In my view, we should invest HEAVILY in a WLB.
We have Sanborn at MLB (although I've seen people say he played WLB for us, but I think that's false). And he's dirt cheap for years. So our budget should allow us to make a strong investment at WLB. SLB, I don't really care about, since we rarely use one.
I'm just not sure who to go after, but we need a guy with speed to track down RBs in the pass game and perhaps blitz. I've heard Leighton Vander Esch mentioned for us, but he plays Sanborn's spot. Tremaine Edmunds is more enticing with his athletic profile, but he's also been playing MLB and will be expensive. Would've been fun to see Roquan next to Sanborn in that role. At this point, I'm not so enthused about meh guys like Matt Adams and Joe Thomas.
Seems like you should be able to get a quality, athletic guy for that role either in FA or the draft, although Sanborn is so young that an experienced FA seems a better fit. We are very likely to beef up the DL, so adding another quality player behind them should be a compounded positive.
Thoughts? Who would your target be?
WLB
Moderator: wab
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5189
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 340 times
- Been thanked: 278 times
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
I'd call the Cardinals and see what it would take to get Isaiah Simmons from them. They haven't seemed to figure out how to use him - although a new AZ staff might put him to better use.Mikefive wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 12:20 pm In my view, we should invest HEAVILY in a WLB.
We have Sanborn at MLB (although I've seen people say he played WLB for us, but I think that's false). And he's dirt cheap for years. So our budget should allow us to make a strong investment at WLB. SLB, I don't really care about, since we rarely use one.
I'm just not sure who to go after, but we need a guy with speed to track down RBs in the pass game and perhaps blitz. I've heard Leighton Vander Esch mentioned for us, but he plays Sanborn's spot. Tremaine Edmunds is more enticing with his athletic profile, but he's also been playing MLB and will be expensive. Would've been fun to see Roquan next to Sanborn in that role. At this point, I'm not so enthused about meh guys like Matt Adams and Joe Thomas.
Seems like you should be able to get a quality, athletic guy for that role either in FA or the draft, although Sanborn is so young that an experienced FA seems a better fit. We are very likely to beef up the DL, so adding another quality player behind them should be a compounded positive.
Thoughts? Who would your target be?
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6805
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 384 times
- Been thanked: 688 times
WLB is one of those positions I really don't believe in paying ($) for.
Pass and draft for me.
Pass and draft for me.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8411
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 909 times
- Been thanked: 1277 times
If only we had a great one on the roster like three months ago or so…..
If Poles signs a Will for big money he should be fired. He had a future HOF’er already on the roster.
If Poles signs a Will for big money he should be fired. He had a future HOF’er already on the roster.
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 12500
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 523 times
- Been thanked: 700 times
- Contact:
"They" (Poles and Co) clearly don't believe in it either. But if a given relatively proven player falls within Poles' model for what he's trying to do, it wouldn't bother me.
What do you think about Morrow coming back at Will for a reasonable price? I liked him OK. He's like another SS out there but I don't consider him a liability. He might be quite good behind a formidable DL.
2023 Chicago Bears... emerging from a long hibernation, and hungry!
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29805
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 127 times
- Been thanked: 1956 times
I don't think he has the length they want, but I wouldn't be too disappointed. He's just awfully small.IE wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 1:28 pm"They" (Poles and Co) clearly don't believe in it either. But if a given relatively proven player falls within Poles' model for what he's trying to do, it wouldn't bother me.
What do you think about Morrow coming back at Will for a reasonable price? I liked him OK. He's like another SS out there but I don't consider him a liability. He might be quite good behind a formidable DL.
Roquan wasn't the guy. I don't care about All Pro's, guy just didn't cause turnovers or change games enough. Baltimore paid him the first ever 20m a year deal for an off the ball linebacker. It's a move I'll never support. The guy just wasn't consistent, that stayed true in Baltimore.
DeMarvion Overshown is a name we should get familiar with. He's a guy that screams intangibles and skillset they want for the position.
DeMarvion Overshown is a name we should get familiar with. He's a guy that screams intangibles and skillset they want for the position.
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6805
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 384 times
- Been thanked: 688 times
I give Morrow a firm "eh".IE wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 1:28 pm"They" (Poles and Co) clearly don't believe in it either. But if a given relatively proven player falls within Poles' model for what he's trying to do, it wouldn't bother me.
What do you think about Morrow coming back at Will for a reasonable price? I liked him OK. He's like another SS out there but I don't consider him a liability. He might be quite good behind a formidable DL.
I definitely would not give him a large raise or anything besides trivial guaranteed money, locking him in in any way.
If they wanted to bring him back for 1 more year, for leadership & depth at 2-5M, maybe.
But if he goes, I also won't give it a second thought.
I definitely want a rookie upgrade this year or next. If nothing else, Morrow doesn't generate INTs or FFs, either.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5004
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1202 times
- Been thanked: 346 times
It's a possibility.
I think even with other needs in the trenches they can splurge a little at either CB or Will. Whichever you don't splurge on is vet flyers and mud rounders.
