That’s true, but what’s important is that our second year 37 year old GM didn’t get fleeced and appears to be focused on building around Fields this year.thunderspirit wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:37 pm Carolina only got "fleeced" (if indeed you think they did) if the QB they pick Trubiskys. If their guy hits, you make that trade every time and don't look back.
Official: Bears trade 1st ovr pick to Panthers for WR DJ Moore & multiple future 1st rounders
Moderator: wab
-
- MVP
- Posts: 1117
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 9:57 pm
- Has thanked: 30 times
- Been thanked: 120 times
- Rusty Trombagent
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 7384
- Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2012 11:19 am
- Location: Maine!
- Has thanked: 571 times
- Been thanked: 1010 times
It's really pretty funny that pretty much everyone is praising this... except bears fans.
You go, girl
You go, girl
- Mikefive
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5196
- Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 9:33 pm
- Location: Valparaiso, IN, USA
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 280 times
I didn't think we'd get the haul that everyone was predicting. I'm fine with what we got.
Mikefive's theory: The only time you KNOW that a sports team player, coach or management member is being 100% honest is when they're NOT reciting "the company line".
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
Go back to leather helmets, NFL.
- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6033
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 1825 times
DJ Moore Contract Details per spotrac:
2023
Base salary: $19,965,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$20,165,000
Dead Cap: $21,075,000
2024
Base salary: $15,850,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$16,050,000
Dead Cap: $1,110,000
2025
Base salary: $14,850,000
Roster: $1,000,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$16,050,000
Dead Cap: $0
That's a very nice situation for the Bears. Take the bigger cap hit this year when they're flush with cap space and those next two years are lower than the likes of Christian Kirk and Mike Williams signed for last year. And they have an easy out after just one season if for some bizarre reason it all goes south.
2023
Base salary: $19,965,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$20,165,000
Dead Cap: $21,075,000
2024
Base salary: $15,850,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$16,050,000
Dead Cap: $1,110,000
2025
Base salary: $14,850,000
Roster: $1,000,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$16,050,000
Dead Cap: $0
That's a very nice situation for the Bears. Take the bigger cap hit this year when they're flush with cap space and those next two years are lower than the likes of Christian Kirk and Mike Williams signed for last year. And they have an easy out after just one season if for some bizarre reason it all goes south.
Arise Sir Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXdXRP6Hi-U
- Moriarty
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6897
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2016 1:22 pm
- Has thanked: 393 times
- Been thanked: 709 times
Not excited.
(And I was counseling modest expectations before this, too...)
I don't mind going down to 9 (or lower). But you gotta do better than that.
They only got ONE extra pick this year. And it's not even a high R2, it's a very late R2. The difference between, say, a 35 and 61 is HUGE.
R1 in 2024 is a nice piece, as Carolina may still suck then. But the R2 in 2025 is 2 years off.
DJ Moore's a nice receiver, but he isn't that valuable a pickup. I'm so sick of having this conversation over and over.
Trading for somebody under contract cheaply has value. Essentially, you're giving up draft capital in exchange for cap capital.
Trading for somebody under contract at market value isn't really helpful (unless they're the final piece of your championship push). You're giving up draft resource in order to pay the financial price that should be paid without any draft resource attached - ie, you're setting fire to your draft pick.
The contract savings on Moore isn't that much - and the Bears need draft capital far more than cap savings, anyway.
(And I was counseling modest expectations before this, too...)
I don't mind going down to 9 (or lower). But you gotta do better than that.
They only got ONE extra pick this year. And it's not even a high R2, it's a very late R2. The difference between, say, a 35 and 61 is HUGE.
R1 in 2024 is a nice piece, as Carolina may still suck then. But the R2 in 2025 is 2 years off.
DJ Moore's a nice receiver, but he isn't that valuable a pickup. I'm so sick of having this conversation over and over.
Trading for somebody under contract cheaply has value. Essentially, you're giving up draft capital in exchange for cap capital.
Trading for somebody under contract at market value isn't really helpful (unless they're the final piece of your championship push). You're giving up draft resource in order to pay the financial price that should be paid without any draft resource attached - ie, you're setting fire to your draft pick.
The contract savings on Moore isn't that much - and the Bears need draft capital far more than cap savings, anyway.
1999-2002: Mouth Off Sports Forum (RIP)
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
2002-2014: KFFL (RIP)
2014-2016: USAToday Fantasy Sports Forum (RIP)
Hello, my name is Moriarty. I have come to kill your website, prepare to die.
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29921
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2007 times
When I first heard the bears were working a deal with the panthers, I think maybe I just had my heart set on Burns and then the chance for JSN at 9. That would have been my preferred outcome, but this is fine. I’m not a HUGE fan of DJ Moore, but he’s a nice player.
