Chiefs won't franchise tag T Orlando Jones

For all non-Bears happenings in the National Football League

Moderator: wab

User avatar
UOK
Site Admin
Posts: 23772
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
Location: Champaign, IL
Has thanked: 21 times
Been thanked: 209 times

"None of us are in the board room, locker room, or on the sideline, so in a way, we don't know shit."
- Otis Day
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 26954
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 731 times

I'm not saying that the Chiefs giving up a first-round pick (and more) for Brown, and then letting him go...is a red flag. But I'm also not saying it isn't.

And if Poles declines to pass on Brown, can we all agree to keep the "he blew it" stuff to a minimum?
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 2769
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 222 times
Been thanked: 185 times

wab wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 3:33 pmI'm not saying that the Chiefs giving up a first-round pick (and more) for Brown, and then letting him go...is a red flag. But I'm also not saying it isn't.
I know what you mean. Legitimate concerns there myself. Having both your team's starting tackles enter free agency at the same time seems, um, suboptimal. Maybe they really think Lucas Niang is back to 100% next season (has he even been 100%?), or maybe they're thinking they land someone in the draft. Either way, feels kind of dicey. That said, the Chiefs watched him every day for two years, so you have to guess they know who he is, and would prefer to move on.

I suspect last year's franchise tag on OBJ was trying to get exactly what they got this year: another ring.

wab wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 3:33 pmAnd if Poles declines to pass on Brown, can we all agree to keep the "he blew it" stuff to a minimum?
Yeah, that's not gonna happen.
KFFL refugee.

Lost a bet that the Bears wouldn't trade #1 overall, so I "pony"'d up. Never been so happy to be so wrong. :D
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
:shocked:
User avatar
Grizzled
Head Coach
Posts: 3793
Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
Has thanked: 241 times
Been thanked: 184 times

He's been rated as a good but not great LT for the Chiefs. They're kind of in cap hell and from things I've read, wants to be the highest paid LT in the game. They stalemated last year over guaranteed money. Trent Williams and David Bakhtiari are cuurently the highest at $23M, with Laremy Tunsil at $22M. He did play gang busters in the Cbiefs run to the Super Bowl.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8193
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 735 times

wab wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 3:33 pm I'm not saying that the Chiefs giving up a first-round pick (and more) for Brown, and then letting him go...is a red flag. But I'm also not saying it isn't.

And if Poles declines to pass on Brown, can we all agree to keep the "he blew it" stuff to a minimum?
I do not agree to this lol.

Seriously though, Poles blows it IMO if he fails to sign some real talent to the OL. It doesn’t have to be any one particular player, but he can’t sit on his hands either.
This is a fan / opinion chat board. The opinions in this post are just that - my opinions. Please treat them as such unless otherwise notified. Have yourself a great day.
User avatar
wulfy
MVP
Posts: 1121
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2020 5:51 pm
Has thanked: 52 times
Been thanked: 99 times
Contact:

I’d rather let Braxton Jones continue to develop and add a stud RT.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8193
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 735 times

Me too. If I could choose Brown or McGlinchey / McGary I’ll take the RT
This is a fan / opinion chat board. The opinions in this post are just that - my opinions. Please treat them as such unless otherwise notified. Have yourself a great day.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5428
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 205 times

wab wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 3:33 pm I'm not saying that the Chiefs giving up a first-round pick (and more) for Brown, and then letting him go...is a red flag. But I'm also not saying it isn't.

And if Poles declines to pass on Brown, can we all agree to keep the "he blew it" stuff to a minimum?
Ha - No deal on the second part

I say we raise "he blew it" - to he blew it, then uncalled for personal attack on Poles (have to way beat just calling him a "Liar") - then suggest that Poles is for unknown reasons trying to get Fields to fail

Book it!

(Also Im more than fine with just overpaying Brown)
User avatar
southdakbearfan
Head Coach
Posts: 3702
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
Location: South Dakota
Has thanked: 73 times
Been thanked: 44 times

RichH55 wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 10:43 pm
wab wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 3:33 pm I'm not saying that the Chiefs giving up a first-round pick (and more) for Brown, and then letting him go...is a red flag. But I'm also not saying it isn't.