I think even with other needs in the trenches they can splurge a little at either CB or Will. Whichever you don't splurge on is vet flyers and mud rounders.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5004
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1202 times
- Been thanked: 346 times
Can't remember if I posted it in thr Roquan Smith thread or not, but the market is valuing offball LB as valuable as they have since the late 90s (measured in relation to the total cap).
Basically the adjusted biggest contracts are Seau and Lewis and then a handful of contracts signed in past few years.
Kind of interesting. A trend or a blip?
Basically the adjusted biggest contracts are Seau and Lewis and then a handful of contracts signed in past few years.
Kind of interesting. A trend or a blip?
I'm guessing the Bears will draft a WLB. Darius/Shaq Leonard was a 3rd round pick. Lance Briggs was a third round pick. Both flourished in this scheme. Leonard was, arguably, a better LB in his first few years than Roquan.
This seems to be a key position in Eberflus' defense, but the kind of player he requires can seemingly be found after the 1st round
This seems to be a key position in Eberflus' defense, but the kind of player he requires can seemingly be found after the 1st round
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1667
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 5:10 pm
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
Doesn't really matter if it's trend or blip at the moment, because it's here for this year's market, and the Bears need at least a couple more warm bodies at the position before the draft. If there's someone that Eberflus covets, I'm up for spending a bit at the position, but I think it will be relatively more now than a few years ago.The Cooler King wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:46 pm Can't remember if I posted it in thr Roquan Smith thread or not, but the market is valuing offball LB as valuable as they have since the late 90s (measured in relation to the total cap).
Basically the adjusted biggest contracts are Seau and Lewis and then a handful of contracts signed in past few years.
Kind of interesting. A trend or a blip?
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5004
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1202 times
- Been thanked: 346 times
But these are top of market numbers. If it's a blip, then that matters.Middleguard wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:58 pmDoesn't really matter if it's trend or blip at the moment, because it's here for this year's market, and the Bears need at least a couple more warm bodies at the position before the draft. If there's someone that Eberflus covets, I'm up for spending a bit at the position, but I think it will be relatively more now than a few years ago.The Cooler King wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:46 pm Can't remember if I posted it in thr Roquan Smith thread or not, but the market is valuing offball LB as valuable as they have since the late 90s (measured in relation to the total cap).
Basically the adjusted biggest contracts are Seau and Lewis and then a handful of contracts signed in past few years.
Kind of interesting. A trend or a blip?
If it's a top to bottom or market blip/trend than yea it matters less, but they can still participate in different products ve points of market if you feel your internal values are different.
Edit - or just based on market size, bigger deals are normally longer commitments too. Hence, blip verse long term trend matters.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5004
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1202 times
- Been thanked: 346 times
- Arkansasbear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 457 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
I think Sanborn can play either the Will or Mike. I expect us to draft a LBand depending on trade downs and how the board shakes out I like Henry To’o To’o, Drew sanders or Jack Campbell. The first might be a bit pricey for what they want to spend on a LB unless they trade back and get more picks so that it’s not a “luxury”
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 511 times
- Been thanked: 598 times
"Leonard was, arguably, a better LB in his first few years than Roquan. "artbest01 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:56 pm I'm guessing the Bears will draft a WLB. Darius/Shaq Leonard was a 3rd round pick. Lance Briggs was a third round pick. Both flourished in this scheme. Leonard was, arguably, a better LB in his first few years than Roquan.
This seems to be a key position in Eberflus' defense, but the kind of player he requires can seemingly be found after the 1st round
Feel like the word is inarguably here
- o-pus #40 in B major
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 2411 times
- Been thanked: 245 times
I think one could argue either way about this choice of adjectives.RichH55 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 10:05 am"Leonard was, arguably, a better LB in his first few years than Roquan. "artbest01 wrote: ↑Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:56 pm I'm guessing the Bears will draft a WLB. Darius/Shaq Leonard was a 3rd round pick. Lance Briggs was a third round pick. Both flourished in this scheme. Leonard was, arguably, a better LB in his first few years than Roquan.
This seems to be a key position in Eberflus' defense, but the kind of player he requires can seemingly be found after the 1st round
Feel like the word is inarguably here
- Arkansasbear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 457 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
It's arguably.
"Leonard was, inarguably, a better LB in his first few years than Hunter Hillenmeyer." Meaning that is pretty certain / not open to logical debate.
"Leonard war, arguably, a better LB in his first few years than Roquan Smith." Meaning there is lots of sound argument to support that position but it is not certain.
At least that's my take on it. I think Leonard was better his first few years than Roquan, but Roquan has arguments in his favor - more solo tackles, more assist and heck even more sacks. Since Roquan has arguments in his favor the proper choice is "arguably," IMO.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 511 times
- Been thanked: 598 times
There are people - not many- who would argue (probably for the sake of argument) that Hunter was better. They would be ultra-wrong.Arkansasbear wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 10:55 amIt's arguably.
"Leonard was, inarguably, a better LB in his first few years than Hunter Hillenmeyer." Meaning that is pretty certain / not open to logical debate.