Feels light on the picks too since 3 first rounders are typically the going rate for the chance at a QB.
It’s fine, I’m just not over the moon about it.
- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6033
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 1825 times
Over The Cap's take on the trade:Bears Whiskey Nut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:03 pm According to the value chart the 1st pick is worth 3000pts. The 9th pick is worth 1350, and the 61st pick is worth 292pts. If Carolina has a top ten pick next year, then maybe it was a good deal. Yes DJ Moore is a good receiver, but he's not in the top 10. Do we think he's worth 800 points? 1000pts? You can put the best receivers you want on the field, but if we don't have an OL it means nothing. I'm probably just complaining, but I don't feel like we got fair value. I'm sure someone will eventually convince me otherwise.
Even without including Moore this is a big trade for the Bears. Using average future expectations for the draft selections Chicago will gain 4,940 points while the Panthers gain 3,000 points in our Fitzgerald-Spielberger model. That is essentially the value of adding the 8th pick in the NFL draft. In addition they are also adding a receiver in Moore who is valued as a $20 million receiver.
If the Bears had no intentions of picking a quarterback with the top pick this type of trade is a no brainer to make. By adding the 2024 1st rounder of a team who will be starting a rookie QB and has, on paper, a weak roster the Bears put themselves in a great position to land a higher than average pick next season. If things do go south with Justin Fields that would give them the ammunition to potentially grab a QB next year if needed. If Fields works out they will be in great shape to build around him.
Full article: https://overthecap.com/bears-trade-top-pick-to-panthers
Arise Sir Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXdXRP6Hi-U
- Hema2.0
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 4:24 pm
- Has thanked: 689 times
- Been thanked: 189 times
Just my opinion, but Poles needs to have zero question marks when it comes to Fields by this time next year. Getting a true #1 and beefing up the oline will eliminate all excuses for that not happening. If Fields balls out, we will have 2 #1's next year for roster building. If Fields craps the bed, we should be in decent position with 2 #1's to make something happen on the QB front. Either way, the WR corp and the Oline should be in good position moving forward .Moriarty wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:56 pm Not excited.
(And I was counseling modest expectations before this, too...)
I don't mind going down to 9 (or lower). But you gotta do better than that.
They only got ONE extra pick this year. And it's not even a high R2, it's a very late R2. The difference between, say, a 35 and 61 is HUGE.
R1 in 2024 is a nice piece, as Carolina may still suck then. But the R2 in 2025 is 2 years off.
DJ Moore's a nice receiver, but he isn't that valuable a pickup. I'm so sick of having this conversation over and over.
Trading for somebody under contract cheaply has value. Essentially, you're giving up draft capital in exchange for cap capital.
Trading for somebody under contract at market value isn't really helpful (unless they're the final piece of your championship push). You're giving up draft resource in order to pay the financial price that should be paid without any draft resource attached - ie, you're setting fire to your draft pick.
The contract savings on Moore isn't that much - and the Bears need draft capital far more than cap savings, anyway.
And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat on him was Caleb, and Hell followed with him.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Bears won't carry any of that dead cap. That's all Carolinas to absorb.HisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:55 pm DJ Moore Contract Details per spotrac:
2023
Base salary: $19,965,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$20,165,000
Dead Cap: $21,075,000
2024
Base salary: $15,850,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$16,050,000
Dead Cap: $1,110,000
2025
Base salary: $14,850,000
Roster: $1,000,000
Workout: $200,000
Cap Hit :$16,050,000
Dead Cap: $0
That's a very nice situation for the Bears. Take the bigger cap hit this year when they're flush with cap space and those next two years are lower than the likes of Christian Kirk and Mike Williams signed for last year. And they have an easy out after just one season if for some bizarre reason it all goes south.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
DJ Moore has as much value as a first. And part of the appeal of having a extra first was the flexibility to say, trade for an impact veteran player.wab wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:58 pmWhen I first heard the bears were working a deal with the panthers, I think maybe I just had my heart set on Burns and then the chance for JSN at 9. That would have been my preferred outcome, but this is fine. I’m not a HUGE fan of DJ Moore, but he’s a nice player.
Feels light on the picks too since 3 first rounders are typically the going rate for the chance at a QB.
It’s fine, I’m just not over the moon about it.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Yea, any non JJ chart is gonna like this quite a it more. Especially OTC. The value curve on any analytical derived chart is not gonna be so steep.HisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 7:05 pmOver The Cap's take on the trade:Bears Whiskey Nut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:03 pm According to the value chart the 1st pick is worth 3000pts. The 9th pick is worth 1350, and the 61st pick is worth 292pts. If Carolina has a top ten pick next year, then maybe it was a good deal. Yes DJ Moore is a good receiver, but he's not in the top 10. Do we think he's worth 800 points? 1000pts? You can put the best receivers you want on the field, but if we don't have an OL it means nothing. I'm probably just complaining, but I don't feel like we got fair value. I'm sure someone will eventually convince me otherwise.
