Chiefs won't franchise tag T Orlando Jones
Moderator: wab
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 26954
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 731 times
I'm not saying that the Chiefs giving up a first-round pick (and more) for Brown, and then letting him go...is a red flag. But I'm also not saying it isn't.
And if Poles declines to pass on Brown, can we all agree to keep the "he blew it" stuff to a minimum?
And if Poles declines to pass on Brown, can we all agree to keep the "he blew it" stuff to a minimum?
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 222 times
- Been thanked: 185 times
I know what you mean. Legitimate concerns there myself. Having both your team's starting tackles enter free agency at the same time seems, um, suboptimal. Maybe they really think Lucas Niang is back to 100% next season (has he even been 100%?), or maybe they're thinking they land someone in the draft. Either way, feels kind of dicey. That said, the Chiefs watched him every day for two years, so you have to guess they know who he is, and would prefer to move on.
I suspect last year's franchise tag on OBJ was trying to get exactly what they got this year: another ring.
Yeah, that's not gonna happen.
KFFL refugee.
Lost a bet that the Bears wouldn't trade #1 overall, so I "pony"'d up. Never been so happy to be so wrong.

Lost a bet that the Bears wouldn't trade #1 overall, so I "pony"'d up. Never been so happy to be so wrong.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here

- Grizzled
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3793
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 241 times
- Been thanked: 184 times
He's been rated as a good but not great LT for the Chiefs. They're kind of in cap hell and from things I've read, wants to be the highest paid LT in the game. They stalemated last year over guaranteed money. Trent Williams and David Bakhtiari are cuurently the highest at $23M, with Laremy Tunsil at $22M. He did play gang busters in the Cbiefs run to the Super Bowl.
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8193
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 321 times
- Been thanked: 735 times
I do not agree to this lol.
Seriously though, Poles blows it IMO if he fails to sign some real talent to the OL. It doesn’t have to be any one particular player, but he can’t sit on his hands either.
This is a fan / opinion chat board. The opinions in this post are just that - my opinions. Please treat them as such unless otherwise notified. Have yourself a great day.
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8193
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 321 times
- Been thanked: 735 times
Me too. If I could choose Brown or McGlinchey / McGary I’ll take the RT
This is a fan / opinion chat board. The opinions in this post are just that - my opinions. Please treat them as such unless otherwise notified. Have yourself a great day.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5428
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 205 times
Ha - No deal on the second part
I say we raise "he blew it" - to he blew it, then uncalled for personal attack on Poles (have to way beat just calling him a "Liar") - then suggest that Poles is for unknown reasons trying to get Fields to fail
Book it!
(Also Im more than fine with just overpaying Brown)
- southdakbearfan
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3702
- Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2011 11:23 pm
- Location: South Dakota
- Has thanked: 73 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
It's called correcting a deficiency after losing a title due to line play, winning a title and now dealing with the cap ramifications. Being in 3 out of 4 Super Bowls and winning 2.RichH55 wrote: ↑Mon Mar 06, 2023 10:43 pmHa - No deal on the second part
I say we raise "he blew it" - to he blew it, then uncalled for personal attack on Poles (have to way beat just calling him a "Liar") - then suggest that Poles is for unknown reasons trying to get Fields to fail
Book it!
(Also Im more than fine with just overpaying Brown)
Sounds like pretty solid gm'ing to me.
- The Marshall Plan
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5550
- Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2014 11:47 am
- Location: Parts Unknown
- Has thanked: 270 times
- Been thanked: 351 times
LOL it all depends upon what the rest of FA looks like.
But we've got to sign this guy. It would change the whole line.

The cigarette has been passed from Jay Cutler to Justin Fields.
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8193
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 321 times
- Been thanked: 735 times
His cost may be nuts, we will see. There looks to be several big FA OTs available in FA and Poles needs to get one of them. No excuses IMO, get one and solidify this line then draft another to compete. It’s not a big ask for a GM that vowed to focus on the OL and has the most cap space in the league. His table is set.
This is a fan / opinion chat board. The opinions in this post are just that - my opinions. Please treat them as such unless otherwise notified. Have yourself a great day.
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11526
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 424 times
- Been thanked: 412 times
- Contact:
Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?
Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?
I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?
I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
2023 Chicago Bear Draft... "The Year of the Trenches".
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2769
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 222 times
- Been thanked: 185 times
FWIW, Baltimore (allegedly) offered OBJ left tackle money to continue playing on the right side. He declined, because he wants to play LT, and the Ravens subsequently traded him to KC.IE wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:59 am Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?
Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?
I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
KFFL refugee.
Lost a bet that the Bears wouldn't trade #1 overall, so I "pony"'d up. Never been so happy to be so wrong.