"Leonard war, arguably, a better LB in his first few years than Roquan Smith." Meaning there is lots of sound argument to support that position but it is not certain.
At least that's my take on it. I think Leonard was better his first few years than Roquan, but Roquan has arguments in his favor - more solo tackles, more assist and heck even more sacks. Since Roquan has arguments in his favor the proper choice is "arguably," IMO.
The first few years of their careers - Leonard was just better than Roquon.
This doesn't make Roquon a bum - or terrible - or anything like that.
But yes Leonard was better. He also has a serious injury now - so Roquon might have the better career just on availablity. But first few seasons? Its a clear distinction
- Arkansasbear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 457 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
Hillenmeyer's first three year in the NFL he had I Int, 4 passes defended, 160 tackles (119 solo, 41 assist, 13 TFL). There is no basis to give an argument he was better than Leonard other that just to argue for argument sake. So the proper word choice is inarguably.RichH55 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 11:10 amThere are people - not many- who would argue (probably for the sake of argument) that Hunter was better. They would be ultra-wrong.Arkansasbear wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 10:55 am
It's arguably.
"Leonard was, inarguably, a better LB in his first few years than Hunter Hillenmeyer." Meaning that is pretty certain / not open to logical debate.
"Leonard war, arguably, a better LB in his first few years than Roquan Smith." Meaning there is lots of sound argument to support that position but it is not certain.
At least that's my take on it. I think Leonard was better his first few years than Roquan, but Roquan has arguments in his favor - more solo tackles, more assist and heck even more sacks. Since Roquan has arguments in his favor the proper choice is "arguably," IMO.
The first few years of their careers - Leonard was just better than Roquon.
This doesn't make Roquon a bum - or terrible - or anything like that.
But yes Leonard was better. He also has a serious injury now - so Roquon might have the better career just on availablity. But first few seasons? Its a clear distinction
Roquan has far more tackles and has more sacks in the same time period as Leonard. Leonard has more "impact plays." They played in different systems that had them have different responsibilities. So a person who argues Roquan was the better LB has valid arguments (I don't agree with their arguments, but they are still valid arguments that I can see why someone would argue he was better). It's debatable, both sides have valid points. So the proper word is "arguably."
No if you don't think there are valid arguments that someone could use to show Roquan was the better player, that's simply your take. I just think that's a very narrow minded approach to take.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7942
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 511 times
- Been thanked: 598 times
Oh the case for Hunter is beyond weak - essentially non-existent. But if the word only means someone would argue it - then no
"Roquan has far more tackles and has more sacks in the same time period as Leonard"
You might want to recheck those Tackle numbers - And Sack Numbers. All via Football Reference But 2018-2021 - ie the First few years of their careers
Leonard seems to also have more Tackles and Sacks.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... onDa00.htm
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... itRo07.htm
I Could 15 Sacks and 538 Tackles for Leonard 14 Sacks and 524 Tackles for Smith.
And that isn't even counting the Turnovers or All Pro votes.
"Roquan has far more tackles and has more sacks in the same time period as Leonard"
You might want to recheck those Tackle numbers - And Sack Numbers. All via Football Reference But 2018-2021 - ie the First few years of their careers
Leonard seems to also have more Tackles and Sacks.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... onDa00.htm
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... itRo07.htm
I Could 15 Sacks and 538 Tackles for Leonard 14 Sacks and 524 Tackles for Smith.
And that isn't even counting the Turnovers or All Pro votes.
- Arkansasbear
- Head Coach
- Posts: 4813
- Joined: Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:41 am
- Has thanked: 457 times
- Been thanked: 650 times
This appears to once again being turned into an argument for argument sake. Yeah I just looked at their career totals and added in 2022 (even so, Roquan had more tackles - total and sole - and 1.5 more sacks). If you are saying inarguable can only be used if no one would argue the point, then the word cannot be used. Several here have proven time and and time again they will argue even if they don't have a points to somewhat support their position. So, I guess we need to simply remove it from our vocabulary.RichH55 wrote: ↑Thu Jan 19, 2023 12:31 pm Oh the case for Hunter is beyond weak - essentially non-existent. But if the word only means someone would argue it - then no
"Roquan has far more tackles and has more sacks in the same time period as Leonard"
You might want to recheck those Tackle numbers - And Sack Numbers. All via Football Reference But 2018-2021 - ie the First few years of their careers
Leonard seems to also have more Tackles and Sacks.
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... onDa00.htm
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/ ... itRo07.htm
I Could 15 Sacks and 538 Tackles for Leonard 14 Sacks and 524 Tackles for Smith.
And that isn't even counting the Turnovers or All Pro votes.
If you think under no circumstances can anyone give a valid argument to support the stance that Roquan was better, use inarguably. I disagree. i think they can point to valid factors that support their stance. I disagree with them, but they have a defensible stance. Unlike trying to stay Hillenmeyer was better. There is simply nothing to point at that has merit for that position.
With that, I will not be traveling down this rabbit hole anymore.
https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats/_ ... quan-smith
https://www.espn.com/nfl/player/stats/_ ... le-leonard
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7336
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 554 times
- Been thanked: 967 times