ex-Bear Steelers

For all non-Bears happenings in the National Football League

Moderator: wab

User avatar
RustinFields
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6498
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 340 times
Been thanked: 531 times

I vacillate on Watson pretty much daily. Lord knows he wasnt ever in a very stable situation either, and he definitely has more tools in his shed than Mitch does. Perhaps if he spent X amount of time LESS on the extra curriculars...
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9557
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 538 times
Been thanked: 1180 times

RustinFields wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 1:23 pm I vacillate on Watson pretty much daily. Lord knows he wasnt ever in a very stable situation either, and he definitely has more tools in his shed than Mitch does. Perhaps if he spent X amount of time LESS on the extra curriculars...
Yea I get it - the dude didn't play for over a year so I just don't know about him going forward as he clearly has issues. But he was a great player his first few years, and if I just isolate the discussion to that 2018 season only - I think Watson would have won us a Super Bowl. Watson threw for over 4100 yards that year, 26 TD's to 9 INT's, and had a QBR of over 103.

His 2020 year was insane (and that happened AFTER they traded away D Hopkins!) He threw for over 4800 yards (led the league), 33 TD's to 7 INT's, and had a QBR over 112! That was his last full season, I'm real curious to see how he looks next year.

I see the troll posted here, I assume he's degrading him because he got pantsed so bad on that 2020 season bet. He predicted he'd suck without Hopkins in 2020 then he went out and put up Aaron Rodgers numbers and Rich still couldn't admit he was wrong lol...
User avatar
RustinFields
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6498
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 340 times
Been thanked: 531 times

dplank wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:10 pm
RustinFields wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 1:23 pm I vacillate on Watson pretty much daily. Lord knows he wasnt ever in a very stable situation either, and he definitely has more tools in his shed than Mitch does. Perhaps if he spent X amount of time LESS on the extra curriculars...
Yea I get it - the dude didn't play for over a year so I just don't know about him going forward as he clearly has issues. But he was a great player his first few years, and if I just isolate the discussion to that 2018 season only - I think Watson would have won us a Super Bowl. Watson threw for over 4100 yards that year, 26 TD's to 9 INT's, and had a QBR of over 103.
I can buy that our 2018 team with more consistent offensive output could have easily gone all the way. And I also believe that Deshaun could have provided that output.
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 3943
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 103 times

RustinFields wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 7:49 pm
dplank wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:10 pm

Yea I get it - the dude didn't play for over a year so I just don't know about him going forward as he clearly has issues. But he was a great player his first few years, and if I just isolate the discussion to that 2018 season only - I think Watson would have won us a Super Bowl. Watson threw for over 4100 yards that year, 26 TD's to 9 INT's, and had a QBR of over 103.
I can buy that our 2018 team with more consistent offensive output could have easily gone all the way. And I also believe that Deshaun could have provided that output.
I think with a kicker they could have.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6311
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 350 times

dplank wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:10 pm
RustinFields wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 1:23 pm I vacillate on Watson pretty much daily. Lord knows he wasnt ever in a very stable situation either, and he definitely has more tools in his shed than Mitch does. Perhaps if he spent X amount of time LESS on the extra curriculars...
Yea I get it - the dude didn't play for over a year so I just don't know about him going forward as he clearly has issues. But he was a great player his first few years, and if I just isolate the discussion to that 2018 season only - I think Watson would have won us a Super Bowl. Watson threw for over 4100 yards that year, 26 TD's to 9 INT's, and had a QBR of over 103.

His 2020 year was insane (and that happened AFTER they traded away D Hopkins!) He threw for over 4800 yards (led the league), 33 TD's to 7 INT's, and had a QBR over 112! That was his last full season, I'm real curious to see how he looks next year.

I see the troll posted here, I assume he's degrading him because he got pantsed so bad on that 2020 season bet. He predicted he'd suck without Hopkins in 2020 then he went out and put up Aaron Rodgers numbers and Rich still couldn't admit he was wrong lol...
He wasn't great

He actually was worse record wise than like Brian Hoyer - the Texans had a good good Defense his first few years

And he lost a playoff game when he was gifted a multiple TD lead (special teams and defense)

Even in his best statistical year - they didn't score many points (even less so in the 1st half of games)

Just never elite

This year even worse without his Sexual Assault spinach
HurricaneBear
MVP
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
Has thanked: 845 times
Been thanked: 146 times

RichH55 wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 9:51 pm
dplank wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 5:10 pm

Yea I get it - the dude didn't play for over a year so I just don't know about him going forward as he clearly has issues. But he was a great player his first few years, and if I just isolate the discussion to that 2018 season only - I think Watson would have won us a Super Bowl. Watson threw for over 4100 yards that year, 26 TD's to 9 INT's, and had a QBR of over 103.

His 2020 year was insane (and that happened AFTER they traded away D Hopkins!) He threw for over 4800 yards (led the league), 33 TD's to 7 INT's, and had a QBR over 112! That was his last full season, I'm real curious to see how he looks next year.