Lost a bet that the Bears wouldn't trade #1 overall, so I "pony"'d up. Never been so happy to be so wrong.

dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here

- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11526
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 424 times
- Been thanked: 412 times
- Contact:
Yep - remember. I'm wondering if he's still in the same mode now. Things change. He got his ring ... now money?thunderspirit wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 11:47 amFWIW, Baltimore (allegedly) offered OBJ left tackle money to continue playing on the right side. He declined, because he wants to play LT, and the Ravens subsequently traded him to KC.IE wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:59 am Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?
Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?
I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
2023 Chicago Bear Draft... "The Year of the Trenches".
- RustinFields
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5991
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 143 times
- Been thanked: 270 times
Oh shit
- dplank
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8193
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 321 times
- Been thanked: 735 times
Yes I'd be fine with that. Poles has to spend on the OL, there's a lot of different ways he can do that. If can spend in FA, or he can spend with high value draft picks, or both. What he can't do, IMO, is go with 2nd tier FA / cheap signings and then also only spend later round draft picks - basically what he did last year. That will have me brandishing my pitchforks.
This is a fan / opinion chat board. The opinions in this post are just that - my opinions. Please treat them as such unless otherwise notified. Have yourself a great day.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5428
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 125 times
- Been thanked: 205 times
You aren't completely - and you are absolutely going to pay 5-6 a YEAR more than he's actually worth. (In fairness - I think that's probably true on McGary and definitely McGinchey too - though maybe thats more like 4 a year?)
Though maybe - like we used to say on the old board about John Tait and his dyslexic groin - that Jones can only play LT?
But to me - having your own Lane Johnson? I'm more than ok with it
My only pause is still the Ohio State kid - just because I think him and Jones are two of the RARE examples where Tackle might just be their better position than Guard
- Ditka’s dictaphone
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2274
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2021 12:33 pm
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 321 times
- pus
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2291
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 1081 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Unlike guards, guys like him don't grow on trees.
"Building the lines through the draft. This is the way."
- IE
- IE
- pus
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2291
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 1081 times
- Been thanked: 114 times
Yeah and thinking back in the same vein to William Perry and Ted Washington and the kind of impact they brought to the Bears D.
Jones would be a decent blue chip pick.
Jones would be a decent blue chip pick.
"Building the lines through the draft. This is the way."
- IE
- IE
- BearsFanInMN
- Assistant Coach
- Posts: 625
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:58 pm
- Location: Phoenix/Tempe
- Has thanked: 80 times
- Been thanked: 27 times
If you believe (like many do) he’s elite at RT and you think Jones with a full offseason as a Pro will continue to develop then yes. Gives you positional flexibility too because we know he can play LT.IE wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:59 am Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?
Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?
I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
MOTML League: Eskimo Brothers
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:56 am
- Has thanked: 563 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
I want minimum 3 new OL, 2 of which should be average or better starters from FA or a 1st or 2nd round pick. I'd prefer the third player be the same as well but I understand it's likely Poles cares about defense a smidge more than me.
An OT, a LG and a C are my preferences. If they snagged Broderick Jones or Paris Johnson, the Minnesota center(or equivalent he's the only one C I know in the draft) and a FA LG(i don't know the FAs so you pick a name) I'd be pretty happy.
- IE
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 11526
- Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 8:46 am
- Location: Plymouth, MI
- Has thanked: 424 times
- Been thanked: 412 times
- Contact:
2nd year Jones, Whitehair, a rookie C (Schmitz), Jenk and Brown .... yes, please. Look at the overall cost of the line, and then consider it could end up one of the better lines in the league.BearsFanInMN wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 8:02 pmIf you believe (like many do) he’s elite at RT and you think Jones with a full offseason as a Pro will continue to develop then yes. Gives you positional flexibility too because we know he can play LT.IE wrote: ↑Tue Mar 07, 2023 9:59 am Am I crazy to be interested in paying Brown LT money to play on the right? Why not - balancing his cost with Brax for 3 more years? I know he was sort of considered a RT but played well enough on the left to get the big payday and move over. But what if he moved back to the right?
Him next to Jenk is sort of amazing to think aobut. Is he a good fit for the Bear offense?
I think the only way Poles blows it is messing with what Jones is cooking on the left.
With 3 more years of Brax and 2 more years of Jenk and Borom, and then a rookie C ... I kind of don't care what it costs at RT. The Bears still might not even bump into the top 10 of highest paid Olines even keeping Whitehair for a year. https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/positional/offensive-line/
2023 Chicago Bear Draft... "The Year of the Trenches".