Even without including Moore this is a big trade for the Bears. Using average future expectations for the draft selections Chicago will gain 4,940 points while the Panthers gain 3,000 points in our Fitzgerald-Spielberger model. That is essentially the value of adding the 8th pick in the NFL draft. In addition they are also adding a receiver in Moore who is valued as a $20 million receiver.
If the Bears had no intentions of picking a quarterback with the top pick this type of trade is a no brainer to make. By adding the 2024 1st rounder of a team who will be starting a rookie QB and has, on paper, a weak roster the Bears put themselves in a great position to land a higher than average pick next season. If things do go south with Justin Fields that would give them the ammunition to potentially grab a QB next year if needed. If Fields works out they will be in great shape to build around him.
Full article: https://overthecap.com/bears-trade-top-pick-to-panthers
Last edited by The Cooler King on Sun Mar 12, 2023 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
- The Cooler King
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5014
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:07 pm
- Has thanked: 1216 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Sure, except impact players rarely hit FA. Especially WR these days.Moriarty wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:56 pm Not excited.
(And I was counseling modest expectations before this, too...)
I don't mind going down to 9 (or lower). But you gotta do better than that.
They only got ONE extra pick this year. And it's not even a high R2, it's a very late R2. The difference between, say, a 35 and 61 is HUGE.
R1 in 2024 is a nice piece, as Carolina may still suck then. But the R2 in 2025 is 2 years off.
DJ Moore's a nice receiver, but he isn't that valuable a pickup. I'm so sick of having this conversation over and over.
Trading for somebody under contract cheaply has value. Essentially, you're giving up draft capital in exchange for cap capital.
Trading for somebody under contract at market value isn't really helpful (unless they're the final piece of your championship push). You're giving up draft resource in order to pay the financial price that should be paid without any draft resource attached - ie, you're setting fire to your draft pick.
The contract savings on Moore isn't that much - and the Bears need draft capital far more than cap savings, anyway.
Plus trading for a guy already on a contract has a small advantage to one who needs to be extended - the other team ate all the upfront cost.
So for example, Bears get Moore on a smaller APY contract that Jacksonville gave Kirk last year.
- Grizzled
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5643
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:55 pm
- Has thanked: 639 times
- Been thanked: 514 times
Very mixed reactions on Carolina message boards. Some very happy and content, some quite unhappy. More than one would have rather have seen Burns traded. The Colts message boards are going crazy. They're ready to march on Ballard's office with pitchforks and torches.
Drafts are like snowflakes, no two are alike.
- HisRoyalSweetness
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6033
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:20 pm
- Has thanked: 63 times
- Been thanked: 1825 times
Panthers: We'll give you our 9th and 61st picks this year plus a first rounder in 2024 and a second rounder in 2025.
Poles: Hm, that's a good set of picks but I'm going to need more.
Panthers: Moore? OK, OK, we'll give you DJ too. Just let us have that number one pick!
Poles: Hm, that's a good set of picks but I'm going to need more.
Panthers: Moore? OK, OK, we'll give you DJ too. Just let us have that number one pick!
Last edited by HisRoyalSweetness on Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Arise Sir Walter: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YXdXRP6Hi-U
- thunderspirit
- Head Coach
- Posts: 3884
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 12:51 pm
- Location: Greater Chicagoland, IL
- Has thanked: 623 times
- Been thanked: 624 times
Go home, sir. You're drunk.Moriarty wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:56 pm Not excited.
(And I was counseling modest expectations before this, too...)
I don't mind going down to 9 (or lower). But you gotta do better than that.
They only got ONE extra pick this year. And it's not even a high R2, it's a very late R2. The difference between, say, a 35 and 61 is HUGE.
R1 in 2024 is a nice piece, as Carolina may still suck then. But the R2 in 2025 is 2 years off.
DJ Moore's a nice receiver, but he isn't that valuable a pickup. I'm so sick of having this conversation over and over.
Trading for somebody under contract cheaply has value. Essentially, you're giving up draft capital in exchange for cap capital.
Trading for somebody under contract at market value isn't really helpful (unless they're the final piece of your championship push). You're giving up draft resource in order to pay the financial price that should be paid without any draft resource attached - ie, you're setting fire to your draft pick.
The contract savings on Moore isn't that much - and the Bears need draft capital far more than cap savings, anyway.