And if Poles declines to pass on Brown, can we all agree to keep the "he blew it" stuff to a minimum?
Ha - No deal on the second part

I say we raise "he blew it" - to he blew it, then uncalled for personal attack on Poles (have to way beat just calling him a "Liar") - then suggest that Poles is for unknown reasons trying to get Fields to fail

Book it!

(Also Im more than fine with just overpaying Brown)
It's called correcting a deficiency after losing a title due to line play, winning a title and now dealing with the cap ramifications. Being in 3 out of 4 Super Bowls and winning 2.

Sounds like pretty solid gm'ing to me.
User avatar
The Marshall Plan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5550
Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
Location: Parts Unknown
Has thanked: 270 times
Been thanked: 351 times

wab wrote: Mon Mar 06, 2023 3:33 pm I'm not saying that the Chiefs giving up a first-round pick (and more) for Brown, and then letting him go...is a red flag. But I'm also not saying it isn't.

And if Poles declines to pass on Brown, can we all agree to keep the "he blew it" stuff to a minimum?
LOL it all depends upon what the rest of FA looks like.

But we've got to sign this guy. It would change the whole line.
Image

The cigarette has been passed from Jay Cutler to Justin Fields.
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8193
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 735 times

His cost may be nuts, we will see. There looks to be several big FA OTs available in FA and Poles needs to get one of them. No excuses IMO, get one and solidify this line then draft another to compete. It’s not a big ask for a GM that vowed to focus on the OL and has the most cap space in the league. His table is set.
This is a fan / opinion chat board. The opinions in this post are just that - my opinions. Please treat them as such unless otherwise notified. Have yourself a great day.
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11526
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 424 times
Been thanked: 412 times
Contact:

Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?

Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?

I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
2023 Chicago Bear Draft... "The Year of the Trenches".
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 26954
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 731 times

Yeah, I'm not a fan of moving displacing Braxton yet.

If the Bears don't sign an OT and draft Paris Johnson at 9 or 11, or Anton Harrison/Blake Freeland in R2, would people be ok?
User avatar
thunderspirit
Head Coach
Posts: 2769
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
Has thanked: 222 times
Been thanked: 185 times

IE wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:59 am Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?

Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?

I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
FWIW, Baltimore (allegedly) offered OBJ left tackle money to continue playing on the right side. He declined, because he wants to play LT, and the Ravens subsequently traded him to KC.
KFFL refugee.

Lost a bet that the Bears wouldn't trade #1 overall, so I "pony"'d up. Never been so happy to be so wrong. :D
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
:shocked:
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11526
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 424 times
Been thanked: 412 times
Contact:

thunderspirit wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 11:47 am
IE wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:59 am Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?

Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?

I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
FWIW, Baltimore (allegedly) offered OBJ left tackle money to continue playing on the right side. He declined, because he wants to play LT, and the Ravens subsequently traded him to KC.
Yep - remember. I'm wondering if he's still in the same mode now. Things change. He got his ring ... now money?
2023 Chicago Bear Draft... "The Year of the Trenches".
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 26954
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 731 times

Am I alone in thinking that you are really just paying for a name with Brown? What about his performance in KC screams out 23m per year?
User avatar
wab
Mod
Posts: 26954
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
Has thanked: 47 times
Been thanked: 731 times

Also I'm starting to think UOK is trolling us. First "Jeff" Pollard and now Orlando "Jones".
User avatar
RustinFields
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5991
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
Location: Maine!
Has thanked: 143 times
Been thanked: 270 times

Oh shit
User avatar
dplank
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8193
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
Has thanked: 321 times
Been thanked: 735 times

wab wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 10:36 am Yeah, I'm not a fan of moving displacing Braxton yet.

If the Bears don't sign an OT and draft Paris Johnson at 9 or 11, or Anton Harrison/Blake Freeland in R2, would people be ok?
Yes I'd be fine with that. Poles has to spend on the OL, there's a lot of different ways he can do that. If can spend in FA, or he can spend with high value draft picks, or both. What he can't do, IMO, is go with 2nd tier FA / cheap signings and then also only spend later round draft picks - basically what he did last year. That will have me brandishing my pitchforks.
This is a fan / opinion chat board. The opinions in this post are just that - my opinions. Please treat them as such unless otherwise notified. Have yourself a great day.
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5428
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 205 times

The one scenario that I am completely and totally fine with zero FA OL?

