Correct.Heinz D. wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 11:02 amI agree with pretty much all of that, except that I honestly think that if Poles does it right, they can contend in '23. That's a lot of projection, I know, and probably an even greater faith in the young players we already have--but that's where my head is at right now. I could be totally wrong about things, and the team crashes and burns...but I doubt that happens.
As far as I've seen in my brief time aboard, only me and @The Marshall Plan are the ones ripping Jackson. Bears fans tend to stick up for the guy and make excuses for him. I have no idea why.Bearfacts wrote: ↑Sun May 29, 2022 9:13 am I'd also add that he and Flus want high effort guys. Players willing to go all out all game long to win. Is it more likely a guy playing for a new contract will put his effort into doing that or the guy who just got paid on his new deal? How many around here have been bitching about EJax NOT doing this after he got his big extension? Raise your hands......high now. Tough to see in such a large crowd.
But I don't see that situation as a widespread problem around the league. Jackson is sort of a glaring exception. I do understand why Poles is dolng out the contracts the way he is, but I think Pringle probably should have been signed to a better deal...
I'm not at all impressed by EJax the past couple of years. I'm not a capologist so I have no idea what impact it would've had this year, but it wouldn't have bothered me if Poles launched EJax too.
Poles seems like a smart guy. I do wonder if he tried moving EJax this past offseason (seems like the perfect offseaon for it given the other moves) and there were no takers. That right there should tell you all you need to know.
It's also entirely likely the Brisker pick is a telegraphed move to give EJax a year's notice that he's gone after this season. If Brisker becomes what he's supposed to become we don't need them both.