KFFL refugee.
dplank wrote:I agree with Rich here
RichH55 wrote: Dplank is correct
- BearsFanInMN
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 772
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2016 11:58 pm
- Location: Phoenix/Tempe
- Has thanked: 201 times
- Been thanked: 40 times
I’d have preferred the 2nd this year be Carolina’s and not the one from 49ers and that’s the only minor problem I have with this move.
I think this is a great trade! I think people were expecting the kind of haul as if there was a Lawrence or Luck in this draft. Nobody even knows who the top pick is for sure. Moore is a great get. Young WR1 who produced with crappy QB. Means you’re not reaching in draft or overpaying on a weak market.
I think this is a great trade! I think people were expecting the kind of haul as if there was a Lawrence or Luck in this draft. Nobody even knows who the top pick is for sure. Moore is a great get. Young WR1 who produced with crappy QB. Means you’re not reaching in draft or overpaying on a weak market.
MOTML League: Eskimo Brothers
I don’t know how you could be underwhelmed with this trade. We essentially got 65% more than the value of #1 before adding in the value of Moore.
Based on the trades for WRs recently and the contracts they received, Moore probably would have 1500 value.
Based on the trades for WRs recently and the contracts they received, Moore probably would have 1500 value.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8010
- Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2016 4:23 pm
- Has thanked: 520 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
HisRoyalSweetness wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 7:05 pmOver The Cap's take on the trade:Bears Whiskey Nut wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 6:03 pm According to the value chart the 1st pick is worth 3000pts. The 9th pick is worth 1350, and the 61st pick is worth 292pts. If Carolina has a top ten pick next year, then maybe it was a good deal. Yes DJ Moore is a good receiver, but he's not in the top 10. Do we think he's worth 800 points? 1000pts? You can put the best receivers you want on the field, but if we don't have an OL it means nothing. I'm probably just complaining, but I don't feel like we got fair value. I'm sure someone will eventually convince me otherwise.
Even without including Moore this is a big trade for the Bears. Using average future expectations for the draft selections Chicago will gain 4,940 points while the Panthers gain 3,000 points in our Fitzgerald-Spielberger model. That is essentially the value of adding the 8th pick in the NFL draft. In addition they are also adding a receiver in Moore who is valued as a $20 million receiver.
If the Bears had no intentions of picking a quarterback with the top pick this type of trade is a no brainer to make. By adding the 2024 1st rounder of a team who will be starting a rookie QB and has, on paper, a weak roster the Bears put themselves in a great position to land a higher than average pick next season. If things do go south with Justin Fields that would give them the ammunition to potentially grab a QB next year if needed. If Fields works out they will be in great shape to build around him.
Full article: https://overthecap.com/bears-trade-top-pick-to-panthers
This was my take away reading as well
Kind of a Home Run in my book
- VA_Mountain_Bear
- Crafty Veteran
- Posts: 798
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:19 am
- Has thanked: 17 times
- Been thanked: 44 times
- crueltyabc
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5136
- Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 7:36 pm
- Location: Dallas TX
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
I wasn’t ready to come to this thread and find so much DJ Moore hate. Wow
Well I’m fucking excited. I think Poles finessed this. On top of all the assets he acquired, he made it happen before FA so he can pitch to agents and build around his suddenly respectable stable of young skill position players.
Well I’m fucking excited. I think Poles finessed this. On top of all the assets he acquired, he made it happen before FA so he can pitch to agents and build around his suddenly respectable stable of young skill position players.
xyt in the discord chats
- wab
- Mod
- Posts: 29921
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 12:49 pm
- Has thanked: 132 times
- Been thanked: 2007 times
I don’t see any DJ Moore hate.crueltyabc wrote: ↑Fri Mar 10, 2023 8:43 pm I wasn’t ready to come to this thread and find so much DJ Moore hate. Wow
Well I’m fucking excited. I think Poles finessed this. On top of all the assets he acquired, he made it happen before FA so he can pitch to agents and build around his suddenly respectable stable of young skill position players.
- UOK
- Site Admin
- Posts: 25182
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 11:07 am
- Location: Champaign, IL
- Has thanked: 110 times
- Been thanked: 941 times
Same, I think some folks get rock hard for defense, some are staunch “build the lines” guys, others have differing ideas on value and fair return, or all of the above. I haven’t seen or heard anyone out there (besides a dipshit packers fan on WSCR) who’s clowned DJ Moore being part of this trade.
- o-pus #40 in B major
- Head Coach
- Posts: 2795
- Joined: Sun Dec 09, 2012 4:27 pm
- Location: Earth
- Has thanked: 2480 times
- Been thanked: 257 times
Welcome aboard, DJ Moore!
There is a GM named Poles
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS
Who has a clear set of goals
He’s rebuilt his team
So Bears’ fans can dream
Of winning some more Super Bowls
- HRS