If we get the monster tOSU kid in the draft
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5428
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 205 times

wab wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 12:04 pm Am I alone in thinking that you are really just paying for a name with Brown? What about his performance in KC screams out 23m per year?
You aren't completely - and you are absolutely going to pay 5-6 a YEAR more than he's actually worth. (In fairness - I think that's probably true on McGary and definitely McGinchey too - though maybe thats more like 4 a year?)


Though maybe - like we used to say on the old board about John Tait and his dyslexic groin - that Jones can only play LT?

But to me - having your own Lane Johnson? I'm more than ok with it

My only pause is still the Ohio State kid - just because I think him and Jones are two of the RARE examples where Tackle might just be their better position than Guard
User avatar
Ditka’s dictaphone
Head Coach
Posts: 2274
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 321 times

RichH55 wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:23 pm The one scenario that I am completely and totally fine with zero FA OL?

If we get the monster tOSU kid in the draft
Who is this?
Fields Apologist
Leatherwood for RT 2023
:thumbsup:
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5428
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 205 times

Ditka’s dictaphone wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 2:11 pm
RichH55 wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 1:23 pm The one scenario that I am completely and totally fine with zero FA OL?

If we get the monster tOSU kid in the draft
Who is this?
Dawand Jones
User avatar
Ditka’s dictaphone
Head Coach
Posts: 2274
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 321 times

RichH55 wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 2:15 pm
Ditka’s dictaphone wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 2:11 pm

Who is this?
Dawand Jones
Got ya.

So you like this kid then?
Fields Apologist
Leatherwood for RT 2023
:thumbsup:
User avatar
pus
Head Coach
Posts: 2291
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
Location: Earth
Has thanked: 1081 times
Been thanked: 114 times

Unlike guards, guys like him don't grow on trees.
"Building the lines through the draft. This is the way."
- IE
RichH55
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5428
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 205 times

pus wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 3:05 pm Unlike guards, guys like him don't grow on trees.
Pure Planet Theory guy
User avatar
pus
Head Coach
Posts: 2291
Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
Location: Earth
Has thanked: 1081 times
Been thanked: 114 times

Yeah and thinking back in the same vein to William Perry and Ted Washington and the kind of impact they brought to the Bears D.

Jones would be a decent blue chip pick.
"Building the lines through the draft. This is the way."
- IE
User avatar
BearsFanInMN
Assistant Coach
Posts: 625
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:58 pm
Location: Phoenix/Tempe
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 27 times

IE wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:59 am Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?

Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?

I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
If you believe (like many do) he’s elite at RT and you think Jones with a full offseason as a Pro will continue to develop then yes. Gives you positional flexibility too because we know he can play LT.
MOTML League: Eskimo Brothers
HurricaneBear
MVP
Posts: 1610
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
Has thanked: 563 times
Been thanked: 90 times

wab wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 10:36 am Yeah, I'm not a fan of moving displacing Braxton yet.

If the Bears don't sign an OT and draft Paris Johnson at 9 or 11, or Anton Harrison/Blake Freeland in R2, would people be ok?
I want minimum 3 new OL, 2 of which should be average or better starters from FA or a 1st or 2nd round pick. I'd prefer the third player be the same as well but I understand it's likely Poles cares about defense a smidge more than me.

An OT, a LG and a C are my preferences. If they snagged Broderick Jones or Paris Johnson, the Minnesota center(or equivalent he's the only one C I know in the draft) and a FA LG(i don't know the FAs so you pick a name) I'd be pretty happy.
User avatar
IE
Hall of Famer
Posts: 11526
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
Location: Plymouth, MI
Has thanked: 424 times
Been thanked: 412 times
Contact:

BearsFanInMN wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:02 pm
IE wrote: Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:59 am Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?

Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?

I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
If you believe (like many do) he’s elite at RT and you think Jones with a full offseason as a Pro will continue to develop then yes. Gives you positional flexibility too because we know he can play LT.
2nd year Jones, Whitehair, a rookie C (Schmitz), Jenk and Brown .... yes, please. Look at the overall cost of the line, and then consider it could end up one of the better lines in the league.

With 3 more years of Brax and 2 more years of Jenk and Borom, and then a rookie C ... I kind of don't care what it costs at RT. The Bears still might not even bump into the top 10 of highest paid Olines even keeping Whitehair for a year. https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/offensive-line/
2023 Chicago Bear Draft... "The Year of the Trenches".
Post Reply