless Braxton Jones falls flat on his face — the best anyone should expect is veteran competition. I also think Jawaan Taylor would be fine at RT, but would again underscore the above point; the LT job is Jones' to lose.
I don't have any confidence that Poles is gonna set the o-line market, and this year's parade of injuries has to give him pause, which to me suggests he's not likely to be in on McGary or, to a lesser extent, McGlinchy, guys who are near the top of most teams' shopping lists but who have both had some injury history and would be risky big-dollar signings.
Taylor has warts, to be sure. But his four years in the league show: 100% of offensive snaps in 2019, 100% in 2020, 100% in 2021, 97.7% in 2022. (OMG, he's trending downward! )
I don't have any confidence that Poles is gonna set the o-line market, and this year's parade of injuries has to give him pause, which to me suggests he's not likely to be in on McGary or, to a lesser extent, McGlinchy, guys who are near the top of most teams' shopping lists but who have both had some injury history and would be risky big-dollar signings.
Taylor has warts, to be sure. But his four years in the league show: 100% of offensive snaps in 2019, 100% in 2020, 100% in 2021, 97.7% in 2022. (OMG, he's trending downward! )
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3864
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 616 times
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29880
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1995 times
I don't dislike Taylor, although I think he gets a sneaky large contract.thunderspirit wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:15 pm FWIW, I don't see any way the Bears look at someone else at LT unless Braxton Jones falls flat on his face — the best anyone should expect is veteran competition. I also think Jawaan Taylor would be fine at RT, but would again underscore the above point; the LT job is Jones' to lose.
I don't have any confidence that Poles is gonna set the o-line market, and this year's parade of injuries has to give him pause, which to me suggests he's not likely to be in on McGary or, to a lesser extent, McGlinchy, guys who are near the top of most teams' shopping lists but who have both had some injury history and would be risky big-dollar signings.
Taylor has warts, to be sure. But his four years in the league show: 100% of offensive snaps in 2019, 100% in 2020, 100% in 2021, 97.7% in 2022. (OMG, he's trending downward! )
I will say that Sam Mustipher hasn't missed a snap either...
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29880
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 130 times
- Been thanked: 1995 times
3 years 27mil seems in line with what Taylor might get.
By contrast, McGlinchy is projected to get 4/43 and McGary is at 4/70 (HOLYSHIT).
By contrast, McGlinchy is projected to get 4/43 and McGary is at 4/70 (HOLYSHIT).
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3864
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 616 times
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8423
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 910 times
- Been thanked: 1294 times
Really?wab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:14 pm*temperingThe Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:08 pm
This is exactly how you get 40 years of futility.
Always managing expectations.
And the 40 years of inconsistent success has more to do with a the QB problems than tempering expectations.
The Grammar Police?
I'll take that as a checkmate.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7995
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 516 times
- Been thanked: 605 times
Really?The Marshall Plan wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 3:53 pmReally?
The Grammar Police?
I'll take that as a checkmate.
Wow.
But sure Fans expectations are why we haven't won a Super Bowl in so long. Sure.
- Arkansasbear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4907
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 471 times
- Been thanked: 685 times
I think it should be a bit more than that. We had so many games that we managed to pull defeat out of the jaws of victory (okay, that's a stretch, but several games we had a real shot at winning). I would expect to win 3 more games if we replayed the season and we got breaks going our way and didn't have the injury bug hit us at an alarming high rate. Assuming we can improve our talent level on the OL, DL and at WR (can't get much worse), I think that's good for 3-4 wins at least. So I'd think an increase of 6 or 7 wins should be the floorGrizzled wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:55 amA realistic goal is an improvement of 4 to possibly 5 wins.wab wrote: ↑Mon Jan 09, 2023 9:54 am I still think we should be cautious with our expectations for 23. Poles has all the resources in the world right now, but they aren't going to upgrade 80% of this roster in one offseason.
I think a wildcard spot should be the goal, but let's not get too far out over our skis. It's still going to be a very young team.
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4039
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 698 times
- Been thanked: 902 times
Realistically I can’t see any team beating the Bears next season.
(26/09/2023) Winner of the inaugural