I see the troll posted here, I assume he's degrading him because he got pantsed so bad on that 2020 season bet. He predicted he'd suck without Hopkins in 2020 then he went out and put up Aaron Rodgers numbers and Rich still couldn't admit he was wrong lol...
He wasn't great

He actually was worse record wise than like Brian Hoyer - the Texans had a good good Defense his first few years

And he lost a playoff game when he was gifted a multiple TD lead (special teams and defense)

Even in his best statistical year - they didn't score many points (even less so in the 1st half of games)

Just never elite

This year even worse without his Sexual Assault spinach
There is an enormous gap between "just never elite" and Mitch Trubisky. With Watson the Bears win that Super Bowl in 2018.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6311
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 350 times

HurricaneBear wrote: Thu Mar 02, 2023 7:07 am
RichH55 wrote: Wed Mar 01, 2023 9:51 pm

He wasn't great

He actually was worse record wise than like Brian Hoyer - the Texans had a good good Defense his first few years

And he lost a playoff game when he was gifted a multiple TD lead (special teams and defense)

Even in his best statistical year - they didn't score many points (even less so in the 1st half of games)

Just never elite

This year even worse without his Sexual Assault spinach
There is an enormous gap between "just never elite" and Mitch Trubisky. With Watson the Bears win that Super Bowl in 2018.
It was the token Mitch "good" year though - Mostly running that wasn't sustainable - and a Defense with a turnover rate that was unsustainable

Watson didn't win when he had Hopkins and a good Defense - and pretty good offensive coaching (Bill OBrien the GM was awful - but he was not a bad offensive coach)

The year before Watson got there they went 9-7 - And that's with Brock Osweiler and Tom "Macho Man" Savage playing QB

The year before that they went 9-7 - Granted they had the IMMORTAL Brian Hoyer playing QB

Watson got there 4-12

Playoff game - gifted 21-0 lead. Lost by a decent margin

There is no real evidence that Watson would have led us to the Super Bowl

The greatest thing he ever did for a team was the trade compensation (after making them a national disgrave)
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 27792
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 71 times
Been thanked: 1030 times

So help me God I'm tired of hearing about Watson and Mitch.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6311
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 350 times

wab wrote: Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:22 pm So help me God I'm tired of hearing about Watson and Mitch.
Watson is 23 times the criminal that Mitch is.... (Its actually infinity - but wheres the fun in that)
User avatar
Moriarty
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6037
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
Has thanked: 241 times
Been thanked: 461 times

wab wrote: Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:22 pm So help me God I'm tired of hearing about Watson and Mitch.
We don't hear much talk about Cade or Rexy any more, so your time will come.



Just give it about 10-12 more years
:evilgrin:
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)

Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6311
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 262 times
Been thanked: 350 times

Moriarty wrote: Thu Mar 02, 2023 5:45 pm
wab wrote: Thu Mar 02, 2023 4:22 pm So help me God I'm tired of hearing about Watson and Mitch.



Just give it about 10-12 more years
:evilgrin:
I.E. What Watson should have got
User avatar
RustinFields
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6498
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 340 times
Been thanked: 531 times

Image
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Head Coach
Posts: 4134
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 37 times
Been thanked: 860 times

Steelers agree to two-year extension with backup QB Mitchell Trubisky
...

The Steelers are finalizing a two-year extension with Mitchell Trubisky, NFL Network Insider Ian Rapoport reported Thursday, per a source. The deal places Trubisky under team control through the 2025 season while lowering his 2023 cap number, which previously stood at $10 million, per Rapoport.
...

It's clear now that Pickett is Pittsburgh's quarterback of the future. Trubisky isn't sticking around to compete for the starting job, but as the football world has learned on a number of occasions over the last decade, the backup quarterback remains a highly important member of the team and to its chances of success.

"We feel good about our quarterback room," Steelers general manager Omar Khan said told The Pat McAfee Show on Thursday. "That was an important piece. We've got, obviously Kenny Pickett is our starter. We feel really good about Mitch Trubisky in the role that he's in. He feels good about it."

The Steelers have seen enough from Trubisky to keep the former No. 2 overall pick on the roster beyond 2023 -- and give themselves some immediate cap flexibility.
...

Full article: https://www.nfl.com/news/steelers-agree ... l-trubisky
User avatar
HisRoyalSweetness
Head Coach
Posts: 4134
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
Has thanked: 37 times
Been thanked: 860 times

The Steelers have cut ex-Bear Anthony Miller.

The Steelers have signed ex-Bear Nick Kwiatkoski.

https://www.nfl.com/news/nfl-news-round ... ay-june-20
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9557
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 538 times
Been thanked: 1180 times

What a disappointing career for Miller. I really missed on that guy.
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 3943
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 103 times

dplank wrote: Wed Jun 21, 2023 8:50 am What a disappointing career for Miller. I really missed on that guy.
He seemed to have it, and then not have it all at the same time. Then shoulders made of glass kicked in.
Post Reply