Who Needs a QB?
Moderator: wab
- Grizzled
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
The Seahawks QB coach has taken the job of Offensive Coordinator with the Buccaneers. The Bucs can't really afford a big QB contract so Geno Smith joining him are remote. But it would open up the 'Hawks to look at a QB with their high draft pick.
- Grizzled
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
It's being reported that Daniel Jones, who just switched agents, is demanding $45 million per year from the Giants. The team did supposedly offer him a 5 year $190 million dollar extension. He did help the team make the playoffs but produced just 15 TDs. it's now thought that the Giants may explore one of the vet QBs who are available while still keeping negotiations open with Jones.
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11519
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 422 times
- Been thanked: 408 times
- Contact:
I like Dimes. Personally I don't like bust as a term for a guy who is at least average. IMO Dimes is better than Eli.
I don't believe he's asking for $50MM that's horsehit.
I don't believe he's asking for $50MM that's horsehit.
2023 Chicago Bear Draft... "The Year of the Trenches".
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11519
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 422 times
- Been thanked: 408 times
- Contact:
My spidey sense is telling me Seattle is going to go QB while they have a high pick, and even trade up a pick or two if they can - they won't again in the near future. That doesn't mean I think they don't want to re-sign Geno. I just think they want to extend him at a reasonable price, and are NOT going to pay him $30MM. I think they'll pay him Glennon money and extend him 3 years... AND draft a QB who they'll intend to replace him in '24 at some point with Geno backing him after that.
2023 Chicago Bear Draft... "The Year of the Trenches".
- Otis Day
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7227
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 2:43 pm
- Location: Armpit of IL.
- Has thanked: 16 times
- Been thanked: 48 times
I can't wait for the day when a qb takes far less so the team can sign/retain more quality players.
I know it is never going to happen, but a guy can dream.
These QB salaries are making me kind of sick.
I know it is never going to happen, but a guy can dream.

These QB salaries are making me kind of sick.
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5286
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 142 times
- Been thanked: 247 times
Yeah.
There's two issues, really.
The larger issue of a guy making half a billion over their career , doing a job which doesn't provide even a tiny fraction of that value to society. That's seriously messed up and wrong.
And the smaller issue of having 1 guy clearing 20% of your cap and it ruining your team for years if something goes wrong. That's not good for the game of football.
You can do something about the first, but I'll leave it be, since it drifts into The Forbidden Zone.
For the second, I think the only thing you can do is find a way to limit guarantees, so that teams can escape QB deals gone wrong. It's easier said than done to get the specifics right. Players do need to have some guarantee. Teams do need to suffer some for stupid moves - you encourage madness, if you remove consequence - but having a team crippled and unable to compete for ~3 years is pretty rough. And sometimes QB deals go wrong which weren't reckless, dumb, ill-considered, just bad luck. Those teams & fanbases don't deserve long-term dead in the water, either.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 26944
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 726 times
I could see them giving him a 3yr deal that they can get out of after year 2. Or one that has some incentives/clauses that protect the team in case he turns back into a pumpkin.IE wrote: ↑Tue Feb 21, 2023 10:40 am My spidey sense is telling me Seattle is going to go QB while they have a high pick, and even trade up a pick or two if they can - they won't again in the near future. That doesn't mean I think they don't want to re-sign Geno. I just think they want to extend him at a reasonable price, and are NOT going to pay him $30MM. I think they'll pay him Glennon money and extend him 3 years... AND draft a QB who they'll intend to replace him in '24 at some point with Geno backing him after that.
But he doesn't have that much milage on him, so it will be interesting. I do think they will take a QB in the first few rounds, but I don't know about top 5.
If Richardson slips to #20, I could see them scooping him up there.
- Grizzled
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3772
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 240 times
- Been thanked: 182 times
Pete Carroll has surprised me. He said rhat the 'Hawks will be (hopefully) be drafting this high again for a long time and they have to consider at least looking at the top QBs. Only good for the Bears if another team enters the bidding.
- RustinFields
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 270 times